| Literature DB >> 30358019 |
Karel Vondrak1, Anil Dhawan2, Francesco Parisi3, Ryszard Grenda4, Dominique Debray5, Stephen D Marks6, Nicholas J A Webb7, Alain Lachaux8, Gbenga Kazeem9,10, Nasrullah Undre9.
Abstract
Phase 2, parallel-group, multicenter, open-label, 4-week study, comparing PK of PR-T vs IR-T in de novo pediatric patients undergoing primary kidney, liver, or heart transplantation. Patients randomized 1:1 to receive once daily, PR-T-, or twice-daily, IR-T-based regimens; dose adjustments permitted after Day 1. Twenty-four-hour PK profiles collected on Days 1, 7, and 28. Primary endpoint: tacrolimus AUC24 . Secondary end points included tacrolimus C24 and Cmax . Endpoints compared between PR-T and IR-T on Days 1, 7, and 28. Predefined similarity interval for CIs of LSM ratios: 80%-125%. PK analysis set comprised 33 patients (PR-T, n = 15; IR-T, n = 18). Overall, AUC24 and Cmax were lower on Day 1 vs 7 and 28. Geometric LSM ratios of PR-T:IR-T on Days 1, 7, and 28 were 66.3%, 92.5%, 99.9%, respectively, for AUC24 ; 66.3%, 82.2%, 90.9% for C24 ; and 77.3%, 120.3%, 92.2% for Cmax . AUC24 90% CI within predefined similarity interval on Day 28; other 90% CIs fell outside. Linear relationship was similar between AUC24 and C24 , and between tacrolimus formulations, suggesting that the same therapeutic drug monitoring method can be used with both formulations in de novo pediatric allograft recipients.Entities:
Keywords: heart transplantation; kidney transplantation; liver transplantation; pediatrics; pharmacokinetics; tacrolimus
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 30358019 DOI: 10.1111/petr.13289
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Pediatr Transplant ISSN: 1397-3142