| Literature DB >> 30347527 |
Rafael García Moreno1, Luis Miguel Bernal García1, Hyaissa Ippolito Bastidas1, Carlos Andrés Mondragón Tirado1, Aurora Moreno Flores1, Juan Pablo Sosa Cabezas1, José Manuel Cabezudo Artero1.
Abstract
STUDYEntities:
Keywords: Aminolevulinic acid; Ependymoma; Fluorescence guided surgery; Spinal cord
Year: 2018 PMID: 30347527 PMCID: PMC6365784 DOI: 10.31616/asj.2018.0165
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Asian Spine J ISSN: 1976-1902
Characteristics of the 14 patients included in the study
| Case | Sex | Age (yr) | Level | McCormick | Time until surgery (mo) | Resection grade | Fluorescence | Ki-67 (%) | Neurophysiological monitoring |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | F | 58 | C1–C2 | III | 36 | Complete | Intense | 1 | Not available |
| 2 | F | 46 | D8–D12 | II | 1 | Subtotal | Intense | 15 (AE) | Not available |
| 3 | F | 72 | D12–L1 | II | 18 | Complete | Intense | 1 | Not available |
| 4 | M | 50 | D4 | II | - | Complete | Intense | 4 | No alterations |
| 5 | M | 52 | C7 | Ib | - | Complete | Intense | 2 | No alterations |
| 6 | F | 18 | D9–D10 | Ib | 2 | Complete | Mild | 5 | No alterations |
| 7 | F | 50 | C4–D1 | II | 24 | Complete | Intense | 2 | No alterations |
| 8 | F | 62 | C5–C6 | Ib | 180 | Complete | Mild | 2 | Improvement of SEPs |
| 9 | M | 44 | L1 | II | 4 | Subtotal | Intense | 1 | Decrease of SEPs |
| 10 | M | 42 | C6–D6 | III | 5 | Complete | Intense | 10 | No alterations |
| 11 | M | 15 | L1–L3 | III | 9 | Complete | Intense | 5 | No alterations |
| 12 | M | 62 | L2 | Ib | 2 | Subtotal | Intense | 5 | Decrease of SEPs |
| 13 | M | 49 | L1 | Ib | 2 | Complete | Intense | 2 | No alterations |
| 14 | F | 56 | D11 | Ib | 24 | Complete | Intense | 2 | No alterations |
F, female; M, male; AE, anaplastic ependymoma; SEPs, somatosensory evoked potentials.
Comparison of the grade on the modified McCormick classification before surgery and at discharge
| M cCormick preoperative | McCormick at discharge | Total | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| I | Ib | II | III | IV | ||
| I | 0 | |||||
| Ib | 4 | 2 | 6 | |||
| II | 2 | 3 | 5 | |||
| III | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 | ||
| IV | 0 | |||||
| Total | 5 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 1 | 14 |
Comparison of the grade on the modified McCormick classification before surgery and at the last follow-up
| M cCormick preoperative | McCormick during follow-up | Total | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| I | Ib | II | III | IV | ||
| I | 0 | |||||
| Ib | 5 | 1 | 6 | |||
| II | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 5 | |
| III | 1 | 2 | 3 | |||
| IV | 0 | |||||
| Total | 7 | 1 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 14 |
Fig. 1.Case 4. (A) Intraoperative image with blue light showing the intense fluorescence emitted by the lesion. (B) Intraoperative image with white light in which the tumor bed is seen. (C) Intraoperative image with blue light in which no fluorescence emission is seen in the tumor bed. (D) Sagittal dorsal postoperative magnetic resonance imaging shows complete resection.
Fig. 2.Case 7. (A) Sagittal cervicodorsal magnetic resonance imaging with gadolinium shows the lesion. (B) Intraoperative image with white light shows the spinal cord with numerous pathologic vessels on its surface. (C) Intraoperative image with blue light shows fluorescence emission before myelotomy.