Literature DB >> 30348866

Fertilizing riparian forests: nutrient repletion across ecotones with trophic rewilding.

Joseph K Bump1.   

Abstract

Trophic rewilding maintains that large mammals are functionally important to resource subsidies and nutrient repletion, yet this prediction is understudied. Here, I report on the potential magnitude and variability of nitrogen that moose populations move from aquatic to terrestrial ecosystems. My aim is to provide justified approximations of the role of moose in the flux of a limiting nutrient across ecotones and to illustrate how this role is linked to wolf predation and climate warming. Using Isle Royale and northeastern Minnesota, USA as contrasting focal systems, I found that the long-term annual N gain for riparian forests likely ranges from 1 to 10 kg N ha-1 yr-1, depending on the heterogeneity of moose movements. For these systems, this range is equivalent to approximately 4-30% of net annual N mineralization, approximately 62-625% of annual N runoff, approximately 28-333% of annual atmospheric N deposition and approximately 31-312% of the N sequestered by trees. The N flux approximation is most sensitive to moose population levels and, as such, is influenced by wolves, climate warming and disease. The potential for other terrestrial ungulates that feed on aquatic plants to provide significant nutrient repletion across ecotones is unknown but important to examine in the context of trophic rewilding. The extent to which predators influence ungulate abundance indirectly impacts this nutrient repletion.This article is part of the theme issue 'Trophic rewilding: consequences for ecosystems under global change'.
© 2018 The Author(s).

Entities:  

Keywords:  boreal; climate change; moose (Alces alces); resource subsidy; ungulate; wolves (Canis lupus)

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30348866      PMCID: PMC6231066          DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2017.0439

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8436            Impact factor:   6.237


  20 in total

1.  Reciprocal subsidies between freshwater and terrestrial ecosystems structure consumer resource dynamics.

Authors:  Pia Bartels; Julien Cucherousset; Kristin Steger; Peter Eklöv; Lars J Tranvik; Helmut Hillebrand
Journal:  Ecology       Date:  2012-05       Impact factor: 5.499

2.  Predator control of ecosystem nutrient dynamics.

Authors:  Oswald J Schmitz; Dror Hawlena; Geoffrey C Trussell
Journal:  Ecol Lett       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 9.492

3.  Large herbivores and aquatic-terrestrial links in southern boreal forests.

Authors:  Joseph K Bump; Keren B Tischler; Amy J Schrank; Rolf O Peterson; John A Vucetich
Journal:  J Anim Ecol       Date:  2008-11-04       Impact factor: 5.091

4.  Impacts of salmon on riparian plant diversity.

Authors:  Morgan D Hocking; John D Reynolds
Journal:  Science       Date:  2011-03-25       Impact factor: 47.728

5.  Plant-soil feedbacks and mycorrhizal type influence temperate forest population dynamics.

Authors:  Jonathan A Bennett; Hafiz Maherali; Kurt O Reinhart; Ylva Lekberg; Miranda M Hart; John Klironomos
Journal:  Science       Date:  2017-01-13       Impact factor: 47.728

6.  The greenscape shapes surfing of resource waves in a large migratory herbivore.

Authors:  Ellen O Aikens; Matthew J Kauffman; Jerod A Merkle; Samantha P H Dwinnell; Gary L Fralick; Kevin L Monteith
Journal:  Ecol Lett       Date:  2017-04-25       Impact factor: 9.492

7.  The influence of top-down, bottom-up and abiotic factors on the moose (Alces alces) population of Isle Royale.

Authors:  John A Vucetich; Rolf O Peterson
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2004-01-22       Impact factor: 5.349

8.  Nitrogen limitation of net primary productivity in terrestrial ecosystems is globally distributed.

Authors:  David S LeBauer; Kathleen K Treseder
Journal:  Ecology       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 5.499

9.  Quantifying aquatic insect deposition from lake to land.

Authors:  Jamin Dreyer; Philip A Townsend; James C Hook; David Hoekman; M Jake Vander Zanden; Claudio Gratton
Journal:  Ecology       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 5.499

10.  Science for a wilder Anthropocene: Synthesis and future directions for trophic rewilding research.

Authors:  Jens-Christian Svenning; Pil B M Pedersen; C Josh Donlan; Rasmus Ejrnæs; Søren Faurby; Mauro Galetti; Dennis M Hansen; Brody Sandel; Christopher J Sandom; John W Terborgh; Frans W M Vera
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-10-26       Impact factor: 11.205

View more
  4 in total

1.  Trophic rewilding: impact on ecosystems under global change.

Authors:  Elisabeth S Bakker; Jens-Christian Svenning
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2018-10-22       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 2.  Linking contemporary river restoration to economics, technology, politics, and society: Perspectives from a historical case study of the Po River Basin, Italy.

Authors:  Fabrizio Frascaroli; Giacomo Parrinello; Meredith Root-Bernstein
Journal:  Ambio       Date:  2020-07-22       Impact factor: 5.129

3.  The megabiota are disproportionately important for biosphere functioning.

Authors:  Brian J Enquist; Andrew J Abraham; Michael B J Harfoot; Yadvinder Malhi; Christopher E Doughty
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2020-02-04       Impact factor: 14.919

4.  White-tailed deer consumption of emergent macrophytes mediates aquatic-to-terrestrial nutrient flows.

Authors:  Jonathan W Lopez; Daniel C Allen; Caryn C Vaughn
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2022-09-12       Impact factor: 3.167

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.