Literature DB >> 30354266

JOURNAL CLUB: Use of Gradient Boosting Machine Learning to Predict Patient Outcome in Acute Ischemic Stroke on the Basis of Imaging, Demographic, and Clinical Information.

Yuan Xie1, Bin Jiang1, Enhao Gong2, Ying Li1, Guangming Zhu1, Patrik Michel3, Max Wintermark1, Greg Zaharchuk1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: When treatment decisions are being made for patients with acute ischemic stroke, timely and accurate outcome prediction plays an important role. The optimal rehabilitation strategy also relies on long-term outcome predictions. The decision-making process involves numerous biomarkers including imaging features and demographic information. The objective of this study was to integrate common stroke biomarkers using machine learning methods and predict patient recovery outcome at 90 days.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 512 patients were enrolled in this retrospective study. Extreme gradient boosting (XGB) and gradient boosting machine (GBM) models were used to predict modified Rankin scale (mRS) scores at 90 days using biomarkers available at admission and 24 hours. Feature selections were performed using a greedy algorithm. Fivefold cross validation was applied to estimate model performance.
RESULTS: For binary prediction of an mRS score of greater than 2 using biomarkers available at admission, XGB and GBM had an AUC of 0.746 and 0.748, respectively. Adding the National Institutes of Health Stroke Score at 24 hours and performing feature selection improved the AUC of XGB to 0.884 and the AUC of GBM to 0.877. With the addition of the recanalization outcome, XGB's AUC improved to 0.807 for nonrecanalized patients and dropped to 0.670 for recanalized patients. GBM's AUC improved to 0.781 for nonrecanalized patients and dropped to 0.655 for recanalized patients.
CONCLUSION: Decision tree-based GBMs can predict the recovery outcome of stroke patients at admission with a high AUC. Breaking down the patient groups on the basis of recanalization and nonrecanalization can potentially help with the treatment decision process.

Entities:  

Keywords:  CT; machine learning; modified Rankin scale; prediction; stroke

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30354266     DOI: 10.2214/AJR.18.20260

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol        ISSN: 0361-803X            Impact factor:   3.959


  16 in total

1.  Machine Learning-Based Prediction of Subsequent Vascular Events After 6 Months in Chinese Patients with Minor Ischemic Stroke.

Authors:  Rong Zhang; Jingfeng Wang
Journal:  Int J Gen Med       Date:  2022-04-07

2.  Radiomics Model Based on Enhanced Gradient Level Set Segmentation Algorithm to Predict the Prognosis of Endoscopic Treatment of Sinusitis.

Authors:  Yabing Li; Ye Tao
Journal:  Comput Math Methods Med       Date:  2022-06-22       Impact factor: 2.809

3.  Machine learning based evaluation of clinical and pretreatment 18F-FDG-PET/CT radiomic features to predict prognosis of cervical cancer patients.

Authors:  Masatoyo Nakajo; Megumi Jinguji; Atsushi Tani; Erina Yano; Chin Khang Hoo; Daisuke Hirahara; Shinichi Togami; Hiroaki Kobayashi; Takashi Yoshiura
Journal:  Abdom Radiol (NY)       Date:  2021-11-25

4.  Potential of machine learning to predict early ischemic events after carotid endarterectomy or stenting: a comparison with surgeon predictions.

Authors:  Kazuya Matsuo; Atsushi Fujita; Kohkichi Hosoda; Jun Tanaka; Taichiro Imahori; Taiji Ishii; Masaaki Kohta; Kazuhiro Tanaka; Yoichi Uozumi; Hidehito Kimura; Takashi Sasayama; Eiji Kohmura
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2021-06-02       Impact factor: 3.042

5.  Prediction of Clinical Outcome in Patients with Large-Vessel Acute Ischemic Stroke: Performance of Machine Learning versus SPAN-100.

Authors:  B Jiang; G Zhu; Y Xie; J J Heit; H Chen; Y Li; V Ding; A Eskandari; P Michel; G Zaharchuk; M Wintermark
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2021-01-07       Impact factor: 3.825

6.  Natural Language Processing Enhances Prediction of Functional Outcome After Acute Ischemic Stroke.

Authors:  Sheng-Feng Sung; Chih-Hao Chen; Ru-Chiou Pan; Ya-Han Hu; Jiann-Shing Jeng
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2021-11-19       Impact factor: 6.106

Review 7.  Artificial Intelligence: A Shifting Paradigm in Cardio-Cerebrovascular Medicine.

Authors:  Vida Abedi; Seyed-Mostafa Razavi; Ayesha Khan; Venkatesh Avula; Aparna Tompe; Asma Poursoroush; Alireza Vafaei Sadr; Jiang Li; Ramin Zand
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2021-12-06       Impact factor: 4.241

8.  Prediction model of laparoendoscopic single-site surgery in gynecology using machine learning algorithm.

Authors:  Jun Ma; Jiani Yang; Shanshan Cheng; Yue Jin; Nan Zhang; Chao Wang; Yu Wang
Journal:  Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne       Date:  2021-05-14       Impact factor: 1.195

Review 9.  Artificial Intelligence and Acute Stroke Imaging.

Authors:  J E Soun; D S Chow; M Nagamine; R S Takhtawala; C G Filippi; W Yu; P D Chang
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2020-11-26       Impact factor: 3.825

10.  Automatic Machine-Learning-Based Outcome Prediction in Patients With Primary Intracerebral Hemorrhage.

Authors:  Hsueh-Lin Wang; Wei-Yen Hsu; Ming-Hsueh Lee; Hsu-Huei Weng; Sheng-Wei Chang; Jen-Tsung Yang; Yuan-Hsiung Tsai
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2019-08-21       Impact factor: 4.003

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.