| Literature DB >> 30356162 |
Johannes Aprojanz1, Stephen R Power2,3,4, Pantelis Bampoulis5,6, Stephan Roche2,7, Antti-Pekka Jauho8, Harold J W Zandvliet5, Alexei A Zakharov9, Christoph Tegenkamp10,11.
Abstract
High quality graphene nanoribbons epitaxially grown on the sidewalls of silicon carbide (SiC) mesa structures stand as key building blocks for graphene-based nanoelectronics. Such ribbons display 1D single-channel ballistic transport at room temperature with exceptionally long mean free paths. Here, using spatially-resolved two-point probe (2PP) measurements, we selectively access and directly image a range of individual transport modes in sidewall ribbons. The signature of the independently contacted channels is a sequence of quantised conductance plateaus for different probe positions. These result from an interplay between edge magnetism and asymmetric terminations at opposite ribbon edges due to the underlying SiC structure morphology. Our findings demonstrate a precise control of transport through multiple, independent, ballistic tracks in graphene-based devices, opening intriguing pathways for quantum information device concepts.Entities:
Year: 2018 PMID: 30356162 PMCID: PMC6200825 DOI: 10.1038/s41467-018-06940-5
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nat Commun ISSN: 2041-1723 Impact factor: 14.919
Fig. 1Ballistic transport in graphene sidewall ribbons on SiC mesa structures. Graphene nanoribbons (GNRs) can be selectively grown on SiC sidewalls as sketched in a. b Sequence of STM measurements performed at room temperature show the entirely overgrown SiC facet areas (+2 V, 0.5 nA, semi-insulating SiC). c High-resolution STM showing the overgrowth of the SiC facet and zigzag orientation (inset). The scale bars indicate a length of 2 nm (blue) and 0.4 nm (green). d The IV-curves measured in a two point probe assembly (2pp) clearly reveal a resistance of h/e2 on the GNR for a probe distance of 2 μm. The GNR can be easily seen also in SEM (inset, doped-SiC, scale bar, 1 μm). By means of a 4-tip STM the ribbons are contacted for in situ transport measurements
Fig. 2Spatially resolved 2pp transport measurements. a SEM image of a ballistic ribbon with an overlaid schematic showing a blunt and sharp tip with a scale bar of 300 nm. Inset: STM topography taken after transport measurements (scale bar, 100 nm). b Line scans across the ribbon, directions are indicated in the inset of a. c Conductance G measured for a fixed distance L = 70 nm, while the sharp tip was moved across the ribbon starting from the lower edge (U = 200 mV). Inset: IV-curves measured at bottom, middle and top of the GNR. d The sequence of the channels can be reversibly measured by moving the ohmically contacted tip forward and backward
Fig. 3Direct imaging of the current channels in ballistic GNRs. a Top: Topographic AFM image of a GNR recorded with a conductive Pt tip. Bottom: the simultaneously recorded current image (sample bias 30 mV), demonstrating that the bottom of the ribbon is significantly more conductive than the top. The scale bar corresponds to a length of 50 nm. b Current and topography cross sections measured across the GNR indicated with the white line in a. c IV-curves recorded in contact mode at the locations indicated at the inset. d The histogram of the resistance values measured on the ribbon of the inset of c. The AFM measurements were performed under ambient conditions at 300 K
Fig. 4Tight-binding model of the edge and bulk channels. a Simulated two-point conductance as a function of the width of the mobile probe in contact with the ribbon, as shown schematically in the upper inset, capturing the characteristic stepwise features from experiment (see Fig. 2c). Lower inset: Band structure for spin-up (grey) and spin-down (red, dashed) electrons for a 188-ZGNR with edge magnetism and asymmetric potential terms. The dashed horizontal line shows the Fermi energy considered in the other panels, with the band crossings highlighted. b Schematic of the GNR. c Real-space projections of the states contributing to transmission (e.g. those at the corresponding crossing points in a) across the ribbon width. The blue and purple states are spin-degenerate, whereas the red state corresponds to the spin-polarised channel at the lower edge of the ribbon