Literature DB >> 30349631

Food Trends and Popular Nutrition Advice Online - Implications for Public Health.

Divya Ramachandran1,2, James Kite1, Amy Jo Vassallo1, Josephine Y Chau1, Stephanie Partridge1,3, Becky Freeman1, Timothy Gill1,2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Consumers routinely seek health and nutrition-related information from online sources, including social media platforms. This study identified popular online nutrition content to examine the advice and assess alignment with the Australian Guideline to Healthy Eating (AGHE).
METHODS: We used Facebook page "likes" as an indicator of popularity to identify online nutrition and diet content. Websites and blogs associated with pages that had more than 100,000 Australian likes on 7th September 2017 were included. The dietary advice promoted was collected and compared with the AGHE across nine categories (Vegetables, Fruits, Legumes, Grains, Lean Meat, Dairy/Alternative, Fat, Sugar, Salt).
RESULTS: Nine Facebook pages met the inclusion criteria. The four most-liked pages were hosted by celebrities. Only two pages and their associated websites had advice consistent with AGHE recommendations across all nine categories reviewed. The concept of "real food" was a popular theme online. While most sources advocated increasing vegetable consumption and reducing processed food, other advice was not evidence-based and frequently deviated from the AGHE. DISCUSSION: Health information seekers are exposed to a variety of online dietary information and lifestyle advice. While few public health goals are promoted, there are many contradictions, as well as deviations from the AGHE, which can create confusion among health information seekers. Public health organisations promoting AGHE on Facebook are few and not as popular.
CONCLUSION: Public health organisations need to be more engaged on popular internet platforms such as Facebook. The prevailing popular nutrition advice online may increase consumer confusion, scepticism and even avoidance of dietary advice. Proactive efforts are needed by public health organisations, in partnership social marketing experts, to create and share engaging and accurate nutrition content. Partnership with celebrities should be explored to improve reach and impact of evidence-based diet recommendations online.

Entities:  

Keywords:  diet fads; health communication; internet; nutrition guidelines; public health; social media

Year:  2018        PMID: 30349631      PMCID: PMC6194095          DOI: 10.5210/ojphi.v10i2.9306

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Online J Public Health Inform        ISSN: 1947-2579


Introduction

Optimal nutrition is important for improved health and wellbeing and reducing the risk of diet-related health conditions including chronic disease [1]. In Australia, the National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) publishes the Australian Dietary Guidelines (ADG) and the Australian Guidelines to Healthy Eating (AGHE) for healthy eating based on the best available scientific evidence [2]. However, most Australians do not follow recommended guidelines for healthy eating [3]. Consumers have reportedly found dietary guidelines confusing [4]. This confusion is aggravated by exposure to conflicting and changing nutrition information [5]. The continuously evolving body of nutrition evidence and inaccurate news media reporting contributes to the public perception that “the science keeps changing” [6]. Exposure to these contradictions provokes negative responses ranging from consumer scepticism to anger and anxiety [7]. In some, it induces a sense of inaction and avoidance of all guidelines [5,6] or a backlash which can potentially deter intentions to adopt healthy lifestyle behaviours [5]. In others, it promotes an active search for ‘truth’ [7] or looking for information from sources perceived to be neutral and free from hidden agendas [8]. Online health and nutrition information seeking is a common phenomenon [9]. A national survey in the US reported that nearly 60% of all adults accessed health information online with over a quarter accessing it through social media [9]. Nearly 32% of US adults shared their perceptions and knowledge of health online, and 9% of social media users had started or joined a health-related group. Information on diet, nutrition, vitamins and supplement information has been reported as one of the more common reasons why people use the internet [10]. A similar phenomenon is evident in Australia, with a study in Western Australia showing a dramatic increase in online nutrition information seeking, from less than 1% in 1995-2001 to 33.7% of all adults in 2012 [11]. In order for public health organizations to address nutrition misinformation, it is essential to first understand the current online nutrition information landscape. This study aimed to identify popular online nutrition content in Australia and examine the dietary advice promoted and its alignment with the AGHE.

Methods

Study Design and Approach

Facebook is the most popular social media platform [12] and searching for health information on social media is a growing phenomenon [13]. We therefore, used Facebook “likes” as an indicator of popularity to identify most popular diet and nutrition content producers in Australia. The “About” section of Facebook pages provide a description of the page including links to associated websites and blogs. These websites or blogs contained the page hosts’ food philosophy and diet advice. In order to do a contained study, we excluded analysing individual Facebook posts, but extracted relevant content from the “About section” of the Facebook page, and from the publicly available content on associated websites or blogs.

Sample Selection

Socialbakers [14], a social media analytics company, lists pages with most likes on their website. We used data available on Socialbakers on 7th September 2017 and identified the most “liked” Facebook pages in Australia that made recommendations on healthy eating. All categories of pages were examined, however only the categories “celebrities”, “brands” and “lifestyle” under “communities” contained the pages of interest. Pages that had 100,000 Australian “likes” or more under these three categories were extracted (n =1304). We then excluded pages that were not related to food (n= 1120), food and beverage brands, industry groups, and food retailers (n = 136), recipe pages (n = 28), and news service pages that simply channelled health and nutrition news articles from various sources but did not develop original content (n=7), and thirteen pages remained. Three of these pages (Clean Eating Recipes, Just Eat Real Food, Fitness Recipes) catered to paleo, vegan, gluten-free, dairy-free lifestyles; and one page (Skinnytastes) promoted low-calorie eating. However, the content in these pages and associated websites did not contain explicit statements comparable with AGHE food groups, and so were subsequently excluded from the sample, leaving a final sample of nine pages for analysis.

Data Collection

We used a two-step approach to first, describe the popular Facebook pages, and second, to examine the dietary advice made by the authors of pages on their websites or blogs. Data recorded included Facebook page name, associated website/blog link, and the number of global and Australian page ‘likes’. All websites had either main or sub-pages or blog posts that indicated author's food preferences and advice on what to eat or not.

Step 1 – Description of popular Facebook Pages

In order to describe the pages, we developed a unique coding scheme to categorise type of author, diet pattern or theme, references to dietary guidelines, using the definitions below.

Step 2 – Assessment of the dietary advice and alignment with AGHE

Data extraction for this step was guided by three questions: Do the authors recommend eating, limiting, and/or avoiding food groups? Do authors specify items to eat, limit, and/or avoid within the food groups? Do authors prescribe the selection of food in any manner (for example: organic, grass-fed, pesticide-free, non-GMO, canned, frozen), or cooking technique (for example: soaking, fermenting). The content extracted was recorded verbatim along with a link to the content. Two reviewers (DR and AV) independently coded the content, and summarised diet advice using the three questions listed above as a guide. Where coding differences could not be reconciled between the two primary reviewers, they were referred to a third reviewer (JK). Examples of coding are available in the Appendix. We then assessed the coded summaries for alignment with the AGHE recommendations for each of the five food groups - vegetables, fruit, lean meat, grain, dairy/alternative; we coded legumes separately as they are included under vegetables as well as lean meat food groups in AGHE; and for fat, sugar and salt.

Results

Step 1 – Description of popular Facebook Pages

As described above, nine pages were found to meet the eligibility criteria for inclusion: Michelle Bridges 12 Week Body Transformation (12WBT), Jamie Oliver, Chef Pete Evans (Pete Evans), I Quit Sugar (IQS), The Healthy Mummy (Healthy Mummy), Super Healthy Kids (SHK), Quirky Cooking, Weight Watchers AUNZ (Weight Watchers), and Rebel Dietitian. As shown in , these nine pages had nearly 16 million ‘likes’, with 2,967,788 ‘likes’ from Australia. 12WBT had the highest number of Australian likes at 778,066, whereas Rebel had the least of those sites in our sample at 104,132 likes. The four most popular pages (12WBT, Jamie Oliver, Pete Evans and IQS) were hosted by celebrities. Two pages (SHK and Rebel Dietitian) were hosted by registered dietitians, two pages (Weight Watchers and Healthy Mummy) were commercial weight loss programs.
Table 1

Top Nine Facebook Pages in Australia that provide nutrition advice (as on 7th September 2017)

Facebook Page URL Australian Likes Total Likes Author Diet type / theme Reference to Dietary Guidelines
Michelle Bridges 12 Week Body Transformation (12WBT) https://www.12wbt.com / 728 214778 066celebrityreal food, calorie-countYes - Australian Dietary Guidelines [2]
Jamie Oliver http://www.jamieoliver.com/ 450 1986 525 310celebrityreal foodYes - UK Guidelines [26]
Chef Pete Evans (Pete Evans) http://www.thepaleoway.com 440 3391 528 167celebritypaleo, real foodno
I Quit Sugar (IQS)* https://iquitsugar.com/,http://www.sarahwilson.com 402 756980 875celebritysugar free, real foodYes – Australian Dietary Guidelines [2]
The Healthy Mummy (Healthy Mummy) https://www.healthymummy.com/ 312 367361 663OtherOther –includes Healthy Mummy protein shakesYes – Australian Dietary Guidelines [2]
Super Healthy Kids (SHK) http://www.superhealthykids.com 204 1203 274 660dietitianOther – focus on fruit and vegetable intake for childrenYes – US Dietary Guidelines [27]
Quirky Cooking https://www.quirkycooking.com.au/ 198 340267 268Otherreal food; paleo, dairy-free, gluten-free, other -GAPS Dietno
Weight Watchers AUNZ (Weight Watchers) https://www.weightwatchers.com/au/ 127 322160 867weight loss programcalorie-countyes – Australian Dietary Guidelines [2]
Rebel Dietitian (Rebel) https://rebeldietitian.us 104 1321 948 694dietitianreal food, vegan, raw.No

*Note: The IQS website was taken down May 31, 2018, however the Sarah Wilson website and blog as well as e-Books are still available online.

*Note: The IQS website was taken down May 31, 2018, however the Sarah Wilson website and blog as well as e-Books are still available online. All pages except three (Healthy Mummy, SHK and Weight Watchers) promoted “real food”- or the shift to consuming organic whole foods that are as close to their natural state as possible, with an avoidance of processed foods. In addition, a variety of dietary patterns and themes such as paleo, gluten-free, sugar-free, raw, vegan and their variants were promoted. These niche diets were promoted as healthy ways of eating for everybody and not limited only to specific patient groups such as coeliac patients or those with allergies and intolerances. Six of the pages (12WBT, Jamie Oliver, IQS, Healthy Mummy, Weight Watchers, and SHK) quoted or referenced government-recommended dietary guidelines including those of Australia, UK and US. Two pages (12WBT and Weight Watchers) recommended tracking calories consumed.

Step 2 – Assessment of the dietary advice and alignment with AGHE

indicates alignment or deviation/ contradiction between advice of popular pages and the AGHE on what to eat or limit. Of the nine pages and associated websites reviewed, two (12 WBT, Weight Watchers) aligned with all nine AGHE categories. Three (Rebel Dietitian, Healthy Mummy and SHK) aligned with 8 AGHE categories; and one aligned with the AGHE on 5 (Quirky Cooking), 4 (Jamie Oliver), 3 (Pete Evans), and 2 (IQS) categories. Two (Jamie Oliver, SHK) deviated from the guidelines only due to insistence on organic versions. IQS deviated from the guidelines by an inappropriate focus on fructose elimination.
Table 2

– Alignment of popular online dietary advice with the Australian Guide to Healthy Eating

Page Vegetables Fruit Legumes Grains Lean Meat Dairy/ Alternative Fat Sugar Salt
Michelle Bridges 12 Week Body Transformation (12WBT)
Jamie OliverX*X*X*X*X*
Chef Pete Evans (Pete Evans)XXXXXX
I Quit Sugar (IQS)XXXXXX**X
The Healthy Mummy (Healthy Mummy)X
Super Healthy Kids (SHK)X
Quirky CookingXXXX
Weight Watchers AUSNZ (Weight Watchers)
Rebel DietitianX

√ -aligned with AGHE.X-conflicting / contradictory to AGHE

* consumption advice aligns with AGHE but stipulates organic versions as healthier. 
** consumption advice aligns with AGHE, but advice to eliminate fructose is not supported by evidence.

√ -aligned with AGHE.X-conflicting / contradictory to AGHE * consumption advice aligns with AGHE but stipulates organic versions as healthier. 
** consumption advice aligns with AGHE, but advice to eliminate fructose is not supported by evidence. provides the advice of popular online authors summarised by food groups. Italics have been used where:
Table 3

– Diet and Nutrition Advice of popular Facebook Pages / Websites

Page Vegetables Fruit Legumes Grains Lean Meat, poultry, fish, eggs Dairy/Alternative Fats Sugar Salt
Michelle Bridges 12 Week Body Transformation (12WBT)Eat all vegetables. Choose non-starchy vegetables. 5 serves a day.Eat fruit. Choose seasonal, variety. Avoid dried fruit and juiceEat legumesEat wholemeal or whole grain.Eat meat, poultry, fish, eggs. Eat lean, grilled. 1 serve a day.Eat dairy or alternatives. Choose low-fat option. Two serves a dayLimit butter/margarineUse unsaturated fat options.Avoid deep-fryingEliminate soft drinks. Eliminate salt.Chose low-sodium foods
Jamie OliverEat vegetables. Choose variety of colours, seasonal, organic.Eat fruit. Choose variety of colours, seasonal, organic.Eat beans. Regularly.Eat wholemeal or whole grain. Chose complex carbohydrates.Eat. Quality over quantity. Choose organic, free-range or higher-welfare, responsibly sourced.Eat dairy. Choose low fat, reduced saturated fat and reduced sugar. Choose organic.Eat unsaturated fat. Coconut oil (saturated fat) may be exception.Avoid added sugar.Reduce salt.
Chef Pete Evans (Pete Evans)Eat vegetables. Choose fibrous (non-starchy) vegetables and greens. Choose cultured and fermented vegetables. Limit fruit avoid legumes avoid grains Eat meat, poultry, fish and eggs. Choose grass-fed meat, pastured and free-range poultry and eggs, wild caught fishavoid dairy eliminate vegetable oils. Use olive or nut oil unheated. use natural fats such as duck fat, tallow, pastured lard. use coconut oil. Eliminate refined sugar. Choose Himalayan and Celtic Sea salt
I Quit Sugar (IQS)Eat vegetables. Choose variety of colours. Plenty. Maximise green vegetables.Limit fruit.Avoid dried fruit and juiceAvoid legumes. If eaten then soak / activate.limit carbohydrates. Choose Gluten-free. Use fermented, sprouted, wholegrain.Eat meat, poultry, eggs and fish. Choose sustainable, organic, grass-fed, grain-fed (organic grain), free range Eat full fat dairy. Eliminate low-fat products. Eat saturated fats. Avoid polyunsaturated fatty acids.Avoid omega 3 supplements. Get Omegas from food sources. Eliminate transfats. eliminate fructose. eat glucose, maltose and lactose in moderation. Eliminate refined table-salt. Choose pink salt, whole food sources of salt.
The Healthy Mummy (Healthy Mummy)Eat vegetablesEat fruitEat legumes and beans. Use dried or canned varieties.Eat wholegrains. Try quinoa a gluten-free grain.Eat. Choose less calorie, lean, low-fat, high protein like turkey.Avoid high sugar dairy.Eat saturated fats, eat coconut oilAvoid processed fatsEliminate soft drinksreduced salt or no salt
Super Healthy Kids (SHK)Eat a variety of fresh, frozen, canned, dried, raw or cooked vegetablesEat fresh, frozen, canned. Limit fruit juice. or dried fruit.Eat legumesEat wholegrain Eat organic or hormone free Eat low fat/fat free dairyAvoid trans fat Salt – not too much
Quirky CookingEat vegetables. Eat organic.Eat fruits. Avoid fruits affected by pesticides. Eat organic.Eat Legumes. Soaked.Eat grain free and/or gluten free/ low gluten Pesticide free, soaked, sprouted, fermented grains Eat grass fed, free-range, organic meat Avoid dairy, except for butter/ghee Eat saturated fats. avoid polyunsaturated vegetable oils. choose macadamia oil, tallow, duck fat, or ghee. Chose fats with high smoke point.Avoid refined sugar. Replace with more natural sugars. Choose Himalayan or Celtic Salt
Weight Watchers AUSNZ (Weight Watchers)Eat vegetables. choose variety and in seasonEat fruit. Variety and In SeasonEat pulses as a meat replacementEat wholegrainsEat lean meatsEat low fat dairyEat vegetable, nut and seed oilslimit sugarlimit sugar
Rebel DietitianEat a variety of vegetablesEat a variety of fruit. Naturally dried fruit is okeat legumes. Minimally processed. Soaked.Eat wholegrainsRecommend soaking.Avoid processed grainslimit meat and processed meat. If eaten, choose organic. Avoid fish and shell-fish products - toxic contaminants.Limit dairyavoid animal sources of saturated fat. use unrefined and cold-pressed oils at room temperatureSparingly use. saturated plant-based fat for cookingavoid added sugars, avoid processed sugarsIodised salt

Note: Italicised text indicate non-evidence-based advice or those that deviate from AGHE.

Note: Italicised text indicate non-evidence-based advice or those that deviate from AGHE. the advice is directly contradictory to AGHE such as limiting fruit, dropping food groups, eating saturated fat; and non-evidence-based advice that overstate the health benefits or harms of categories and sub-categories of food that deviates from government guidelines – for example eating organic food, choosing Himalayan salt, replacing sugar with natural sugar or eliminating fructose. Only two websites,12WBTand Weight Watchers, were fully consistent with recommendations in the AGHE, across all food groups, fat, sugar and salt. Jamie Oliver was consistent on all nine AGHE recommendations; however, the advice on fruits, vegetables, lean meat and dairy goes beyond the guidelines by stipulating organic versions of are healthier. Similarly, the website of SHK too aligned on all nine categories, but promotes organic meat. The AGHE does not recommend organic varieties over conventionally grown foods, as there is no consistently proven nutritional advantage [15]. Further, Food Standards Australia and New Zealand (FSANZ) specify a maximum residual limit (MRL) for agricultural or veterinary chemical residue that is legally allowed for all food sold in Australia [16] ensuring conventionally grown food is safe for consumption. Thus, insisting on only organic versions as the healthier option may compromise attempts to increase fresh food consumption among all Australians due to the additional costs and lesser availability of organic produce. The Healthy Mummy and Rebel Dietitian were aligned with AGHE on all food groups, salt and sugar except in the promotion of saturated fats. Pete Evans, Quirky Cooking, and IQS presented the most contradictions with AGHE, with advice including limiting fruit (Pete Evans, IQS) to going dairy-free (Pete Evans and Quirky Cooking) or gluten-free or dropping grains completely. All three promoted “real food” versions such as grass-fed meat, pastured and free-range poultry and eggs, wild caught fish and espoused consuming full-fat dairy, and saturated fats, including coconut oil. Although these websites limited sugar, IQS advice claimed only fructose elimination (component of fruits) was more important than addressing total added sugars. These websites also promoted Himalayan, Pink or Celtic varieties of salt.

Discussion and Conclusion

Our assessment revealed that the most popular nutrition information pages on Facebook are often hosted by celebrities, followed by dietitians, weight loss programs or other persons. Only two were fully aligned with government guidelines, while the rest deviated from AGHE in some way – either through direct contradiction on one or more categories, misinformation, or through overly-restrictive recommendations, exposing health information seekers to conflicting nutrition information. While some public health goals such as consumption of vegetables and avoiding ‘junk’ foods are prominent, the balance of the advice does not align closely with AGHE. The “real food” trend characterized by organic food choices is very popular online within our study sample. Public health organisations promoting AGHE on Facebook are few and have negligible likes compared with popular pages. Proactive efforts are needed by public health organizations in partnership with social media and social marketing experts to leverage Facebook to promote dietary guidelines. Partnering with celebrities may be a vehicle to boost reach of evidence-based nutrition information and countering misinformation, by improving quality and consistency of nutrition messaging. Although the sources we reviewed were consistent with AGHE on increasing vegetable consumption and limiting sugar and ‘junk foods,’ food fads and misinformation were otherwise common. Promotion of ‘niche’ dietary patterns such as gluten-free and diary-free are concerning because they are promoted to everybody, and not limited only to special patient groups for whom they may be necessary. Equally, although some health benefits have been reported in small samples and for specific health conditions for the Paleo diet [17] there is no evidence around its long-term safety and efficacy within the general population. Paleo pages’ advice to the general population to eat saturated fat, exclude grains and legumes, and exclude dairy not only directly contradict official dietary guidelines, but can potentially aggravate the problem of Australians not eating minimum recommended serves of several food groups [3]. While the government guidelines are evidence-based and promote balanced diets drawing on all food groups, diet trends such as promotion of coconut oil and pink salt, or arousing public fear of fructose, deviate from guidelines [18]. Such emphasis to consume or eliminate particular foods or food components, and the trend of dropping entire food groups, create fertile ground for contradictory nutrition messaging and may lead people to doubt dietary guidelines and health recommendations in general [5]. The “real food” trend is predominant online and promoted across popular Facebook pages. While there are no formal definitions for “real food,” the pages in our study broadly refer to “real food” as organic and responsibly sourced whole foods, and exclusion of highly processed foods. Sustainability and sources of food appear to be important to Facebook followers of popular nutrition pages. This is consistent with findings from an earlier study on food beliefs and perceptions of Australians [18]. Public health organizations can learn much from popular pages on fostering public engagement by linking discussions on healthy eating with other values important to Australians, such as environmental sustainability and animal welfare. The lack of Facebook pages dedicated to the promotion of government dietary guidelines amidst various popular pages was particularly striking. For example, pages of Nutrition Australia [19] and DAA [20] had less than 25,000 likes and seemed to be followed by professional nutritionists and dietitians, rather than by the general public. We also found a single post on Australian Dietary Guidelines on the page of Department of Health [21] which had less than 75,000 likes. An earlier study looking for Facebook presence of public health organizations also found only one nutrition-related page - that of Nutrition Australia [22]. It appears that current online dissemination of evidence-based dietary guidelines does not have a large reach in the general population and lacks a strong enough presence on Facebook to counter misinformation propagated by popular pages. Our study finds a clear opportunity for public health organizations and health communicators to leverage Facebook to promote healthy eating guidelines. For example, public health organizations can create Facebook pages dedicated to promoting healthy eating, by disseminating evidence-based guidelines, and countering misinformation. Content should be tailored in light of popular online nutrition themes and broader food choice issues identified in this study and leveraged along with effective Facebook strategies identified in existing research [22]. Building a network and reaching audiences on Facebook is not easy. Celebrity-power, on the other hand, allows their pages to have vast following and social media influence. Positive influences that celebrities can have on public health has been highlighted before [23] and this is exemplified by popular and government response to Jamie Oliver’s Ministry of Food [24] and the more recent Sugar Smart UK [25] campaigns. We recommend public health organizations explore partnerships with celebrities in promoting accurate healthy eating guidelines. We believe this can vastly improve reach and impact of nutrition and diet communication.

Study Limitations

As Facebook is the single largest social media platform, we used number of “likes” to extrapolate nutrition websites that are popular in Australia. It is possible that some popular dietary trends not promoted on Facebook or did not have more than 100,000 Facebook likes were not included in our study (for example intermittent fasting and ketogenic diets). We did not analyse data across all online and social platforms or quantify repetitions of themes within these platforms. Nonetheless, while not definitive, the approach taken may be a reasonable indicator of the predominant nutrition and food choice related themes trending, to inform public health agencies in approaching nutrition communication efforts. As a next step, research examining effectiveness of a dedicated evidence-based nutrition Facebook page, and countering misinformation is recommended. Celebrity partnership may be explored for such a page along with assessment of reach and impact.

Conclusion

Our study shows that that the popular diet and nutrition information websites are not fully aligned with evidence-based guidelines. Even those popular pages that reference government guidelines do so with their own interpretation and perceptions, which can create confusion among online health information seekers. A concentrated effort is required to promote healthy eating guidelines to the general public and counter the misinformation easily accessible online. Such online efforts may be well served by beginning with Facebook given its near universal popularity and reach.
Author type The type of page host, including ‘Celebrities’, ‘Weight loss programs’, ‘Dietitians/nutritionists’, or ‘Other’
Diet pattern or theme Whether the page promoted a particular theme or pattern of diet, including:     • ‘Real food’ (a diet consisting of organic whole foods that are as close to their natural state as possible, with an avoidance of processed foods);     • ‘Paleo’ (consumption of foods presumed to have been the foods available to or consumed by humans during the Paleolithic era. Therefore, grains, dairy, oil, sugar, processed foods are all excluded)     • ‘Calorie-count’ (diets that recommend tracking calories consumed in a day)     • ‘Raw’ (diets that emphasize mostly raw food, rather than cooked)     • ‘Vegan’ (diet based on plant-based foods, avoiding animal-based foods including dairy, eggs and honey)     • ‘Sugar free’ (a diet that emphasizes elimination of almost all sugar from the diet)     • Dairy free (a diet devoid of dairy products)     • Gluten free (a diet devoid of wheat, wheat products and barley)     • ‘Other’(other diet themes –e.g.fruit and vegetables for children, protein powders, Gut and Psychology Syndrome or GAPs Diet)
Reference to dietary guidelines Whether there was any reference or mention of alignment with any government-backed dietary guidelines.
  9 in total

Review 1.  Consumer response to healthy eating, physical activity and weight-related recommendations: a systematic review.

Authors:  S Boylan; J C Y Louie; T P Gill
Journal:  Obes Rev       Date:  2012-03-08       Impact factor: 9.213

Review 2.  Communicating actionable nutrition messages: challenges and opportunities.

Authors:  Jeanne P Goldberg; Sarah A Sliwa
Journal:  Proc Nutr Soc       Date:  2011-01-05       Impact factor: 6.297

Review 3.  Paleolithic nutrition for metabolic syndrome: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Eric W Manheimer; Esther J van Zuuren; Zbys Fedorowicz; Hanno Pijl
Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr       Date:  2015-08-12       Impact factor: 7.045

4.  Does celebrity involvement in public health campaigns deliver long term benefit? Yes.

Authors:  Simon Chapman
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2012-09-25

5.  A qualitative study of how women make meaning of contradictory media messages about the risks of eating fish.

Authors:  Jennifer E Vardeman; Linda Aldoory
Journal:  Health Commun       Date:  2008

6.  Adverse outcomes associated with media exposure to contradictory nutrition messages.

Authors:  Rebekah H Nagler
Journal:  J Health Commun       Date:  2013-10-11

7.  Who Uses the Internet as a Source of Nutrition and Dietary Information? An Australian Population Perspective.

Authors:  Christina Mary Pollard; Claire Elizabeth Pulker; Xingqiong Meng; Deborah Anne Kerr; Jane Anne Scott
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2015-08-26       Impact factor: 5.428

8.  Please Like Me: Facebook and Public Health Communication.

Authors:  James Kite; Bridget C Foley; Anne C Grunseit; Becky Freeman
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-09-15       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Health Information Seeking and Social Media Use on the Internet among People with Diabetes.

Authors:  Ryan J Shaw; Constance M Johnson
Journal:  Online J Public Health Inform       Date:  2011-06-22
  9 in total
  14 in total

1.  Brain Fog in Hypothyroidism: Understanding the Patient's Perspective.

Authors:  Matthew D Ettleson; Ava Raine; Alice Batistuzzo; Samuel P Batista; Elizabeth McAninch; Maria Cristina T V Teixeira; Jacqueline Jonklaas; Neda Laiteerapong; Miriam O Ribeiro; Antonio C Bianco
Journal:  Endocr Pract       Date:  2021-12-08       Impact factor: 3.701

Review 2.  How does the food environment influence people engaged in weight management? A systematic review and thematic synthesis of the qualitative literature.

Authors:  Kimberley L Neve; Anna Isaacs
Journal:  Obes Rev       Date:  2021-12-08       Impact factor: 10.867

Review 3.  Food is medicine: actions to integrate food and nutrition into healthcare.

Authors:  Sarah Downer; Seth A Berkowitz; Timothy S Harlan; Dana Lee Olstad; Dariush Mozaffarian
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2020-06-29

4.  Role of Food Neophobia and Allergen Content in Food Choices for a Polish Cohort of Young Women.

Authors:  Dominika Guzek; Joanna Pęska; Dominika Głąbska
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2019-11-01       Impact factor: 5.717

5.  A Call for a Public Health Agenda for Social Media Research.

Authors:  Sherry Pagoto; Molly E Waring; Ran Xu
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2019-12-19       Impact factor: 5.428

6.  Developing and implementing a new methodology to test the affordability of currently popular weight loss diet meal plans and healthy eating principles.

Authors:  Ella L Bracci; Rachel Milte; Jennifer B Keogh; Karen J Murphy
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2022-01-06       Impact factor: 3.295

7.  Revisiting the Food- and Nutrition-Related Curriculum in Healthcare Education: An Example for Pharmacy Education.

Authors:  Eline Tommelein; Marthe De Boevre; Lize Vanhie; Inge Van Tongelen; Koen Boussery; Sarah De Saeger
Journal:  Pharmacy (Basel)       Date:  2021-05-22

8.  Using the Internet: Nutrition Information-Seeking Behaviours of Lay People Enrolled in a Massive Online Nutrition Course.

Authors:  Melissa Adamski; Helen Truby; Karen M Klassen; Stephanie Cowan; Simone Gibson
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2020-03-12       Impact factor: 5.717

9.  Sorting the Healthy Diet Signal from the Social Media Expert Noise: Preliminary Evidence from the Healthy Diet Discourse on Twitter.

Authors:  Theo Lynn; Pierangelo Rosati; Guto Leoni Santos; Patricia Takako Endo
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-11-18       Impact factor: 3.390

10.  Online Fake News about Food: Self-Evaluation, Social Influence, and the Stages of Change Moderation.

Authors:  Greta Castellini; Mariarosaria Savarese; Guendalina Graffigna
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-03-12       Impact factor: 3.390

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.