Maria Ironside1,2, Michael Browning1,3, Tahereh L Ansari4, Christopher J Harvey4, Mama N Sekyi-Djan1, Sonia J Bishop4,5, Catherine J Harmer1,3, Jacinta O'Shea4. 1. Department of Psychiatry, University of Oxford, Oxford, England. 2. Center for Depression, Anxiety and Stress Research, McLean Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Belmont, Massachusetts. 3. Oxford Health National Health Service Trust, Oxford, England. 4. Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, England. 5. University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley.
Abstract
Importance: Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) of the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) is under clinical investigation as a treatment for major depressive disorder. However, the mechanisms of action are unclear, and there is a lack of neuroimaging evidence, particularly among individuals with affective dysfunction. Furthermore, there is no direct causal evidence among humans that the prefrontal-amygdala circuit functions as described in animal models (ie, that increasing activity in prefrontal cortical control regions inhibits amygdala response to threat). Objective: To determine whether stimulation of the prefrontal cortex reduces amygdala threat reactivity in individuals with trait anxiety. Design, Setting, and Participants: This community-based randomized clinical trial used a double-blind, within-participants design (2 imaging sessions per participant). Eighteen women with high trait anxiety (age range, 18-42 years) who scored greater than 45 on the trait measure of State-Trait Anxiety Inventory were randomized to receive active or sham tDCS of the DLPFC during the first session and the other intervention during the next session. Each intervention was followed immediately by a functional imaging scan during which participants performed an attentional task requiring them to ignore threatening face distractors. Data were collected from May 7 to October 6, 2015. Main Outcomes and Measures: Amygdala threat response, measured with functional magnetic resonance imaging. Results: Data from 16 female participants (mean age, 23 years; range, 18-42 years), with 8 in each group, were analyzed. Compared with sham stimulation, active DLPFC stimulation significantly reduced bilateral amygdala threat reactivity (z = 3.30, P = .04) and simultaneously increased activity in cortical regions associated with attentional control (z = 3.28, P < .001). In confirmatory behavioral analyses, there was a mean improvement in task accuracy of 12.2% (95% CI, 0.30%-24.0%; mean [SD] difference in number of correct answers, 2.2 [4.5]; t15 = 1.94, P = .04) after active DLPFC stimulation. Conclusions and Relevance: These results reveal a causal role for prefrontal regulation of amygdala function in attentional capture by threat in individuals with high trait anxiety. The finding that prefrontal stimulation acutely increases attentional control signals and reduces amygdala threat reactivity may indicate a neurocognitive mechanism that could contribute to tDCS treatment effects in affective disorders. Trial Registration: isrctn.org Identifier: ISRCTN78638425.
RCT Entities:
Importance: Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) of the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) is under clinical investigation as a treatment for major depressive disorder. However, the mechanisms of action are unclear, and there is a lack of neuroimaging evidence, particularly among individuals with affective dysfunction. Furthermore, there is no direct causal evidence among humans that the prefrontal-amygdala circuit functions as described in animal models (ie, that increasing activity in prefrontal cortical control regions inhibits amygdala response to threat). Objective: To determine whether stimulation of the prefrontal cortex reduces amygdala threat reactivity in individuals with trait anxiety. Design, Setting, and Participants: This community-based randomized clinical trial used a double-blind, within-participants design (2 imaging sessions per participant). Eighteen women with high trait anxiety (age range, 18-42 years) who scored greater than 45 on the trait measure of State-Trait Anxiety Inventory were randomized to receive active or sham tDCS of the DLPFC during the first session and the other intervention during the next session. Each intervention was followed immediately by a functional imaging scan during which participants performed an attentional task requiring them to ignore threatening face distractors. Data were collected from May 7 to October 6, 2015. Main Outcomes and Measures: Amygdala threat response, measured with functional magnetic resonance imaging. Results: Data from 16 female participants (mean age, 23 years; range, 18-42 years), with 8 in each group, were analyzed. Compared with sham stimulation, active DLPFC stimulation significantly reduced bilateral amygdala threat reactivity (z = 3.30, P = .04) and simultaneously increased activity in cortical regions associated with attentional control (z = 3.28, P < .001). In confirmatory behavioral analyses, there was a mean improvement in task accuracy of 12.2% (95% CI, 0.30%-24.0%; mean [SD] difference in number of correct answers, 2.2 [4.5]; t15 = 1.94, P = .04) after active DLPFC stimulation. Conclusions and Relevance: These results reveal a causal role for prefrontal regulation of amygdala function in attentional capture by threat in individuals with high trait anxiety. The finding that prefrontal stimulation acutely increases attentional control signals and reduces amygdala threat reactivity may indicate a neurocognitive mechanism that could contribute to tDCS treatment effects in affective disorders. Trial Registration: isrctn.org Identifier: ISRCTN78638425.
Authors: Tomas Furmark; Maria Tillfors; Ina Marteinsdottir; Håkan Fischer; Anna Pissiota; Bengt Långström; Mats Fredrikson Journal: Arch Gen Psychiatry Date: 2002-05
Authors: Greg J Siegle; Wesley Thompson; Cameron S Carter; Stuart R Steinhauer; Michael E Thase Journal: Biol Psychiatry Date: 2006-10-06 Impact factor: 13.382
Authors: Alexandre Heeren; Chris Baeken; Marie-Anne Vanderhasselt; Pierre Philippot; Rudi de Raedt Journal: PLoS One Date: 2015-04-24 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Richard L Lin; Gwenaëlle Douaud; Nicola Filippini; Thomas W Okell; Charlotte J Stagg; Irene Tracey Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2017-02-02 Impact factor: 4.379
Authors: Caroline W Oppenheimer; Michele Bertocci; Tsafrir Greenberg; Henry W Chase; Richelle Stiffler; Haris A Aslam; Jeanette Lockovich; Simona Graur; Genna Bebko; Mary L Phillips Journal: Psychiatry Res Neuroimaging Date: 2021-09-03 Impact factor: 2.376
Authors: Gay Florian; Allison Singier; Bruno Aouizerate; Francesco Salvo; Thomas C M Bienvenu Journal: Front Psychiatry Date: 2022-07-01 Impact factor: 5.435
Authors: Aurore Thibaut; Vivian L Shie; Colleen M Ryan; Ross Zafonte; Emily A Ohrtman; Jeffrey C Schneider; Felipe Fregni Journal: Burns Date: 2020-06-20 Impact factor: 2.744