| Literature DB >> 30346980 |
Camille Roesch1, Jean Popovici1, Sophalai Bin1, Vorleak Run1, Saorin Kim1, Stéphanie Ramboarina2, Emma Rakotomalala2, Rado Lalaina Rakotoarison2, Tsikiniaina Rasoloharimanana2, Zo Andriamanantena2, Anuj Kumar3, Micheline Guillotte-Blisnick4, Christèle Huon4, David Serre5, Chetan E Chitnis3,4, Inès Vigan-Womas2, Didier Menard1.
Abstract
The interaction between Plasmodium vivax Duffy binding protein (PvDBP) and Duffy antigen receptor for chemokines (DARC) has been described as critical for the invasion of human reticulocytes, although increasing reports of P. vivax infections in Duffy-negative individuals questions its unique role. To investigate the genetic diversity of the two main protein ligands for reticulocyte invasion, PvDBP and P. vivax Erythrocyte Binding Protein (PvEBP), we analyzed 458 isolates collected in Cambodia and Madagascar from individuals genotyped as Duffy-positive. First, we observed a high proportion of isolates with multiple copies PvEBP from Madagascar (56%) where Duffy negative and positive individuals coexist compared to Cambodia (19%) where Duffy-negative population is virtually absent. Whether the gene amplification observed is responsible for alternate invasion pathways remains to be tested. Second, we found that the PvEBP gene was less diverse than PvDBP gene (12 vs. 33 alleles) but provided evidence for an excess of nonsynonymous mutations with the complete absence of synonymous mutations. This finding reveals that PvEBP is under strong diversifying selection, and confirms the importance of this protein ligand in the invasion process of the human reticulocytes and as a target of acquired immunity. These observations highlight how genomic changes in parasite ligands improve the fitness of P. vivax isolates in the face of immune pressure and receptor polymorphisms.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 30346980 PMCID: PMC6211765 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0006555
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS Negl Trop Dis ISSN: 1935-2727
Number of samples from Cambodia and Madagascar collected before (D0) and after treatment in case of recurrence (Dx) with available data for PvDBP and PvEBP (SNP and CNV) and Duffy genotyping.
| No. of samples with available data for | Day of collection | Country | Year | Total | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2003 | 2004 | 2011 | 2012 | 2013 | 2014 | 2015 | 2016 | 2017 | ||||
| SNPs | D0 | Cambodia | 80 | 18 | 46 | 9 | 153 | |||||
| Dx | 0 | |||||||||||
| D0 | Madagascar | 25 | 57 | 10 | 92 | |||||||
| SNPs | D0 | Cambodia | 87 | 17 | 36 | 10 | 150 | |||||
| Dx | 0 | |||||||||||
| D0 | Madagascar | 27 | 39 | 3 | 69 | |||||||
| CNVs | D0 | Cambodia | 2 | 46 | 51 | 48 | 73 | 94 | 41 | 17 | 20 | 392 |
| Dx | 14 | 14 | ||||||||||
| D0 | Madagascar | 25 | 25 | 16 | 66 | |||||||
| CNVs | D0 | Cambodia | 59 | 42 | 47 | 16 | 20 | 184 | ||||
| Dx | 5 | 5 | ||||||||||
| D0 | Madagascar | 23 | 27 | 16 | 66 | |||||||
| Duffy genotyping | D0 | Cambodia | 13 | 17 | 53 | 16 | 20 | 119 | ||||
| Dx | Madagascar | 27 | 24 | 4 | 55 | |||||||
Fig 1Distribution of PvDBP and PvEBP gene copy number in isolates from Cambodia and Madagascar (Panel A and B, left side). Number of isolates from Cambodia and Madagascar with single or multiple copies PvDBP and PvEBP genes (Panel A and B, right side). The grey squares represent the medians and whiskers the IQRs.
Fig 2Distribution of PvDBP alleles observed in P. vivax isolates collected in Cambodia and Madagascar (Panel A). Phylogenetic tree inferred using the Neighbor-Joining method (Panel B). Each allele was numbered 1–32 (see S1 Table). The evolutionary distances were computed using the Poisson correction method [56] and are in the units of the number of amino acid substitutions per site. The analysis involved 33 amino acid sequences. Evolutionary analyses were conducted in MEGA7 [57].
Fig 3Mapping of SNPs on the structure of PvDBPII (Protein Data Bank code 4NUU) monomer and PvEBPII.
SNPs present specifically to Cambodian and Madagascar isolates are highlighted in red and blue respectively, whereas SNPs present in the isolates from both the countries are highlighted in green. Putative binding residues on PvDBPII are highlighted in orange. Molecular surface diagram of PvDBPII is shown. SNPs and putative binding residues of PvDBPII are highlighted (Panel A). Predicted structure of PvEBPII is shown as molecular surface diagram and SNPs are highlighted (Panel B). Helical ribbon representation of PvDBPII (in light blue) and PvEBPII (in light grey) are superimposed. SNPs and putative binding residues are highlighted (Panel C).
Fig 4Distribution of PvDBP gene copy number of 33 PvDBP alleles in isolates from Cambodia and Madagascar (Panel A). Distribution of PvEBP gene copy number of 12 PvEBP alleles in isolates from Cambodia and Madagascar (Panel B).
Fig 5Distribution and number of PvEBP alleles among Malagasy and Cambodian samples (Panel A). Phylogenetic tree inferred using the Neighbor-Joining method (Panel B). Each allele was numbered 1–11 (see S2 Table). The evolutionary distances were computed using the Poisson correction method [56] and are in the units of the number of amino acid substitutions per site. The analysis involved 12 amino acid sequences. Evolutionary analyses were conducted in MEGA7 [57].