Literature DB >> 30353882

The Importance of Imaging in Radiation Oncology for National Clinical Trials Network Protocols.

Thomas J FitzGerald1, Maryann Bishop-Jodoin2, Fran Laurie2, Elizabeth O'Meara3, Christine Davis3, Jeffrey Bogart4, John Kalapurakal5, Marilyn J Siegel5, Bapsi Chakravarthy6, Paul Okunieff7, Bruce Haffty8, Jeff Michalski9, Kenneth Ulin2, David S Followill10, Stephen Kry10, Michael Knopp11, Jun Zhang11, Don Rosen3, Mark Rosen3, Ying Xiao3, Lawrence Schwartz12, Janaki Moni2, Maria Giulia Cicchetti2.   

Abstract

Imaging is essential in successfully executing radiation therapy (RT) in oncology clinical trials. As technically sophisticated diagnostic imaging and RT were incorporated into trials, quality assurance in the National Clinical Trials Network groups entered a new era promoting image acquisition and review. Most trials involving RT require pre- and post-therapy imaging for target validation and outcome assessment. The increasing real-time (before and during therapy) imaging and RT object reviews are to ensure compliance with trial objectives. Objects easily transmit digitally for review from anywhere in the world. Physician interpretation of imaging and image application to RT treatment plans is essential for optimal trial execution. Imaging and RT data sets are used to credential RT sites to confirm investigator and institutional ability to meet trial target volume delineation and delivery requirements. Real-time imaging and RT object reviews can be performed multiple times during a trial to assess response to therapy and application of RT objects. This process has matured into an effective data management mechanism. When necessary, site and study investigators review objects together through web media technologies to ensure the patient is enrolled on the appropriate trial and the intended RT is planned and executed in a trial-compliant manner. Real-time imaging review makes sure: (1) the patient is entered and eligible for the trial, (2) the patient meets trial-specific adaptive therapy requirements, if applicable, and (3) the intended RT is according to trial guidelines. This review ensures the study population is uniform and the results are believable and can be applied to clinical practice.
Copyright © 2018. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30353882      PMCID: PMC6510266          DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2018.08.039

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys        ISSN: 0360-3016            Impact factor:   7.038


  11 in total

1.  Randomized study of intensive MOPP-ABVD with or without low-dose total-nodal radiation therapy in the treatment of stages IIB, IIIA2, IIIB, and IV Hodgkin's disease in pediatric patients: a Pediatric Oncology Group study.

Authors:  M A Weiner; B Leventhal; M L Brecher; R B Marcus; A Cantor; P W Gieser; J L Ternberg; F G Behm; M D Wharam; A R Chauvenet
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1997-08       Impact factor: 44.544

2.  Phase III study of craniospinal radiation therapy followed by adjuvant chemotherapy for newly diagnosed average-risk medulloblastoma.

Authors:  Roger J Packer; Amar Gajjar; Gilbert Vezina; Lucy Rorke-Adams; Peter C Burger; Patricia L Robertson; Lisa Bayer; Deborah LaFond; Bernadine R Donahue; MaryAnne H Marymont; Karin Muraszko; James Langston; Richard Sposto
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2006-09-01       Impact factor: 44.544

3.  Critical impact of radiotherapy protocol compliance and quality in the treatment of advanced head and neck cancer: results from TROG 02.02.

Authors:  Lester J Peters; Brian O'Sullivan; Jordi Giralt; Thomas J Fitzgerald; Andy Trotti; Jacques Bernier; Jean Bourhis; Kally Yuen; Richard Fisher; Danny Rischin
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2010-05-17       Impact factor: 44.544

4.  Examining credentialing criteria and poor performance indicators for IROC Houston's anthropomorphic head and neck phantom.

Authors:  Mallory E Carson; Andrea Molineu; Paige A Taylor; David S Followill; Francesco C Stingo; Stephen F Kry
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2016-12       Impact factor: 4.071

5.  Approaches to reducing photon dose calculation errors near metal implants.

Authors:  Jessie Y Huang; David S Followill; Rebecca M Howell; Xinming Liu; Dragan Mirkovic; Francesco C Stingo; Stephen F Kry
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 4.071

6.  Modification and validation of an analytical source model for external beam radiotherapy Monte Carlo dose calculations.

Authors:  Scott E Davidson; Jing Cui; Stephen Kry; Joseph O Deasy; Geoffrey S Ibbott; Milos Vicic; R Allen White; David S Followill
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2016-08       Impact factor: 4.071

7.  Results From the Imaging and Radiation Oncology Core Houston's Anthropomorphic Phantoms Used for Proton Therapy Clinical Trial Credentialing.

Authors:  Paige A Taylor; Stephen F Kry; Paola Alvarez; Tyler Keith; Carrie Lujano; Nadia Hernandez; David S Followill
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2016-02-10       Impact factor: 7.038

Review 8.  Does quality of radiation therapy predict outcomes of multicenter cooperative group trials? A literature review.

Authors:  Alysa Fairchild; William Straube; Fran Laurie; David Followill
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2013-05-15       Impact factor: 7.038

9.  Future vision for the quality assurance of oncology clinical trials.

Authors:  Thomas J Fitzgerald; Maryann Bishop-Jodoin; Walter R Bosch; Walter J Curran; David S Followill; James M Galvin; Richard Hanusik; Steven R King; Michael V Knopp; Fran Laurie; Elizabeth O'Meara; Jeff M Michalski; Joel H Saltz; Mitchell D Schnall; Lawrence Schwartz; Kenneth Ulin; Ying Xiao; Marcia Urie
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2013-03-15       Impact factor: 6.244

10.  Significance of pleural effusion at diagnosis in pediatric Hodgkin lymphoma: a report from Children's Oncology Group protocol AHOD0031.

Authors:  Kathleen M McCarten; Monika L Metzger; Richard A Drachtman; Qinglin Pei; Debra L Friedman; Cindy L Schwartz; Kara M Kelly
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2018-07-16
View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  Radiation Oncology: Future Vision for Quality Assurance and Data Management in Clinical Trials and Translational Science.

Authors:  Linda Ding; Carla Bradford; I-Lin Kuo; Yankhua Fan; Kenneth Ulin; Abdulnasser Khalifeh; Suhong Yu; Fenghong Liu; Jonathan Saleeby; Harry Bushe; Koren Smith; Camelia Bianciu; Salvatore LaRosa; Fred Prior; Joel Saltz; Ashish Sharma; Mark Smyczynski; Maryann Bishop-Jodoin; Fran Laurie; Matthew Iandoli; Janaki Moni; M Giulia Cicchetti; Thomas J FitzGerald
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-08-10       Impact factor: 5.738

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.