Literature DB >> 30353909

The future is coming: promising perspectives regarding the use of machine learning in renal transplantation.

Pedro Guilherme Coelho Hannun1, Luis Gustavo Modelli de Andrade1.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: The prediction of post transplantation outcomes is clinically important and involves several problems. The current prediction models based on standard statistics are very complex, difficult to validate and do not provide accurate prediction. Machine learning, a statistical technique that allows the computer to make future predictions using previous experiences, is beginning to be used in order to solve these issues. In the field of kidney transplantation, computational forecasting use has been reported in prediction of chronic allograft rejection, delayed graft function, and graft survival. This paper describes machine learning principles and steps to make a prediction and performs a brief analysis of the most recent applications of its application in literature. DISCUSSION: There is compelling evidence that machine learning approaches based on donor and recipient data are better in providing improved prognosis of graft outcomes than traditional analysis. The immediate expectations that emerge from this new prediction modelling technique are that it will generate better clinical decisions based on dynamic and local practice data and optimize organ allocation as well as post transplantation care management. Despite the promising results, there is no substantial number of studies yet to determine feasibility of its application in a clinical setting.
CONCLUSION: The way we deal with storage data in electronic health records will radically change in the coming years and machine learning will be part of clinical daily routine, whether to predict clinical outcomes or suggest diagnosis based on institutional experience.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30353909      PMCID: PMC6699438          DOI: 10.1590/2175-8239-jbn-2018-0047

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bras Nefrol        ISSN: 0101-2800


  7 in total

1.  Predicting kidney transplant survival using tree-based modeling.

Authors:  Sergey Krikov; Altaf Khan; Bradley C Baird; Lev L Barenbaum; Alexander Leviatov; James K Koford; Alexander S Goldfarb-Rumyantzev
Journal:  ASAIO J       Date:  2007 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.872

2.  Inclusion of dynamic clinical data improves the predictive performance of a 30-day readmission risk model in kidney transplantation.

Authors:  David J Taber; Arun P Palanisamy; Titte R Srinivas; Mulugeta Gebregziabher; John Odeghe; Kenneth D Chavin; Leonard E Egede; Prabhakar K Baliga
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 4.939

3.  Big Data, Predictive Analytics, and Quality Improvement in Kidney Transplantation: A Proof of Concept.

Authors:  T R Srinivas; D J Taber; Z Su; J Zhang; G Mour; D Northrup; A Tripathi; J E Marsden; W P Moran; P D Mauldin
Journal:  Am J Transplant       Date:  2017-01-04       Impact factor: 8.086

4.  Prediction of 3-yr cadaveric graft survival based on pre-transplant variables in a large national dataset.

Authors:  Alexander S Goldfarb-Rumyantzev; John D Scandling; Lisa Pappas; Randall J Smout; Susan Horn
Journal:  Clin Transplant       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 2.863

5.  Predicting the Future - Big Data, Machine Learning, and Clinical Medicine.

Authors:  Ziad Obermeyer; Ezekiel J Emanuel
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2016-09-29       Impact factor: 91.245

6.  MySurgeryRisk: Development and Validation of a Machine-learning Risk Algorithm for Major Complications and Death After Surgery.

Authors:  Azra Bihorac; Tezcan Ozrazgat-Baslanti; Ashkan Ebadi; Amir Motaei; Mohcine Madkour; Panagote M Pardalos; Gloria Lipori; William R Hogan; Philip A Efron; Frederick Moore; Lyle L Moldawer; Daisy Zhe Wang; Charles E Hobson; Parisa Rashidi; Xiaolin Li; Petar Momcilovic
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2019-04       Impact factor: 12.969

7.  A Machine Learning Approach Using Survival Statistics to Predict Graft Survival in Kidney Transplant Recipients: A Multicenter Cohort Study.

Authors:  Kyung Don Yoo; Junhyug Noh; Hajeong Lee; Dong Ki Kim; Chun Soo Lim; Young Hoon Kim; Jung Pyo Lee; Gunhee Kim; Yon Su Kim
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-08-21       Impact factor: 4.379

  7 in total
  1 in total

1.  The impact of deceased donor maintenance on delayed kidney allograft function: A machine learning analysis.

Authors:  Silvana Daher Costa; Luis Gustavo Modelli de Andrade; Francisco Victor Carvalho Barroso; Cláudia Maria Costa de Oliveira; Elizabeth De Francesco Daher; Paula Frassinetti Castelo Branco Camurça Fernandes; Ronaldo de Matos Esmeraldo; Tainá Veras de Sandes-Freitas
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-02-06       Impact factor: 3.240

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.