Literature DB >> 30346803

Imaging the bifid mandibular canal using high resolution MRI.

Peerapong Wamasing1, Chutamas Deepho1,2, Hiroshi Watanabe1, Yoshiki Hayashi1, Junichiro Sakamoto1, Tohru Kurabayashi1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: : This study aimed to investigate the incidence of bifid mandibular canals (BMCs) using high-resolution MRI with a three-dimensional volumetric interpolated breath-hold examination sequence (3D-VIBE) through the neurovascular bundle (NVB).
METHODS: : In this retrospective study, we extracted 154 datasets from our archive of patients who underwent MRI examination with a 3D-VIBE sequence for mandible lesions from January 2015 to April 2016. The right and the left mandibles were treated independently with 59 cases excluded due to NVB morphology or artifacts, yielding 249 hemi-mandible cases classified among three subtypes: Type 0 with no BMC, Type one with one NVB and two NVBs on route to it, and Type two with two NVBs. We also investigated the incidence of nutrient canals (NCs) using MRI. Finally, we determined whether each BMC case could also be identified via panoramic radiography (PR) or CT.
RESULTS: : Of the 249 cases examined, 6.4% were found to have BMC (Types 1 and 2). Subtypes were classified as follows: 233 as Type 0 (93.6%), 11 as Type 1 (4.4%), and 5 as Type 2 (2.0%). The NC was identified on MRI in a majority of cases. No BMCs were identified using PR or CT except for one, which was identified by CT.
CONCLUSION: : The incidence rate of BMC per MRI was 6.4% in this study. NCs, including the retromolar canal, had an incidence rate of 58.4-97.6%. Further, BMCs were not verified by PR or CT, indicating that MRI should be used to assess BMCs.

Entities:  

Keywords:  X-ray computed; incidence; magnetic resonance imaging; mandible; panoramic; radiography; tomography

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30346803      PMCID: PMC6476361          DOI: 10.1259/dmfr.20180305

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol        ISSN: 0250-832X            Impact factor:   2.419


  17 in total

1.  Bifid mandibular canal: confirmation of limited cone beam CT findings by gross anatomical and histological investigations.

Authors:  K Fukami; K Shiozaki; A Mishima; A Kuribayashi; Y Hamada; K Kobayashi
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2011-11-24       Impact factor: 2.419

2.  Bifid mandibular canals: cone beam computed tomography evaluation.

Authors:  A Kuribayashi; H Watanabe; A Imaizumi; W Tantanapornkul; K Katakami; T Kurabayashi
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 2.419

3.  A comparative study of computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging for the detection of mandibular canals and cross-sectional areas in diagnosis prior to dental implant treatment.

Authors:  Hideyuki Imamura; Hironobu Sato; Takashi Matsuura; Masatsugu Ishikawa; Ryousuke Zeze
Journal:  Clin Implant Dent Relat Res       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 3.932

4.  Observation of bifid mandibular canal using cone-beam computerized tomography.

Authors:  Munetaka Naitoh; Yuichiro Hiraiwa; Hidetoshi Aimiya; Eiichiro Ariji
Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants       Date:  2009 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.804

5.  Assessment of variations of the mandibular canal through cone beam computed tomography.

Authors:  Christiano de Oliveira-Santos; Paulo Henrique Couto Souza; Soraya de Azambuja Berti-Couto; Lien Stinkens; Kristin Moyaert; Izabel Regina Fischer Rubira-Bullen; Reinhilde Jacobs
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2011-03-30       Impact factor: 3.573

6.  Localizing the mandibular canal on dental CT reformatted images: usefulness of panoramic views.

Authors:  Akira Takahashi; Hiroshi Watanabe; Yosuke Kamiyama; Eiichi Honda; Yasunori Sumi; Tohru Kurabayashi
Journal:  Surg Radiol Anat       Date:  2013-04-17       Impact factor: 1.246

7.  Bifid mandibular canal.

Authors:  J M Sanchis; Miguel Peñarrocha; F Soler
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 1.895

8.  Double mandibular foramen leading to the accessory canal on the mandibular ramus.

Authors:  Young-Yuhn Choi; Sang-Sun Han
Journal:  Surg Radiol Anat       Date:  2014-05-10       Impact factor: 1.246

9.  Descriptive study of the bifid mandibular canals and retromolar foramina: cone beam CT vs panoramic radiography.

Authors:  J Muinelo-Lorenzo; J A Suárez-Quintanilla; A Fernández-Alonso; S Marsillas-Rascado; M M Suárez-Cunqueiro
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2014-04-30       Impact factor: 2.419

10.  Comparison between the use of magnetic resonance imaging and conebeam computed tomography for mandibular nerve identification.

Authors:  Anson Chau
Journal:  Clin Oral Implants Res       Date:  2011-04-13       Impact factor: 5.977

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  What are the retromolar and bifid/trifid mandibular canals as seen on cone-beam computed tomography? Revisiting classic gross anatomy of the inferior alveolar nerve and correcting terminology.

Authors:  Joe Iwanaga; Yohei Takeshita; Yuki Matsushita; Mi-Sun Hur; Soichiro Ibaragi; R Shane Tubbs
Journal:  Surg Radiol Anat       Date:  2021-12-02       Impact factor: 1.246

2.  Incidence and Anatomical Properties of Retromolar Canal in an Iranian Population: A Cone-Beam Computed Tomography Study.

Authors:  N Nikkerdar; A Golshah; M Norouzi; S Falah-Kooshki
Journal:  Int J Dent       Date:  2020-03-09
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.