| Literature DB >> 30348220 |
Takeshi Akiyama1, Ernesto R Gregorio2, Jun Kobayashi3.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Sports activities is broadly utilized to support well-being of youth after a disaster or conflict. However, scientific validation of programs have not been conducted. The Mastery Approach to Coaching (MAC) is a coaching-education program on sports activities. The MAC reported to have a positive effect on youngsters' self-esteem. As self-esteem is generally known to be beneficial for mental status, we tested the effect of a MAC program on students' self-esteem in a disaster-affected area: Leyte, Philippines. We recruited 10th grade students from three schools; one school was allocated to the MAC intervention and the two schools to the control group. All schools were encouraged to involve students in volleyball from January to February 2015. In January 2015, MAC workshop was conducted in the intervention school before the sports activity.Entities:
Keywords: Adolescent; Mastery Approach to Coaching; Philippines; Post disaster; Self-esteem; Sports activity
Mesh:
Year: 2018 PMID: 30348220 PMCID: PMC6196409 DOI: 10.1186/s13104-018-3860-1
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Res Notes ISSN: 1756-0500
Characteristics of the participants (n = 293)
|
| (%) | Mean age (years) | SD | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total | 293 | (100.0) | 16.6 | 1.61 |
| Male | 127 | (43.3) | 16.9 | 1.53 |
| Female | 166 | (56.7) | 16.3 | 1.63 |
| Intervention (n = 51) | ||||
| School A | 51 | (17.4) | 16.4 | 1.08 |
| Control (n = 242) | ||||
| School B | 21 | (7.2) | 16.2 | 1.12 |
| School C | 221 | (75.4) | 16.6 | 1.74 |
Scores on the Rosenberg’s self-esteem scale in pre-and post-intervention
| Pre | Engaged days | Post | p valuea | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mean | SD | Meanb | SD | Meanb | SD | ||
| Intervention | |||||||
| School A (n = 51) | 20.2 | 2.36 | 23.4 | 10.30 | 21.1 | 2.81 | 0.02 |
| Control (n = 242) | 19.7 | 3.05 | 18.6 | 2.92 | 19.7 | 3.28 | 0.83 |
| School B (n = 21) | 19.2 | 2.86 | 18.1 | 2.56 | 20.2 | 3.26 | |
| School C (n = 221) | 19.7 | 3.07 | 18.6 | 2.97 | 19.7 | 3.26 | |
aThe t-test results on the difference between pre and post intervention
bThe difference between the intervention and control groups was statistically significant (p < 0.05)