Literature DB >> 30352422

Association between PCOS and autoimmune thyroid disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Mirian Romitti1, Vitor C Fabris2, Patricia K Ziegelmann3, Ana Luiza Maia4, Poli Mara Spritzer5.   

Abstract

Polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) is the most prevalent endocrine disorder affecting women of reproductive age. PCOS has been associated with distinct metabolic and cardiovascular diseases and with autoimmune conditions, predominantly autoimmune thyroid disease (AITD). AITD has been reported in 18-40% of PCOS women, depending on PCOS diagnostic criteria and ethnicity. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to summarize the available evidence regarding the likelihood of women with PCOS also having AITD in comparison to a reference group of non-PCOS women. We systematically searched EMBASE and MEDLINE for non-interventional case control, cross-sectional, or cohort studies published until August 2017. The Ottawa-Newcastle Scale was used to assess the methodological quality of studies. Statistical meta-analysis was performed with R. Thirteen studies were selected for the present analysis, including 1,210 women diagnosed with PCOS and 987 healthy controls. AITD was observed in 26.03% and 9.72% of PCOS and control groups respectively. A significant association was detected between PCOS and chance of AITD (OR= 3.27, 95%CI 2.32-4.63). Notably, after geographical stratification, the higher risk of AITD in PCOS women persisted for Asians (OR= 4.56, 95%CI 2.47-8.43), Europeans (OR= 3.27, 95%CI 2.07-5.15), and South Americans (OR= 1.86, 95 %CI 1.05-3.29). AIDT is a frequent condition in PCOS patients, and might affect thyroid function. Thus, screening for thyroid function and thyroid-specific autoantibodies should be considered in patients with PCOS even in the absence of overt symptoms. This systematic review and meta-analysis is registered in PROSPERO under number CRD42017079676.

Entities:  

Year:  2018        PMID: 30352422      PMCID: PMC6215798          DOI: 10.1530/EC-18-0309

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Endocr Connect        ISSN: 2049-3614            Impact factor:   3.335


Introduction

Polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) is an endocrine disorder affecting women of reproductive age. The worldwide prevalence of PCOS ranges from 9 to 19.9%, depending on population characteristics and diagnostic criteria (1, 2, 3, 4, 5). Diagnosis of this complex multifactorial disease is based on the presence of two out of three of the following: clinical and/or biochemical androgen excess, anovulation and polycystic ovaries on pelvic ultrasound. The mechanisms underlying individual susceptibility to PCOS include hyperinsulinemia, disruption of the hypothalamic–pituitary–gonadal axis, dysregulation of ovarian steroidogenesis, low-grade chronic inflammation (6) and genetic and environmental factors (7, 8, 9). PCOS has also been associated with type 2 diabetes, insulin resistance, obesity, dyslipidemia, hypertension and metabolic syndrome, suggesting a contribution of the syndrome to cardiovascular risk (10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15). The association between inflammation and autoimmunity in women with PCOS has been extensively discussed in recent years (16). Chronic low-grade inflammation might be a relevant connecting link between obesity and metabolic manifestations in PCOS (6, 17). After detecting antiovarian autoantibodies localized to the granulosa cells in women with PCOS, Van Gelderen et al. suggested a role of stimulating ovarian antibodies in PCOS pathophysiology (18). However, the concept of an autoimmune etiology is not supported by other studies describing similar prevalence of antiovarian autoantibodies in women with PCOS and controls (19), leading to the proposal of systemic immune activation by nonorgan-specific autoantibodies in PCOS (20). This could explain the recurrent association between PCOS and autoimmune diseases (21, 22) and especially autoimmune thyroid diseases (AITD), the most common form of autoimmune disorder, with an estimated prevalence of 5% (23, 24, 25). AITD results from a dysregulation of the immune system that produces an immune attack with consequent chronic inflammation of the thyroid gland. It is classified as a T cell-mediated organ-specific autoimmune disorder (26). Affected individuals are usually positive for thyroid peroxidase (TPOAbs) and/or thyroglobulin (TgAbs) antibodies, with a typical hypoechogenic pattern at ultrasonography (27, 28). AITD is regarded as the most frequent cause of hypothyroidism in young women. Nevertheless, detectable antibodies may be observed for years without overt thyroid dysfunction. Hence, AITD often goes unnoticed until the onset of hypothyroidism later in life (29). Furthermore, a recent meta-analysis has demonstrated that the presence of subclinical hypothyroidism in PCOS women produces mild metabolic abnormalities, affecting the levels of high-density lipoprotein (HDL), triglyceride and homeostatic model assessment for insulin resistance (HOMA-IR) (30). To date, several studies evaluating the association between AITD and PCOS have been published without reaching a clear conclusion. A previous meta-analysis assessed the relationship between PCOS and some of its features and thyroiditis. That article included six studies, three of which were meta-analyzed to assess the prevalence of thyroiditis among women with PCOS. The results suggested a higher incidence of thyroiditis in PCOS than those in controls (31). Therefore, the aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to summarize and update the available evidence regarding the likelihood of women with PCOS also having AITD in comparison to a reference group of women without PCOS.

Methods

Search strategy and study selection

EMBASE and MEDLINE databases were searched for studies published until August 2017. No other limits except for the end date were established for the search. The protocol for this systematic review and meta-analysis is registered in PROSPERO (http://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/) under number CRD42017079676. Medical subject headings (MeSH) used in the search are presented as supplementary data (see section on supplementary data given at the end of this article). The research question was developed using the PICOS strategy: the population (P) was defined as women in menacme; the intervention (I) was defined as diagnosis of PCOS; the comparison group (C) corresponded to women without PCOS; the outcome (O) was defined as autoimmune thyroid disease (AITD) and the study design (S) was defined to include non-interventional case control, cross-sectional or cohort studies. This review had no year or language restrictions. In case multiple reports of the same study were identified, the most complete report was chosen. If the abstracts did not provide enough information about inclusion and exclusion criteria, the full text was retrieved for evaluation.

Data extraction and quality control

Two investigators (M R and V C F) independently reviewed the titles and abstracts of all articles identified in the initial search to assess eligibility of the studies for inclusion in this systematic review and meta-analysis. The selected articles were read in full for confirmation of eligibility and data extraction. In case of disagreement, a third reviewer (P M S) was consulted. The following information was extracted from each study: name of first author, publication year, country, number of subjects in case and control groups, age, BMI and number of patients with AITD (according to the diagnostic criteria for AITD described in the study) and serum levels of thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH). The Newcastle–Ottawa Scale (NOS) (Retrieved August, 2017, from: www.ohri.ca/programs/clinical_epidemiology/oxford.asp) was used to assess the quality of the studies included in the meta-analysis. The NOS uses a ‘star system’ to judge the included studies in three broad perspectives: selection of the study groups, comparability of those groups and ascertainment of outcome of interest.

Statistical analysis

Odds ratios (ORs) were used to measure the association between diagnostic status (PCOS or healthy) and AITD. ORs were pooled by the Mantel and Haenszel method using a random effects model with Der Simonian and Laird's estimator. The Mantel–Haenszel method is more appropriate when using OR because it provides interval estimates with greater precision than those produced by the conventional inverse variance method. I 2 statistics and the Cochran Q test were used to assess heterogeneity among studies. Subgroup meta-analysis (considering region of the study) and meta-regression (considering year of publication and total sample size) were also performed to investigate the heterogeneity among studies. All statistical tests were two-tailed. Significance was defined as P < 0.05. Statistical analyses were performed with R version 3.2.1.

Results

Study selection

The primary literature search identified 811 articles. After title and abstract screening, 20 studies were retrieved for full-text review. Of these, three were excluded because the full-text version could not be retrieved. A fourth study was excluded for not having a full text version (only a conference abstract had been published). Finally, three additional studies were excluded because data regarding the number or percentage of AITD individuals in each study group (PCOS and controls) was not provided. Therefore, 13 studies were included in the systematic review and meta-analysis (Fig. 1).
Figure 1

PRISMA flow diagram of the study selection process.

PRISMA flow diagram of the study selection process.

Characteristics of the included studies

A summary of the main characteristics of the 13 studies included in the systematic review and meta-analysis is described in Table 1. Seven studies focused on Asian populations: three were performed with Turkish women (32, 33, 34), three with women from India (35, 36, 37) and one with Chinese women (38). Four studies in Europe evaluated German (39), Italian (40), Bulgarian (41) and Slovakian (42) women. Another two studies were performed in Brazilian (43) and Argentinian (44) populations. All studies employed the 2003 Rotterdam criteria for diagnosis of PCOS. AITD diagnosis was based on the criteria defined in each study. Regarding design, there were nine cross-sectional studies (32, 33, 34, 37, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43) and four case–control studies (35, 36, 38, 44)). Population size ranged from 22 to 175 patients, totaling 1210 women with PCOS and 987 healthy controls. In nine studies, age-matched women were selected for inclusion in the comparison group (32, 34, 37, 39, 40, 42, 44), whereas three studies included healthy age-matched and BMI-matched controls (33, 38, 41). In one study, controls were described only as healthy women, without further specification (43). The mean age of PCOS participants ranged from 22 to 30.23 years, vs 20.5 to 33.5 years in comparison groups. Mean BMI ranged from 24.6 to 34.8 kg/m2 in PCOS and 21.3 to 29.2 kg/m2 in comparison groups (Table 1). NOS score was 9 in six studies (33, 37, 38, 40, 41, 44), 8 in six studies (32, 34, 35, 36, 39, 42) and 7 in one study (43) (Table 2).
Table 1

Characteristics of studies included in systematic review and meta-analysis investigating the association between polycystic ovary syndrome and autoimmune thyroid disease.

Author, yearCountryType of studyComparison groupPCOSComparison groupAITH criteriaMain results
nAge (mean ± s.d.)BMI (mean ± s.d.)AITHn/%nAge (mean ± s.d.)BMI (mean ± s.d.)AITHn/%
Asia
 Duran et al. 2014 (32)TurkeyCross-sectionalAge-matched women without PCOS7322 (18–37)a27.45 ± 5.7323/32.5%6020.50 (19–35)a22.55 ± 3.7814/23.3%Anti-TPO and/or Anti-Tg positivity and/or heterogeneous thyroidAITD prevalence was similar between the groups (P < 0.05)
 Arduc et al. 2015 (33)TurkeyCross-sectionalAge and BMI-matched healthy women8624.6 ± 6.324.9 ± 3.619/22.1%60 26.17 ± 5.023.4 ± 2.93/5%Anti-TPO and/or Anti-Tg positivity and hypoechoic thyroidHigher prevalence of AITD in PCOS group (P < 0.0004)
 Arora et al. 2015 (35)IndiaCase-controlAge-matched women without PCOS5523.27 ± 3.2NA21/37.72%51 22.80 ± 4.4NA8/15.6%Anti-TPO and/or Anti-Tg positivityHigher prevalence of AITD in PCOS group (P < 0.05)
 Menon et al. 2016 (36)IndiaCase-controlAge-matched women without PCOS9030.02 ± 8.5124.6 ± 4.023/25%9031.4 ± 8.621.3 ± 2.85/5.6%Anti-TPO positivityHigher prevalence of AITD in PCOS group (P < 0.05)
 Yu et al. 2016 (38)ChinaCase-controlAge and BMI-matched healthy women10027.4 ± 5.431.2 ± 8.325/25%100 23.3 ± 4.129.2 ± 5.12/2%Anti-TPO and hypoechoic thyroidHigher prevalence of AITD in PCOS group (P < 0.0001)
 Sinha et al. 2017 (37)IndiaCross-sectionalAge-matched women without PCOS8022.7 ± 5.3024.68 ± 3.0718/22.5%8024.3 ± 5.6923.55 ± 3.021/1.25%Anti-TPO positivityHigher prevalence of AITD in PCOS group (P < 0.05)
 Karakose et al. 2017 (34)TurkeyCross-sectionalAge-matched healthy women9724.1 ± 6.027.5 ± 6.039/40.2%7124.4 ± 4.523.4 ± 5.011/15.5%Two of three criteria: Anti-TPO and/or Anti-Tg positivity; hypoechoic thyroid; high levels of TSHHigher prevalence of AITD in PCOS group (P = 0.001)
Europe
 Janssen et al. 2004 (39)GermanyCross-sectionalAge-matched women without PCOS17528.4 ± 6.530.0 ± 7.936/20.6%165 29.8 ± 7.425.5 ± 7.111/6.5%Anti-TPO and/or Anti-Tg positivity and hypoechoic thyroidHigher prevalence of AITD in PCOS group (P = 0.001)
 Garelli et al. 2013 (40)ItalyCross-sectionalAge-matched healthy women11324 ± 6.3NA30/27%10027.1 ± 1.2NA8/8%Two of three criteria: Anti-TPO and/or Anti-Tg positivity; hypoechoic thyroid; high levels of TSHHigher prevalence of AITD in PCOS group (P < 0.0001)
 Mitkov et al. 2015 (41)BulgariaCross-sectionalAge and BMI-matched healthy women7025.06 ± 0.6926.50 ± 0.8314/20%2225.78 ± 1.723.36 ± 1.42/9.09%Anti-TPO and Anti-Tg positivityAITD prevalence was similar between the groups (P = 0.24)
 Petrikova et al. 2015 (42)SlovakiaCross-sectionalAge-matched healthy women6430.23 ± 6.728.08 ± 6.9112/18.75%6829 ± 421.31 ± 3.057/10.29%Anti-TPO and/or Anti-Tg positivity and hypoechoic thyroidHigher prevalence of AITD in PCOS group (P = 0.045)
South America
 Novais et al. 2014 (43)BrazilCross-sectionalWomen without PCOS6527.8 ± 6.934.8 ± 8.928/43.1%65 33.5 ± 5.728.4 ± 4.817/26.2%Anti-TPO and/or Anti-Tg positivityHigher prevalence of AITD in PCOS group (P = 0.04)
 Calvar et al. 2015 (44)ArgentinaCase-controlAge-matched healthy women14224.5 ± 6.729.1 ± 7.927/19%52 26.3 ± 7.424.3 ± 4.97/13.5%Anti-TPO positivityAITD prevalence was similar between the groups (P < 0.05)

aMedian (minimum and maximum).

AITD, autoimmune thyroid disease; NA, not available; PCOS, polycystic ovary syndrome; s.d., standard deviation; Tg, thyroglobulin; TPO, thyroid peroxidase; TSH, thyroid-stimulating hormone.

Table 2

Newcastle–Ottawa Scale for assessing the quality of nonrandomized studies.

Author, yearScore (Stars)Total score
SelectionComparabilityOutcome
Duran et al. 2014 (31)★★★★★★★8
Arduc et al. 2015 (32)★★★★★★★★★9
Arora et al. 2015 (34)★★★★★★★8
Menon et al. 2016 (35)★★★★★★★8
Yu et al. 2016 (37)★★★★★★★★★9
Sinha et al. 2017 (36)★★★★★★★★★9
Karakose et al. 2017 (33)★★★★★★★8
Janssen et al. 2004 (38)★★★★★★★8
Garelli et al. 2013 (39)★★★★★★★★★9
Mitkov et al. 2015 (40)★★★★★★★★★9
Petrikova et al. 2015 (41)★★★★★★★8
Novais et al. 2014 (42)★★★★★★★7
Calvar et al. 2015 (43)★★★★★★★★★9
Characteristics of studies included in systematic review and meta-analysis investigating the association between polycystic ovary syndrome and autoimmune thyroid disease. aMedian (minimum and maximum). AITD, autoimmune thyroid disease; NA, not available; PCOS, polycystic ovary syndrome; s.d., standard deviation; Tg, thyroglobulin; TPO, thyroid peroxidase; TSH, thyroid-stimulating hormone. Newcastle–Ottawa Scale for assessing the quality of nonrandomized studies.

Main results

AITD was detected in 315 (26.03%) out of 1210 PCOS women and in 96 (9.72%) out of 987 healthy controls. Geographical stratification revealed the presence of AITD in 28.91, 21.8 and 26.57% of PCOS patients and in 8.59, 7.82 and 20.51% of healthy women from Asia, Europe and South America respectively. Figure 2 shows the individual and pooled odds ratios (ORs) for associations between PCOS and risk of AITD. Overall, a significant association was observed between PCOS and the presence of AITD (OR = 3.27, 95% CI 2.32–4.63; P < 0.0001). After geographical stratification, the higher chance of AITD in PCOS persisted for Asians (OR = 4.56, 95% CI 2.47–8.43), Europeans (OR = 3.27, 95% CI 2.07–5.15) and South Americans (OR = 1.86, 95% CI 1.05–3.29); however, the difference between subgroups was not statistically significant (P = 0.0987).
Figure 2

Forest plot showing individual and pooled odds ratios for presence of AITD in women with PCOS in different populations.

Forest plot showing individual and pooled odds ratios for presence of AITD in women with PCOS in different populations. Between-study heterogeneity was I 2 = 39% (P = 0.07). Subgroup analysis by geographic region accounted for 10.81% of this heterogeneity, although statistical significance was not reached (P = 0.20). Meta-regression showed that neither year of publication nor total sample size contributed to the observed heterogeneity (<0.1%) (Supplementary Figure 1). Table 3 describes TSH levels in PCOS and comparison groups. Heterogeneous findings were obtained: six studies demonstrated higher TSH levels in PCOS women compared to the control group (P < 0.05) (33, 37, 38, 39, 43, 44). Conversely, five studies did not find a significant difference (P > 0.05) (32, 34, 35, 36, 41) between women with PCOS and controls, and one study did not provide TSH data (40). Further analyses were not performed because of the limited amount of data regarding clinical characteristics of PCOS patients with or without AITD in the studies that were selected for analysis.
Table 3

Studies comparing TSH levels in PCOS and control groups.

Author, yearTSH (mean ± s.d.)P value
PCOSComparison group
Duran et al. 2014 (32)2.09 (0.67–16.51)a1.96 (0.01–7.08)a0.397
Arduc et al. 2015 (33)2.9 (0.20–17.9)a1.8 (0.31–5.4)a0.037
Arora et al. 2015 (35)3.17 ± 2.742.98 ± 2.180.70
Menon et al. 2016 (36)5.99 ± 1.88.09 ± 2.40.50
Yu et al. 2016 (38)5.11 ± 22.72.9 ± 3.2<0.001
Sinha et al. 2017 (37)4.547 ± 2.662.67 ± 3.11<0.001
Karakose et al. 2017 (34)2.4 ± 1.22.0 ± 1.00.243
Janssen et al. 2004 (39)2.0 ± 1.0 1.4 ± 0.6 <0.001
Garelli et al. 2013 (40)NANANA
Mitkov et al. 2015 (41)2.46 ± 0.251.73 ± 0.11>0.05
Petrikova et al. 2015 (42)2.37 ± 1.462.37 ± 1.460.937
Novais et al. 2014 (43)2.9 ± 1.8 2.2 ± 1.20.013
Calvar et al. 2015 (44)3.4 ± 2.81.8 ± 0.9<0.001

aMedian (minimum and maximum).

NA, not available; PCOS, polycystic ovary syndrome; s.d., standard deviation; TSH, thyroid-stimulating hormone.

Studies comparing TSH levels in PCOS and control groups. aMedian (minimum and maximum). NA, not available; PCOS, polycystic ovary syndrome; s.d., standard deviation; TSH, thyroid-stimulating hormone.

Discussion

In the present systematic review and meta-analysis, PCOS patients from different populations presented higher likelihood of AIDT compared to controls (OR = 3.27, 95% CI 2.32–4.63). Of note, higher risk of AIDT was detected in Asian populations (OR = 4.56, 95% CI 2.47–8.43). However, such differences among the regions were not explained by specific risk factors. Also, there is evidence that thyroid autoimmunity occurs across the world without geographic differences (45). In this sense, the differences in AIDT frequency among the studies could be attributed to variations in AIDT diagnostic criteria and in the size of studied groups. While thyroid disorders and PCOS are among the most common endocrine conditions in the general population, the pathophysiological pathway connecting these two disorders has not been clearly established. The mechanism driving the autoimmune attack to the thyroid is complex and includes predominantly genetic, gender-associated and environmental factors such as iodine supply, drugs, infections and chemicals (26, 46). Likewise, the etiology of PCOS is suggested to involve genetic, ovarian-related and other hormonal and metabolic factors such as insulin resistance/compensatory hyperinsulinemia (47). However, a common genetic background has not yet been established. Abnormal interactions between thyrocytes, antigen-presenting cells and T cells, along with environmental and hormonal factors are found in thyroid disease, producing disturbances in the normal balance between type 1 helper (TH1) and type 2 helper (TH2) lymphocyte immune response. More specifically, TH1-mediated autoimmunity leads to the lysis of thyrocytes and autoimmune hypothyroidism (Hashimoto’s thyroiditis), whereas stimulatory TH2 responses against the TSH receptor lead to hyperthyroidism (Grave’s disease) (48). PCOS is characterized by androgen excess, which has been shown to be associated with reduction of most immune system elements, enhancement of T suppressor cell activity, promotion of TH1 response and activation of CD8C (49). In addition, progesterone levels may inhibit macrophage proliferation, IL6 synthesis and peripheral antibody production (50). Also, in vivo and in vitro data indicate that progesterone has some capacity to suppress CD4+T cell proliferation and TH1 response (51). Indeed, PCOS women often present anovulatory cycles with low luteal phase progesterone levels and higher estrogen-to-progesterone ratio, which may increase their susceptibility to autoimmune disorders. This increased susceptibility may be due, at least in part, to the stimulatory action of estrogens on the immune system (39, 50). In turn, while studies suggest that androgens could provide protection against autoimmune disease, androgen influence on the immune system at the levels observed in PCOS is probably insufficient to prevent autoimmunity (46). High levels of circulating IFN-γ-inducible protein 10 (IP-10/CXCL10) have been shown in patients with AITD, especially in association with a hypoechoic ultrasonographic pattern, which is a sign of a more severe lympho-monocytic infiltration and hypothyroidism (52). In fact, CXCL10 has been suggested as a marker of a stronger and more aggressive inflammatory response in the thyroid, subsequently leading to thyroid destruction and hypothyroidism (26). Interestingly, a recent study has shown that serum CXCL10 concentrations are increased in women with PCOS, which appears to be correlated with the inflammatory and insulin resistance status of PCOS (53). The most obvious connection between thyroid diseases and PCOS seems to be an increase in BMI and insulin resistance found in both conditions. Increased BMI is very prevalent in women with PCOS, observed in 54–68% of cases (54). Interestingly, although the pathophysiological mechanisms linking thyroid function and obesity have not been clearly established, evidence indicates that TSH is higher in people with high BMI (55, 56). In contrast, recent data have shown that thyroid autoimmunity was not associated with BMI, though a connection with leptin and obesity has been suggested (57, 58). In the present meta-analysis, only 3 out of 13 studies included a BMI-matched control group (33, 38, 41), and higher BMI was found in PCOS compared to controls in most of the studies (32, 34, 36, 39, 42, 43, 44). However, the three studies that stratified PCOS patients with and without AIDT did not observe significant differences in BMI, indicating a lack of association between BMI and AIDT in PCOS women (39, 40, 44). According to large epidemiological surveys, AIDT is the most frequent cause of hypothyroidism in the adult population (59, 60, 61, 62). Clinical disease involves a variety of manifestations ranging from simple presence of thyroid antibodies (Tabs) in euthyroid patients to severe thyroid dysfunction. Most often, a euthyroid phase is followed by subclinical hypothyroidism (SCH), which slowly progresses to overt hypothyroidism (24). Subclinical hypothyroidism is frequently observed among women with PCOS, with an estimated prevalence range of 10–25% (63). Regarding the impact of subclinical hypothyroidism on the clinical, hormonal or metabolic phenotype of women with PCOS, a recent meta-analysis has shown that the coexistence of SCH and PCOS leads to mild alterations in serum lipids and HOMA-IR, but not in hormone levels (SHBG, FSH, LH and their ratio). These mild changes are not clinically relevant in the short term. The long-term impact of these alterations regarding morbidity has not been established (30). In this sense, further studies searching for the prevalence of PCOS in women with autoimmune thyroid disease could add some additional information regarding the association between these two conditions. One strength of the present systematic review and meta-analysis is that all studies considered the Rotterdam criteria to diagnose PCOS, ensuring a homogeneous PCOS population. One limitation concerns the fact that AITD diagnosis was assessed according to the authors’ chosen criteria. Moreover, because the studies did not provide this information, we were unable to evaluate the differences in TSH levels between PCOS women with or without AIDT. The same was true for other clinical characteristics, which were not reported and therefore precluded further comparisons between the two groups. Another limitation is that, despite the absence of significant heterogeneity among studies from different geographical regions, there were limited data from Western European countries and the US. Due to these limitations, the present data should be interpreted with caution. In conclusion, the present systematic review and meta-analysis provides evidence of higher prevalence of AITD in patients with PCOS compared to healthy controls. Therefore, physicians should consider screening for thyroid function and thyroid-specific autoantibodies at PCOS diagnosis, even in the absence of symptoms related with thyroid dysfunction.

Declaration of interest

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest that could be perceived as prejudicing the impartiality of the research reported.

Funding

This work was supported by the Brazilian National Institute of Hormones and Women’s Health/Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq INCT 465482/2014-7) and Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Rio Grande do Sul (FAPERGS INCT 17/2551-0000519-8).
  63 in total

Review 1.  Chronic autoimmune thyroiditis.

Authors:  C M Dayan; G H Daniels
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1996-07-11       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 2.  Mediators of chronic inflammation in polycystic ovarian syndrome.

Authors:  E Deligeoroglou; N Vrachnis; N Athanasopoulos; Z Iliodromiti; S Sifakis; S Iliodromiti; C Siristatidis; G Creatsas
Journal:  Gynecol Endocrinol       Date:  2012-05-04       Impact factor: 2.260

Review 3.  Autoimmune thyroid disorders.

Authors:  Alessandro Antonelli; Silvia Martina Ferrari; Alda Corrado; Andrea Di Domenicantonio; Poupak Fallahi
Journal:  Autoimmun Rev       Date:  2014-10-25       Impact factor: 9.754

4.  Serologic markers of autoimmunity in women with polycystic ovary syndrome.

Authors:  Katrin Hefler-Frischmuth; Katharina Walch; Wolfgang Huebl; Konstantin Baumuehlner; Clemens Tempfer; Lukas Hefler
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2009-03-17       Impact factor: 7.329

5.  Association of serum TSH with high body mass differs between smokers and never-smokers.

Authors:  Bjørn Olav Asvold; Trine Bjøro; Lars J Vatten
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2009-10-21       Impact factor: 5.958

6.  Polycystic ovary syndrome and chronic autoimmune thyroiditis.

Authors:  Jussara de Souza Mayrink Novais; Cristina Laguna Benetti-Pinto; Heraldo Mendes Garmes; Rodrigo Menezes Jales; Cássia Raquel Teatin Juliato
Journal:  Gynecol Endocrinol       Date:  2014-09-11       Impact factor: 2.260

7.  Is polycystic ovary syndrome another risk factor for venous thromboembolism? United States, 2003-2008.

Authors:  Ekwutosi M Okoroh; W Craig Hooper; Hani K Atrash; Hussain R Yusuf; Sheree L Boulet
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2012-08-10       Impact factor: 8.661

Review 8.  Thyroid disorders and polycystic ovary syndrome: An emerging relationship.

Authors:  Rajiv Singla; Yashdeep Gupta; Manju Khemani; Sameer Aggarwal
Journal:  Indian J Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2015 Jan-Feb

9.  Subclinical Hypothyroidism in PCOS: Impact on Presentation, Insulin Resistance, and Cardiovascular Risk.

Authors:  Qun Yu; Jin-Bei Wang
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2016-07-12       Impact factor: 3.411

10.  Thyroid disorders in polycystic ovarian syndrome subjects: A tertiary hospital based cross-sectional study from Eastern India.

Authors:  Uma Sinha; Keshab Sinharay; Sudipta Saha; T Amenla Longkumer; Shuvra Neel Baul; Salil Kuamr Pal
Journal:  Indian J Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2013-03
View more
  13 in total

1.  2021 European Thyroid Association Guideline on Thyroid Disorders prior to and during Assisted Reproduction.

Authors:  Kris Poppe; Peter Bisschop; Laura Fugazzola; Gesthimani Minziori; David Unuane; Andrea Weghofer
Journal:  Eur Thyroid J       Date:  2021-01-21

2.  ANTI-THYROID ANTIBODIES AND THE GONADOTROPHINS PROFILE (LH/FSH) IN EUTHYROID POLYCYSTIC OVARIAN SYNDROME WOMEN.

Authors:  M Sharma; A Modi; M Goyal; P Sharma; P Purohit
Journal:  Acta Endocrinol (Buchar)       Date:  2022 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 1.104

Review 3.  Metabolic and Molecular Mechanisms of Diet and Physical Exercise in the Management of Polycystic Ovarian Syndrome.

Authors:  Giorgia Scarfò; Simona Daniele; Jonathan Fusi; Marco Gesi; Claudia Martini; Ferdinando Franzoni; Vito Cela; Paolo Giovanni Artini
Journal:  Biomedicines       Date:  2022-06-02

4.  Hashimoto's thyroiditis might increase polycystic ovary syndrome and associated comorbidities risks in Asia.

Authors:  Chun-Wei Ho; Hsin-Hung Chen; Ming-Chia Hsieh; Ching-Chu Chen; Sheng-Pang Hsu; Hei-Tung Yip; Chia-Hung Kao
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2020-06

5.  Increased Risk of Polycystic Ovary Syndrome and It's Comorbidities in Women with Autoimmune Thyroid Disease.

Authors:  Chun-Wei Ho; Hsin-Hung Chen; Ming-Chia Hsieh; Ching-Chu Chen; Sheng-Pang Hsu; Hei-Tung Yip; Chia-Hung Kao
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-04-02       Impact factor: 3.390

6.  Increased risk of thyroid disease in Danish women with polycystic ovary syndrome: a cohort study.

Authors:  Dorte Glintborg; Katrine Hass Rubin; Mads Nybo; Bo Abrahamsen; Marianne Andersen
Journal:  Endocr Connect       Date:  2019-10-01       Impact factor: 3.335

Review 7.  Genetic Susceptibility to Joint Occurrence of Polycystic Ovary Syndrome and Hashimoto's Thyroiditis: How Far Is Our Understanding?

Authors:  Natalia Zeber-Lubecka; Ewa E Hennig
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2021-02-26       Impact factor: 7.561

8.  A Comparative Study on Insulin Secretion, Insulin Resistance and Thyroid Function in Patients with Polycystic Ovary Syndrome with and without Hashimoto's Thyroiditis.

Authors:  Hongli Zhao; Ying Zhang; Jianhong Ye; Hongjiang Wei; Zhengping Huang; Xiaoyan Ning; Xiaoying Fu
Journal:  Diabetes Metab Syndr Obes       Date:  2021-04-28       Impact factor: 3.168

9.  Ovarian Reserve and Serum Concentration of Thyroid Peroxidase Antibodies in Euthyroid Women With Different Polycystic Ovary Syndrome Phenotypes.

Authors:  Agnieszka Adamska; Agnieszka Łebkowska; Anna Krentowska; Justyna Hryniewicka; Marcin Adamski; Monika Leśniewska; Aleksandra Maria Polak; Irina Kowalska
Journal:  Front Endocrinol (Lausanne)       Date:  2020-07-28       Impact factor: 5.555

10.  The Role of GnRH Receptor Autoantibodies in Polycystic Ovary Syndrome.

Authors:  David C Kem; Hongliang Li; Xichun Yu; Elizabeth Weedin; Anna C Reynolds; Elizabeth Forsythe; Marci Beel; Hayley Fischer; Brendon Hines; Yankai Guo; Jielin Deng; Jonathan T Liles; Zachary Nuss; Myriam Elkosseifi; Christopher E Aston; Heather R Burks; LaTasha B Craig
Journal:  J Endocr Soc       Date:  2020-06-18
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.