Literature DB >> 30354556

Impact of Baseline Hemodynamics on the Effects of a Transcatheter Interatrial Shunt Device in Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction.

Jeffrey Wessler1, David Kaye2, Finn Gustafsson3, Mark C Petrie4, Gerd Hasenfuβ5, Carolyn S P Lam6, Barry A Borlaug7, Jan Komtebedde8, Ted Feldman9, Sanjiv J Shah10, Daniel Burkhoff1.   

Abstract

Background Interatrial shunt device (IASD) effects have been described in patients with heart failure and ejection fractions (EFs) ≥40%. However, baseline characteristics that correlate with greatest hemodynamic effects are unknown. On the basis of fundamental principles, we hypothesized that larger pressure gradients between left and right atria would yield greater shunt flow and greater hemodynamic effects. Methods and Results REDUCE LAP-HF (Reduce Elevated Left Atrial Pressure in Patients With Heart Failure) was a multicenter study that investigated IASD safety and performance. Sixty-four patients with EF ≥40% underwent device implantation followed by hemodynamic assessments at rest and exercise, including pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (PCWP, surrogate for left atrial pressure) and central venous pressure (CVP). At 6 months, IASD resulted in an average pulmonary-to-systemic blood flow ratio of 1.27 and increased exercise tolerance. The PCWP-CVP gradient (ie, the driving pressure for shunt flow) decreased at peak exercise from 16.8±6.9 to 11.4±5.5 mm Hg, because of increased CVP (17.5±5.4 to 20.3±7.9 mm Hg; P=0.04) and decreased PCWP (34.1±7.6 to 31.6±8.0 mm Hg; P=0.025). Baseline PCWP-CVP gradient during exercise correlated with changes of both PCWP-CVP and PCWP: Δ(PCWP-CVP)=10.0-0.89·(PCWP-CVP)baseline ( r2=0.56) and ΔPCWP=7.54-0.60·(PCWP-CVP)baseline ( P=0.001). Hemodynamics of patients with EF ≥50% and those with EF <50% responded similarly to IASD. Conclusions In heart failure patients with EF ≥40%, IASD significantly reduced PCWP and PCWP-CVP at peak exercise. Patients with higher baseline PCWP-CVP gradient had greater reductions in both parameters at follow-up. Results were sustained through 12 months and were independent of whether EF was ≥50% or between 40% and 49%. Additional studies will help further define the baseline hemodynamic predictors of exercise, hemodynamic, and clinical efficacy of the IASD. Clinical Trial Registration URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov . Unique identifier: NCT01913613.

Entities:  

Keywords:  central venous pressure; exercise; heart failure; hemodynamics; rest

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30354556     DOI: 10.1161/CIRCHEARTFAILURE.117.004540

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Circ Heart Fail        ISSN: 1941-3289            Impact factor:   8.790


  12 in total

Review 1.  The future of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction : Deep phenotyping for targeted therapeutics.

Authors:  Frank R Heinzel; Sanjiv J Shah
Journal:  Herz       Date:  2022-06-29       Impact factor: 1.740

Review 2.  Transcatheter Implantation of Interatrial Shunt Devices to Lower Left Atrial Pressure in Heart Failure.

Authors:  Troels Højsgaard Jørgensen; Lars Søndergaard
Journal:  Int J Heart Fail       Date:  2022-01-19

Review 3.  Device-based treatment options for heart failure with preserved ejection fraction.

Authors:  Chihiro Miyagi; Takuma Miyamoto; Jamshid H Karimov; Randall C Starling; Kiyotaka Fukamachi
Journal:  Heart Fail Rev       Date:  2021-01-12       Impact factor: 4.214

4.  In Vitro Pressure Measurements Across an Interatrial Shunt for HFpEF Treatment.

Authors:  Erica Cherry Kemmerling
Journal:  Cardiovasc Eng Technol       Date:  2022-02-01       Impact factor: 2.495

5.  Identification of physiologic treatment targets with favourable haemodynamic consequences in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction.

Authors:  David M Kaye; Melissa Byrne; Justin Mariani; Shane Nanayakkara; Daniel Burkhoff
Journal:  ESC Heart Fail       Date:  2020-09-09

6.  Left atrial unloading with an 8 mm septal cutting balloon to treat postcapillary pulmonary hypertension: a case report.

Authors:  Fabrice Bauer; Emmanuel Besnier; Chadi Aludaat; Romain Breil; Nicolas Bettinger; Charles Fauvel; Véronique Wurtz; Olivier Raitiere; Nassima Si Belkacem; Najime Bouhzam
Journal:  ESC Heart Fail       Date:  2021-11-11

Review 7.  Pulmonary Hypertension in Patients With Heart Failure With Mid-Range Ejection Fraction.

Authors:  Micha T Maeder; Lukas Weber; Marc Buser; Roman Brenner; Lucas Joerg; Hans Rickli
Journal:  Front Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2021-07-09

Review 8.  Interatrial Shunt Device for Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction.

Authors:  David M Kaye; Shane Nanayakkara
Journal:  Front Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2019-09-18

9.  Impact of Interatrial Shunts on Invasive Hemodynamics and Exercise Tolerance in Patients With Heart Failure.

Authors:  Jan M Griffin; Barry A Borlaug; Jan Komtebedde; Sheldon E Litwin; Sanjiv J Shah; David M Kaye; Elke Hoendermis; Gerd Hasenfuß; Finn Gustafsson; Emil Wolsk; Nir Uriel; Daniel Burkhoff
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2020-08-15       Impact factor: 5.501

10.  Prediction of haemodynamics after interatrial shunt for heart failure using the generalized circulatory equilibrium.

Authors:  Takuya Nishikawa; Keita Saku; Kiyoshi Uike; Kazunori Uemura; Genya Sunagawa; Takeshi Tohyama; Keimei Yoshida; Takuya Kishi; Kenji Sunagawa; Hiroyuki Tsutsui
Journal:  ESC Heart Fail       Date:  2020-08-04
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.