BACKGROUND/AIM: To examine the correlation between dosimetric parameters and acute radiation dermatitis in early breast cancer patients subjected to post-operative radiotherapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The data of 84 patients treated with post-operative radiotherapy were analyzed. The total prescribed dose was 50 Gy in 25 fractions over 5 weeks. Radiation dermatitis was assessed according to Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v4.0. We set organ at risk whole body (from neck to abdomen examined by CT images) also as surrogate skin volume (3 mm thickness). RESULTS: A total of 28 patients showed radiation dermatitis grade equal or higher than 2 at the 50 Gy time point. These 28 patients were compared to 56 matched pair patients with grade 0-1 radiation dermatitis during the same treatment period. The mean of V5-20 and V40 in patient's whole volume and V40-50 in skin volume were significantly higher in patients who presented with acute radiation dermatitis Grades ≥2 than in the other patients who did not. The statistically most significant difference was observed for V40 for skin volume and V5 for patient whole volume. Rate of acute radiation dermatitis grade ≥2 was significantly higher for patients with V5 (whole body) >1,360 cm3 than those with V5 (whole body) <1,360 cm3 (47% vs. 27%, p=0.0353), as well as for patients with V40 (skin volume) >45 cm3 compared with those with V40 (skin volume) <45 cm3 (50% vs. 18%, p=0.0043). CONCLUSION: Dosimetric parameters were useful to predict radiation dermatitis grade ≥2. V5 (whole body) 1,360 cm3 and V40 (skin volume) 45 cm3 may be dose volume constrain for radiation dermatitis grade ≥2. Copyright
BACKGROUND/AIM: To examine the correlation between dosimetric parameters and acute radiation dermatitis in early breast cancerpatients subjected to post-operative radiotherapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The data of 84 patients treated with post-operative radiotherapy were analyzed. The total prescribed dose was 50 Gy in 25 fractions over 5 weeks. Radiation dermatitis was assessed according to Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v4.0. We set organ at risk whole body (from neck to abdomen examined by CT images) also as surrogate skin volume (3 mm thickness). RESULTS: A total of 28 patients showed radiation dermatitis grade equal or higher than 2 at the 50 Gy time point. These 28 patients were compared to 56 matched pair patients with grade 0-1 radiation dermatitis during the same treatment period. The mean of V5-20 and V40 in patient's whole volume and V40-50 in skin volume were significantly higher in patients who presented with acute radiation dermatitis Grades ≥2 than in the other patients who did not. The statistically most significant difference was observed for V40 for skin volume and V5 for patient whole volume. Rate of acute radiation dermatitis grade ≥2 was significantly higher for patients with V5 (whole body) >1,360 cm3 than those with V5 (whole body) <1,360 cm3 (47% vs. 27%, p=0.0353), as well as for patients with V40 (skin volume) >45 cm3 compared with those with V40 (skin volume) <45 cm3 (50% vs. 18%, p=0.0043). CONCLUSION: Dosimetric parameters were useful to predict radiation dermatitis grade ≥2. V5 (whole body) 1,360 cm3 and V40 (skin volume) 45 cm3 may be dose volume constrain for radiation dermatitis grade ≥2. Copyright
Authors: M Clarke; R Collins; S Darby; C Davies; P Elphinstone; V Evans; J Godwin; R Gray; C Hicks; S James; E MacKinnon; P McGale; T McHugh; R Peto; C Taylor; Y Wang Journal: Lancet Date: 2005-12-17 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Julie B Schnur; Suzanne C Ouellette; Terry A Dilorenzo; Sheryl Green; Guy H Montgomery Journal: Psychooncology Date: 2011-03 Impact factor: 3.894
Authors: J Fisher; C Scott; R Stevens; B Marconi; L Champion; G M Freedman; F Asrari; M V Pilepich; J D Gagnon; G Wong Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2000-12-01 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: L L Kestin; M B Sharpe; R C Frazier; F A Vicini; D Yan; R C Matter; A A Martinez; J W Wong Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2000-12-01 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: Escarlata López; M Isabel Núñez; M Rosario Guerrero; Rosario del Moral; Juan de Dios Luna; M del Mar Rodríguez; M Teresa Valenzuela; Mercedes Villalobos; José Mariano Ruiz de Almodóvar Journal: Breast Cancer Res Treat Date: 2002-05 Impact factor: 4.872
Authors: Bernard Fisher; Stewart Anderson; John Bryant; Richard G Margolese; Melvin Deutsch; Edwin R Fisher; Jong-Hyeon Jeong; Norman Wolmark Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2002-10-17 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Laurie W Cuttino; Linda McCall; Charlotte Kubicky; Karla V Ballman; Huong Le-Petross; Kelly K Hunt; Bruce Haffty; Kari M Rosenkranz; Judy C Boughey Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2021-10-08 Impact factor: 7.038