| Literature DB >> 30349289 |
Vikas Pareek1, Vp Subramanyam Rallabandi1, Prasun K Roy2.
Abstract
We investigate the relationship between Gray matter's volume vis-a-vis White matter's integrity indices, such Axial diffusivity, Radial diffusivity, Mean diffusivity, and Fractional anisotropy, in individuals undergoing healthy aging. We investigated MRI scans of 177 adults across 20 to 85 years. We used Voxel-based morphometry, and FDT-FSL analysis for estimation of Gray matter volume and White matter's diffusion indices respectively. Across the life span, we observed an inter-relationship between the Gray matter and White matter, namely that both Axial diffusivity and Mean Diffusivity show strong correlation with Gray matter volume, along the aging process. Furthermore, across all ages the Fractional anisotropy and Mean diffusivity are found to be significantly reduced in females when compared to males, but there are no significant gender differences in Axial Diffusivity and Radial diffusivity. We conclude that for both genders across all ages, the Gray matter's Volume is strongly correlated with White matter's Axial Diffusivity and Mean Diffusivity, while being weakly correlated with Fractional Anisotropy. Our study clarifies the multi-scale relationship in brain tissue, by elucidating how the White matter's micro-structural parameters influences the Gray matter's macro-structural characteristics, during healthy aging across the life-span.Entities:
Keywords: White matter; diffusion tensor imaging; diffusivity; fiber tractography; gray matter volume; magnetic resonance imaging
Year: 2018 PMID: 30349289 PMCID: PMC6194920 DOI: 10.1177/1178623X18799926
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Magn Reson Insights ISSN: 1178-623X
Figure 1.Bar chart representation of subjects age distribution. Mean age ± standard deviation is presented with in the blocks of individual sections of bar plot. (n) number of subjects, for females (n=89) and for (n=88).
Figure 2.Work flow/ processing pipeline stating the methods involved in study.
AD: axial diffusivity; CSF: cerebrospinal fluid; FA: fractional anisotropy; MD: mean diffusivity; RD: radial diffusivity; SPM: statistical parametric mapping; TBSS: tract-based spatial statistics; VBM: voxel-based morphometry.
Diffusivity Indices, for white matter integrity fractional anisotropy (FA), mean diffusivity(MD), radial diffusivity (RD), and axial diffusivity (AD) are evaluated from the diffusion tensor images using FSL-FDT toolbox and the TBSS is used to perform all voxels statistical analysis on the DTIFIT generated maps. Further, the ROI based tractography is performed on the DTI images using Diffusion Toolkit and TrackVis software, ROI’s are selected based on the areas with a significant decrease in FA across normal aging. T1- weighted Magnetic Resonance images were processed for three compartmental segmentations (white matter, gray matter, and CSF) and then the respective volumes of the parcelled compartments were evaluated using SPM-VBM, further the statistical analysis was done on the obtained data.
Age-related changes in gray matter volume (GMV) observed across age (young to old) using regional VBM analysis.
| Area/region | Age-related changes | MNI coordinates (X, Y, Z) (right) (left) | Z-statistics |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dorsolateral prefrontal cortex | Decrease | (−6, 38, 58) (5, 26, 42) | 7.92 |
| Anterior prefrontal cortex (rostral superior middle frontal gyri) | Decrease | (−28, 52, 19) (27, 50, 28) | 7.86 |
| Orbitofrontal cortex (orbital rectus gyri, rostral superior frontal gyrus) | Decrease | (−24, 17, −21) (22, 41, −16) | 6.51 |
| Precentral gyrus | Decrease | (−54, −9, 50) (56, −12, 30) | 7.92 |
| Inferior/middle temporal gyrus | Decrease | (−56, 10, −24) (50, 12, −28) | 6.62 |
| Entorhinal cortex (parahippocampal gyrus) | Decrease | (−27,−32,−12) (18, −17, −16) | 7.06 |
| Anterior cingulate cortex | Decrease | (−6, 10, 45) (4, 14, 32) | 6.91 |
| Retrosplenial cingulate cortex | Decrease | (−10, −46, 12) (9, −51, 18) | 6.52 |
| Cerebellum (posterior lobe) | Decrease | (−32, −84, −38) (31, −90, −34) | 6.28 |
| Temporo-parietal cortex | Decrease | (−52, −40, 28) (54, −42, 25) | 7.22 |
| Amygdala/hippocampus | Decrease | (−27,−4,−21) (26,−3,−22) | 7.43 |
| Anterior thalamus | Decrease | (−2, 1, 3) (5, 2, 7) | 6.98 |
| Posterior thalamus | Decrease | (−14, 18, 8) (15,−17, 9) | 6.89 |
| Fusiform gyrus | No significant change | (−30, −53, −9) (32, −43, −11) | 6.21 |
| Angular gyrus | No significant change | (−35, −65, 40) (42, −54, 32) | 7.97 |
| Supramarginal gyrus | No significant change | (−50, −21, 35) (54, −13, 26) | 6.02 |
| Frontoparietal cortex | No significant change | (−41, 11, 39) (46, 21, 32) | 7.37 |
| Superior temporal gyrus | No significant change | (−48, −34, 14) (52, −38, 12) | 6.18 |
| Auditory cortex | No significant change | (−42, −30, 13) (45, −27, 19) | 6.54 |
| Postcentral gyrus | No significant change | (−57, −28, 45) (62, −20, 40) | 7.87 |
| Primary somatosensory cortex | No significant change | (−8 −54 62) (12,−52, 68) | 6.84 |
| Posterior primary motor cortex | No significant change | (−28,−28, 70) (32, −28, 70) | 6.92 |
| Premotor/ Supplementary cortex | No significant change | (−3, −6, 53) (8, −2, 40) | 6.16 |
| Parieto-occipital cortex | No significant change | (−5, −58, 42) (6, −52, 53) | 7.08 |
| Primary visual cortex (V1) | No significant change | (−8,−76, 3) (6, 72, 4) | 7.28 |
| Inferior occipital gyrus | No significant change | (9, −70, −6) (−8, −68, −4) | 6.99 |
| Superior occipital gyrus | No significant change | (−16, −77, 17) (18, −75, 20) | 7.11 |
| Striatum | No significant change | (−32, 20, 0) (30, 24, 6) | 6.8 |
Figure 3.Regional gray matter volume using voxel-based morphometry analysis. A. young>old; B. young>middle; C. middle>old.
Alteration of the relative gray matter ratio as aging transition occurs.
| Brain tissue parameters |
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Gray matter volume (cc.) | 715 | 668 | 636 |
| White matter volume (cc.) | 534 | 523 | 472 |
| Gray matter ratio | 1.339 | 1.277 | 1.347 |
Gray matter ratio = gray matter volume/White matter volume; ratio indicates the relative amount of gray matter when normalized with respect to the White matter size.
Significant decrease in gray matter volume (P < .001) in the old aged individuals compared to the middle age subjects.
Significant decrease in gray matter volume (P < .05) in the old aged individuals compared to the middle age subjects.
Figure 4.As the aging process ensues, there is a U-shaped alteration in the gray matter ratio, which indicates the amount of gray matter (in cc.) corresponding to unit amount (1 cc.) of White matter size. The curve of quadratic fit is shown. The second-order polynomial (quadratic) fit: P < .05 (perfect fit), 0.87; -0.2; 0.06, for B0, B1 and B2 respectively.
List of brain regions which show significant FA changes (P < .05) as aging occurs from young (20 years) to old (85 years). For each brain region the MNI coordinates and the number of voxels (cluster size) exhibiting that change in the brain region is shown. R & L implies that the particular brain region shows the change bilaterally.
| White matter location (FA) | Cluster size (voxel) | MNI Coordinates (X Y Z (mm)) |
|---|---|---|
| Posterior radiations of thalamus (geniculocalcarine tract) R | 435 | (34 -42 8) |
| Anterior thalamic radiations of thalamus (geniculocalcarine tract) R | 566 | (-39 -44 3) |
| Body – corpus callosum | 581 | (18 -17 35) |
| Genus of corpus callosum | 622 | (12 32 3) |
| Fornix (Cres)/Stria Terminalis(R & L) | 1030 | (-31 -18 -12) (35 -15 -12) |
| Cerebral peduncle R & L | 1032 | (19 -17 -7) (-14 -19 -12) |
| Stratum sagittale (inclusive of inf. fronto-occipital fasciculus) (R & L) | 1042 | (38 -17 -12) (-37 -13 -12) |
| Retrolentricular part of internal capsule R & L | 1090 | (29 -21 8) (-32 -24 3) |
| External capsule (R & L) | 1110 | (31 -17 10) (-32 -18 3) |
| Posterior limb of internal capsule (R & L) | 1114 | (28 -17 17) (-10 -4 3) |
| Superior longitudinal fasciculus (R & L) | 1166 | (40 -17 32) (-34 -17 36) |
| Cingulate cortex (R & L) | 1220 | (9 -17 34) (-9 -16 34) |
| Superior corona radiata (R & L) | 1224 | (20 -19 37) (-18 -17 37) |
| Internal capsule (Anterior Limb-R) | 1236 | (12 3 3) (-22 23 3) |
| Anterior corona radiata (R & L) | 1312 | (17 38 3) (-24 29 3) |
Figure 5.Normal aging based regions with significant FA changes from young (20 years) to old (85 years) ages and their respective cluster sizes. R+L, for the same regions showing significant differences in both hemispheres.
Figure 6.Region specific changes of fibertractography in all the three age groups. ROI based tractography using Diffusion Toolkit and TrackVis.
Global mean gray matter volume and various diffusion indices in three age groups (Young-middle-old).
| Parameter | Young (Mean ± SD) | Middle (Mean ± SD) | Old (Mean ± SD) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gray matter volume | 0.715 ± 0.061 | 0.668 ± 0.076 | 0.636 ± 0.062 |
| Fractional anisotropy | 0.397 ± 0.0133 | 0.396 ± 0.0210 | 0.388 ± 0.007 |
| Mean diffusivity | 0.000202 ± 2.248e-05 | 0.000198 ± 2.281e-05 | 0.000217 ± 2.69e-05 |
| Radial diffusivity | 0.000176 ± 1.98e-05 | 0.000174 ± 2.0e-05 | 0.000193 ± 2.46e-05 |
| Axial diffusivity | 0.000253 ± 2.71e-05 | 0.000248 ± 2.95e-05 | 0.000264± 3.172e-05 |
P < .05. ***P < .001
The significant decrease in gray matter volume (P < .001) and the fractional anisotropy values (P < .05) is observed in the old age subjects compared to the middle age subjects. The significant increase in the mean diffusivity, radial diffusivity, and axial diffusivity (P < .05) is observed in the old age subjects compared to the Young and the middle age subjects. In Young to Old comparison the significant (p<0.05) decrease in global GMV and FA values is observed.
Figure 7.Regression analysis, for the relationship between diffusion indices (FA, MD, AD and RD) with GMV [A-D] and the subjective differences between male and female and the respective relationship of the young, middle and old age groups.
Figure 8.Regression analysis, for the relationship between Diffusion Indices (FA, MD, AD and RD) with GMV [A-D] and the subjective differences between the relationship of the young, middle and old age groups.
Value of correlation between white matter indices and gray matter volume while aging progresses.
| White matter indices | Gray matter volume | ||
|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
| |
| Axial diffusivity | 0.73 | 0.71 | 0.81 |
| Mean diffusivity | 0.72 | 0.67 | 0.77 |
| Radial diffusivity | Not significant | Not significant | Not significant |
| Fractional anisotropy | Not significant | Not significant | Not significant |
“Not significant” implies that the correlation value is not statistically significant, with the P value exceeding .05 (see text).
Figure 9.While the aging transition takes place, there occurs a U-shaped change in the value of correlation between the white matter axial diffusivity and the gray matter volume. The data is fitted to a quadratic curve. The second-order polynomial (quadratic) fit: P < .05 (perfect fit); 1.533; -0.26; 0.066 for B0, B1 and B2 respectively.