Literature DB >> 30346199

Surprise as an explanation to auditory novelty distraction and post-error slowing.

Fabrice B R Parmentier1, Martin R Vasilev2, Pilar Andrés1.   

Abstract

Performance in sustained attention tasks is known to be slowed by the occurrence of unexpected task-irrelevant distractors (novelty distraction) and the detection of errors (posterror slowing), 2 well-established phenomena studied separately and regarded as reflecting distinct underpinning mechanisms. We measured novelty distraction and posterror slowing in an auditory-visual oddball task to test the hypothesis that they both involve an orienting response. Our results confirm that the 2 effects exhibit a positive interaction. We show that a trial-by-trial measure of surprise credibly accounts for our empirical data. We suggest that novelty distraction and posterror slowing both reflect an orienting response to unexpected events and a reappraisal of action plans. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2018 APA, all rights reserved).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30346199     DOI: 10.1037/xge0000497

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen        ISSN: 0022-1015


  9 in total

1.  Reduced Error Recognition Explains Post-Error Slowing Differences among Children with Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder.

Authors:  Anne B Arnett; Candace Rhoads; Tara M Rutter
Journal:  J Int Neuropsychol Soc       Date:  2021-09-07       Impact factor: 3.114

2.  Action errors impair active working memory maintenance.

Authors:  Jan R Wessel; Jiefeng Jiang; Jeff J Stolley
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2022-02-10

3.  How the Mind Creates Structure: Hierarchical Learning of Action Sequences.

Authors:  Maria K Eckstein; Anne G E Collins
Journal:  Cogsci       Date:  2021-07

4.  Timing-dependent differential effects of unexpected events on error processing reveal the interactive dynamics of surprise and error processing.

Authors:  Yao Guan; Jan R Wessel
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  2021-08-12       Impact factor: 4.016

5.  Alignment of Continuous Auditory and Visual Distractor Stimuli Is Leading to an Increased Performance.

Authors:  Stefanie Mühlberg; Matthias M Müller
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2020-05-08

6.  Distraction by deviant sounds during reading: An eye-movement study.

Authors:  Martin R Vasilev; Fabrice Br Parmentier; Bernhard Angele; Julie A Kirkby
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol (Hove)       Date:  2019-01-13       Impact factor: 2.143

7.  Distraction by auditory novelty during reading: Evidence for disruption in saccade planning, but not saccade execution.

Authors:  Martin R Vasilev; Fabrice Br Parmentier; Julie A Kirkby
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol (Hove)       Date:  2021-01-12       Impact factor: 2.143

8.  Distraction by violation of sensory predictions: Functional distinction between deviant sounds and unexpected silences.

Authors:  Fabrice B R Parmentier; Alicia Leiva; Pilar Andrés; Murray T Maybery
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-09-06       Impact factor: 3.752

9.  Distraction by deviant sounds: disgusting and neutral words capture attention to the same extent.

Authors:  Fabrice B R Parmentier; Isabel Fraga; Alicia Leiva; Pilar Ferré
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2019-05-03
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.