Literature DB >> 30353474

Prostate-Specimen Antigen (PSA) Screening and Shared Decision Making Among Deaf and Hearing Male Patients.

Poorna Kushalnagar1,2, Colin Hill3, Shane Carrizales4, Georgia R Sadler5.   

Abstract

Some deaf men who use American Sign Language (ASL) experience barriers in patient-physician communication which may leave them at disparity for shared decision making compared to hearing men. Transparent communication accessibility is needed between deaf male ASL users and their physicians to maximize the benefit to risk ratio of using the prostate-specific antigen (PSA) as a screening tool for early detection. The objective is to compare shared decision-making outcomes between deaf and hearing males who are (1) age-eligible for PSA screening and (2) younger than 45 years old with a family history of cancer. An accessible health survey including questions about PSA test, PCC, modes of communication, and cancer history was administered in ASL to a nationwide sample of deaf adults from February 2017 to April 2018. Two subsamples were created: (1) 45- to 69-year-old men who were age-eligible for PSA testing and (2) 18- to 44-year-old men with a family history of cancer. Age-eligible and younger deaf men with a family history of cancer are at disparity for shared decision making compared to their hearing peers. Regardless of age and PSA testing status, deaf men felt significantly less engaged in shared decision making with their health care providers compared to hearing men. Participation in shared decision making requires not only accessible communication but also cultural competency in working with deaf patients. This is critical in the shared decision-making era in maximizing the benefit of prostate cancer screening in deaf male patient population.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Deaf; Men; PSA; Prostate; Shared Decision Making; Sign Language

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 30353474      PMCID: PMC6478572          DOI: 10.1007/s13187-018-1436-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cancer Educ        ISSN: 0885-8195            Impact factor:   2.037


  6 in total

Review 1.  Can Cancer Education Programs Improve Health Literacy Among Deaf and Hard of Hearing Patients: a Systematic Review.

Authors:  Jan Münstermann; Jutta Hübner; Jens Büntzel
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2022-09-19       Impact factor: 1.771

Review 2.  Video Relay Interpretation and Overcoming Barriers in Health Care for Deaf Users: Scoping Review.

Authors:  Minerva Rivas Velarde; Caroline Jagoe; Jessica Cuculick
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2022-06-09       Impact factor: 7.076

Review 3.  Assessing and Providing Culturally Competent Care in Radiation Oncology for Deaf Cancer Patients.

Authors:  Colin Hill; Curtiland Deville; Sara Alcorn; Ana Kiess; Akila Viswanathan; Brandi Page
Journal:  Adv Radiat Oncol       Date:  2020-04-13

4.  Delivery of Online Adaptive MRI-Guided Radiation Therapy for a Deaf Patient.

Authors:  Lauren C Linkowski; Austin J Sim; Gage Redler; Andrew S Brohl; Stephen A Rosenberg; Evan J Wuthrick
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2022-08-01

5.  Community-Engaged Needs Assessment of Deaf American Sign Language Users in Florida, 2018.

Authors:  Tyler G James; Michael M McKee; Meagan K Sullivan; Glenna Ashton; Stephen J Hardy; Yary Santiago; David G Phillips; JeeWon Cheong
Journal:  Public Health Rep       Date:  2021-06-23       Impact factor: 3.117

Review 6.  Conceptual Model of Emergency Department Utilization among Deaf and Hard-of-Hearing Patients: A Critical Review.

Authors:  Tyler G James; Julia R Varnes; Meagan K Sullivan; JeeWon Cheong; Thomas A Pearson; Ali M Yurasek; M David Miller; Michael M McKee
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-12-07       Impact factor: 3.390

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.