Literature DB >> 30357930

Using a personalized clinical decision support system for bromdihydrochlorphenylbenzodiazepine dosing in patients with anxiety disorders based on the pharmacogenomic markers.

Michael S Zastrozhin1,2, Aleksandr S Sorokin2, Tatyana V Agibalova2, Elena A Grishina1, Anastasiya Р Antonenko2, Ilya N Rozochkin2, Denis V Duzhev2, Valentine Y Skryabin2, Tatyana E Galaktionova2, Ilya V Barna2, Anna V Orlova2, Albert D Aguzarov2, Ludmila M Savchenko1, Evgeny A Bryun1,2, Dmitry A Sychev1.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Although pharmacogenetic tests provide the information on a genotype and the predicted phenotype, these tests themselves do not provide the interpretation of data for a physician. There are currently approximately two dozen pharmacogenomic clinical decision support systems used in psychiatry. Implementation of clinical decision support systems capable of forming recommendations on drug and dose selection according to the results of pharmacogenetic testing is an urgent task. Fulfillment of this task may allow increasing the efficacy of therapy and decreasing the risk of undesirable side effects.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study included 51 male patients (21 in the main group and 30 in the control group) with alcohol withdrawal syndrome. To evaluate the efficacy and safety of therapy, several international psychometric scales and rating scales to measure side effects were used. Genotyping was performed using real-time polymerase chain reaction with allele-specific hybridization. Pharmacogenetic test results were interpreted using free software PGX2 (www.pgx2.com).
RESULTS: Statistically significant differences between the scores derived from all psychometric scales were revealed. For instance, the total score on CIWA-Ar scale by day 3 was 13.5 [11.2; 16.0] for the main group and 18.0 [17.0; 22.0] (p < 0.001) for the control group; by day 5, it was 6.5 [4.2; 8.0] for the main group and 15.0 [14.0; 16.0] (p < 0.001) for the control group. The UKU side effect rating scale (UKU) also revealed a statistically significant difference. The total score on UKU scale by day 3 was 6.0 [5.0; 7.0] for the main group and 7.0 [6.0; 8.0] (p < 0.001) for the control group; by day 5, this difference grew significantly: 5.5 [3.0; 9.0] for the main group and 14.0 [12.0; 19.0] (p < 0.001) for the control group. The groups were representative (there was no difference between the scores at the inclusion of patients).
CONCLUSION: Pharmacogenetic-guided personalization of drug dose in patients with alcohol withdrawal syndrome can reduce the risk of undesirable side effects and pharmacoresistance. It allows recommending the use of pharmacogenomic clinical decision support systems for optimizing drug dosage.
© 2018 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  CYP2C19; alcohol withdrawal syndrome; benzodiazepines; clinical decision support system; pharmacogenetics; tranquilizers

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30357930     DOI: 10.1002/hup.2677

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Psychopharmacol        ISSN: 0885-6222            Impact factor:   1.672


  5 in total

1.  Influence of Plasma Concentration of Hsa-Mir-370-3p and Cyp2d6*4 On Equilibrium Concentration of Phenazepam in Patients with Recurrent Depressive Disorder.

Authors:  M S Zastrozhin; A V Efimova; VYu Skryabin; V V Smirnov; A E Petukhov; E P Pankratenko; S A Pozdniakov; E V Kaverina; D A Klepikov; E A Grishina; K A Ryzhikova; I V Bure; E A Bryun; D A Sychev
Journal:  Psychopharmacol Bull       Date:  2021-11-03

2.  Impact of the Omics-Based Biomarkers on the Fluvoxamine's Steady-State Concentration, Efficacy and Safety in Patients with Affective Disorders Comorbid with Alcohol Use Disorder.

Authors:  M S Zastrozhin; VYu Skryabin; VYu Smirnov; A K Zastrozhina; E V Kaverina; D A Klepikov; E A Grishina; K A Ryzhikova; I V Bure; E A Bryun; D A Sychev
Journal:  Psychopharmacol Bull       Date:  2021-01-12

3.  Effects of CYP2C19 genetic polymorphism on the steady-state concentration of citalopram in patients with major depressive disorder.

Authors:  M S Zastrozhin; V Yu Skryabin; A E Petukhov; M V Torrado; E P Pankratenko; A K Zastrozhina; E A Grishina; K A Ryzhikova; V V Shipitsyn; E A Bryun; D A Sychev
Journal:  Pharmacogenomics J       Date:  2021-02-19       Impact factor: 3.550

4.  Impact of the Omics-Based Biomarkers on the Mirtazapine's Steady-State Concentration, Efficacy and Safety in Patients with Affective Disorders Comorbid with Alcohol Use Disorder.

Authors:  M S Zastrozhin; VYu Skryabin; VYu Smirnov; A K Zastrozhina; E V Kaverina; D A Klepikov; E A Grishina; K A Ryzhikova; I V Bure; E A Bryun; D A Sychev
Journal:  Psychopharmacol Bull       Date:  2021-03-16

5.  The Influence of Concentration of Micro-RNA hsa-miR-370-3p and CYP2D6*4 on Equilibrium Concentration of Mirtazapine in Patients With Major Depressive Disorder.

Authors: 
Journal:  Psychopharmacol Bull       Date:  2020-07-23
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.