Literature DB >> 30346076

Shared decision making in oncology: A model based on patients', health care professionals', and researchers' views.

Hanna Bomhof-Roordink1, Maarten J Fischer2, Nanny van Duijn-Bakker1, Monique C Baas-Thijssen1, Trudy van der Weijden3, Anne M Stiggelbout1, Arwen H Pieterse1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To construct a model of shared decision making (SDM) about cancer treatment by conducting an extensive consultation of stakeholders, informed by the literature.
METHODS: We interviewed 76 stakeholders: cancer patients, potential future patients, oncologists, nurses, and SDM-researchers. We asked, "If I say 'Doctors and patients making decisions together about cancer treatment,' what does this make you think about?" Ideas were further solicited by presenting 19 cards each describing a possible SDM element. Interviews were inductively coded and analysed, and the emerging themes were integrated into a model.
RESULTS: The model that was based on participants' views assigns specific roles in SDM to both oncologists and patients. Oncologists determine possible treatments, emphasise the importance of patients' opinion, explain treatment options, get to know patients, guide patients, and provide treatment recommendations. Patients ask questions, express thoughts and feelings, consider options, offer opinions, and decide or delegate decisions to oncologists. Outside consultations, patients search for information, prepare questions, and consider options.
CONCLUSIONS: Next to oncologists' role, cancer patients also have a clear role in SDM about cancer treatment, during and outside consultations. Patients should receive the support they need to fulfil this requirement.
© 2018 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  SDM; cancer; interviews; model; oncology; perspectives; shared decision making; stakeholders; treatment decision making; views

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30346076     DOI: 10.1002/pon.4923

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychooncology        ISSN: 1057-9249            Impact factor:   3.894


  8 in total

1.  Provider Recommendations for Phase I Clinical Trials Within a Shared Decision-Making Model in Phase I Cancer Clinical Trial Discussions.

Authors:  Rachel S Hianik; Gavin P Campbell; Eli Abernethy; Colleen Lewis; Christina S Wu; Mehmet Akce; Margie D Dixon; Walid L Shaib; Rebecca D Pentz
Journal:  JCO Oncol Pract       Date:  2020-05-19

2.  Measuring shared decision making in oncology: Development and first testing of the iSHAREpatient and iSHAREphysician questionnaires.

Authors:  Hanna Bomhof-Roordink; Fania R Gärtner; Nanny van Duijn-Bakker; Trudy van der Weijden; Anne M Stiggelbout; Arwen H Pieterse
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2020-02-05       Impact factor: 3.377

3.  Key components of shared decision making models: a systematic review.

Authors:  Hanna Bomhof-Roordink; Fania R Gärtner; Anne M Stiggelbout; Arwen H Pieterse
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2019-12-17       Impact factor: 2.692

4.  Why Rotationplasty? A Qualitative Study of Decision-Making by Families of Patients With Primary Bone Sarcoma.

Authors:  Chung M Chan; Adam D Lindsay; Andre R V Spiguel; C Parker Gibbs; Mark T Scarborough
Journal:  J Patient Exp       Date:  2022-01-04

5.  Real-World Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Treatment Patterns and Clinical Outcomes in The Netherlands.

Authors:  S A van Laar; K B Gombert-Handoko; R H H Groenwold; T van der Hulle; L E Visser; D Houtsma; H J Guchelaar; J Zwaveling
Journal:  Front Pharmacol       Date:  2022-03-23       Impact factor: 5.810

6.  Treatment decision making (TDM): a qualitative study exploring the perspectives of patients with chronic haematological cancers.

Authors:  Dorothy McCaughan; Eve Roman; Alexandra Smith; Russell Patmore; Debra Howell
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2022-03-29       Impact factor: 2.692

Review 7.  Leveraging the timing and frequency of patient decision aids in longitudinal shared decision-making: A narrative review and applied model.

Authors:  Lara R LoBrutto; Gemmae Fix; Renda S Wiener; Amy M Linsky
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2022-06-02       Impact factor: 3.318

8.  Fostering Patient Choice Awareness and Presenting Treatment Options Neutrally: A Randomized Trial to Assess the Effect on Perceived Room for Involvement in Decision Making.

Authors:  Arwen H Pieterse; Kim Brandes; Jessica de Graaf; Joyce E de Boer; Nanon H M Labrie; Anouk Knops; Cornelia F Allaart; Johanna E A Portielje; Willem Jan W Bos; Anne M Stiggelbout
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  2021-11-02       Impact factor: 2.583

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.