Alana Cavadino1,2, David Prieto-Merino3,4, Joan K Morris1. 1. Wolfson Institute of Preventive Medicine, Queen Mary University of London, UK. 2. Section of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Population Health, University of Auckland, New Zealand. 3. Department of Medical Statistics, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK. 4. Applied Statistics in Medical Research Group, Catholic University of Murcia (UCAM), Spain.
Abstract
AIMS: Surveillance of medication use in pregnancy is essential to identify associations between first trimester medications and congenital anomalies (CAs). Medications in the same Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical classes may have similar effects. We aimed to use this information to improve the detection of potential teratogens in CA surveillance data. METHODS: Data on 15 058 malformed fetuses with first trimester medication exposures from 1995-2011 were available from EUROmediCAT, a network of European CA registries. For each medication-CA combination, the proportion of the CA in fetuses with the medication was compared to the proportion of the CA in all other fetuses in the dataset. The Australian classification system was used to identify high-risk medications in order to compare two methods of controlling the false discovery rate (FDR): a single FDR applied across all combinations, and a double FDR incorporating groupings of medications. RESULTS: There were 28 765 potential combinations (523 medications × 55 CAs) for analysis. An FDR cut-off of 50% resulted in a reasonable effective workload, for which single FDR gave rise to eight medication signals (three high-risk medications) and double FDR 50% identified 16 signals (six high-risk). Over a range of FDR cut-offs, double FDR identified more high-risk medications as signals, for comparable effective workloads. CONCLUSIONS: The double FDR method appears to improve the detection of potential teratogens in comparison to the single FDR, while maintaining a low risk of false positives. Use of double FDR is recommended in routine signal detection analyses of CA data.
AIMS: Surveillance of medication use in pregnancy is essential to identify associations between first trimester medications and congenital anomalies (CAs). Medications in the same Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical classes may have similar effects. We aimed to use this information to improve the detection of potential teratogens in CA surveillance data. METHODS: Data on 15 058 malformed fetuses with first trimester medication exposures from 1995-2011 were available from EUROmediCAT, a network of European CA registries. For each medication-CA combination, the proportion of the CA in fetuses with the medication was compared to the proportion of the CA in all other fetuses in the dataset. The Australian classification system was used to identify high-risk medications in order to compare two methods of controlling the false discovery rate (FDR): a single FDR applied across all combinations, and a double FDR incorporating groupings of medications. RESULTS: There were 28 765 potential combinations (523 medications × 55 CAs) for analysis. An FDR cut-off of 50% resulted in a reasonable effective workload, for which single FDR gave rise to eight medication signals (three high-risk medications) and double FDR 50% identified 16 signals (six high-risk). Over a range of FDR cut-offs, double FDR identified more high-risk medications as signals, for comparable effective workloads. CONCLUSIONS: The double FDR method appears to improve the detection of potential teratogens in comparison to the single FDR, while maintaining a low risk of false positives. Use of double FDR is recommended in routine signal detection analyses of CA data.
Authors: Suzan L Carmichael; Gary M Shaw; Cecile Laurent; Mary S Croughan; Richard S Olney; Edward J Lammer Journal: Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med Date: 2005-10
Authors: Areti Angeliki Veroniki; Elise Cogo; Patricia Rios; Sharon E Straus; Yaron Finkelstein; Ryan Kealey; Emily Reynen; Charlene Soobiah; Kednapa Thavorn; Brian Hutton; Brenda R Hemmelgarn; Fatemeh Yazdi; Jennifer D'Souza; Heather MacDonald; Andrea C Tricco Journal: BMC Med Date: 2017-05-05 Impact factor: 8.775
Authors: Joanne E Given; Maria Loane; Johannes M Luteijn; Joan K Morris; Lolkje T W de Jong van den Berg; Ester Garne; Marie-Claude Addor; Ingeborg Barisic; Hermien de Walle; Miriam Gatt; Kari Klungsoyr; Babak Khoshnood; Anna Latos-Bielenska; Vera Nelen; Amanda J Neville; Mary O'Mahony; Anna Pierini; David Tucker; Awi Wiesel; Helen Dolk Journal: Br J Clin Pharmacol Date: 2016-07-07 Impact factor: 4.335
Authors: Alana Cavadino; Lovisa Sandberg; Inger Öhman; Tomas Bergvall; Kristina Star; Helen Dolk; Maria Loane; Marie-Claude Addor; Ingeborg Barisic; Clara Cavero-Carbonell; Ester Garne; Miriam Gatt; Babak Khoshnood; Kari Klungsøyr; Anna Latos-Bielenska; Nathalie Lelong; Reneé Lutke; Anna Materna-Kiryluk; Vera Nelen; Amanda Nevill; Mary O'Mahony; Olatz Mokoroa; Anna Pierini; Hanitra Randrianaivo; Anke Rissmann; David Tucker; Awi Wiesel; Lyubov Yevtushok; Joan K Morris Journal: Drug Saf Date: 2021-05-09 Impact factor: 5.606