Literature DB >> 30354267

Breast Arterial Calcification in the Mammogram Report: The Patient Perspective.

Laurie R Margolies1, Rowena Yip1, Esther Hwang1, Rebecca H Oudsema1, Varun R Subramaniam1, Harvey Hecht2, Jagat Narula2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to determine patient attitudes about mammographic reporting of breast arterial calcification (BAC), result communication, and action. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: A self-administered survey was created for this project and was offered to mammography patients presenting for screening or diagnostic mammography over a 1-month period.
RESULTS: Among those who accepted questionnaires, 61.8% (419/678) responded with varying response rates to specific questions. A large percentage (95.8% [363/379]) preferred to have BAC reported. All 107 patients who were unaware of a personal history of heart disease wanted notification about BAC. There were 552 communication responses from 354 women. Among these responses, 62.5% (345/552) indicated a preference for notification from the radiology department by letter or telephone call. Among those who had a single preference, 76.6% (180/235) preferred notification by the radiology department in the patient results letter or by telephone call. Of those who chose one action option, 87.4% (181/207) indicated that they would undergo coronary artery CT before making a decision. Among those who selected multiple options, 53.2% (272/511) expressed a desire for coronary artery CT before making a decision. Age, level of education, and race were not associated with patients' attitudes toward BAC.
CONCLUSION: Patients had an overwhelming preference to be informed about BAC found at mammography. Given the ease of reporting BAC and the calls by preventive cardiologists to have the information, the widespread adoption of BAC reporting on mammography reports can promote prevention, diagnosis, and if needed, treatment of cardiovascular disease.

Entities:  

Keywords:  atherosclerotic disease; breast calcification; mammography; screening; shared decision making

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30354267     DOI: 10.2214/AJR.18.20171

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol        ISSN: 0361-803X            Impact factor:   3.959


  7 in total

1.  Leveraging Mammography as a Unique Opportunity for Cardiovascular Health Promotion.

Authors:  Natalie A Cameron; Sadiya S Khan
Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2022-03-15       Impact factor: 7.792

2.  Breast Arterial Calcification: a Novel Cardiovascular Risk Enhancer Among Postmenopausal Women.

Authors:  Carlos Iribarren; Malini Chandra; Catherine Lee; Gabriela Sanchez; Danny L Sam; Farima Faith Azamian; Hyo-Min Cho; Huanjun Ding; Nathan D Wong; Sabee Molloi
Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2022-03-15       Impact factor: 7.792

3.  Breast artery calcification as a predictor of coronary artery calcification: a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Batool Seifi; Reza Javadrashid; Fatemeh Seifi; Jhila Khamanian; Armin Zarrintan; Mohammad Mirza-Aghazadeh-Attari
Journal:  Pol J Radiol       Date:  2020-07-20

4.  Breast Arterial Calcifications on Mammography among Patients Attending the Radiology Department in a Tertiary Care Centre: A Descriptive Cross-sectional Study.

Authors:  Anamika Jha; Anugya Sah; Birendra Raj Joshi; Benu Lohani
Journal:  JNMA J Nepal Med Assoc       Date:  2021-09-11       Impact factor: 0.556

5.  Is breast arterial calcification associated with coronary artery disease?-A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Sing Ching Lee; Michael Phillips; Jamie Bellinge; Jennifer Stone; Elizabeth Wylie; Carl Schultz
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-07-28       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 6.  Added benefits of early detection of other diseases on low-dose CT screening.

Authors:  Rowena Yip; Artit Jirapatnakul; Minxia Hu; Xiangmeng Chen; Dan Han; Teng Ma; Yeqing Zhu; Mary M Salvatore; Laurie R Margolies; David F Yankelevitz; Claudia I Henschke
Journal:  Transl Lung Cancer Res       Date:  2021-02

7.  Breast arterial calcifications as a biomarker of cardiovascular risk: radiologists' awareness, reporting, and action. A survey among the EUSOBI members.

Authors:  Rubina Manuela Trimboli; Davide Capra; Marina Codari; Andrea Cozzi; Giovanni Di Leo; Francesco Sardanelli
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2020-08-27       Impact factor: 5.315

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.