| Literature DB >> 30349979 |
Zahra Zaredar1, Fahimeh Askari2, Parvin Shokrolahi3.
Abstract
Three polyurethane formulations were prepared on the basis of siloxane; two formulations contained 1% and 3% of a hydroxyl functionalized polyhedral oligomeric silsesquioxane [POSS (ROH)2] nano-particles (as a co-chain extender) and one was without nano-particle. Structures of the polyurethanes were characterized by FTIR and SEM. The effect of POSS nano-particles on properties of the synthesized PUs was examined for vascular applications by tensile test, contact angle, SEM, AFM and endothelial cells viability evaluation. Properties of the polyurethane with 1% POSS were compared with those of PU without POSS and the results showed 66% increase in the elongation-at-break, 53% increase in tensile strength and 33% increase in modulus, 9.45% increase in contact angle, 76.7% reduction in surface roughness and 9.46% increase in cell viability. It was also shown that a polyurethane containing 1% of POSS nano-particles in its structure developed the highest hydrophobicity, which resulted in its lowest potential for thrombosis.Entities:
Keywords: Biocompatibility; POSS nano-particles; Polyurethane; Siloxane macrodiol; Vascular applications
Year: 2018 PMID: 30349979 PMCID: PMC6304180 DOI: 10.1007/s40204-018-0101-6
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Prog Biomater ISSN: 2194-0517
Fig. 1Synthesis route of PU-BDO
Fig. 2Synthesis route of PU-BDO/POSS
Fig. 3ATR-FTIR spectra of the PUs
Characteristic FTIR peak specifications of PUs (Bai et al. 2008; Zia et al. 2014)
| Links | Wavelength (cm−1) |
|---|---|
| Stretching vibrating SiOSi bonds | 1010, 1068 |
| C=O (urethane, H-bonded) | 1704 |
| Vintage vibrational integration of NH urethane and OH | 3320 |
| Stretching vibrational CH in SiCH3 | 1257 |
| The bending vibration H connected to C=C | 730 |
| Stretching vibrational C=C in aromatic ring | 1675 |
| Stretching vibrational CH and CH2 | 2955 |
| CH2 bending vibration CH | 1457 |
| Bending vibration CH3 | 2850 |
| Bending vibration CH3 | 1365 |
Fig. 4SEM images taken at the PUs’ fracture surface; a distribution of nano-particles in PU-BDO, b distribution of nano-particles in PU-BDO/POSS 1, and c distribution of nano-particles in PU-BDO/POSS 3
Fig. 5Stress–stress curves of the synthesized PU-BDO, PU-BDO/POSS 1, and PU-BDO/POSS 3
Mechanical properties of the synthesized polyurethanes
| Samples | Modulus (kPa) | Strength at-break (kPa) | Strain-at-break (%) |
|---|---|---|---|
| PU-BDO | 0 ± 3 | 0.04 ± 150 | 11 ± 60 |
| PU-BDO/POSS 1 | 0 ± 4 | 0.03 ± 230 | 7 ± 126 |
| PU-BDO/POSS 3 | 0 ± 4 | 0.02 ± 120 | 6 ± 35 |
Contact angle of the polyurethanes
Fig. 6AFM images of the synthesized polyurethanes; a PU-BDO, b PU-BDO/POSS1, and c PU-BDO3
Fig. 7Cell viability evaluation result as measured by MTT assay. Standard deviations are less than 0.025 for all the samples
MTT test results
| Polyurethanes | Viability (%) |
|---|---|
| PU-BDO | 77 |
| PU-BDO/POSS 1 | 85 |
| PU-BDO/POSS 3 | 90 |
DSC results
| Polyurethane | ∆ | ∆ | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PU-BDO | 149 | − 11 | 92 | 33 |
| PU-BDO/POSS 1 | 147 | − 48 | 75 | 47 |
| PU-BDO/POSS 3 | 149 | − 43 | 84 | 41 |
Tm: Hard segment melting point, ∆Hm: Melting enthalpies of the hard segment, TC: Crystallization temperature of the hard segment, ∆HC: Crystallization enthalpies of the hard segment