Literature DB >> 30354656

Systematic Review for the 2017 ACC/AHA/AAPA/ABC/ACPM/AGS/APhA/ASH/ASPC/NMA/PCNA Guideline for the Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Management of High Blood Pressure in Adults: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines.

David M Reboussin1, Norrina B Allen1, Michael E Griswold1, Eliseo Guallar1, Yuling Hong1, Daniel T Lackland1, Edgar Pete R Miller1, Tamar Polonsky1, Angela M Thompson-Paul1, Suma Vupputuri1.   

Abstract

Objective To review the literature systematically and perform meta-analyses to address these questions: 1) Is there evidence that self-measured blood pressure (BP) without other augmentation is superior to office-based measurement of BP for achieving better BP control or for preventing adverse clinical outcomes that are related to elevated BP? 2) What is the optimal target for BP lowering during antihypertensive therapy in adults? 3) In adults with hypertension, how do various antihypertensive drug classes differ in their benefits and harms compared with each other as first-line therapy? Methods Electronic literature searches were performed by Doctor Evidence, a global medical evidence software and services company, across PubMed and EMBASE from 1966 to 2015 using key words and relevant subject headings for randomized controlled trials that met eligibility criteria defined for each question. We performed analyses using traditional frequentist statistical and Bayesian approaches, including random-effects Bayesian network meta-analyses. Results Our results suggest that: 1) There is a modest but significant improvement in systolic BP in randomized controlled trials of self-measured BP versus usual care at 6 but not 12 months, and for selected patients and their providers self-measured BP may be a helpful adjunct to routine office care. 2) systolic BP lowering to a target of <130 mm Hg may reduce the risk of several important outcomes including risk of myocardial infarction, stroke, heart failure, and major cardiovascular events. No class of medications (ie, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, angiotensin-receptor blockers, calcium channel blockers, or beta blockers) was significantly better than thiazides and thiazide-like diuretics as a first-line therapy for any outcome.

Entities:  

Keywords:  AHA Scientific Statements; Evidence Review Committee; antihypertensive drug class; blood pressure; cardiovascular disease; home blood pressure monitoring; hypertension; meta-analysis; risk reduction; targets; treatment outcomes

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30354656     DOI: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000601

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Circulation        ISSN: 0009-7322            Impact factor:   29.690


  27 in total

Review 1.  Gender Differences in Hypertension.

Authors:  Juan-Juan Song; Zheng Ma; Juan Wang; Lin-Xi Chen; Jiu-Chang Zhong
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Transl Res       Date:  2019-05-01       Impact factor: 4.132

2.  Hypertension.

Authors:  James Brian Byrd; Robert D Brook
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2019-05-07       Impact factor: 25.391

Review 3.  Hypertension in Cancer Survivors: A Review of the Literature and Suggested Approach to Diagnosis and Treatment.

Authors:  David Chuquin; Antonio Abbate; Wendy Bottinor
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Pharmacol       Date:  2022-10-01       Impact factor: 3.271

4.  Triglyceride-Glucose Index and Homeostasis Model Assessment-Insulin Resistance in Young Adulthood and Risk of Incident Congestive Heart Failure in Midlife: The Coronary Artery Risk Development in Young Adults Study.

Authors:  Xianghui Zeng; Dunzheng Han; Haobin Zhou; Yuting Xue; Xiao Wang; Qiong Zhan; Yujia Bai; Xingfu Huang; Qingchun Zeng; Hao Zhang; Zhuang Ma; Hao Ren; Dingli Xu
Journal:  Front Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2022-06-30

5.  American Society of Hematology 2019 guidelines for sickle cell disease: cardiopulmonary and kidney disease.

Authors:  Robert I Liem; Sophie Lanzkron; Thomas D Coates; Laura DeCastro; Ankit A Desai; Kenneth I Ataga; Robyn T Cohen; Johnson Haynes; Ifeyinwa Osunkwo; Jeffrey D Lebensburger; James P Lash; Theodore Wun; Madeleine Verhovsek; Elodie Ontala; Rae Blaylark; Fares Alahdab; Abdulrahman Katabi; Reem A Mustafa
Journal:  Blood Adv       Date:  2019-12-10

6.  Comprehensive comparative effectiveness and safety of first-line antihypertensive drug classes: a systematic, multinational, large-scale analysis.

Authors:  Marc A Suchard; Martijn J Schuemie; Harlan M Krumholz; Seng Chan You; RuiJun Chen; Nicole Pratt; Christian G Reich; Jon Duke; David Madigan; George Hripcsak; Patrick B Ryan
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2019-10-24       Impact factor: 79.321

7.  Regression to the mean in home blood pressure: Analyses of the BP GUIDE study.

Authors:  Nelson Wang; Emily R Atkins; Abdul Salam; Myles N Moore; James E Sharman; Anthony Rodgers
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2020-07-07       Impact factor: 3.738

8.  Pharmacological treatment of hypertension in people without prior cerebrovascular disease for the prevention of cognitive impairment and dementia.

Authors:  Emma L Cunningham; Stephen A Todd; Peter Passmore; Roger Bullock; Bernadette McGuinness
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2021-05-24

9.  Non-Adherence to Antihypertensive Guidelines in Patients with Asymptomatic Carotid Stenosis.

Authors:  William Haley; Fayaz Shawl; W Charles Sternbergh; Tanya N Turan; Kevin Barrett; Jenifer Voeks; Thomas Brott; James F Meschia
Journal:  J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis       Date:  2021-06-18       Impact factor: 2.677

10.  Office, Central, and Ambulatory Blood Pressure for Predicting First Stroke in Older Adults: A Community-Based Cohort Study.

Authors:  Kenji Matsumoto; Zhezhen Jin; Shunichi Homma; Mitchell S V Elkind; Joseph E Schwartz; Tatjana Rundek; Carlo Mannina; Kazato Ito; Ralph L Sacco; Marco R Di Tullio
Journal:  Hypertension       Date:  2021-07-12       Impact factor: 9.897

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.