| Literature DB >> 30347870 |
Hui Gao1, Guangshui Na2, Yao Yao3,4, Ruijing Li5, Yuhang Gao6,7, Zhifeng Zhang8, Ziwei Yao9.
Abstract
Dechloranes (Decs) have been widely found in the environment, even in the Tibetan Plateau and remote polar regions. However, the understanding of their regional distribution characteristics in polar regions is limited. To study the long-range atmospheric transport and fates of these emerging contaminants, Decs were analyzed in soil and lichen from the Fildes Peninsula in Antarctica. The concentrations of five Decs in soil and lichen ranged from 141.46 to 838.47 pg/g dw and 237.04 to 3599.18 pg/g dw, respectively. The mean fractions of anti-Dechlorane Plus (DP) (fanti) values estimated in the current soils (0.37) and lichen (0.24) were lower than those of commercial products (fanti = 0.64⁻0.80), which confirms that long-range atmospheric transport is a main source of DP, and the DP burdens could be driven by the accumulation of syn-DP. The average ΣDP concentration in soil in the coastal area was higher than that in the inland area and Ardley Island, while in lichen, the average DP concentration at the Ardley Island site was approximately three-fold higher than that in the coastal area and inland areas. This indicates that the distribution of DP was influenced by anthropogenic interference and animal activities in the Fildes Peninsula. The spatial variation of fanti of the three regions was clearer in soil than that in lichen. The fanti values were negatively correlated with DP concentrations in soil, suggesting that DP concentration levels play an important role in determining the isomeric composition of DP in the soil.Entities:
Keywords: Fildes Peninsula; dechloranes; lichen; soil; stereo selection
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 30347870 PMCID: PMC6210969 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph15102312
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health ISSN: 1660-4601 Impact factor: 3.390
Figure 1Map of the sampling sites.
Concentrations (mean values) of dechloranes in soil and lichen samples from coastal, inland, and Ardley island areas in the Fildes Peninsula, Antarctica.
| Sampling Area | Sample Number | Soil (pg/g dw) | Sample Number | Lichen (pg/g dw) | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 602 | 603 | 604 | DP | 602 | 603 | 604 | DP | |||||
| Coastal area | 12 | FD (%) | 33 | 25 | 75 | 100 | 9 | FD (%) | 22 | 22 | 78 | 100 |
| Range | nd–7.04 | nd–43.10 | nd–483.22 | 97.18–336.42 | Range | nd–1.72 | nd–62.91 | nd–309.70 | 213.29–757.12 | |||
| Mean | 2.31 ± 2.01 | 21.01 ± 10.89 | 187.85 ± 147.60 | 232.58 ± 88.96 | Mean | 0.65 ± 0.44 | 18.09 ± 23.90 | 69.64 ± 93.81 | 449.32 ± 213.26 | |||
| Inland area | 5 | FD (%) | 40 | 60 | 40 | 100 | 6 | FD (%) | 17 | 33 | 83 | 100 |
| Range | nd–5.56 | nd–74.25 | nd–116.85 | 97.37–316.08 | Range | nd–3.56 | nd–24.74 | nd–130.76 | 175–659.24 | |||
| Mean | 2.49 ± 2.01 | 38.20 ± 25.02 | 52.89 ± 38.94 | 200.54 ± 86.48 | Mean | 0.97 ± 1.27 | 11.27 ± 8.28 | 70.16 ± 46.29 | 337.47 ± 171.90 | |||
| Ardley island | 3 | FD (%) | 67 | 0 | 67 | 100 | 3 | FD (%) | 33 | 0 | 100 | 100 |
| Range | nd–3.05 | nd | nd–293.87 | 57.86–319.71 | Range | nd–1.47 | nd | 142.14–543.75 | 393.80–3048.91 | |||
| Mean | 2.33 ± 1.06 | nd | 136.73 ± 139.39 | 150.43 ± 146.82 | Mean | 0.79 ± 0.59 | nd | 294.26 ± 217.79 | 1513.03 ± 1375.72 | |||
Note: FD, frequency of detection; DP, Dechlorane Plus; nd, not detected.
Figure 2The fanti values of (a) soil and lichen soil and (b) lichen from the Fildes Peninsula, Antarctica.
Figure 3Boxplot of the fanti values in soil and lichen from the Fildes Peninsula, Antarctica.
Figure 4Correlation between the fanti values and DP levels in (a) soil and (b) lichen from the Fildes Peninsula, Antarctica.