Literature DB >> 30350096

Comparison of postoperative pain at umbilical wound after conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy between transumbilical and infraumbilical incisions: a randomized control trial.

Boonying Siribumrungwong1,2, Trirat Chunsirisub1, Palin Limpavitayaporn1, Assanee Tongyoo1, Ekkapak Sriussadaporn1, Chatchai Mingmalairak1, Weerayut Thowprasert1, Ammarin Thakkinstian3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Transumbilical incision has been applied in single-incision laparoscopy. Evidence for the effect of transumbilical incision on postoperative pain compared with infraumbilical incision is still lacking.
METHODS: A randomized controlled trial (RCT) was conducted in a university hospital. Patients who underwent conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy were randomized to have transumbilical or infraumbilical incision. Postoperative pain was measured using visual analog score at 6, 24 h, and 7 days post operation. Secondary outcomes were analgesic usage, length of stay, superficial surgical site infection (SSI), wound numbness, and hypersensitivity. Risk ratio and mean difference (MD) along with their 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were estimated. Adjusted analysis was done, if clinical unbalanced characteristics presented. The study was registered at http://ClinicalTrial.gov (ID NCT02738710).
RESULTS: A total of 102 patients were enrolled in which 51 patients were randomized to each interventional group. Postoperative pain was not significantly different between the groups with the MD of - 0.07 (95% CI - 0.47, 0.35). Paracetamol usage was significantly 1 tab (95% CI - 1.9, - 0.1) less after transumbilical incision, but this was not significant after adjusting for unbalanced characteristics. Superficial SSI rate was much higher in the transumbilical than the infraumbilical group, i.e., 16 versus 4%, but this was not significant (p = 0.070). Satisfaction scores at 3 months were not different between the groups, with the corresponding means of 8.9 [standard deviation (SD) 1.3] and 9.0 (SD 1.0).
CONCLUSIONS: Transumbilical incision had non-significant different pain compared to infraumbilical incision. Most patients in both groups were satisfied with the operation at 3 months. A further large RCT is required for comparing SSI between the two incisions.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Infraumbilical; Laparoscopic cholecystectomy; Postoperative pain; Randomized controlled trial; Transumbilical

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30350096     DOI: 10.1007/s00464-018-6447-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  15 in total

1.  Prospective randomized clinical trial comparing laparoscopic cholecystectomy and hybrid natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) (NCT00835250).

Authors:  José F Noguera; Angel Cuadrado; Carlos Dolz; José M Olea; Juan C García
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2012-05-31       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  CDC/NHSN surveillance definition of health care-associated infection and criteria for specific types of infections in the acute care setting.

Authors:  Teresa C Horan; Mary Andrus; Margaret A Dudeck
Journal:  Am J Infect Control       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 2.918

3.  Does the clinically significant difference in visual analog scale pain scores vary with gender, age, or cause of pain?

Authors:  A M Kelly
Journal:  Acad Emerg Med       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 3.451

4.  Transumbilical laparoscopic cholecystectomy: towards a scarless abdominal surgery.

Authors:  Tarik Abdel Azeez; Khaled M Mahran
Journal:  Hepatogastroenterology       Date:  2011 Mar-Apr

5.  Laparo-endoscopic single site cholecystectomy versus standard laparoscopic cholecystectomy: results of a pilot randomized trial.

Authors:  Marco Maria Lirici; Andrea Domenico Califano; Pierluigi Angelini; Francesco Corcione
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2011-05-19       Impact factor: 2.565

6.  Periumbilical vs transumbilical laparoscopic incision: A patients' satisfaction-centered randomised trial.

Authors:  Audrey Bouffard-Cloutier; Alex Paré; Nathalie McFadden
Journal:  Int J Surg       Date:  2017-05-25       Impact factor: 6.071

Review 7.  Meta-analysis of single-port versus conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy comparing body image and cosmesis.

Authors:  R Haueter; T Schütz; D A Raptis; P-A Clavien; M Zuber
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2017-06-01       Impact factor: 6.939

8.  Simple technique for single incision transumbilical laparoscopic appendectomy.

Authors:  Alan A Saber; Mohamed H Elgamal; Tarek H El-Ghazaly; Aditya V Dewoolkar; Abir Akl
Journal:  Int J Surg       Date:  2009-12-11       Impact factor: 6.071

9.  Single-incision vs three-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy: prospective randomized study.

Authors:  Ming-Xin Pan; Ze-Sheng Jiang; Yuan Cheng; Xiao-Ping Xu; Zhi Zhang; Jia-Sheng Qin; Guo-Lin He; Ting-Cheng Xu; Chen-Jie Zhou; Hai-Yan Liu; Yi Gao
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2013-01-21       Impact factor: 5.742

10.  Transumbilical single incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy with conventional instruments: A continuing study.

Authors:  Rajeev Sinha; Albel S Yadav
Journal:  J Minim Access Surg       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 1.407

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.