| Literature DB >> 30356450 |
Gabriella Beckvid-Henriksson1,2, Thu Hoai Nguyen3, Julia Kilhed1, Agnes Nordström1, Sofie Svensson1, Thi Thanh Huong Tran4, Ingeborg Van Der Ploeg1, Carl Johan Sundberg1,5.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Regular physical activity (PA) has documented effects in prevention and treatment of many non-communicable diseases (NCDs). Physical inactivity is recognized as the fourth leading risk factor for premature death, worldwide. Despite these facts, physical inactivity is increasing, not only in high-income, but also in middle- and low-income countries. To address this negative trend, evidence-based methods to increase PA are needed. The purpose of this paper is to describe the implementation and assessment of 4 strategies designed to increase PA in Vietnam.Entities:
Keywords: Exercise prescription; Guidelines and recommendations; Health promotion; Lower middle-income country; Non-communicable diseases; Physical activity
Year: 2017 PMID: 30356450 PMCID: PMC6180528 DOI: 10.1016/j.jshs.2017.11.004
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Sport Health Sci ISSN: 2213-2961 Impact factor: 7.179
Fig. 1Project timeline. FYSS is the Swedish abbreviation of the evidence-based handbook Physical Activity in the Prevention and Treatment of Disease that accompanies PAP. Int. = international; PA = physical activity; PAP = Physical Activity on Prescription; TOT = Training of Trainers.
Demographic characteristics of course participants completing the 6–14 months follow-up PAP course evaluation (n = 123).
| Parameter | |
|---|---|
| ≤20 | 1 (1) |
| 21–35 | 58 (47) |
| 36–50 | 48 (39) |
| 51–65 | 15 (12) |
| >65 | 1 (1) |
| Male | 42 (34) |
| Female | 79 (64) |
| Missing | 2 (2) |
| TOT | 10 (8) |
| PAP | 110 (90) |
| Not-eligible for either course | 3 (2) |
| Physician | 66 (53) |
| Nurse | 39 (32) |
| Volunteer/medical collaborator | 10 (8) |
| Other | 8 (7) |
| ≤1 | 1 (1) |
| >1 and <2 | 10 (8) |
| 2–3 | 20 (16) |
| ≥3 | 92 (75) |
| 0–1 | 6 (5) |
| 2–5 | 37 (30) |
| 6–15 | 32 (26) |
| >15 | 46 (37) |
| Missing | 2 (2) |
| Hanoi | 55 (45) |
| Phu Tho | 64 (52) |
| Other | 2 (2) |
| Missing | 2 (1) |
Abbreviations: PAP = Physical Activity on Prescription; TOT = Training of Trainers.
Frequencies of responses from the Physical Activity on Prescription course evaluation administered after the course (n = 42).
| Evaluation items | Frequencies of responses |
|---|---|
| 1. What is your general impression of the course? | |
| Excellent | 18 |
| Good | 23 |
| Neutral | 0 |
| Poor | 0 |
| Very poor | 0 |
| Missing | 1 |
| 2. How do you perceive the usefulness of the course? | |
| Very useful | 30 |
| Useful | 12 |
| Neutral | 0 |
| Fairly useful | 0 |
| Very unuseful | 0 |
| Missing | 0 |
| 3. How was the course when it came to meeting your expectations? | |
| Met completely | 9 |
| Met well | 30 |
| Met medium | 2 |
| Met fairly | 1 |
| Met not at all | 0 |
| Missing | 0 |
| 4. Did you find the course content appropriate for your needs as a health care practitioner? | |
| Very appropriate | 31 |
| Appropriate | 8 |
| Medium | 1 |
| Inappropriate | 0 |
| Very inappropriate | 0 |
| Missing | 2 |
| 5. Did you find the course content appropriate for the Vietnamese situation? | |
| Very appropriate | 33 |
| Appropriate | 4 |
| Medium | 5 |
| Inappropriate | 0 |
| Very inappropriate | 0 |
| Missing | 0 |
| 6. What is your opinion about the lectures? | |
| Excellent | 21 |
| Good | 20 |
| Neutral | 0 |
| Poor | 0 |
| Very poor | 0 |
| Missing | 1 |
Responses to the 6–14 months follow-up evaluation of the PAP course and comparison of responses between the course participants in the PAP only and the TOT courses (n = 123)a.
| Course | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TOT | PAP | Total | ||
| 0.300 | ||||
| Very unimportant | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| Somewhat unimportant | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| Neither important nor unimportant | 0 | 7 (6) | 7 (6) | |
| Somewhat important | 2 (20) | 42 (38) | 44 (36) | |
| Very important | 8 (80) | 61 (56) | 69 (58) | |
| 0.985 | ||||
| Very poor | 0 | 3 (3) | 3 (3) | |
| Poor | 1 (10) | 10 (9) | 11 (9) | |
| Neither poor nor good | 5 (50) | 54 (49) | 59 (49) | |
| Good | 3 (30) | 35 (32) | 38 (32) | |
| Very good | 1 (10) | 8 (7) | 9 (7) | |
| 0.854 | ||||
| Very poor | 0 | 5 (5) | 5 (4) | |
| Poor | 0 | 7 (6) | 7 (6) | |
| Neither poor nor good | 6 (60) | 61 (56) | 67 (56) | |
| Good | 3 (30) | 30 (27) | 33 (27) | |
| Very good | 1 (10) | 7 (6) | 8 (7) | |
| 0.884 | ||||
| Very unconfident | 0 | 4 (4) | 4 (3) | |
| Somewhat unconfident | 1 (10) | 5 (5) | 6 (5) | |
| Neither confident nor unconfident | 3 (30) | 42 (38) | 45 (38) | |
| Somewhat confident | 4 (40) | 36 (32) | 40 (33) | |
| Very confident | 2 (20) | 23 (21) | 25 (21) | |
Abbreviations: PA = physical activity; PAP = Physical Activity on Prescription; TOT = Training of Trainers.
Three participants did not complete the evaluation resulting in an analysis sample of n = 120.
Data presented as n (%).
Chi-square analysis was used to compare categorical responses to each question with p < 0.05 regarded as statistically significant differences.
Health care professionals self-reported number of PA recommendations given before and after the training course on PAP (n = 103)a.
| PA recommendations prior to course | PA recommendations after course | Total ( | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 patient/month | 1–2 patients/month | 1–2 patients/week | 3–4 patients/week | ≥5 patients/week | ||
| 0 patient/month | 0 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 4 |
| 1–2 patients/month | 0 | 11 | 8 | 1 | 0 | 20 |
| 1–2 patients/week | 0 | 5 | 6 | 5 | 4 | 20 |
| 3–4 patients/week | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 8 | 12 |
| ≥5 patients/week | 2 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 41 | 47 |
| Total ( | 2 | 18 | 20 | 9 | 53 | 103 |
Abbreviations: PA = physical activity; PAP = Physical Activity on Prescription.
20 study participants did not answer this question since they did not prescribe PA.
1 missing case.