Emma Underwood1, Mary Woods2, Katie Riches3,4, Vaughan Keeley5,6, Anita Wallace7, Jennifer Freeman8. 1. 1 Lymphoedema Clinic, Therapy Department, PAW, Royal Cornwall Hospital NHS Trust, Truro, United Kingdom. 2. 2 Lymphoedema Service, Royal Marsden Hospital, London, United Kingdom. 3. 3 Lymphoedema Service, Derby Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Derby, United Kingdom. 4. 4 British Lymphology Society Scientific Committee, United Kingdom. 5. 5 Lymphoedema Service, Derby Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Derby, United Kingdom. 6. 6 University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom. 7. 7 The Lymphoedema Support Network, London, United Kingdom. 8. 8 Faculty of Health and Human Sciences, Plymouth University, Plymouth, United Kingdom.
Abstract
Background: More research is needed in lymphedema management to strengthen the evidence base and ensure patients receive clinically and cost-effective treatment. It is critical that patients and clinicians are involved in prioritizing research to ensure that it reflects their needs and is not biased by commercial interests. This study aimed to set the research priorities for lymphedema management in the United Kingdom, through collaboration with patients, carers, and clinicians. Methods and Results: Following the James Lind Alliance's methodology, a national survey was conducted to identify unanswered questions about lymphedema management from the perspective of patients, carers, and clinicians. These were collated and verified against an in-depth evidence review. Unanswered questions were formatted into broad research questions, which were prioritized by a purposive sample of patients, carers, and clinicians, using an online Delphi survey. The initial survey generated 631 submissions from 213 participants, including 108 patients, 9 carers, and 88 clinicians. Of these, 485 met inclusion criteria and were grouped into 12 overarching themes. The evidence review demonstrated that 101 submissions were answered by existing research and identified an additional 78 questions. The remaining unanswered submissions were collated into 126 broad research questions, which were prioritized over four rounds of the Delphi survey to produce the top 10 priorities. Conclusions: This study is the first to attempt to systematically identify research priorities for lymphedema management in the United Kingdom, from the perspective of patients, carers, and clinicians. The results provide guidance for researchers and funders to ensure future research meets the needs of those living with lymphedema.
Background: More research is needed in lymphedema management to strengthen the evidence base and ensure patients receive clinically and cost-effective treatment. It is critical that patients and clinicians are involved in prioritizing research to ensure that it reflects their needs and is not biased by commercial interests. This study aimed to set the research priorities for lymphedema management in the United Kingdom, through collaboration with patients, carers, and clinicians. Methods and Results: Following the James Lind Alliance's methodology, a national survey was conducted to identify unanswered questions about lymphedema management from the perspective of patients, carers, and clinicians. These were collated and verified against an in-depth evidence review. Unanswered questions were formatted into broad research questions, which were prioritized by a purposive sample of patients, carers, and clinicians, using an online Delphi survey. The initial survey generated 631 submissions from 213 participants, including 108 patients, 9 carers, and 88 clinicians. Of these, 485 met inclusion criteria and were grouped into 12 overarching themes. The evidence review demonstrated that 101 submissions were answered by existing research and identified an additional 78 questions. The remaining unanswered submissions were collated into 126 broad research questions, which were prioritized over four rounds of the Delphi survey to produce the top 10 priorities. Conclusions: This study is the first to attempt to systematically identify research priorities for lymphedema management in the United Kingdom, from the perspective of patients, carers, and clinicians. The results provide guidance for researchers and funders to ensure future research meets the needs of those living with lymphedema.
Entities:
Keywords:
lymphedema; patient and public involvement; research prioritization
Authors: Gordon H Guyatt; Andrew D Oxman; Regina Kunz; David Atkins; Jan Brozek; Gunn Vist; Philip Alderson; Paul Glasziou; Yngve Falck-Ytter; Holger J Schünemann Journal: J Clin Epidemiol Date: 2010-12-30 Impact factor: 6.437
Authors: Jeanette Ezzo; Eric Manheimer; Margaret L McNeely; Doris M Howell; Robert Weiss; Karin I Johansson; Ting Bao; Linda Bily; Catherine M Tuppo; Anne F Williams; Didem Karadibak Journal: Cochrane Database Syst Rev Date: 2015-05-21
Authors: Katherine H O Deane; Helen Flaherty; David J Daley; Roland Pascoe; Bridget Penhale; Carl E Clarke; Catherine Sackley; Stacey Storey Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2014-12-14 Impact factor: 2.692
Authors: Ali M Al-Sakkaf; Jaume Masia; Ariadna Auladell-Rispau; Aliaa I Shamardal; Luis Vasconcello-Castillo; Ivan Sola; Xavier Bonfill Journal: Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open Date: 2022-01-18