(+)-Hongoquercin A and B were synthesized from commercially available trans, trans-farnesol in six and eleven steps, respectively, using dual biomimetic strategies with polyketide aromatization and subsequent polyene functionalization from a common farnesyl-resorcylate intermediate. Key steps involve Pd(0)-catalyzed decarboxylative allylic rearrangement of a dioxinone β,δ-diketo ester to a β,δ-diketo dioxinone, which was readily aromatized into the corresponding resorcylate, and subsequent polyene cyclization via enantioselective protonation or regioselective terminal alkene oxidation and cationic cyclization of enantiomerically enriched epoxide to furnish the tetracyclic natural product cores. Analogues of the hongoquercin were synthesized via halonium-induced polyene cyclizations, and the meroterpenoid could be further functionalized via saponification, hydrolytic decarboxylation, reduction, and amidation reactions.
(+)-Hongoquercin A and B were synthesized from commercially available n class="Chemical">trans, trans-farnesol in six and eleven steps, respectively, using dual biomimetic strategies with polyketide aromatization and subsequent polyene functionalization from a common farnesyl-resorcylate intermediate. Key steps involve Pd(0)-catalyzed decarboxylative allylic rearrangement of a dioxinone β,δ-diketo ester to a β,δ-diketo dioxinone, which was readily aromatized into the corresponding resorcylate, and subsequent polyene cyclization via enantioselective protonation or regioselective terminal alkene oxidation and cationic cyclization of enantiomerically enriched epoxide to furnish the tetracyclic natural product cores. Analogues of the hongoquercin were synthesized via halonium-induced polyene cyclizations, and the meroterpenoid could be further functionalized via saponification, hydrolytic decarboxylation, reduction, and amidation reactions.
(+)-Hongoquercin A (1) and
B (2) were
isolated from the fermentation broths produced by an unidentified
fungus in 1998 independently by Roll and Abbanat (Figure ).[1] They exhibited modest antibacterial activity against methicillin-resistant n class="Species">Staphylococcus aureus and vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus
faecium.[1] These natural products
are meroterpenoids which have a mixed biosynthetic origin involving
polyketide and terpenoid pathways. (−)-Siccanin (3) and (−)-austalide K (4) are additional examples
of such structurally diverse bioactive meroterpenoids.[2]
Figure 1
Bioactive meroterpenoid natural products.
Bioactive meroterpenoidnatural products.Over the last two decades, several total syntheses of hongoquercins 5 have been reported.[3] The common
synthetic strategy involves the coupling of two synthons, an enantiopure
synthesized n class="Chemical">drimene 6 coupled with a substituted resorcinol
derivative 7 (Scheme ). However, this conventional approach often requires
extensive use of protecting groups on the resorcinol unit 7 and multistep transformations for the synthesis of the precursor
drimene 6. Most of the reported processes for the preparation
of the resorcinol rely on extensive derivatization of an aromatic
precursor, while alternative synthetic strategies to prepare resorcinol,
such as benzannulation, have been shown to be more concise and flexible.[4] Therefore, we considered that a dual biomimetic
approach for elaborating the arene ring and tricyclic terpenoid residues
from acyclic precursor 9 sequentially via cascade cyclizations
would simplify the syntheses of these natural products. Additionally,
if the farnesyl residue was functionalized after aromatization to
construct the resorcylate entity, a diverse range of hongoquercin
analogues 8 should be available by variation of the electrophilic
reagents used in such derivatizations.
Scheme 1
Synthetic Strategies
of the Hongoquercins 5
Inspired by the pioneering work of the Harris group and
Hyatt group,
respectively, on the biomimetic synthesis of β-resorylate and
on the generation of acyl ketenes by the thermolysis of n class="Chemical">dioxinones,[5,6] our group has developed a biomimetic route to β-resorylate
natural products that utilizes β,δ-diketo dioxinones as
masked triketo ketenes.[7] In 2009, we additionally
discovered a regioselective palladium(0)-catalyzed decarboxylative
rearrangement during the synthesis of aigialomycin D.[8] Application of this reaction greatly facilitated the synthesis
of meroterpenoid resorcylate natural products.[9] More recently, we developed an efficient methodology for the synthesis
of dioxinone β-keto esters 12 using dioxane-4,6-dione
keto dioxanones 10 as the masked dioxinone acylketene 11 (Scheme ).[10] Application of this reaction provided
an efficient route for the synthesis of β-resorylates, and its
utility has been showcased in the total syntheses of several bioactive
meroterpenoid natural products.[10] Herein
we report further extensive studies on the dual biomimetic total synthesis
of the hongoquercins 5, which we initially published
as a communication.[9e]
Scheme 2
Thermolysis of Dioxane-4,6-dione
Ketodioxanones 10
Results and Discussion
We considered that the key meroterpenoids 13 should
be available using a n class="Chemical">polyene cyclization from resorcylate 14 by enantioselective electrophilic reactions with chiral Brønsted
acids (E = H), epoxidation, and subsequent reaction with a Lewis acid
(E = OH) or halogenations with reagents that provide halonium ion
intermediates (E = Br and I) (Scheme ). The common resorcylate intermediate 14 should be available from the cycloaromatization of β,δ-diketodioxinone 9, which could be synthesized via palladium(0)-catalyzed decarboxylative
allylic rearrangement of dioxinone β,δ-diketo ester 15. Dioxinone β,δ-diketo ester 15, in turn, should be available via C-acylation of
dioxinone β-keto ester 16, which, in turn, is available
from trapping a dioxinone acylketene with trans,trans-farnesol (17).[10]
Scheme 3
Retrosynthetic Analyses of Hongoquercins A (1) and B
(2)
Following our recently published methods,[10] thermolysis of dioxane-4,6-dione keto dioxanone 19 at
55 °C generated the n class="Chemical">dioxinone acyl ketene 11, which
was trapped with trans,trans-farnesol
(17) to provide dioxinone β-keto ester 21 (79%) (Scheme ).
Magnesium chloride mediated regioselective C-acylation
of β-keto ester 21 with acetyl chloride gave dioxinone
β,δ-diketo ester 23, which on reaction with
Pd2(dba)3 and tri(2-furyl)phosphine resulted
in a highly regioselective decarboxylative allylic rearrangement giving
the β,δ-diketo dioxinone 9 and readily aromatized
in situ to produce farnesyl resorcylate 14 (55% overall
from 21). A geranyl-substituted analogue 24 was also synthesized, using the same reaction sequence, from geraniol
(18) in three steps with an overall yield of 57%.
Scheme 4
Synthesis of the Terpene Resorcylates 14 and 24
We first investigated the synthesis
of (+)-hongoquercin A (1) via n class="Chemical">enantioselective protonation
of farnesyl resorcylate 14 (Scheme ) using the Lewis acid enhanced chiral Brønsted
acids derived
from antimony pentachloride with binol 25 and stannic
chloride with binol 26 as introduced by Corey et al.[11] and Yamamoto et al.[12] Enantioselective protonation with SbCl5·25 gave a mixture of partially cyclized products from which the desired
meroterpenoid 23 was isolated in 15% yield and with an
enantiomeric excess of 20% as determined by chiral HPLC. Fortunately,
the cyclization using SnCl4·26 as the
dual Brønsted and Lewis acids was highly enantioselective and
gave the desired meroterpenoid 27 (61%, 81% dr and 90%
ee as determined by chiral HPLC) on sequential reaction with SnCl4·26 and SnCl4 and trifluoroacetic
acid. Finally, saponification[13] of meroterpenoid 27 gave (+)-hongoquercin A (1) (75%) with an
overall yield of 20% over five5 steps from trans,trans-farnesol 17. The spectroscopic data were
in full agreement with that reported for the isolated natural product,[1] and the structure was unambiguously confirmed
by single-crystal X-ray crystallography.
Scheme 5
Total Synthesis of
(+)-Hongoquercin A (1)
Next, we focused on the synthesis of (+)-hongoquercin
B, which
utilized n class="Chemical">enantioselective epoxidation (Scheme ). While we had reported the synthesis of
this natural product from the farnesyl derivative 33,[9e] we wished to reinvestigate this synthesis with
late-stage oxidation of the terminal alkene on the pendant farnesyl
side chain since this should greatly facilitate the synthesis and
bioassay of a focused library of novel hongoquercin analogues with
the late-stage introduction of terpene structural diversity. In order
to effect such electrophilic functionalization of the terminal alkene
unit, we needed to suppress phenol-directed oxidation.[14] We found that protection by phenol allylation
was suitable for this purpose. Allylation of farnesyl resorcylate 14 gave allyl ether 28 (77%), which was subjected
to dihydroxylation in the presence of the Corey dihydroquinidine ligand 29, thus producing the (R)-diol 30 (58%, 78% brsm, 88% ee as determined by Mosher ester analysis).[15] Diol 30 was subsequently converted
into the (S)-epoxide 31 (93%) via mesylation
and potassium carbonate mediated cyclization. The allyl protecting
group was selectively removed by reaction with dimethylbarbituric
acid 32 catalyzed by Pd(PPh3)4 to
provide epoxide 33 (91%).[16] After screening a variety of different Lewis acids with epoxide 33, it was found that ferric chloride hydrate was a superior
Lewis acid catalyst to boron trifluoride etherate,[9e] which we previously reported for this cyclization of epoxide 33 to provide meroterpenoid 34. The use of boron
trifluoride etherate often led to the formation of undesired byproducts
such as bicyclic ethers and partially cyclized products. Such side
reactions and irreproducibility were substantially suppressed using
ferric chloride hydrate.[17] Thus, treatment
of epoxide 33 with FeCl3·6H2O resulted in biomimetic cationic cyclization to give meroterpeonoid 34 (56%, 92% ee as determined by chiral HPLC) as a single
diastereoisomer. Saponification of meroterpenoid 34 gave
acid 35 (69%),[13] which was
subjected to acetylation to provide diacetate 36. Subsequent
selective deacetylation of the phenolic acetate gave (+)-hongoquercin
B (66%) with an overall yield of 3.7% over 11 steps. The analytical
data for this synthetic material are in full agreement with that reported
for the isolated natural product.[1]
Scheme 6
Total Synthesis of (+)-Hongoquercin B (2)
Additional meroterpenoids analogues
were prepared via epoxidation
(Scheme ) and halogenations
(Scheme ). First,
the n class="Chemical">geranyl-substituted resorcylate 24 was protected
as its silyl ether 37 (76%) and epoxidized with the dioxirane
derived from the Shi chiral ketone 38 to give epoxide 39 (69%).[18] Subsequent deprotection
gave epoxide 40 (92%), which was cyclized using boron
trifluoride etherate to give meroterpenoid 41 (77%, 84%
ee as determined by chiral HPLC) as a single diastereoisomer. The
(S)-enantiomer of meroterpenoid 41 (98%
ee as determined by chiral HPLC) was obtained by recrystallization
to enhance chiral purity. Second, we examined the halonium-induced
polyene cyclization of the resorcylates to produce additional analogues
(Scheme ).[19] Reaction of the geranyl resorcylate 24 with the Snyder reagents Et2SBr·SbCl5Br (BDSB, 46) and (Et2SI)2Cl·SbCl6 (IDSI, 47) resulted in bromo- and iodo-cyclizations
to produce the racemic bromo-meroterpenoid 42 (64%) and
racemic iodo-meroterpenoid 43 (88%) as single diastereoisomers,
respectively. Racemic bromide 44 (45%, 2:1 dr) and racemic
iodide 45 (54%, 2:1 dr) were also successfully synthesized
from farnesyl-substituted resorcylate 14 using the BDSB-
(46) and IDSI-mediated (47) halocyclizations.[20]
Scheme 7
Synthesis of Meroterpenoid 41
Scheme 8
Halocyclizations To Produce Meroterpenoids 42–45[20]
The 2,2-dimethyl-1,3-benzodioxan-4-one
moiety of the n class="Chemical">meroterpenoids
intermediates was also used in alternative derivatization reactions
(Scheme ). Thus, reaction
of the geranyl-substituted resorcylate 24 with boron
trifluoride etherate at 25 °C gave the racemic meroterpenoid 48 (89%, 3:1 dr), and the desired pure trans-fused ring product was obtained by recrystallization from n-hexane.[21] Saponification[13] of meroterpenoid 48 gave racemic
carboxylic acid 49 (69%), while hydrolytic decarboxylation
gave racemic phenol 50 (97%). Furthermore, reduction
of meroterpenoid 48 with LiAlH4 gave racemic
diol 51 (95%), and racemic Weinreb amide 52 (96%) was obtained following Grignard reagent mediated amidation.[22]
Scheme 9
Synthesis and Functionalization of Meroterpenoid 48
Conclusion
In
conclusion, the total syntheses of (+)-hongoquercins A (1) and B (2) were completed in five and eleven
steps, respectively with an overall yield of 20% and 3.7% via a dual
biomimetic approach involving sequential n class="Chemical">polyketide and late-stage
electrophile-mediated polyene cyclizations. Several analogues were
synthesized by epoxidation or bromo- and iodo-cyclizations. The meroterpenoids
were additionally functionalized using saponification, hydrolytic
decarboxylation, reduction, and Grignard reagent mediated amidation
reactions. Further studies on the synthesis of novel meroterpenoids
adopting such dual biomimetic approach are ongoing in our laboratory.
Experimental Section
General Methods
All reagents and solvents were used
directly without further purification unless otherwise stated. The
preparation of malonate and dioxinone acid was performed according
to the method of Barrett et al.[10b] n class="Chemical">Binol 25 and binol 26 were prepared, respectively,
according to the procedures reported by Corey et al.[11] and Yamamoto et al.[12] Dihydroquinidine
ligand 29 was prepared according to the procedure reported
by Corey et al.[15] Et2SBr·SbCl5Br (BDSB, 46) and (Et2SI)2Cl·SbCl6 (IDSI, 47) were prepared according
to the method published by Snyder et al.[19] All solvents were purified and dried by distillation under an atmosphere
of N2 before use. The chiral ketone 38 was
prepared from l-fructose according to the established method
by Shi et al.[18] Et2O and THF
were redistilled from Na–Ph2CO. CH2Cl2, Et3N, MeOH, PrNO2, MeNO2, and pyridine were redistilled from CaH2, and PhMe was redistilled from Na. All air- and moisture-sensitive
reactions were carried out under an atmosphere of N2 using
standard Schlenk techniques in oven-dried glassware equipped with
a magnetic stirring bar. The progress of reactions was monitored by
analytical thin-layer chromatography (TLC) on silica gel coated aluminum
oxide F254 plates. Developed TLC was visualized under UV
light and stained with acidic vanillin solution. Flash column chromatography
was performed by employing silica gel 60 Å, particle size 40–63
μm. The enantiomeric excesses of the compounds were determined
by chiral HPLC analysis on Chiralpak IE column with n-hexane and PrOH as the mobile phase.
All 1H and proton-decoupled 13C NMR spectra
were recorded at 400 and 101 MHz, respectively, at ambient temperature
in deuterated solvent as noted. NMR spectra were referenced to residual
solvent peaks (CDCl3: δ = 7.26 for 1H
NMR and δ = 77.0 for 13C NMR; CD3OD δ
= 3.31 and 4.87 for 1H NMR and δ = 49.0 for 13C NMR; (CD3)2CO: δ = 2.05 for 1H NMR and δ = 29.8 for 13C NMR) and chemical
shifts were reported in ppm. IR spectra are reported in cm–1. Optical rotations were recorded with a polarimeter with the specified
concentration and temperature. Mass spectra were obtained from the
Imperial College Mass Spectrometry Service with the use of TOF and
magnetic analyzers for ESI and EI techniques, respectively. Melting
points are uncorrected. X-ray diffraction data were recorded at the
Imperial College X-ray Crystallography Facility.
General Procedures
for the Synthesis of Dioxinone β-Keto
Esters
2-Phenyl-1,3-dioxane-4,6-dione (6.91 g, 36.0 mmol),
DCC (7.43 g, 36.0 mmol), and DMAP (4.40 g, 36.0 mmol) were dissolved
inn class="Chemical">CH2Cl2 (300 mL), and the resulting mixture
was stirred for 5 min at 25 °C. 2-(2,2-Dimethyl-4-oxo-4H-1,3-dioxin-6-yl)acetic acid (6.70 g, 36.0 mmol) was added
with stirring at 25 °C. After 18 h, the mixture was cooled to
0 °C, and the insoluble solid was filtered off and washed with
CH2Cl2 (15 mL). The filtrate was washed with
aqueous HCl (1 M; 2 × 200 mL), the two phases were separated,
and the organic layer was dried MgSO4), filtered, and concentrated
under reduced pressure to give the crude delicate dioxane-4,6-dione
keto dioxinone 19 as a yellow foam, which was used directly
without further purification. Crude dioxane-4,6-dione keto dioxinone 19 and geraniol (18) or trans,trans-farnesol (17) (20.0 mmol) were
dissolved in PhMe (150 mL) and stirred at 55 °C for 4 h. The
reaction mixture was concentrated under reduced pressure, and the
brown residue was chromatographed (pentane/EtOAc 9:1–4:1) to
provide the dioxinone β-keto esters 20 and 21, respectively.
General Procedure for the
Synthesis of Resorcylates 14 and 24
MgCl2 (476 mg, 5.00 mmol)
and pyridine (0.810 mL, 10.0 mmol) were added with stirring to β-keto
ester 20 or 21 (5.00 mmol) inn class="Chemical">CH2Cl2 (25 mL) at 0 °C. After 15 min, AcCl (0.540 mL,
7.50 mmol) was added dropwise, and the reaction mixture was further
stirred for 1 h at 0 °C. The reaction was quenched by addition
of saturated aqueous NH4Cl (20 mL), and the pH was adjusted
to ∼2 with aqueous HCl (1 M). The two phases were separated,
and the aqueous layer was extracted with EtOAc (3 × 50 mL). The
combined organic layers were dried (MgSO4), filtered, and
concentrated under reduced pressure to give the crude dioxinone β,δ-diketo
ester 22 or 23. P(2-furyl)3 (232
mg, 1.00 mmol) and Pd2dba3 (229 mg, 0.250 mmol)
were added sequentially with stirring to this crude material in THF
(30 mL) at 25 °C. After 1 h, CsOAc (2.88 g, 15.0 mmol) in PrOH (30 mL) was added, and the resulting
mixture was stirred for an dditional 1.5 h. The reaction was quenched
with aqueous HCl (1 M; 30 mL), the two phases were separated, and
the aqueous layer was extracted with CH2Cl2 (3
× 5 mL). The combined organic layers were dried (MgSO4), filtered, concentrated under reduced pressure, and chromatographed
(pentane/EtOAc 19:1–10:1) to give resorcylate 24 or 14.
SnCl4 inn class="Chemical">heptane (1 M; 0.750 mL, 0.750 mmol) was added with stirring to
binol 26 (463 mg, 0.900 mmol) in PhMe (9 mL) at 25 °C.
After 10 min, the mixture was cooled to −78 °C, when resorcylate 14 (124 mg, 0.300 mmol) in PhMe (1.5 mL) was added dropwise
and the reaction mixture was further stirred for 48 h at −78
°C. The reaction was quenched with NaHCO3 (15 mL)
and the mixture diluted with Et2O (10 mL). The two phases
were separated, and the aqueous layer was extracted with CH2Cl2 (4 × 15 mL). The combined organic layers were
dried (MgSO4), filtered, concentrated, and chromatographed
(pentane/Et2O 9:1 to PhMe/Et2O 12:1) to recover
the binol 26. The crude mixture of products was then
dissolved in 2-nitropropane (6 mL) and cooled to −78 °C.
SnCl4 in heptane (1 M; 0.750 mL, 0.750 mmol) and CF3COOH (0.230 mL, 3.00 mmol) were sequentially added dropwise
with stirring at −78 °C. After 24 h, the reaction was
quenched with saturated aqueous NaHCO3 (10 mL) and diluted
with Et2O (10 mL). The two phases were separated, and the
aqueous layer was extracted with Et2O (4 × 15 mL).
The combined organic layers were dried (MgSO4), filtered,
concentrated, and chromatographed (pentane/Et2O 9:1) to
provide meroterpenoid 27 (78 mg, 0.189 mmol, 63%, 80%
dr, 90% ee, measured by chiral HPLC, Chiralpak IE column, n-hexane/PrOH 19:1, 5 mL/min, tR = 15.9 [(+)-enantiomer], 14.9 [(−)-enantiomer]
min) as a colorless oil containing a mixture of diastereoisomers.
An analytical sample was purified by preparative chiral HPLC: R 0.75 (pentane/EtOAc 9:1);
[α]D20 +80.3 (c 0.57, MeOH); 1H NMR (500 MHz,
CDCl3) δ 6.33 (s, 1H), 2.57 (s, 3H), 2.53 (dd, 1H),
2.24 (dd, J = 16.8, 13.2 Hz, 1H), 2.08 (dt, J = 12.5, 3.2 Hz, 1H), 1.82–1.77 (m, 1H), 1.77–1.74
(m, 1H), 1.72 (s, 3H), 1.69 (s, 3H), 1.68–1.65 (m, 1H), 1.65–1.62
(m, 1H), 1.53 (d, J = 5.3 Hz, 1H), 1.52–1.45
(m, 1H), 1.45–1.39 (m, 1H), 1.39–1.34 (m, 1H), 1.19
(s, 3H), 1.16 (dd, J = 13.5, 4.3 Hz, 1H), 1.02 (dd, J = 12.2, 2.3 Hz, 1H), 0.98 (dd, J = 12.8,
3.8 Hz, 1H), 0.91 (s, 6H), 0.85 (s, 3H); 13C{1H} NMR (101 MHz, CDCl3) δ 160.9, 158.7, 156.1, 142.0,
114.3, 108.3, 104.8, 103.9, 78.4, 56.1, 51.3, 41.8, 40.8, 39.2, 36.9,
33.4, 33.2, 26.2, 25.5, 22.0, 21.6, 20.7, 19.7, 18.5, 16.5, 14.9;
IR νmax (neat) 2928, 2867, 1728, 1616, 1575, 1452,
1388, 1285, 1127 cm–1; HRMS (ESI) m/z [M + H]+ calcd for C26H37O4 413.2696, found 413.2698.
(+)-Hongoquercin
A [(4aS,6aR,12aR,12bS)-11-Hydroxy-4,4,6a,9,12b-pentamethyl-1,3,4,4a,5,6,6a,12,12a,12b-decahydro-2H-benzo[a]xanthene-10-carboxylic Acid (1)]
H2O (7 μL, 0.383 mmol) was added
with stirring to a suspension of n class="Chemical">meroterpenoid 27 (79.0
mg, 0.191 mmol) and KOBu (172 mg, 1.53
mmol) in Et2O (3 mL) at 25 °C. After 2 h, ice was
added until two layers were formed, and the two phases were separated.
The organic layer was extracted with H2O (5 × 5 mL),
and the combined aqueous layers were acidified with HCl (4 M) to pH
∼1. The two phases were separated, and the aqueous layer was
extracted with Et2O (5 × 5 mL). The combined organic
layers were dried (MgSO4), filtered, concentrated, and
chromatographed (pentane/EtOAc/AcOH 9:1:0.01) to afford (+)-hongoquercin
A (1) (53 mg, 0.142 mmol, 75%) as white solid. An analytical
sample was prepared by recrystallization (pentane/CH2Cl2): R 0.25 (pentane/EtOAc/AcOH
9:1:0.01); mp 146.1–148.5 °C; [α]D24 +90.5 (c 0.57,
MeOH); 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 11.86
(s, 1H), 6.21 (s, 1H), 2.69 (dd, J = 16.9, 5.0 Hz,
1H), 2.51 (s, 3H), 2.29 (dd, J = 16.9, 13.2 Hz, 1H),
2.08 (dt, J = 12.5, 3.1 Hz, 1H), 1.86–1.72
(m, 2H), 1.69 (dd, J = 13.1, 4.8 Hz, 1H), 1.66–1.58
(m, 1H), 1.55 (dd, J = 13.1, 5.0 Hz, 1H), 1.52–1.45
(m, 1H), 1.44–1.42 (m, 1H), 1.42–1.34 (m, 1H), 1.20
(s, 3H), 1.15 (dd, J = 13.4, 4.0 Hz, 1H), 1.03 (dd, J = 12.2, 2.2 Hz, 1H), 1.00–0.94 (m, 1H), 0.92 (s,
3H), 0.91 (s, 3H), 0.85 (s, 3H). 1H NMR (500 MHz, CD3OD) δ 6.11 (s, 1H), 2.65 (dd, J = 16.9,
5.0 Hz, 1H), 2.46 (s, 3H), 2.27 (dd, J = 16.7, 13.2
Hz, 1H), 2.05 (dt, J = 12.5, 3.2 Hz, 1H), 1.81–1.76
(m, 2H), 1.72 (dt, J = 13.7, 3.6 Hz, 1H), 1.69–1.61
(m, 1H), 1.52 (dd, J = 13.2, 5.2 Hz, 1H), 1.50–1.40
(m, 3H), 1.26–1.21 (m, 1H), 1.19 (s, 3H), 1.08 (dd, J = 12.2, 2.3 Hz, 1H), 1.05–0.98 (m, 1H), 0.96 (s,
3H), 0.92 (s, 3H), 0.89 (s, 3H); 13C{1H} NMR
(100 MHz, CDCl3) δ 175.3, 163.9, 158.8, 141.3, 112.6,
108.1, 104.9, 78.4, 56.1, 51.5, 41.8, 40.8, 39.2, 37.0, 33.4, 33.2,
24.1, 21.6, 20.8, 19.7, 18.5, 16.7, 14.9); 13C{1H} NMR (126 MHz, CD3OD) δ 175.6, 164.5, 158.9, 141.7,
112.8, 108.8, 104.9, 79.0, 57.5, 53.2, 43.0, 42.1, 40.4, 38.1, 34.2,
33.9, 24.2, 22.0, 21.1, 20.8, 19.6, 17.7, 15.4; IR νmax (neat) 2927, 1621, 1574, 1454, 1378, 1262, 1126 cm–1; HRMS (ESI) m/z [M + H]+ calcd for C23H33O4 373.2383, found
373.2379. Anal. Calcd for C23H32O4: C, 74.16; H, 8.66. Found: C, 74.22; H, 8.78.
H2O (10 μL, 0.552 mmol) was
added to a suspension of KOBu (124 mg,
1.10 mmol) inn class="Chemical">Et2O (1 mL) at 0 °C and stirred for
5 min. Meroterpenoid 34 (59 mg, 0.138 mmol) in Et2O (1 mL) was added with stirring at 25 °C. After 3 h,
ice was added until two layers were formed, and the two phases were
separated and diluted with Et2O (2 mL). The pH was adjusted
to ∼1 with aqueous HCl (4 M). The two phases were separated,
and the aqueous layer was extracted with Et2O (3 ×
2 mL). The combined organic layers were dried (MgSO4),
filtered, concentrated, and chromatographed (pentane/EtOAc/AcOH 3:1:0.01)
to give the carboxylic acid 35 (37 mg, 0.0952 mmol, 69%)
as a white solid: R 0.14
(pentane/EtOAc/AcOH 4:1:0.01); mp 153–155 °C; [α]D24 +104.3 (c 0.3, CH3OH); 1H NMR (400 MHz, CD3OD) δ 6.08 (s, 1H), 3.18 (dd, J = 11.3,
5.0 Hz, 1H), 2.61 (dd, J = 16.8, 5.0 Hz, 1H), 2.45
(s, 3H), 2.26 (dd, J = 16.7, 13.0 Hz, 1H), 2.03 (dt, J = 12.4, 3.2 Hz, 1H), 1.84–1.73 (m, 2H), 1.72–1.59
(m, 3H), 1.54–1.41 (m, 2H), 1.16 (s, 3H), 1.15–1.08
(m, 1H), 1.04–1.01 (m, 1H), 1.00 (s, 3H), 0.94 (s, 3H), 0.81
(s, 3H); 13C{1H} NMR (101 MHz, CD3OD) δ 175.6, 164.4, 158.7, 141.7, 112.7, 108.6, 105.2, 79.4,
78.7, 56.5, 52.9, 42.1, 39.9, 38.8, 37.8, 28.7, 27.9, 24.2, 21.0,
20.5, 17.8, 16.2, 15.5; IR νmax (neat) 3445, 2972,
2934, 2865, 1621, 1579, 1453, 1379, 1265, 1178, 1126, 1038 cm–1; HRMS (ESI) m/z [M – H]− Calcd for C23H31O5 387.2171, found 387.2180.
(+)-Hongoquercin
B [(3S,4aR,6aR,12aR,12bS)-3-Acetoxy-11-hydroxy-4,4,6a,9,12b-pentamethyl-1,3,4,4a,5,6,6a,12,12a,12b-decahydro-2H-benzo[a]xanthene-10-carboxylic Acid (2)]
Ac2O (63 μL, 0.666 mmol) was
added with stirring to n class="Chemical">carboxylic acid 35 (37 mg, 0.0952
mmol) in pyridine (0.5 mL) at 25 °C. After 24 h, CH2Cl2 (2 mL) was added, and the pH was adjusted to ∼1
with aqueous HCl (4 M). The two phases were separated, and the aqueous
layer was extracted with CH2Cl2 (3 × 2
mL). The combined organic layers were dried (MgSO4), filtered,
and concentrated to give diacetate 36. Crude diacetate 36 was dissolved in MeOH (2 mL) and H2O (0.2 mL),
and K2CO3 (20 mg, 0.143 mmol) was added at 25
°C. The resulting mixture was stirred for 5 h, when CH2Cl2 (2 mL) was added, and the pH was adjusted to ∼1
with aqueous HCl (4 M). The two phases were separated, and the aqueous
layer was extracted with CH2Cl2 (3 × 1
mL). The combined organic layers were dried (MgSO4), filtered, concentrated,
and chromatographed (pentane/EtOAc/AcOH 3:1:0.01) to give (+)-hongoquercin
B (2) (27 mg, 0.0627 mmol, 66% over two steps from carboxylic
acid 35) as white solid: R 0.29 (pentane/EtOAc/AcOH 3:1:0.01); mp 155–157
°C; [α]D30 +91.0 (c 0.52, CH3OH); 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 11.85 (s, 1H), 6.21
(s, 1H), 4.52 (dd, J = 11.6, 4.7 Hz, 1H), 2.66 (dd, J = 16.8, 4.8 Hz, 1H), 2.52 (s, 3H), 2.30 (dd, J = 16.8, 13.1 Hz, 1H), 2.13–2.07 (m, 1H), 2.07 (s, 3H), 1.86
(dt, J = 13.3, 3.6 Hz, 1H), 1.81–1.60 (m,
4H), 1.53 (dd, J = 13.1, 5.0 Hz, 1H), 1.47–1.42
(m, 1H), 1.24–1.18 (m, 1H), 1.20 (s, 3H), 1.10 (dd, J = 12.1, 2.2 Hz, 1H), 0.96 (s, 3H), 0.91 (s, 3H), 0.90
(s, 3H); 13C{1H} NMR (126 MHz, CDCl3) δ 175.9, 171.0, 163.8, 158.6, 141.6, 112.6, 107.7, 102.7,
80.4, 78.0, 55.1, 51.3, 40.6, 37.7, 37.1, 36.6, 28.1, 24.1, 23.5,
21.3, 20.7, 19.3, 16.8, 16.7, 15.0; IR νmax (neat)
3063, 2972, 2941, 1731, 1623, 1580, 1454, 1371, 1263, 1178, 1126,
1035, 1007 cm–1; HRMS (ESI) m/z [M – H]− calcd for C25H33O6 429.2277, found 429.2284.
BF3OEt2 (0.2 mL, 0.139 mmol) was added with stirring to n class="Chemical">epoxide 40 (110 mg, 0.305 mmol) in CH2Cl2 (30 mL) at
−78 °C. After 5 min, Et3N (5 mL) and H2O (20 mL) were added, the mixture was allowed to warm to 25
°C, and the two phases were separated. The aqueous layer was
extracted with CH2Cl2 (3 × 30 mL), and
the combined organic layers were dried (MgSO4), filtered,
concentrated, and purified by chromatography (pentane/EtOAc 5:2) to
give the meroterpenoid 41 (85 mg, 0.236 mmol, 77%, 84%
ee, measured by chiral HPLC, Chiralpak IE column, n-hexane/PrOH 9:1, 5 mL/min, tR = 22.0 [(−)-enantiomer], 26.6 [(+)-enantiomer]
min) as a white foam: R 0.29 (pentane/EtOAc 5:2); [α]D24 −71.0 (c 1.0, CHCl3); 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 6.33
(s, 1H), 3.41 (dd, J = 11.4, 4.2 Hz, 1H), 2.63 (dd, J = 16.8, 4.9 Hz, 1H), 2.56 (s, 3H), 2.31 (dd, J = 16.9, 13.2 Hz, 1H), 2.00 (dt, J = 12.5, 3.3 Hz,
1H), 1.91–1.81 (m, 1H), 1.78–1.74 (m, 1H), 1.73 (s,
3H), 1.69 (s, 3H), 1.64–1.52 (m, 2H), 1.20 (s, 3H), 1.12 (s,
3H), 0.89 (s, 3H); 13C{1H} NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3) δ 160.8, 158.6, 156.0, 142.2, 114.3, 107.9, 104.8,
104.1, 77.8, 77.6, 46.1, 38.5, 37.4, 28.1, 27.3, 26.1, 25.4, 21.9,
19.8, 17.2, 14.3; IR νmax (neat) 3433, 2942, 1708,
1617, 1573, 1287, 1128 cm–1; HRMS (ESI) m/z [M – H]− calcd
for C21H27O5 359.1858, found 359.1853.
Anal. Calcd for C21H28O5: C, 69.98;
H, 7.83. Found: C, 69.86; H, 7.94.
General Procedure for BDSB
(46)-Induced Halocyclization
BDSB (46) (604 mg, 1.10 mmol) was added with stirring
to resorcylate 24 or 14 (1.00 mmol) in MeNO2 (50 mL) at −25 °C. After 10 min, saturated aqueous
n class="Chemical">NaHCO3 (15 mL) and aqueous Na2SO3 (0.5 M; 5 mL) were added, and stirring was continued for 15 min.
The two phases were separated, and the aqueous layer was extracted
with CH2Cl2 (3 × 10 mL). The combined organic
layers were dried (MgSO4), filtered, concentrated, and
chromatographed (pentane/Et2O 9:1) to give the bromo-meroterpenoid 42 or 44.
General Procedure for IDSI (47)-Induced Halocyclization
IDSI (47) (884 mg,
1.10 mmol) was added with stirring
to resorcylate 24 or 14 (1.00 mmol) in MeNO2 (50 mL) at −25 °C. After 10 min, saturated aqueous
n class="Chemical">NaHCO3 (15 mL) and aqueous Na2SO3 (0.5 M; 5 mL) were added, and stirring was continued for 15 min.
The two phases were separated, and the aqueous layer was extracted
with CH2Cl2 (3 × 10 mL). The combined organic
layers were dried (MgSO4), filtered, concentrated, and
chromatographed (pentane/Et2O 9:1) to give the iodo-meroterpenoid 43 or 45.
Aqueous KOH (5
M; 1 mL)
was added with stirring to n class="Chemical">meroterpenoid 48 (69 mg, 0.200
mmol) in 1,4-dioxane (2 mL), and the resulting mixture was heated
at 110 °C for 23 h. After the reaction mixture was cooled to
25 °C, the pH was adjusted to ∼2 with aqueous HCl (4 M).
The two phases were separated, and the aqueous layer was extracted
with Et2O (3 × 10 mL). The combined organic layers
were dried (MgSO4), filtered, concentrated, and chromatographed
(pentane/EtOAc 15:1) to give the phenol 50 (40 mg, 0.194
mmol, 97%) as a white foam: R 0.33 (pentane/EtOAc 15:1); 1H NMR (400 MHz, (CD3)2CO) δ 8.00 (s, 1H), 6.21 (s, 1H), 6.05
(s, 1H), 2.71 (dd, J = 16.7, 5.0 Hz, 1H), 2.26 (dd, J = 16.6, 13.5 Hz, 1H), 2.12 (s, 3H), 1.92–1.81 (m,
1H), 1.68–1.53 (m, 4H), 1.52–1.44 (m, 1H), 1.40–1.27
(m, 1H), 1.17 (s, 3H), 1.01 (s, 3H), 0.94 (s, 3H); 13C{1H} NMR (100 MHz, (CD3)2CO) δ 156.2,
155.0, 137.2, 109.7, 107.7, 107.6, 77.0, 48.8, 42.3, 40.8, 34.0, 21.3,
20.9, 20.4, 20.0, 18.6; IR νmax (neat) 3398, 2935,
2866, 1627, 1587, 1516, 1457, 1101, 1063, 1040 cm–1; HRMS (EI) m/z [M]•+ calcd for C17H24O2 260.1776, found
260.1786.
Authors: Katie Anderson; Frederick Calo; Toni Pfaffeneder; Andrew J P White; Anthony G M Barrett Journal: Org Lett Date: 2011-09-21 Impact factor: 6.005
Authors: Jens Cordes; Frederick Calo; Katie Anderson; Toni Pfaffeneder; Sylvain Laclef; Andrew J P White; Anthony G M Barrett Journal: J Org Chem Date: 2011-12-07 Impact factor: 4.354
Authors: Daniel C Elliott; Tsz-Kan Ma; Aymane Selmani; Rosa Cookson; Philip J Parsons; Anthony G M Barrett Journal: Org Lett Date: 2016-04-04 Impact factor: 6.005
Authors: Zachary Powers; Adam Scharf; Andrea Cheng; Feng Yang; Martin Himmelbauer; Takaaki Mitsuhashi; Lena Barra; Yoshimasa Taniguchi; Takashi Kikuchi; Makoto Fujita; Ikuro Abe; John A Porco Journal: Angew Chem Int Ed Engl Date: 2019-09-25 Impact factor: 15.336