Neil Hall1, Sam Eldabe1. 1. The James Cook University Hospital, Middlesbrough, UK.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Phantom limb pain (PLP) is a complex condition resulting in pain in the missing limb affecting 60-80% amputees. Increasing number of patients are undergoing amputations. Approximately 1 per every 1000 people in the United Kingdom is an amputee. Incidence of PLP can be as high as 80% following amputation. PLP can be severe and difficult to treat. A range of pharmacological interventions exist yet little is known about them in respect to PLP. This article will address the effectiveness of both single pharmacological, therapy as well as drug combination therapy. METHODS: We reviewed all literature looking at the evidence for the efficacy of both single and combined pharmacological therapy in the management of phantom limb pain. Not all commonly prescribed analgesic agents have been studied in the use of PLP and in these cases, the evidence of their efficacy in neuropathic pain was reviewed. CONCLUSION: It is difficult to draw definitive conclusions on the pharmacological management of PLP based on current available evidence. Most trials involved small cohorts and were not specific to the PLP. The trials which looked specifically at the PLP population gave conflicting results. Only the N-methyl-d-aspartate (NMDA) receptor antagonist class demonstrated consistent positive results. Most notably ketamine did produce a reduction in pressure pain thresholds and pain windup associated with PLP, although the numbers in these studies remain small. This benefit was not demonstrated across all NMDA receptor antagonists. Combination therapy has demonstrated effectiveness in previous studies for neuropathic pain but this has never been tested specifically against a PLP cohort. Therefore, combination treatment of agents with proven efficacy in PLP such as opioid and gabapentin deserves a closer examination in a controlled study against a placebo as well as single drug therapy.
INTRODUCTION: Phantom limb pain (PLP) is a complex condition resulting in pain in the missing limb affecting 60-80% amputees. Increasing number of patients are undergoing amputations. Approximately 1 per every 1000 people in the United Kingdom is an amputee. Incidence of PLP can be as high as 80% following amputation. PLP can be severe and difficult to treat. A range of pharmacological interventions exist yet little is known about them in respect to PLP. This article will address the effectiveness of both single pharmacological, therapy as well as drug combination therapy. METHODS: We reviewed all literature looking at the evidence for the efficacy of both single and combined pharmacological therapy in the management of phantom limb pain. Not all commonly prescribed analgesic agents have been studied in the use of PLP and in these cases, the evidence of their efficacy in neuropathic pain was reviewed. CONCLUSION: It is difficult to draw definitive conclusions on the pharmacological management of PLP based on current available evidence. Most trials involved small cohorts and were not specific to the PLP. The trials which looked specifically at the PLP population gave conflicting results. Only the N-methyl-d-aspartate (NMDA) receptor antagonist class demonstrated consistent positive results. Most notably ketamine did produce a reduction in pressure pain thresholds and pain windup associated with PLP, although the numbers in these studies remain small. This benefit was not demonstrated across all NMDA receptor antagonists. Combination therapy has demonstrated effectiveness in previous studies for neuropathic pain but this has never been tested specifically against a PLP cohort. Therefore, combination treatment of agents with proven efficacy in PLP such as opioid and gabapentin deserves a closer examination in a controlled study against a placebo as well as single drug therapy.
Authors: Christopher L Wu; Prabhav Tella; Peter S Staats; Rachel Vaslav; Debra A Kazim; Ursula Wesselmann; Srinivasa N Raja Journal: Anesthesiology Date: 2002-04 Impact factor: 7.892
Authors: Christopher L Wu; Shefali Agarwal; Prabhav K Tella; Brendan Klick; Michael R Clark; Jennifer A Haythornthwaite; Mitchell B Max; Srinivasa N Raja Journal: Anesthesiology Date: 2008-08 Impact factor: 7.892
Authors: Emma H Beisheim-Ryan; Ryan T Pohlig; Gregory E Hicks; John R Horne; Jared Medina; Jaclyn M Sions Journal: Clin J Pain Date: 2021-10-06 Impact factor: 3.423
Authors: Steven P Cohen; Christopher A Gilmore; Richard L Rauck; Denise D Lester; Robert J Trainer; Thomas Phan; Leonardo Kapural; James M North; Nathan D Crosby; Joseph W Boggs Journal: Mil Med Date: 2019-07-01 Impact factor: 1.437