Literature DB >> 30351305

Spread of a model invasive alien species, the harlequin ladybird Harmonia axyridis in Britain and Ireland.

P M J Brown1, D B Roy2, C Harrower2, H J Dean2, S L Rorke2, H E Roy2.   

Abstract

Invasive alien species are widely recognized as one of the main threats to global biodiversity. Rapid flow of information on the occurrence of invasive alien species is critical to underpin effective action. Citizen science, i.e. the involvement of volunteers in science, provides an opportunity to improve the information available on invasive alien species. Here we describe the dataset created via a citizen science approach to track the spread of a well-studied invasive alien species, the harlequin ladybird Harmonia axyridis (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae) in Britain and Ireland. This dataset comprises 48 510 verified and validated spatio-temporal records of the occurrence of H. axyridis in Britain and Ireland, from first arrival in 2003, to the end of 2016. A clear and rapid spread of the species within Britain and Ireland is evident. A major reuse value of the dataset is in modelling the spread of an invasive species and applying this to other potential invasive alien species in order to predict and prevent their further spread.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30351305      PMCID: PMC6198752          DOI: 10.1038/sdata.2018.239

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Data        ISSN: 2052-4463            Impact factor:   6.444


Background & Summary

The invasion process for an alien species involves various stages, notably introduction, establishment, increase in abundance and geographic spread[1]. An alien species that spreads and has negative effects (which may be ecological, economic or social) is termed invasive[2,3]. Invasive alien species are widely recognized as one of the main threats to global biodiversity[4-6]. There are a number of international agreements which recognize the threat posed by invasive alien species, which are designated as a priority within the Convention on Biological Diversity Aichi biodiversity target 9 (https://www.cbd.int/sp/targets/rationale/target-9/) and are relevant to many of the Sustainable Development Goals (http://www.un.org/sustainabledevelopment/sustainable-development-goals/). An EU Regulation on invasive alien species came into force on 1 January 2015 (http://ec.europa.eu/environment/nature/invasivealien/index_en.htm) and subsequently a list of invasive alien species of EU concern was adopted for which member states are required to take action to eradicate, manage or prevent entry. Rapid flow of information on the occurrence of invasive alien species is critical to underpin effective action. There have been few attempts to monitor the spread of invasive alien species systematically from the onset of the invasion process. Citizen science, i.e. the involvement of volunteers in science, provides an opportunity to improve the information available on invasive alien species[7]. Here we describe the dataset created via a citizen science approach to track the spread of a well-studied invasive alien species, the harlequin ladybird Harmonia axyridis (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae) in Britain and Ireland. This species was detected very early in the invasion process and a citizen science project was initiated and widely promoted to maximize the opportunity to gather data from the public across Britain and Ireland. Harmonia axyridis was introduced between approximately 1982 and 2003 to at least 13 European countries[8] as a biological control agent. It was mainly introduced to control aphids that are pests to a range of field and glasshouse crops. From the early 2000s it subsequently spread to many other European countries, including Britain and Ireland. It is native to Asia (including China, Japan, Mongolia and Russia)[9] and was also introduced in North and South America and Africa[10]. Harmonia axyridis was introduced unintentionally to Britain from mainland Europe by a number of pathways: some were transported with produce such as cut flowers, fruit and vegetables; others arrived through natural dispersal (flight) from other invaded regions[11]. To a lesser extent H. axyridis also arrived from North America[12]. The major pathways of spread to Ireland were probably natural dispersal (from Britain) and arrival with produce. Harmonia axyridis is a eurytopic (generalist) species and may be found on deciduous or coniferous trees, arable and horticultural crops and herbaceous vegetation in a wide range of habitats. It is particularly prevalent in urban and suburban localities (e.g. parks, gardens, and in or on buildings)[13]. Citizen science approaches to collecting species data are becoming increasingly popular and respected[14]. Advances in communication and digital technologies (e.g. online recording via websites and smartphone applications; digital photography) have increasingly enabled scientists to collect and verify large datasets of species information[15]. For a few species groups, including ladybirds, verification to species is possible if a reasonably good photograph of the animal is available. In late 2004, shortly after the first H. axyridis ladybird record was reported, funding was acquired from Defra and the National Biodiversity Network (NBN) to set up and trial an online recording scheme for ladybirds, and H. axyridis in particular. Thus, the online Harlequin Ladybird Survey and UK Ladybird Survey were launched in March 2005. The surveys have been very successful in gaining records from the public since 2005. Innovations such as the launch of a free smartphone application (iRecord Ladybirds) in 2013 helped to maintain the supply of records. The dataset here comprises species records of H. axyridis in various life stages (larva, pupa or adult) from Britain and Ireland over the period 2003 to 2016. A major reuse value of the dataset is in modelling the spread of an invasive species and applying this to other potential invasive alien species in order to predict and prevent their further spread. The time period of the study captures the initial fast spread of H. axyridis (principally from 2004 to 2009) plus a further substantial period (2010 to 2016) in which the distribution of the species altered relatively little, despite many further records being received.

Methods

This dataset (Data Citation 1) comprises 48 510 spatio-temporal records of the occurrence of H. axyridis in Britain and Ireland, from first arrival in 2003, to the end of 2016. For its type it is thus an unusually substantial dataset. Whilst the records were collated and verified by the survey organizers, the records themselves were provided by members of the public in Britain and Ireland. Uptake to the Harlequin Ladybird Survey was undoubtedly assisted by the pre-existence of the Coccinellidae Recording Scheme (now the UK Ladybird Survey), supported by the Biological Records Centre (within NERC Centre for Ecology & Hydrology)[16]. Reflecting the general diversification of citizen science through innovative use of technology[17], high levels of public access to the internet and digital photography enabled an online survey form to be established for H. axyridis in Britain and Ireland. The Harlequin Ladybird Survey (www.harlequin-survey.org) was one of the first online wildlife surveys in Britain and Ireland. It was launched in March 2005 in response to the first report of H. axyridis in Britain, in September 2004[18]. The Harlequin Ladybird Survey benefited from high levels of media interest, and members of the public showed great willingness to look for H. axyridis, and to register their sightings with the survey[13]. There are only three records from 2003 and no earlier records have been received, supporting the case that the earliest records in the dataset represent the onset of the invasion process for this species. Indeed H. axyridis has a relatively high detectability (e.g.[19]) and rapid reproductive rate, so is unlikely to have arrived unnoticed. Each record represents a verified sighting of H. axyridis on a given date (or range of dates) and comprises one or more individual ladybirds observed from one or more life stages (larva, pupa, adult). Records are from Britain (England, Wales and Scotland, including offshore islands), Ireland (both Northern Ireland and the Republic of Ireland), the Isle of Man and the Channel Islands (primarily Guernsey and Jersey) and are mainly from the period 2004 to 2016. The earliest record of H. axyridis in Britain was initially thought to be from 3 July 2004, but three earlier records (from 2003) were received retrospectively. The data records represent species presence and there are no absence data available. The majority of the records were received from members of the public via online recording forms (at www.harlequin-survey.org or www.ladybird-survey.org) (Supplementary Figure 1) or via smartphone apps (iRecord Ladybirds or iRecord - www.brc.ac.uk/irecord) (Supplementary Figure 2), with some records (especially in earlier years) received by post. Other records, particularly from amateur expert[16] coleopterists and other naturalists, were received in spreadsheets. The spatial resolution of the records is variable. Many include an Ordinance Survey grid reference (converted to latitude and longitude), enabling resolution to 100 metres or less, but many others were derived at 1 km resolution from a UK postal code (UK Government Schemas and Standards, http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/20101126012154/http://www.cabinetoffice.gov.uk/govtalk/schemasstandards/e-gif/datastandards/address/postcode.aspx). The option on the online recording form to enter the location via a UK postal code was provided to make the entry of records easier for members of the public unfamiliar with grid referencing systems. Whilst the resolution is thus reduced for these records, the reduction in user error (e.g. the problem of grid reference eastings and northings being transposed) is an advantage[20]. The postal code method was applicable for sightings of H. axyridis made within 200 metres of a specified postal code, so could not be used for a minority of records where the ladybird was seen in a remote semi-natural habitat. The spatial resolution of the records tended to increase over time, as the number of records received via the smartphone apps increased, and these records generally have GPS-generated latitudes and longitudes.

Data Records

Repository

The dataset is freely available for download from the Environmental Information Data Centre (EIDC) catalogue (Data Citation 1). The dataset is provided as a single tab-delimited text file, with each line representing a single record.

Constituents of Species Records

Each species record includes 19 fields (Table 1).
Table 1

The fields contained in each Harmonia axyridis species record in the database, with a descriptor for each.

FieldDescriptor
STARTDATEStart data for the record (DD/MM/YYYY).
ENDDATEEnd date for the record (DD/MM/YYYY).
GRIDREFThe grid reference specifying the location of the observation at the fullest precision available. The grid reference is either Ordnance Survey British (OSGB), Ordnance Survey of Ireland (OSI), or a truncated version of the Military Grid Reference System (MGRS) depending on the location of the record. Records from Britain use OSGB, from Ireland use OSI, and from the Channel Islands use MGRS. OSI grid references are distinguished by having a single letter at the start (e.g. N48), while OSGB and truncated MGRS grid references both start with 2 letters (e.g. SP30), those that start WA or WV belonging to the truncated MGRS and the rest to OSGB. The truncated MGRS grid references used here for the Channel Islands simply omit the zone number and 100 km square code from the start of the grid references as all squares within the Channel Islands are within the same zone and 100 km square 30U (e.g. WV6548 in this dataset refers to MGRS 1 km grid reference 30UWV6548).
PRECISIONThe precision of the grid reference (in metres) given in GRIDREF field.
VCThe Watsonian vice county code (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vice-county). Codes 1 to 112 represent the vice counties of Britain, 113 represents the Channel Islands, and codes 201 to 240 represent Irish vice counties (where 201 = vice county H1, 202 = H2, etc).
LATITUDELatitude (WGS 84) for the centre of the grid reference supplied in the GRIDREF field.
LONGITUDELongitude (WGS 84) for the centre of the grid reference supplied in the GRIDREF field.
GR_1KMThe grid reference of the 1 km grid square in which the occurrence record lies (only populated if the original grid reference is at 1000 m precision or finer).
LATITUDE_1KMLatitude (WGS 84) for the centre of the 1 km grid square in which the record occurs.
LONGITUDE_1KMLongitude (WGS 84) for the centre of the 1 km grid square in which the record occurs.
GR_10KMThe grid reference of the 10 km grid square in which the occurrence record lies.
LATITUDE_10KMLatitude (WGS 84) for the centre of the 10 km grid square in which the record occurs.
LONGITUDE_10KMLongitude (WGS 84) for the centre of the 10 km grid square in which the record occurs.
ABUNDANCEA text field containing any abundance information that was supplied with the record.
FORM_ABUNDANCEAbundance information relating to color forms, if available
FORMColor form of the ladybird, if available: conspicua, spectabilis, succinea.
STAGE_ABUNDANCEAbundance information of different life stages, if available.
STAGELadybird life stage: larva, pupa, adult.
RECORDERID(s) for recorder name(s) that submitted the record. In the BRC database recorder information is standardized to Surname followed by initials (e.g. Smith, J.). For this reason, the recorder ID relates to a unique standardized name and not an individual. A single ID can refer to multiple individuals and a single individual can also be associated with multiple recorder IDs.

Figures and Tables

The figures and tables here show a summary of the dataset, notably the number of verified H. axyridis records received by year (Fig. 1), by month (Fig. 2), by vice county (Fig. 3 and Table 2 (available online only)) and the spread of H. axyridis in Britain, the Channel Islands and Ireland from 2003 to 2016 (Fig. 4).
Figure 1

The number of verified Harmonia axyridis records received for Britain, the Channel Islands and Ireland by year, from 2003 to 2016.

Figure 2

The number of verified Harmonia axyridis records received for Britain, the Channel Islands and Ireland by month, from 2003 to 2016.

Figure 3

The number of verified Harmonia axyridis records received for Britain, the Channel Islands and Ireland, split by Vice County, from 2003 to 2016.

Table 2

The number of Harmonia axyridis records in the dataset, listed by vice county and region (England, Wales, Isle of Man, Scotland, Channel Islands or Ireland).

Vice County NumberVice County NameRegionNumber of Records in Dataset
1West Cornwall with ScillyEngland45
2East CornwallEngland101
3South DevonEngland1015
4North DevonEngland76
5South SomersetEngland357
6North SomersetEngland786
7North WiltshireEngland334
8South WiltshireEngland409
9DorsetEngland638
10Isle of WightEngland212
11South HampshireEngland1242
12North HampshireEngland705
13West SussexEngland775
14East SussexEngland1227
15East KentEngland1294
16West KentEngland1383
17SurreyEngland3404
18South EssexEngland1089
19North EssexEngland1265
20HertfordshireEngland1344
21MiddlesexEngland3300
22BerkshireEngland1654
23OxfordshireEngland1360
24BuckinghamshireEngland983
25East SuffolkEngland966
26West SuffolkEngland584
27East NorfolkEngland986
28West NorfolkEngland358
29CambridgeshireEngland1388
30BedfordshireEngland549
31HuntingdonshireEngland564
32NorthamptonshireEngland550
33East GloucestershireEngland498
34West GloucestershireEngland834
35MonmouthshireWales212
36HerefordshireEngland123
37WorcestershireEngland930
38WarwickshireEngland976
39StaffordshireEngland627
40ShropshireEngland470
41GlamorganshireWales795
42BreconshireWales35
43RadnorshireWales17
44CarmarthenshireWales40
45PembrokeshireWales13
46CardiganshireWales34
47MontgomeryshireWales50
48MerionethshireWales4
49CaernarvonshireWales33
50DenbighshireWales118
51FlintshireWales73
52AngleseyWales4
53South LincolnshireEngland325
54North LincolnshireEngland477
55Leicestershire (with Rutland)England2163
56NottinghamshireEngland970
57DerbyshireEngland1048
58CheshireEngland1137
59South LancashireEngland1547
60West LancashireEngland289
61South-east YorkshireEngland663
62North-east YorkshireEngland330
63South-west YorkshireEngland1667
64Mid-west YorkshireEngland730
65North-west YorkshireEngland36
66County DurhamEngland87
67South NorthumberlandEngland19
68North NorthumberlandEngland5
69Westmorland (with Furness)England43
70CumberlandEngland8
71Isle of ManIsle of Man39
72DumfriesshireScotland0
73KirkcudbrightshireScotland3
74WigtownshireScotland0
75AyrshireScotland2
76RenfrewshireScotland1
77LanarkshireScotland4
78PeeblesshireScotland0
79SelkirkshireScotland0
80RoxburghshireScotland0
81BerwickshireScotland4
82East LothianScotland0
83MidlothianScotland4
84West LothianScotland0
85FifeshireScotland1
86StirlingshireScotland2
87West PerthshireScotland2
88Mid PerthshireScotland4
89East PerthshireScotland0
90AngusScotland0
91KincardineshireScotland3
92South AberdeenshireScotland0
93North AberdeenshireScotland3
94BanffshireScotland0
95MorayScotland0
96East Inverness-shireScotland3
97West Inverness-shireScotland0
98ArgyllshireScotland0
99DunbartonshireScotland0
100Clyde IslesScotland1
101KintyreScotland0
102South EbudesScotland1
103Mid EbudesScotland0
104North EbudesScotland0
105West Ross & CromartyScotland0
106East Ross & CromartyScotland0
107East SutherlandScotland0
108West SutherlandScotland0
109CaithnessScotland2
110Outer HebridesScotland0
111OrkneyScotland9
112ShetlandScotland3
113Channel IslandsChannel Islands20
201South KerryIreland0
202North KerryIreland0
203West CorkIreland0
204Mid-CorkIreland4
205East CorkIreland1
206WaterfordIreland0
207South TipperaryIreland0
208LimerickIreland0
209ClareIreland0
210North TipperaryIreland0
211KilkennyIreland1
212WexfordIreland0
213CarlowIreland0
214LaoisIreland0
215South-east GalwayIreland0
216West GalwayIreland0
217North-east GalwayIreland0
218OffalyIreland0
219KildareIreland0
220WicklowIreland1
221DublinIreland0
222MeathIreland0
223WestmeathIreland0
224LongfordIreland0
225RoscommonIreland0
226East MayoIreland0
227West MayoIreland0
228SligoIreland0
229LeitrimIreland0
230CavanIreland0
231LouthIreland1
232MonaghanIreland0
233FermanaghIreland0
234East DonegalIreland0
235West DonegalIreland0
236TyroneIreland1
237ArmaghIreland0
238DownIreland11
239AntrimIreland3
240LondonderryIreland0
Figure 4

The spread and distribution in 10 km squares in Britain, the Channel Islands and Ireland of Harmonia axyridis from 2003 to 2016.

NB where H. axyridis was recorded in a square in multiple time periods, the older time period overlays the newer one(s).

Technical Validation

Record Verification

Verification of the records was made by the survey organizers (led by HER and PMJB but also including others) on receipt of either a photograph or ladybird specimen. The records received from amateur expert coleopterists and other naturalists are regarded as accurate (i.e. without the survey organizers seeing a photograph or specimen) and have been included in the dataset. Many further online records were received that remain unverified (i.e. no photograph or specimen was sent, or the photograph was of insufficient quality to enable identification) or were verified as another species. All such unverified or inaccurate records are excluded from this dataset. For discussion of these issues (partly relating to our dataset) see[21]. Verified records were regularly uploaded to the NBN Gateway (now the NBN Atlas - https://nbnatlas.org/). There the records could be viewed via online maps, which helped to encourage further recording.

Recording Intensity

Recording intensity by the public was not consistent over time and was influenced by media coverage, publicity events by the survey organizers, and other factors. The number of records in a period is also influenced by weather conditions and seasonality: the main peak in record numbers each year tended to be from late October to early November, the period in which H. axyridis generally moves to indoor overwintering sites (hence this is when many people first notice the species in their homes). There is also spatial variability in recording intensity: more records come from areas with high densities of people (Fig. 3). Across Britain and Ireland there were a number of particularly active local groups or individuals which contributed hotspots of recorder activity, e.g. London. To many recorders, juvenile stages (especially pupae and early instar larvae) were less noticeable and more difficult to identify than the adult stage, thus limiting their recording. The possibility of a reporting bias towards sightings early in the season also exists (i.e. some recorders may have reported their first sighting of H. axyridis, but not subsequent sightings). In order to minimize this effect, the importance of recording multiple sightings was stressed to recorders. The peaks in record numbers observed late in each year also suggest that any effect of this potential bias was minor. There is probably a further minor temporal bias towards recording on some days of the week (e.g. weekend days) more than others.

Technical Validation

In addition to the expert verification detailed above, each record has also undergone a series of validation checks that are designed to highlight other potential issues with the data. Checks were performed on the date information supplied with the record to ensure that both the start and/or end dates supplied are in recognized formats, are valid dates, are in the past or present (e.g. no future dates), and where both supplied that the start date is prior or equal to the end date. The location information is also checked to ensure that the supplied grid reference is in a recognized format and is a valid grid reference and that the supplied grid reference is from a 10 km and/or 1 km square that contains land. If other location fields were supplied with the grid reference (such as 10 km grid reference, vice county, tetrad or quadrant codes, etc) they were cross-checked to ensure consistency.

Additional information

How to cite this article: Brown, P. M. J. et al. Spread of a model invasive alien species, the harlequin ladybird Harmonia axyridis in Britain and Ireland. Sci. Data. 5:180239 doi: 10.1038/sdata.2018.239 (2018). Publisher’s note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
  7 in total

1.  Global biodiversity: indicators of recent declines.

Authors:  Stuart H M Butchart; Matt Walpole; Ben Collen; Arco van Strien; Jörn P W Scharlemann; Rosamunde E A Almond; Jonathan E M Baillie; Bastian Bomhard; Claire Brown; John Bruno; Kent E Carpenter; Geneviève M Carr; Janice Chanson; Anna M Chenery; Jorge Csirke; Nick C Davidson; Frank Dentener; Matt Foster; Alessandro Galli; James N Galloway; Piero Genovesi; Richard D Gregory; Marc Hockings; Valerie Kapos; Jean-Francois Lamarque; Fiona Leverington; Jonathan Loh; Melodie A McGeoch; Louise McRae; Anahit Minasyan; Monica Hernández Morcillo; Thomasina E E Oldfield; Daniel Pauly; Suhel Quader; Carmen Revenga; John R Sauer; Benjamin Skolnik; Dian Spear; Damon Stanwell-Smith; Simon N Stuart; Andy Symes; Megan Tierney; Tristan D Tyrrell; Jean-Christophe Vié; Reg Watson
Journal:  Science       Date:  2010-04-29       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  A new dawn for citizen science.

Authors:  Jonathan Silvertown
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  2009-07-06       Impact factor: 17.712

3.  A proposed unified framework for biological invasions.

Authors:  Tim M Blackburn; Petr Pyšek; Sven Bacher; James T Carlton; Richard P Duncan; Vojtěch Jarošík; John R U Wilson; David M Richardson
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  2011-05-19       Impact factor: 17.712

4.  Invasive Alien Species: Denialism, Disagreement, Definitions, and Dialogue.

Authors:  James C Russell; Tim M Blackburn
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  2017-02-24       Impact factor: 17.712

5.  No saturation in the accumulation of alien species worldwide.

Authors:  Hanno Seebens; Tim M Blackburn; Ellie E Dyer; Piero Genovesi; Philip E Hulme; Jonathan M Jeschke; Shyama Pagad; Petr Pyšek; Marten Winter; Margarita Arianoutsou; Sven Bacher; Bernd Blasius; Giuseppe Brundu; César Capinha; Laura Celesti-Grapow; Wayne Dawson; Stefan Dullinger; Nicol Fuentes; Heinke Jäger; John Kartesz; Marc Kenis; Holger Kreft; Ingolf Kühn; Bernd Lenzner; Andrew Liebhold; Alexander Mosena; Dietmar Moser; Misako Nishino; David Pearman; Jan Pergl; Wolfgang Rabitsch; Julissa Rojas-Sandoval; Alain Roques; Stephanie Rorke; Silvia Rossinelli; Helen E Roy; Riccardo Scalera; Stefan Schindler; Kateřina Štajerová; Barbara Tokarska-Guzik; Mark van Kleunen; Kevin Walker; Patrick Weigelt; Takehiko Yamanaka; Franz Essl
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2017-02-15       Impact factor: 14.919

6.  The diversity and evolution of ecological and environmental citizen science.

Authors:  Michael J O Pocock; John C Tweddle; Joanna Savage; Lucy D Robinson; Helen E Roy
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-04-03       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Characteristics and drivers of high-altitude ladybird flight: insights from vertical-looking entomological radar.

Authors:  Daniel L Jeffries; Jason Chapman; Helen E Roy; Stuart Humphries; Richard Harrington; Peter M J Brown; Lori-J Lawson Handley
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-12-18       Impact factor: 3.240

  7 in total
  5 in total

Review 1.  The role of passive surveillance and citizen science in plant health.

Authors:  Nathan Brown; Ana Pérez-Sierra; Peter Crow; Stephen Parnell
Journal:  CABI Agric Biosci       Date:  2020-10-30

2.  Community science data suggests that urbanization and forest habitat loss threaten aphidophagous native lady beetles.

Authors:  Mary M Gardiner; Kayla I Perry; Christopher B Riley; Katherine J Turo; Yvan A Delgado de la Flor; Frances S Sivakoff
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2021-02-21       Impact factor: 3.167

3.  Variability of the mitochondrial CO1 gene in native and invasive populations of Harmonia axyridis Pall. comparative analysis.

Authors:  Alla Blekhman; Irina Goryacheva; Dimitry Schepetov; Ilia Zakharov
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-04-02       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Do atmospheric events explain the arrival of an invasive ladybird (Harmonia axyridis) in the UK?

Authors:  Pilvi Siljamo; Kate Ashbrook; Richard F Comont; Carsten Ambelas Skjøth
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-01-15       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Mortality of native and invasive ladybirds co-infected by ectoparasitic and entomopathogenic fungi.

Authors:  Danny Haelewaters; Thomas Hiller; Emily A Kemp; Paul S van Wielink; David I Shapiro-Ilan; M Catherine Aime; Oldřich Nedvěd; Donald H Pfister; Ted E Cottrell
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2020-11-04       Impact factor: 2.984

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.