Literature DB >> 30355107

Operator Versus Core Lab Adjudication of Reperfusion After Endovascular Treatment of Acute Ischemic Stroke.

Guang Zhang1,2, Kilian M Treurniet2, Ivo G H Jansen2, Bart J Emmer2, Rene van den Berg2, Henk A Marquering3, Maarten Uyttenboogaart4, Sjoerd F M Jenniskens5, Yvo B W E M Roos6, Pieter Jan van Doormaal7, Adriaan C G M van Es, Aad van der Lugt, Jan-Albert Vos8, Geert J Lycklama À Nijeholt9, Wim H van Zwam10, Huaizhang Shi1, Albert J Yoo11, Diederik W J Dippel12, Charles B L M Majoie2.   

Abstract

Background and Purpose- The modified Treatment In Cerebral Ischemia (mTICI) score is the standard method to quantify the degree of reperfusion after endovascular treatment in acute ischemic stroke. In clinical practice, it is commonly assessed by local operators after the procedure. In clinical trials and registries, mTICI is evaluated by an imaging core lab. The aim of this study was to compare operator mTICI with core lab mTICI scores in patients included in the MR CLEAN (Multicenter Randomized Clinical Trial of Endovascular Treatment for Acute Ischemic Stroke in the Netherlands) Registry. Methods- All patients with an intracranial carotid or middle cerebral artery occlusion with anteroposterior and lateral digital subtraction angiography runs were included. Operators determined the mTICI score immediately after endovascular treatment. Core lab neuroradiologists were blinded to clinical characteristics and assessed mTICI scores based on pre- and postintervention digital subtraction angiography. The agreement between operator and core lab mTICI scores and their value in the prediction of outcome (score on modified Rankin Scale at 90 days) was determined. Results- In total, 1130 patients were included. The proportion of agreement between operator and core lab mTICI score was 56% (95% CI, 54%-59%). In 33% (95% CI, 31%-36%), mTICI was overestimated by operators. Operators reported a higher rate of successful reperfusion than the core lab (77% versus 67%; difference 10% [95% CI, 6%-14%]; P<0.001). In 252 (33%) of 763 patients scored as incomplete reperfusion by the core lab (mTICI <3), the local read was mTICI 3. Multivariable logistic regression models containing either core lab scored or operator scored successful reperfusion predicted outcome on the full (C statistic of both models: 0.76) or dichotomized modified Rankin Scale (modified Rankin Scale, 0-2; C statistic of both models: 0.83) equally well. Conclusions- Operators tend to overestimate the degree of reperfusion compared with the core lab although this does not affect the accuracy of outcome prediction.

Entities:  

Keywords:  infarction, middle cerebral artery; logistic models; reperfusion; stroke; thrombectomy

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30355107     DOI: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.118.022031

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stroke        ISSN: 0039-2499            Impact factor:   7.914


  10 in total

1.  Reliability of the Modified TICI Score among Endovascular Neurosurgeons.

Authors:  D M Heiferman; N C Pecoraro; A W Wozniak; K C Ebersole; L M Jimenez; M R Reynolds; A J Ringer; J C Serrone
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2020-07-23       Impact factor: 3.825

2.  Factors Associated With Decreased Accuracy of Modified Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarct Scoring Among Neurointerventionalists During Thrombectomy.

Authors:  Elliot Pressman; Muhammad Waqas; Victoria Sands; Adnan Siddiqui; Kenneth Snyder; Jason Davies; Elad Levy; Ciprian Ionita; Waldo Guerrero; Zeguang Ren; Maxim Mokin
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2021-09-09       Impact factor: 7.914

3.  Use of quantitative angiographic methods with a data-driven model to evaluate reperfusion status (mTICI) during thrombectomy.

Authors:  Mohammad Mahdi Shiraz Bhurwani; Kenneth V Snyder; Muhammad Waqas; Maxim Mokin; Ryan A Rava; Alexander R Podgorsak; Felix Chin; Jason M Davies; Elad I Levy; Adnan H Siddiqui; Ciprian N Ionita
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  2021-01-07       Impact factor: 2.995

4.  Acute Endovascular Treatment of Patients With Ischemic Stroke From Intracranial Large Vessel Occlusion and Extracranial Carotid Dissection.

Authors:  Kars C J Compagne; R B Goldhoorn; Maarten Uyttenboogaart; Robert J van Oostenbrugge; Wim H van Zwam; Pieter J van Doormaal; Diederik W J Dippel; Aad van der Lugt; Bart J Emmer; Adriaan C G M van Es
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2019-02-19       Impact factor: 4.003

5.  Mechanical thrombectomy for basilar artery occlusion: efficacy, outcomes, and futile recanalization in comparison with the anterior circulation.

Authors:  Thomas Raphael Meinel; Johannes Kaesmacher; Jan Gralla; Urs Fischer; Panagiotis Chaloulos-Iakovidis; Leonidas Panos; Pasquale Mordasini; Pascal J Mosimann; Patrik Michel; Steven Hajdu; Marc Ribo; Manuel Requena; Christian Maegerlein; Benjamin Friedrich; Vincent Costalat; Amel Benali; Laurent Pierot; Matthias Gawlitza; Joanna Schaafsma; Vitor M Pereira
Journal:  J Neurointerv Surg       Date:  2019-06-25       Impact factor: 5.836

6.  Endovascular therapy in basilar artery occlusion in Sweden 2016-2019-a nationwide, prospective registry study.

Authors:  Birgitta Ramgren; Petrea Frid; Bo Norrving; Johan Wassélius; Teresa Ullberg
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  2021-10-30       Impact factor: 2.804

7.  CT angiographic radiomics signature for risk stratification in anterior large vessel occlusion stroke.

Authors:  Emily W Avery; Jonas Behland; Adrian Mak; Stefan P Haider; Tal Zeevi; Pina C Sanelli; Christopher G Filippi; Ajay Malhotra; Charles C Matouk; Christoph J Griessenauer; Ramin Zand; Philipp Hendrix; Vida Abedi; Guido J Falcone; Nils Petersen; Lauren H Sansing; Kevin N Sheth; Seyedmehdi Payabvash
Journal:  Neuroimage Clin       Date:  2022-05-07       Impact factor: 4.891

8.  Improvements in Endovascular Treatment for Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Longitudinal Study in the MR CLEAN Registry.

Authors:  Kars C J Compagne; Manon Kappelhof; Wouter H Hinsenveld; Josje Brouwer; Robert-Jan B Goldhoorn; Maarten Uyttenboogaart; Reinoud P H Bokkers; Wouter J Schonewille; Jasper M Martens; Jeannette Hofmeijer; H Bart van der Worp; Rob T H Lo; Koos Keizer; Lonneke S F Yo; Geert J Lycklama À Nijeholt; Heleen M den Hertog; Emiel J C Sturm; Paul J A M Brouwers; Marianne A A van Walderveen; Marieke J H Wermer; Sebastiaan F de Bruijn; Lukas C van Dijk; Hieronymus D Boogaarts; Ewout J van Dijk; Julia H van Tuijl; Jo P P Peluso; Paul L M de Kort; Boudewijn A A M van Hasselt; Puck S Fransen; Tobien H C M L Schreuder; Roel J J Heijboer; Sjoerd F M Jenniskens; Marieke E S Sprengers; Elias Ghariq; Ido R van den Wijngaard; Stefan D Roosendaal; Anton F J A Meijer; Ludo F M Beenen; Alida A Postma; René van den Berg; Albert J Yoo; Pieter Jan van Doormaal; Marc P van Proosdij; Menno G M Krietemeijer; Dick G Gerrits; Sebastiaan Hammer; Jan Albert Vos; Jelis Boiten; Jonathan M Coutinho; Bart J Emmer; Ad C G M van Es; Bob Roozenbeek; Yvo B W E M Roos; Wim H van Zwam; Robert J van Oostenbrugge; Charles B L M Majoie; Diederik W J Dippel; Aad van der Lugt
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2022-02-09       Impact factor: 10.170

9.  Prognostic factors for acute posterior circulation cerebral infarction patients after endovascular mechanical thrombectomy: A retrospective study.

Authors:  Jun Gao; Changming Wen; Jun Sun; Di Chen; Donghuan Zhang; Ning Wang; Yifeng Liu; Jie Wang; Baochao Zhang
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2022-04-29       Impact factor: 1.817

10.  Futile complete recanalization: patients characteristics and its time course.

Authors:  Takaya Kitano; Kenichi Todo; Shinichi Yoshimura; Kazutaka Uchida; Hiroshi Yamagami; Nobuyuki Sakai; Manabu Sakaguchi; Hajime Nakamura; Haruhiko Kishima; Hideki Mochizuki; Masayuki Ezura; Yasushi Okada; Kazuo Kitagawa; Kazumi Kimura; Makoto Sasaki; Norio Tanahashi; Kazunori Toyoda; Eisuke Furui; Yuji Matsumaru; Kazuo Minematsu; Takeshi Morimoto
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-03-18       Impact factor: 4.379

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.