A stereoselective intramolecular Tsuji-Trost cascade cyclization of (homo)allylic vicinal diacetates with a pendant β-ketoamide or related carbon nucleophile to give γ-lactam-fused vinylcyclopropanes is reported. In addition to two new rings, the products contain three new C-C stereocenters (two of which are quaternary) with a 9:1 dr. Moreover, the reaction proceeds in >94% enantiospecificity with optically enriched starting materials, using an inexpensive carbohydrate as the source of chirality.
A stereoselective intramolecular Tsuji-Trost cascade cyclization of (homo)allylic vicinal diacetates with a pendant β-ketoamide or related carbon nucleophile to give γ-lactam-fused vinylcyclopropanes is reported. In addition to two new rings, the products contain three new C-C stereocenters (two of which are quaternary) with a 9:1 dr. Moreover, the reaction proceeds in >94% enantiospecificity with optically enriched starting materials, using an inexpensive carbohydrate as the source of chirality.
Donor–acceptor (DA) cyclopropanes
are widely recognized as highly versatile intermediates in modern
synthetic chemistry.[1] DA cyclopropanes
with a vinyl group as the donor moiety have garnered specific interest
as a result of the wide variety of transformations they can undergo,[2] including vinylcyclopropane–cyclopentene
(VC–CP) rearrangement[3] and [3 +
2]-,[4] [3 + 3]-,[5] [4 + 2]-,[6] and intramolecular [5 + 2]-cycloaddition,[7] providing access to a broad range of structurally
diverse scaffold structures. However, progress in this area has been
limited by a lack of suitable stereoselective methods for the synthesis
of DA vinylcyclopropanes, especially those fused to other ring systems
and/or containing one or more quaternary stereocenters. The current
methods often involve precursors already containing a cyclopropane
moiety.[8] Syntheses from linear precursors
include ruthenium-catalyzed cyclopropanation of electron-rich alkenes
using diazocarbonyls,[9] formal [2 + 1] addition
of carbenes to electron-deficient alkenes,[10] and dialkylation of malonates with 1,4-dihalo-2-butenes.[11] Unfortunately, these reactions provide limited
control over relative and absolute stereochemistry. Despite recent
progress in catalytic asymmetric cyclopropanations with chiral transition
metal complexes,[12] their application to
highly substituted and/or ring-fused vinylcyclopropanes remains a
challenge.Given our interest in cascade reactions and palladium
catalysis,[13] we envisioned the intramolecular
double Tsuji–Trost
cyclization of (homo)allylic vicinal diacetates 3 bearing
a β-dicarbonyl moiety as an efficient entry into fused vinylcyclopropanes.
Previously, the Pd-catalyzed allylic alkylation has proven to be a
useful strategy in the synthesis of cyclic compounds,[14] e.g. γ-lactones and γ-lactams.[15] Furthermore, a Tsuji–Trost allylation/retro-Claisen/Tsuji–Trost
cyclization sequence was recently reported to afford a range of vinylcyclopropanes.[16] In our strategy, the allylic acetate in 3 is activated by the Pd(0) catalyst, resulting in a 5-exo-trig cyclization in the presence of a base with concomitant
migration of the olefin to give 4 (Scheme , eq 2). Then, activation of the new allylic
acetate moiety by Pd(0) should lead to 3-exo-trig cyclization, as 5-endo-trig cyclization is believed
to be hampered by the E-geometry of the allylpalladium
intermediate.[17] The feasibility of this
strategy is supported by a report by Lambert et al. demonstrating
the cascade cyclization of diene-functionalized β-ketoesters
under Pd(II) catalysis (Scheme , eq 1).[18]
Scheme 1
Synthesis of Ring-Fused
Vinylcyclopropanes
We decided to investigate this Tsuji–Trost cascade
cyclization
using 3a as the benchmark cyclization substrate. A ketoamide
system was selected for ease of synthetic access and variability.
Starting from known alcohol 6(19) (derived from d-mannitol), we synthesized 3a in five steps (bromination, substitution, amidation, acetal hydrolysis,
and acetylation) in 68% overall yield (Scheme ). To our delight, after optimization of
various reaction parameters (for details, see the Supporting Information (SI)), 3a underwent smooth
conversion in the presence of Pd(PPh3)4 (10
mol %) and N,N,tetramethyl-guanidine (TMG, 2.0 equiv) in DMF at
80 °C within 5 h to give 5a in 75% isolated yield
as a 9:1 diastereomeric mixture. Moreover, the product proved to be
optically enriched, with an ee nearly identical to the starting material
(90% for 5a vs 92% for 3a(20)), indicating the reaction proceeds with 98% enantiospecificity.
X-ray crystallographic analysis of the m-nitrophenylhydrazone
derivative 7 unambiguously confirmed the absolute and
relative stereochemistry.
Scheme 2
Precursor Synthesis and Cyclization
Ar = 3-nitrophenyl; PMB = 4-methoxybenzyl.
Precursor Synthesis and Cyclization
Ar = 3-nitrophenyl; PMB = 4-methoxybenzyl.The observed stereochemical outcome can be rationalized
based on
the mechanism (Scheme ). Initial displacement of the allylic acetate by oxidative addition
of Pd(0) proceeds with inversion of the stereochemistry.[21] Next, the resulting chiral π-allyl-Pd
complex is trapped by the deprotonated β-dicarbonyl moiety (a
relatively soft nucleophile), closing γ-lactam intermediate 9 (again with inversion), resulting in net retention of the
stereochemistry with regard to 3a.[21] The second oxidative addition of Pd(0) to the newly formed
allylic acetate in 9 likely forms a mixture of diastereomeric
π-allyl-Pd complexes 10a and 10b,
with no apparent steric or electronic preference for either. Tsuji–Trost
cyclization then produces 5a and 5a′ in a 9:1 ratio. In an attempt to rationalize this rather remarkable
diastereoselectivity, the isolated diastereomers 5a and 5a′ were separately subjected to the cascade cyclization
conditions resulting in both cases in the re-establishment of a 9:1
mixture of 5a and 5a′. This result
suggests a thermodynamic equilibrium of 5a and 5a′ via a retro-Tsuji–Trost/Tsuji–Trost
sequence. Interestingly, during optimization (see the SI) we observed that the use of DPEPhos as the
Pd ligand [Pd(OAc)2 (10 mol %), DPEPhos (25 mol %)] provides 5a and 5a′ in a 3:7 ratio, plausibly representing
the kinetic product mixture. This observation suggests that the interconversion
of 10a and 10b and/or the retro-Tsuji–Trost
does not occur under these conditions. Indeed, when the isolated diastereomers 5a and 5a′ were resubjected to these reaction
conditions using DPEPhos, no such interconversion was observed.
Scheme 3
Rationalization of Observed Stereochemistry
With the mechanistic model in hand, we explored the scope
of the
cyclization cascade (Scheme ). We first examined the effect of electron-withdrawing groups
(EWGs) α to the amide. We hypothesized that increased electron-withdrawing
capacity (and thus increased acidity) would facilitate ring closure
by increasing the concentration of the enolate nucleophile. Although
most of the tested substrates (other ketones, sulfone, ester) underwent
conversion to the desired fused vinylcyclopropanes 5,
we did not observe any correlation between the reaction rate and the
electron-withdrawing capacity. Gratifyingly, the sulfone derivative 5b was obtained in the same yield as the benchmark product 5a. Also the phenyl ketone 3c and ester 3d were converted to the corresponding vinylcyclopropanes 5c and 5d, respectively, in reasonable yield.
Surprisingly, the nitrile analog 3e did not show any
conversion. Furthermore, reaction of the trifluoromethyl ketone 3f provided bicyclic hemiacetal 11 (resulting
from the attack of the enol oxygen on the π-allyl-Pd intermediate)
as the sole isolable product rather than the expected vinylcyclopropane 5f.
Scheme 4
Scope of the Tsuji–Trost Cascade Cyclization,
Standard
conditions: 3 (1.0 equiv), Pd(PPh3)4 (10 mol %), TMG (2.0
equiv) in DMF (0.2 M), 80 °C, 5 h.
Isolated yields.
1.0 mmol scale.
es (enantiospecificity)
= ee (5)/ee (3).
Using DBU (2.0 equiv) as a base in PhMe (0.2 M).
Yield based on recovered starting
material.
Scope of the Tsuji–Trost Cascade Cyclization,
Standard
conditions: 3 (1.0 equiv), Pd(PPh3)4 (10 mol %), TMG (2.0
equiv) in DMF (0.2 M), 80 °C, 5 h.Isolated yields.1.0 mmol scale.es (enantiospecificity)
= ee (5)/ee (3).Using DBU (2.0 equiv) as a base in PhMe (0.2 M).Yield based on recovered starting
material.Next, we hypothesized that increasing
the steric bulk on the amide
substituent would promote cyclization by favoring the productive rotamer
of the tertiary amide. In contrast to our expectations, the N-iPr derivative 3h showed
significantly slower conversion, resulting in a rather modest isolated
yield after a 5 h reaction time. However, the yield with respect to
conversion was comparable to that for 5a. On the other
hand, N-Me derivative 3g was converted
to 5g with similar efficiency as the N-PMB derivative 3a.We then investigated the influence
of the substituent at the ring
junction. Further increasing the steric bulk is challenging considering
the dense substitution of the products 5. Moreover, significant
additional allylic strain is imposed on the allylpalladium intermediate 8. We were pleased to see 3i (R1 =
Et) was converted to 5i, albeit more slowly and in lower
yield. Unfortunately, in this case the nature of the EWG proved to
have more impact on the reaction outcome, as ester 3j and sulfone 3k showed little to no conversion to the
corresponding fused vinylcyclopropanes 5.A different
result was observed using cyclization precursor 3l (R1 = H, Scheme ). Rather than the expected fused vinylcyclopropane 5l, we obtained a mixture of 12 and 13 in
modest yield. Plausibly, after the initial formation of γ-lactam
intermediate 9l, in this case β-H-elimination takes
precedence over 3-exo-trig Tsuji–Trost cyclization,
leading to product 12, which is (partially) tautomerized
under the basic reaction conditions to its conjugated isomer 13.
Scheme 5
Formation of Dienes by β-H-Elimination
Products 12 and 13 were obtained as a 1:2 inseparable mixture.
Formation of Dienes by β-H-Elimination
Products 12 and 13 were obtained as a 1:2 inseparable mixture.In an attempt to further expand the scope of the reaction,
we synthesized
ketoester 3m featuring a methylene spacer (Scheme ). Unfortunately, 3m did not undergo the cascade cyclization under the standard conditions.
This ketone, which has considerably more conformational freedom than
the tertiary amides 3a–l, apparently
does not adopt the turn-like conformation required for the initial
cyclization. Likely, additional conformational constraints (e.g., gem-dimethyl substitution, cf. ref (18)/Scheme , eq 1) are required for this class of substrates
to react.
Scheme 6
Cyclization Attempt with Ketoester Precursor
In order to verify that our
cyclization products display characteristic
DA cyclopropane reactivity, we subjected 5a to typical
VC–CP rearrangement conditions. Unfortunately, initial attempts
only showed degradation of the starting material. Therefore, 5a was first converted by cross metathesis to styrylcyclopropane 14 which subsequently underwent SnCl4-mediated
rearrangement to give cyclopentene 15 as a single diastereomer
in moderate yield (58%, Scheme ). Moreover, the Sn(OTf)2-catalyzed cycloaddition
of benzaldehyde and 5a provided tetrahydrofuran-fused
γ-lactam 16 as a partially separable mixture of
diastereomers (dr = 4:3:1) in moderate yield (43%).
Scheme 7
Postmodification
of Vinylcyclopropanes
Finally, we wished to address the control over the absolute
stereochemistry.
We demonstrated that our Tsuji–Trost cascade reaction proceeds
with near-complete retention of optical purity starting from nonracemic
substrates derived from carbohydrates. Cyclization precursors 3a–l were ultimately derived from (R)-glyceraldehyde cyclohexylidene acetal
(or the corresponding acetonide), which, in turn, were derived from d-mannitol.Advantageously, the opposite enantiomers are
also available from
the chiral pool. We accordingly prepared ent-3a from l-gulonolactone and demonstrated it is indeed
converted to ent-5a under the optimized
reaction conditions (Scheme ; for details, see the SI). However,
based on the proposed mechanism (Scheme ) we realized that there may be an alternative
way to control the absolute stereochemistry of the product not depending
on the availability of both antipodes of the chiral pool material,
i.e. the geometry of the alkene moiety. According to our mechanistic
hypothesis, changing the alkene geometry from E to Z should lead to the formation of a pseudoenantiomeric π-allyl-Pd
intermediate, ultimately resulting in the formation of the enantiomeric
product. To verify this hypothesis, we synthesized Z-configured precursor Z-3a, starting
from the same chiral pool material but employing a Still–Gennari
reaction instead of the Wittig olefination in the initial stage of
the precursor synthesis. After subjection of Z-3a to the optimized Tsuji–Trost cyclization conditions,
we indeed obtained ent-5a (Scheme ), although conversion
was slower, presumably due to increased allylic strain in the π-allylpalladium
intermediate Z-8a.
Scheme 8
Absolute Stereochemistry
Control
Standard conditions: Pd(PPh3)4 (10 mol %), TMG (2.0 equiv) in DMF (0.2 M),
80 °C, 5 h.
Yield based
on recovered starting material.
Absolute Stereochemistry
Control
Standard conditions: Pd(PPh3)4 (10 mol %), TMG (2.0 equiv) in DMF (0.2 M),
80 °C, 5 h.Yield based
on recovered starting material.In conclusion,
we have developed a novel intramolecular Tsuji–Trost
cascade cyclization affording γ-lactam-fused vinylcyclopropanes.
The reaction proceeds with high diastereoselectivity (∼9:1)
and a high degree of stereospecificity. The absolute configuration
may be controlled either by selection of the appropriate inexpensive
carbohydrate starting material or alternatively by the geometry of
the alkene moiety in the cyclization precursor. The products of the
reaction undergo typical vinylcyclopropane transformations leading
to highly functionalized bicyclic scaffolds with full stereocontrol.
Studies toward extension of the substrate scope of the reaction and
its application in the synthesis of selected natural products are
currently ongoing in our laboratory.
Authors: Matteo Faltracco; Koen N A van de Vrande; Martijn Dijkstra; Jordy M Saya; Trevor A Hamlin; Eelco Ruijter Journal: Angew Chem Int Ed Engl Date: 2021-05-26 Impact factor: 15.336