Literature DB >> 30352515

Functional assessment of coronary stenosis: an overview of available techniques. Is quantitative flow ratio a step to the future?

Arturo Cesaro1,2, Felice Gragnano1,2, Domenico Di Girolamo1, Elisabetta Moscarella1,2, Vincenzo Diana1,2, Ivana Pariggiano1,2, Alfonso Alfieri1, Rocco Perrotta1, Pasquale Golino1, Francesco Cesaro1, Giuseppe Mercone1, Gianluca Campo3,4, Paolo Calabrò1,2.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: The assessment of coronary lesions severity has always been a relevant topic in the management of the patient undergoing coronary angiography. Fractional flow reserve (FFR) has been introduced as an objective index to determine the significance of a coronary stenosis with a positive impact on clinical outcomes has been demonstrated for FFR-guided coronary interventions. However, several technical drawbacks have been pointed out in clinical practice limiting the diffusion of FFR worldwide. To exceed these limits, other indices and the quantitative flow ratio (QFR) have been recently developed and tested in clinical studies. Areas covered: This review aims to provide a brief overview of functional assessment of coronary stenosis and a particular attention to the QFR, to its validation and application studies for its potential applicability in clinical practice. QFR through a computational fluid dynamic analysis, proved to be useful in discriminating functionally significant stenosis, with an excellent correlation with FFR values, and considerable advantages in terms of acquisition time and costs. Expert opinion/commentary: QFR is an innovative angiographic-based technique that uses modern software for three-dimensional vessel reconstruction, and flow models calculation. The significant technical benefits reported in the management of patients with intermediate coronary stenosis, make it a modern, effective and usable tool.

Entities:  

Keywords:  3D-angiography; Myocardial ischemia; coronary angiography; coronary artery disease; coronary physiology; fractional flow ratio; percutaneous coronary intervention; quantitative flow ratio

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30352515     DOI: 10.1080/14779072.2018.1540303

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Expert Rev Cardiovasc Ther        ISSN: 1477-9072


  4 in total

Review 1.  Physiologic Assessment of Coronary Stenosis: Current Status and Future Directions.

Authors:  Sercan Okutucu; Mehmet Cilingiroglu; Marc D Feldman
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2021-06-03       Impact factor: 2.931

2.  Impact of diabetes on coronary physiology evaluated by quantitative flow ratio in patients who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention.

Authors:  Zhen Ye; Qin Chen; Jiaxin Zhong; Long Chen; Lihua Chen; Mingfang Ye; Yuanming Yan; Lianglong Chen; Yukun Luo
Journal:  J Diabetes Investig       Date:  2022-03-29       Impact factor: 3.681

Review 3.  Physiologic Lesion Assessment to Optimize Multivessel Disease.

Authors:  Murtaza Bharmal; Morton J Kern; Gautam Kumar; Arnold H Seto
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2022-03-02       Impact factor: 3.955

Review 4.  Coronary Revascularization and Long-Term Survivorship in Chronic Coronary Syndrome.

Authors:  Ana Gabaldon-Perez; Victor Marcos-Garces; Jose Gavara; Cesar Rios-Navarro; Gema Miñana; Antoni Bayes-Genis; Oliver Husser; Juan Sanchis; Julio Nunez; Francisco Javier Chorro; Vicente Bodi
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2021-02-05       Impact factor: 4.241

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.