Literature DB >> 30349589

Euthymia in Diabetes.

Sanjay Kalra1, Yatan Pal Singh Balhara2, Manish Bathla3.   

Abstract

Euthymia, or optimal mood, is an integral part of health. A diagnosis of diabetes poses multiple challenges to mental and emotional health and may lead to psychological and psychiatric dysfunction. Such conditions influence glycaemic control negatively and may act as barriers to achievement of desired biomedical outcomes. This article describes the concept of euthymia in diabetes and calls for euthymia to be accepted as a target, as well as a tool, in modern diabetes care.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Anxiety; depression; diabetes distress; dysthymia; quality of life; schizophrenia; substance abuse

Year:  2018        PMID: 30349589      PMCID: PMC6182925          DOI: 10.17925/EE.2018.14.2.18

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Endocrinol        ISSN: 1758-3772


Diabetes is a heterogeneous metabolic syndrome characterised by the wide diversity of biomedical and psychosocial features. While the acute and chronic medical complications of diabetes have been recognised for a long time, the psychological and psychiatric aspects of diabetes have garnered attention only in the recent years.[1]

Mental health and diabetes

Disorders such as anxiety, depression and schizophrenia have been found to occur with greater frequency in people with diabetes.[2] Additionally, unique to diabetes is a syndrome-specific condition known as diabetes distress. Perhaps better termed as diabetes adjustment disorder, diabetes distress is defined as a perceived inability to cope with the demands and challenges of living with diabetes.[3] A call has also been made to recognise a drug-specific condition known as insulin distress. Insulin distress is a response or adjustment disorder which may occur in people who are prescribed insulin.[4] All these contribute to an unacceptably high burden of mental health dysfunction in people with diabetes. Such dysfunction has a bidirectional relationship with hyperglycaemia: diabetes is linked with a higher burden of psychiatric morbidity, while depression and anxiety are worsened by the presence of hyperglycaemia.[5] Thus, it becomes important to measure distress, depression and anxiety, along with glycaemic levels, if optimal outcomes are to be achieved. While biomedical targets such as euglycaemia, eulipidemia and normotension are clearly delineated in diabetes care, similar targets are not utilised for the psychological domain of health. One reason for this may be lack of familiarity with psychiatric nosology and diagnostic tools as used in the classification of psychiatric disorders (ICD-10 and DSM-5) among diabetes care professionals.[6,7]

The concept of euthymia

The word euthymia (′eu′ = well + ′thymos′= soul/emotion) was first defined by the Greek scholar Democritus as follows: one is satisfied with what is present and available, taking little heed of people who are envied and admired and observing the lives of those who suffer and yet endure.[8] This definition is uncannily similar to the concept of equanimity or balance found in the ancient Indian text, the Bhagavad Gita.[9,10] It is also reflected in the concept of positive mental health,[11] eustress,[12] and psychological well-being.[13] Psychological flexibility, conceptualised as the ability to recognise and adapt to various situational demands; to change one’s paradigms when these strategies compromise personal or social functioning; to maintain balance among important life domains; and to display consistency in one’s behaviour and deeply held values, adds to the understanding of euthymia as a dynamic entity.[14]

Euthymia – a tool and a target

We propose euthymia as a tool, as well as a target, for diabetes care. The term conveys a sense of healthy life, and healthy coping, with diabetes. Euthymia implies not only an absence of psychiatric illness, but also lack of diabetes distress. This is extremely important, as communication impacts diabetes care in many ways. Euthymia, defined as a state of optimal mood, or mental wellbeing, can be measured objectively by validated tools including the WHO-5.[15] Fava and Bech list the following characteristics of a euthymic state: lack of mood disturbances that meet diagnostic criteria of disease, a feeling of cheerfulness with refreshing/restorative sleep, and psychological flexibility with resistance to stress (resilience and anxiety/frustration tolerance).[16] A 10 item euthymia scale has been proposed as a clinometric tool for euthymia assessment.[16] The Acceptance and Action Questionnaire (AAQ-II) has been designed to measure psychological flexibility.[17]

The case for euthymia

Euthymic diabetes, or diabetic euthymia (as some may wish to call this) conveys a positive connotation and can be used as a counterfoil to the term ‘diabetes distress’. Thus, patient-provider communication may revolve around the need to achieve diabetes euthymia, rather than avoid diabetes distress. It reinforces the importance of the biopsychosocial model of health, as opposed to a purely glucocentric or biomedical approach.[18] It reminds healthcare professionals of the need to assess patient-reported outcomes and psychological measures as a part of routine diabetes care.[19] Once incorporated into daily practice, it will facilitate ‘eulexithymia’ in diabetes care professionals themselves.[20]
  13 in total

1.  Democritus and the origins of moral psychology.

Authors:  C H Kahn
Journal:  Am J Philol       Date:  1985

2.  Management of diabetes distress.

Authors:  Sanjay Kalra; Komal Verma; Yatan Pal Singh Balhara
Journal:  J Pak Med Assoc       Date:  2017-10       Impact factor: 0.781

3.  The sixth vital sign in diabetes.

Authors:  Sanjay Kalra; Komal Verma; Yatan Pal Singh Balhara
Journal:  J Pak Med Assoc       Date:  2017-11       Impact factor: 0.781

4.  A model of the eustress system for health/illness.

Authors:  J H Milsum
Journal:  Behav Sci       Date:  1985-10

5.  To flourish or not: positive mental health and all-cause mortality.

Authors:  Corey L M Keyes; Eduardo J Simoes
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2012-09-20       Impact factor: 9.308

Review 6.  Psychological flexibility as a fundamental aspect of health.

Authors:  Todd B Kashdan; Jonathan Rottenberg
Journal:  Clin Psychol Rev       Date:  2010-03-12

Review 7.  Association of diabetes with anxiety: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Kimberley J Smith; Mélanie Béland; Matthew Clyde; Geneviève Gariépy; Véronique Pagé; Ghislaine Badawi; Rémi Rabasa-Lhoret; Norbert Schmitz
Journal:  J Psychosom Res       Date:  2012-12-28       Impact factor: 3.006

Review 8.  Psychosocial Care for People With Diabetes: A Position Statement of the American Diabetes Association.

Authors:  Deborah Young-Hyman; Mary de Groot; Felicia Hill-Briggs; Jeffrey S Gonzalez; Korey Hood; Mark Peyrot
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2016-12       Impact factor: 19.112

Review 9.  Bhagavad Gita for the Physician.

Authors:  Sanjay Kalra; Ameya Joshi; Bharti Kalra; Vivekanand G Shanbhag; Rajib Bhattacharya; Komal Verma; Manash P Baruah; Rakesh Sahay; Sarita Bajaj; Navneet Agrawal; Ashim Chakraborty; Yatan Pal Singh Balhara; Sandeep Chaudhary; Deepak Khandelwal; Sameer Aggarwal; Nanik Ram; Jubbin Jacob; Sandeep Julka; Gagan Priya; Shelley Bhattacharya; Komal Dalal
Journal:  Indian J Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2017 Nov-Dec

10.  National recommendations: Psychosocial management of diabetes in India.

Authors:  Sanjay Kalra; G R Sridhar; Yatan Pal Singh Balhara; Rakesh Kumar Sahay; Ganapathy Bantwal; Manash P Baruah; Mathew John; Ambika Gopalkrishnan Unnikrishnan; K Madhu; Komal Verma; Aswathy Sreedevi; Rishi Shukla; K M Prasanna Kumar
Journal:  Indian J Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2013-05
View more
  3 in total

1.  Type D Personality Is Associated with Glycemic Control and Socio-Psychological Factors on Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: A Cross-Sectional Study.

Authors:  Yi-Hsin Lin; Di-An Chen; Chemin Lin; Hsuan Huang
Journal:  Psychol Res Behav Manag       Date:  2020-05-01

Review 2.  A Practitioner's Toolkit for Insulin Motivation in Adults with Type 1 and Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: Evidence-Based Recommendations from an International Expert Panel.

Authors:  Sanjay Kalra; Sarita Bajaj; Surendra Kumar Sharma; Gagan Priya; Manash P Baruah; Debmalya Sanyal; Sambit Das; Tirthankar Chaudhury; Kalyan Kumar Gangopadhyay; Ashok Kumar Das; Bipin Sethi; Vageesh Ayyar; Shehla Shaikh; Parag Shah; Sushil Jindal; Vaishali Deshmukh; Joel Dave; Aslam Amod; Ansumali Joshi; Sunil Pokharel; Faruque Pathan; Faria Afsana; Indrajit Prasad; Moosa Murad; Soebagijo Adi Soelistijo; Johanes Purwoto; Zanariah Hussein; Lee Chung Horn; Rakesh Sahay; Noel Somasundaram; Charles Antonypillai; Manilka Sumanathilaka; Uditha Bulugahapitiya
Journal:  Diabetes Ther       Date:  2020-01-24       Impact factor: 2.945

3.  Personality Traits Do Not Have Influence on Glycemic Control in Outpatients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus.

Authors:  Norio Yasui-Furukori; Hiroshi Murakami; Hideyuki Otaka; Jutaro Tanabe; Miyuki Yanagimachi; Masaya Murabayashi; Koki Matsumura; Yuki Matsuhashi; Hirofumi Nakayama; Satoru Mizushiri; Norio Sugawara; Makoto Daimon; Kazutaka Shimoda
Journal:  Psychiatry Investig       Date:  2020-01-25       Impact factor: 2.505

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.