| Literature DB >> 30350115 |
Yi-Dan Wang1,2, Yi-Dan Li1, Xue-Yan Ding1, Xiao-Peng Wu1, Cheng Li1, Di-Chen Guo1, Yan-Ping Shi1, Xiu-Zhang Lu3.
Abstract
Pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) is more prevalent in females. Paradoxically, female patients have better right ventricular (RV) function and higher survival rates than males. However, the effects of 17β-estradiol (E2) on RV function in PAH has not been studied. Twenty-four male rats were exposed to monocrotaline (MCT) to induce experimental PAH, while treated with E2 or vehicle respectively. Together with eight control rats, thirty-two rats were examined by echocardiography 4 weeks after drug administration. Echocardiographic measurement of RV function included: tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion (TAPSE), RV index of myocardial performance (RIMP), RV fractional area change (RVFAC) and tricuspid annular systolic velocity (s'). RV free wall longitudinal strain (RVLSFW) and RV longitudinal shortening fraction (RVLSF) were also used to quantify RV function. RV morphology was determined by echocardiographic and histological analysis. TAPSE, RVFAC and s' were reduced, and RIMP was elevated in the MCT-treated group and vehicle-treated group, when compared with control group (P < 0.01). TAPSE, RVFAC and s' in the E2 group were higher, while RIMP was lower than those in the MCT-treated group and vehicle-treated group (P < 0.01). Myocardial functional parameters (RVLSFW and RVLSF) were also higher in the E2 group. Enhanced serum E2 levels were closely correlated with the improvement in RV functional parameters and enhancement of serum BNP levels (P < 0.01 for all groups). RV function decreased significantly in male rats with MCT-induced PAH, while E2 exhibited a protective effect on RV function, suggesting that E2 is a critical modulator of sex differences in PAH.Entities:
Keywords: Echocardiography; Estradiol; Pulmonary arterial hypertension; Sex difference; Ventricular function
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 30350115 PMCID: PMC6454076 DOI: 10.1007/s10554-018-1468-0
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Cardiovasc Imaging ISSN: 1569-5794 Impact factor: 2.357
Body weight, right ventricular morphological, hemodynamic and serum parameters
| Control | MCT | MCT + E2 | MCT + vehicle | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Weights | |||||
| Baseline weight, g | 325.83 ± 5.17 | 338.33 ± 3.73 | 330.00 ± 2.84 | 324.17 ± 1.89 | 0.070 |
| Terminal weight, g | 495.83 ± 16.11 | 432.67 ± 6.18* | 369.83 ± 14.60†‡ | 427.20 ± 10.37† | < 0.001 |
| Weight gain,% | 51.83 ± 2.89 | 28.00 ± 2.33† | 12.00 ± 0.04†§ | 31.40 ± 3.20† | < 0.001 |
| RV/BW, mg/g | 0.44 ± 0.16 | 1.41 ± 0.09† | 0.73 ± 0.05§ | 1.33 ± 0.11† | < 0.001 |
| RV/LV + IVS | 0.26 ± 0.01 | 0.61 ± 0.02† | 0.36 ± 0.01§ | 0.63 ± 0.05† | < 0.001 |
| Hemodynamics | |||||
| RVSP, mmHg | 25.22 ± 0.85 | 63.58 ± 2.97† | 56.38 ± 1.05† | 62.46 ± 4.82† | < 0.001 |
| mPAP, mmHg | 15.77 ± 0.52 | 35.29 ± 1.68† | 31.72 ± 0.51† | 36.78 ± 2.36† | < 0.001 |
| RAP, mmHg | 4.93 ± 1.18 | 10.64 ± 0.28† | 10.36 ± 0.30† | 11.32 ± 1.68† | < 0.001 |
| Serum parameters | |||||
| E2 (pg/ml) | 5.55 ± 0.59 | 7.80 ± 0.68 | 14.07 ± 1.45†§ | 8.09 ± 0.62 | < 0.001 |
| BNP (pg/ml) | 161.33 ± 15.04 | 727.33 ± 43.22† | 260.00 ± 18.22 | 759.40 ± 44.12† | < 0.001 |
Data are presented as means ± SEM. N = 5–8 per group
BSA body surface area, RV right ventricle, BW body weight, LV left ventricle, IVS interventricular septum, RVSP right ventricular systolic pressure, mPAP mean pulmonary arterial pressure, RAP right atrial pressure, E2 17β-estradiol, BNP B-type natriuretic peptide
*P < 0.05 when compared with the control group
†P < 0.01 when compared with the control group
‡P < 0.05 when compared with the MCT-treated group
§P < 0.01 when compared with the MCT-treated group
Right heart morphological and functional measurement by echocardiography
| Control | MCT | MCT + E2 | MCT + vehicle | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (n = 8) | (n = 5) | (n = 8) | (n = 6) | ||
| RV morphology | |||||
| RV basal diameter, mm | 3.88 ± 0.10 | 6.29 ± 0.23† | 4.42 ± 0.21§ | 6.20 ± 0.23† | < 0.001 |
| RV mid diameter, mm | 3.38 ± 0.16 | 8.14 ± 0.34† | 3.80 ± 0.26§ | 7.64 ± 0.27† | < 0.001 |
| RVD/LVD | 0.71 ± 0.02 | 1.36 ± 0.08† | 0.88 ± 0.06§ | 1.28 ± 0.06† | < 0.001 |
| RV wall thickness, mm | 0.82 ± 0.05 | 2.02 ± 0.09† | 0.98 ± 0.04§ | 2.04 ± 0.05† | < 0.001 |
| EI | 0.91 ± 0.07 | 1.57 ± 0.04† | 0.95 ± 0.04§ | 1.50 ± 0.06† | < 0.001 |
| RV EDA indexed to BW (cm2/kg) | 0.74 ± 0.04 | 1.66 ± 0.07† | 1.01 ± 0.11§ | 1.59 ± 0.09† | < 0.001 |
| RV ESA indexed to BW (cm2/kg) | 0.40 ± 0.03 | 1.34 ± 0.07† | 0.62 ± 0.09§ | 1.28 ± 0.06† | < 0.001 |
| RA area indexed to BW (cm2/kg) | 0.35 ± 0.04 | 1.10 ± 0.06† | 0.58 ± 0.06§ | 1.08 ± 0.07† | < 0.001 |
| RV function | |||||
| Hemodynamic parameters | |||||
| VTI, cm | 7.45 ± 0.43 | 2.61 ± 0.20† | 5.97 ± 0.20*§ | 2.76 ± 0.32† | < 0.001 |
| CI, mL/min/kg | 202.70 ± 19.29 | 136.71 ± 9.27* | 247.36 ± 13.24§ | 130.98 ± 14.78* | < 0.001 |
| Conventional parameters | |||||
| TAPSE, mm | 3.11 ± 0.08 | 1.01 ± 0.07† | 2.69 ± 0.17§ | 1.07 ± 0.07† | < 0.001 |
| RVFAC, % | 46.17 ± 1.71 | 21.73 ± 1.68† | 38.95 ± 1.96§ | 23.18 ± 2.32† | < 0.001 |
| RIMP | 0.36 ± 0.08 | 0.87 ± 0.08† | 0.46 ± 0.06§ | 0.84 ± 0.07† | < 0.001 |
| s′ | 6.85 ± 0.18 | 3.91 ± 0.25† | 6.04 ± 0.35§ | 3.96 ± 0.23† | < 0.001 |
| STI parameters | |||||
| RVLSFW (%) | |||||
| Global | − 39.28 ± 1.13 | − 29.52 ± 1.61† | − 37.40 ± 1.55§ | − 27.98 ± 1.64† | < 0.001 |
| Basal | − 40.67 ± 1.11 | − 30.50 ± 1.41* | − 37.50 ± 2.63 | − 29.00 ± 2.80† | 0.002 |
| Mid | − 35.83 ± 1.31 | − 26.83 ± 2.31* | − 35.00 ± 2.11‡ | − 27.67 ± 1.17* | 0.002 |
| Apical | − 42.50 ± 2.36 | − 30.67 ± 1.41† | − 40.17 ± 2.30‡ | − 28.17 ± 1.82† | < 0.001 |
| RV LSF (%) | 15.18 ± 1.33 | 9.17 ± 0.80† | 14.28 ± 1.11§ | 9.25 ± 0.63† | < 0.001 |
Data are presented as means ± SEM
PAH pulmonary arterial hypertension, RV right ventricle, RVOT RV outflow tract, RVD right ventricular diameter, LVD left ventricular diameter, EI eccentricity index, EDA end-diastolic area, ESA end-systolic area, BW body weight, RA right atrium, VTI velocity time integral, CI cardiac index, TAPSE tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion, RVFAC RV fractional area change, RIMP right ventricular index of myocardial performance, s′ tissue Doppler-derived tricuspid lateral annular systolic velocity, STI speckle tracking imaging, RVLS RV free wall longitudinal strain, RVLSF RV longitudinal shortening fraction
*P < 0.05 when compared with the control group
†P < 0.01 when compared with the control group
‡P < 0.05 when compared with the MCT-treated group
§P < 0.01 when compared with the MCT-treated group
Fig. 1E2 administration prevented RV cardiomyocyte hypertrophy in rats with MCT-induced PAH. Representative photomicrographs of cross-sections with HE staining for RV cardiomyocytes from the following experimental groups: a control group; b MCT-treated group; c MCT + E2 group; and d MCT + vehicle group. Original magnification, × 400, scale bar = 50 µm. e Quantitative analysis of mean cross sectional area (CSA) of RV cardiomyocytes in rats. Values are expressed as mean ± SEM. **P < 0.01 versus the Control group, #P < 0.05 versus the MCT-treated PAH group (one-way ANOVA with post hoc Turkey’s test). N = 5−8 per group. MCT monocrotaline; E2, 17β-estradiol
Fig. 2E2 administration reduced RV fibrosis in rats with MCT-induced PAH. Representative Masson’s Trichrome staining of RV free wall cardiomyocyte sections showing the extent of RV fibrosis (blue-stained areas) for the following experimental groups: a control group; b MCT-treated group; c MCT + E2 group; d MCT + vehicle group. Original magnification, × 200. e Quantitative analysis of RV fibrosis in cardiomyocyte sections (blue-stained areas expressed as percentage of total RV surface area). Values are expressed as mean ± SEM. **P < 0.01 versus the control group, ##P < 0.01 versus the MCT-treated PAH group (one-way ANOVA with post hoc Turkey’s test). N = 5−8 per group. MCT monocrotaline; E2, 17β-estradiol
Fig. 3The evaluation of RV function in MCT-induced PAH rats and with E2 treatment by conventional echocardiography and STI. a Conventional parameters of RV function in PAH rats: TAPSE (upper left panel), RVFAC (upper right panel), s′ (lower left panel) and RIMP (lower right panel); b conventional parameters of RV function in PAH rats with E2 treatment: TAPSE (upper left panel), RVFAC (upper right panel), s′ (lower left panel) and RIMP (lower right panel); c STI analysis of PH rats: RVLSFW (upper left panel) and RVLSF (upper right panel); and d STI analysis of PAH rats with E2 treatment: RVLSFW (lower left panel) and RVLSF (lower right panel). EDA end-diastolic area, ESA end-diastolic area, TCO tricuspid closure-open Time, ET ejection time
Fig. 4The assessment of inter-observer agreement and intra-observer reproducibility. By using the Bland–Altman method, all the data presented were evaluated for inter-observer agreement and intra-observer reproducibility through the comparison of the distributions of relative amount of TAPSE (a), RVFAC (b), RIMP (c), s′ (d), RVLSFW (e), RVLS (f), respectively. RV right ventricle; TAPSE, tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion; RVFAC, RV fractional area change; RIMP, right ventricular index of myocardial performance; s′, tissue Doppler-derived tricuspid lateral annular systolic velocity; RVLSFW, RV free wall longitudinal strain; RVLSF, RV longitudinal shortening fraction