Literature DB >> 30357091

A Comparative Study between Universal Eclectic Septoplasty and Cottle.

Burak Karabulut1, Serap Sahin-Onder1.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Year:  2018        PMID: 30357091      PMCID: PMC6197966          DOI: 10.1055/s-0038-1642606

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Arch Otorhinolaryngol        ISSN: 1809-4864


× No keyword cloud information.
The original article titled “A Comparative Study Between Universal Eclectic Septoplasty Technique and Cottle”, published in October 2017, defended that universal eclectic septoplasty is a reliable surgical method. 1 It was a great pleasure to read this article. However, a discrepancy was noticed. In the introduction section the authors stated that nasal obstruction was the 90 th (ninetieth) most frequent complaint reported at medical exams in the United States. Yet, there is no precise reference for this statement in the article. Nasal obstruction is one of the leading complaints reported in rhinology practice and primary health care. 2 Thus, we think it is a minor but important mistake to inaccurately rank this frequent symptom. Though its effect on the reasoning of the article is negligible, we believe that this statement can easily misdirect and misinform readers.
  2 in total

Review 1.  Chapter 2: Nasal obstruction.

Authors:  Jodi L Osborn; Raymond Sacks
Journal:  Am J Rhinol Allergy       Date:  2013 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.467

2.  A Comparative Study between Universal Eclectic Septoplasty Technique and Cottle.

Authors:  Odim Ferreira do Amaral Neto; Flavio Massao Mizoguchi; Renato da Silva Freitas; João Jairney Maniglia; Fábio Fabrício Maniglia; Ricardo Fabrício Maniglia
Journal:  Int Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2017-03-22
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.