Literature DB >> 30355717

Eighteen-year prospective audit of LASIK outcomes for myopia in 53 731 eyes.

Daniel Chua1,2, Hla Myint Htoon1,2, Li Lim1,2, Cordelia Ml Chan1,2, Jodhbir S Mehta1,2, Donald T H Tan1,2, Mohamad Rosman3,2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: To assess the outcomes of laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) performed for the treatment of myopia in terms of safety, efficacy and predictability in an 18-year clinical audit.
METHOD: In this single-centre, prospective, non-randomised study, preoperative and postoperative refractions, uncorrected (UCVA), best-corrected Snellen visual acuity (BCVA) and complications of all eyes undergoing myopic LASIK were recorded. Safety, efficacy, refractive predictability, treatment trends, retreatment rates and complication rates were evaluated.
RESULTS: Between 1998 and 2015, 53 731 eyes of 27312 patients underwent myopic LASIK. Patients' median age was 31.6 years (mean, 32.6±7.3 years); there were 9703 males (35.5%). Patients were predominantly ethnic Chinese (87.4%). Mean follow-up time was 78±75.6 days (median, 86 days). Overall efficacy index was 0.91 with >99% of eyes achieving UCVA of ≥20/40 and >70% achieving 20/20 since 2010. 95.43% of eyes had no loss of vision postoperatively and 4.2% and 0.37% lost 1 and ≥2 lines BCVA, respectively. From 2010 the safety index has been >1.05. More than 94.0% of eyes achieved within ±1.0 D of target refraction and at least 70% achieved within ±0.50 D of target from 2010 onwards. Retreatment rate was 2.55% and after retreatment 98.4% of eyes achieved ≥20/40 UCVA and 63.5% achieved ≥20/20 UCVA. The overall complication rate is 0.98%, and since 2010, the annual complication rate has been <0.8%.
CONCLUSIONS: Myopic LASIK performed in Asian eyes is safe and effective with high refractive predictability in a comprehensive LASIK programme with appropriate clinical audit. © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

Entities:  

Keywords:  treatment lasers; vision

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30355717     DOI: 10.1136/bjophthalmol-2018-312587

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0007-1161            Impact factor:   4.638


  5 in total

1.  Could the percent tissue altered (PTA) index be considered as a unique factor in ectasia risk assessment?

Authors:  Carlos Rocha-de-Lossada; José-María Sánchez-González; Rahul Rachwani-Anil; Juan-Luis García-Madrona; Federico Alonso-Aliste; Sandra Figueroa-Ardila; Elvira Colmenero-Reina
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-07-27       Impact factor: 2.031

2.  A Prospective Comparison of Wavefront-Guided LASIK versus Wavefront-Guided PRK After Previous Keratorefractive Surgery.

Authors:  Michele D Lee; Lisa Y Chen; Elaine M Tran; Edward E Manche
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-10-20

3.  Are choriocapillaris flow void features robust to diurnal variations? A swept-source optical coherence tomography angiography (OCTA) study.

Authors:  Emily Lin; Mengyuan Ke; Bingyao Tan; Xinwen Yao; Damon Wong; Lirong Ong; Leopold Schmetterer; Jacqueline Chua
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-07-09       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 4.  Ectasia After Corneal Refractive Surgery: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Majid Moshirfar; Alyson N Tukan; Nour Bundogji; Harry Y Liu; Shannon E McCabe; Yasmyne C Ronquillo; Phillip C Hoopes
Journal:  Ophthalmol Ther       Date:  2021-08-20

5.  Three-Year Follow-Up of Laser In Situ Keratomileusis Treatments for Myopia: Multi-Center Cohort Study in Korean Population.

Authors:  Jae-Yong Kim; Hun Lee; Choun-Ki Joo; Joon-Young Hyon; Tae-Im Kim; Jin-Hyoung Kim; Jin-Kuk Kim; Eun-Young Cho; Ji-Eun Choi; Na-Rae Lee; Hung-Won Tchah
Journal:  J Pers Med       Date:  2021-05-16
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.