| Literature DB >> 30347674 |
Pedram Shokouh1,2, Per Bendix Jeppesen3, Kjeld Hermansen4, Christoffer Laustsen5, Hans Stødkilde-Jørgensen6, Stephen Jacques Hamilton-Dutoit7, Mette Søndergaard Schmedes8, Haiyun Qi9, Thomas Stokholm Nørlinger10, Søren Gregersen11.
Abstract
The literature is inconsistent as to how coffee affects metabolic syndrome (MetS), and which bioactive compounds are responsible for its metabolic effects. This study aimed to evaluate the effects of unfiltered coffee on diet-induced MetS and investigate whether or not phenolic acids and trigonelline are the main bioactive compounds in coffee. Twenty-four male Sprague‒Dawley rats were fed a high-fat (35% W/W) diet plus 20% W/W fructose in drinking water for 14 weeks, and were randomized into three groups: control, coffee, or nutraceuticals (5-O-caffeoylquinic acid, caffeic acid, and trigonelline). Coffee or nutraceuticals were provided in drinking water at a dosage equal to 4 cups/day in a human. Compared to the controls, total food intake (p = 0.023) and mean body weight at endpoint (p = 0.016) and estimated average plasma glucose (p = 0.041) were lower only in the coffee group. Surrogate measures of insulin resistance including the overall fasting insulin (p = 0.010), endpoint HOMA-IR (p = 0.022), and oral glucose tolerance (p = 0.029) were improved in the coffee group. Circulating triglyceride levels were lower (p = 0.010), and histopathological and quantitative (p = 0.010) measurements indicated lower grades of liver steatosis compared to controls after long-term coffee consumption. In conclusion, a combination of phenolic acids and trigonelline was not as effective as coffee per se in improving the components of the MetS. This points to the role of other coffee chemicals and a potential synergism between compounds.Entities:
Keywords: caffeic acid; carbon-13 magnetic resonance spectroscopy; chlorogenic acid; coffee; insulin resistance; metabolic syndrome x; non-alcoholic fatty liver disease; phytotherapy; trigonelline
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 30347674 PMCID: PMC6213813 DOI: 10.3390/nu10101547
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nutrients ISSN: 2072-6643 Impact factor: 5.717
Nutrient composition of the high fat diet, D12492 (Research Diets, Inc., New Brunswick, NJ, USA), used in the current study in combination with 20% W/W fructose in drinking water to induce a rat model of metabolic syndrome.
| Ingredients | Gram Percent |
|---|---|
| Casein, 30 Mesh | 25.84 |
| L-Cystine | 0.39 |
| Corn Starch | 0.00 |
| Maltodextrin 10 | 16.15 |
| Sucrose | 8.89 |
| Cellulose | 6.46 |
| Soybean Oil | 32.53 |
| Lard | 31.66 |
| Mineral Mix S10026 | 1.29 |
| DiCalcium Phosphate | 1.68 |
| Calcium Carbonate | 0.71 |
| Potassium Citrate, 1 H2O | 2.13 |
| Vitamin Mix V10001 | 1.29 |
| Choline Bitartrate | 0.26 |
Figure 1(A) The mean daily food consumption measured biweekly and the total food consumed between weeks 2 and 14 (as the area under the curve). (B) The trend of changes in body weight of each group over time is displayed. Straight lines represent the slope of changes in coffee vs. the control group; Error bars represent standard deviation of the mean. Asterisks denote significantly different values from the control group (* p ˂ 0.05).
Mean (SD) of glucose and insulin measures recorded four times during the intervention period; AUC: area under the curve of repeated measurements. Significant one-way ANOVA p-values are in bold.
| Mean (SD) | Control | Coffee | Nutraceuticals | Between Group |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fasting plasma glucose (mmol/L) | ||||
| Baseline | 7.69 (0.75) | 7.35 (0.42) | 7.60 (0.82) | 0.588 |
| Week 4 | 8.24 (1.09) | 7.93 (1.03) | 8.43 (0.63) | 0.560 |
| Week 10 | 8.17 (1.92) | 7.51 (0.61) | 7.70 (0.92) | 0.588 |
| Week 14 | 10.00 (1.48) | 9.09 (1.50) | 9.46 (1.55) | 0.491 |
| Glycated hemoglobin (mM/M) | ||||
| Week 14 | 22.88 (1.25) | 21.25 (1.04) * | 23.67 (2.16) †† |
|
| Fasting plasma Insulin (mU/L) | ||||
| Baseline | 24.47 (8.79) | 23.50 (7.88) | 26.94 (5.58) | 0.647 |
| Week 4 | 52.55 (21.29) | 34.26 (13.49) | 52.85 (23.56) | 0.126 |
| Week 10 | 41.21 (13.82) | 26.49 (6.14) | 43.31 (8.88) †† |
|
| Week 14 | 80.73 (33.83) | 53.11 (29.25) | 76.07 (27.91) | 0.211 |
| AUC | 146.38 (49.54) | 100.79 (34.09) * | 133.16 (41.80) † |
|
* significantly different from the control group (* p ˂ 0.05); † significantly different from the other intervention group († p ˂ 0.05, †† p ˂ 0.01); Statistically significant p-values are shown in bold.
Figure 2Surrogate measures of insulin resistance: (A) changes in HOMA-IR in each study group and its area under the curve (AUC); (B) repeated plasma glucose measurements during an oral glucose tolerance test and the AUC of changes in the first two hours. Error bars are standard deviation of the mean. Asterisks denote significantly different values (* p ˂ 0.05, ** p ˂ 0.01).
Mean (SD) value of endpoint immunoassay and 1H-MR spectroscopy measurements. F-test p-values are presented in the right-most column. Significantly different values from the control and from the other intervention group are bolded and marked by superscript symbols.
| Mean (SD) | Control Group | Coffee Group | Chemicals Group | Between Group |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Plasma | ||||
| Lipids (mmol/L) | ||||
| Total Cholesterol | 1.650 (0.118) | 1.728 (0.099) | 1.558 (0.125) | 0.604 |
| NonHDL-C | 0.544 (0.045) | 0.535 (0.092) | 0.488 (0.029) | 0.588 |
| LDL-C | 0.250 (0.023) | 0.336 (0.036) | 0.257 (0.011) | 0.156 |
| HDL-C | 1.106 (0.085) | 1.193 (0.098) | 1.080 (0.104) | 0.690 |
| Triglycerides | 0.649 (0.041) | 0.380 (0.053) ** | 0.535 (0.082) |
|
| Nonesterified fatty acids | 0.279 (0.039) | 0.295 (0.025) | 0.288 (0.039) | 0.941 |
| Adiponectine (μg/mL) | 5.694 (0.371) | 5.188 (0.618) | 4.701 (0.573) | 0.474 |
| Total antioxidant capacity (Trolox equivalent, mmol/L) | 102.323 (1.743) | 97.228 (2.168) | 102.272 (2.344) | 0.152 |
| Alanine transaminase (U/L) | 18.838 (1.280) | 19.875 (1.612) | 17.983 (1.061) | 0.718 |
| Liver triglycerides content (mmol/L) | 2.806 (0.384) | 1.379 (0.108) **,† | 2.386 (0.432) |
|
| Urine (relative units) | ||||
| Trigonelline | 0.0002 (0.000) | 0.038 (0.015) | 0.025 (0.019) | 0.597 ¥ |
| Ethanol | 1.355 (0.829) | 1.378 (0.257) | 1.404 (0.262) | 0.991 |
** significantly different from the control group (** p ˂ 0.01); † significantly different from the other intervention group († p ˂ 0.05); ¥ independent t-test p-value of comparison between two intervention groups; Statistically significant p-values are shown in bold.
Figure 3Representative hematoxylin and eosin-stained histological sections of rat liver: (A) Samples from the control group showing marked fatty change. There is mixed small- and large-droplet macrovesicular steatosis affecting most hepatocytes. There is no ballooning, inflammation or fibrosis. (B) Rat liver sample from the coffee group showing normal morphology with no significant steatosis. (C) Marked steatosis, predominantly large-droplet macrovesicular, in most hepatocytes without ballooning, inflammation, or fibrosis in a random sample from the nutraceuticals group.
Figure 4(A) A typical full-torso coronal 1H MR image; (B) a representative 2D 13C sum spectra observed after injecting the hyperpolarized [1-13C]-pyruvate; (C) changes in the signal intensity of metabolites over the 60-s scanning period; (D) area under the curve of signal intensity‒time curves of each metabolite normalized to [1-13C]-pyruvate and (E) total carbon. (F) Signal intensity ratios between pyruvate metabolites; error bars represent the standard deviation of the mean.