Literature DB >> 30345051

Evaluation of the clinical efficacy of preserving the left colic artery in laparoscopic resection for rectal cancer: A meta-analysis.

Dongwei Fan1, Chensong Zhang1, Xuanhe Li1, Changyang Yao1, Tingjing Yao1.   

Abstract

The aim of the present meta-analysis compared left colic artery (LCA) preservation with non-preservation in laparoscopic resection of rectal cancer in terms of feasibility, efficacy and safety. The PubMed, Ovid, Embase, Web of Science, CBM, CNKI, VIP and WanFang Data databases were searched prior to June 2017 for studies comparing LCA preservation and non-preservation in laparoscopic resection for rectal cancer. Two researchers screened the literature independently, extracted the data and evaluated the risk of bias. The study was performed using RevMan 5.3 software for meta-analysis. A total of 10 studies comparing LCA preservation and non-preservation in laparoscopic resection for rectal cancer were selected for this meta-analysis, with a combined study population of 1,471 patients. The results of the meta-analysis demonstrated that, when comparing LCA preservation with non-preservation in laparoscopic resection for rectal cancer, there were significant differences between the two groups in terms of operative time (P<0.01), estimated blood loss (P<0.01), percentage of neostomy (P<0.01), the number of retrieved lymph nodes (P<0.01), time to first postoperative exhaust (P<0.01) and amount of anastomotic leakage (P<0.01). However, there were no significant differences in postoperative hospital stay (P=0.28), incidence of recurrence (P=0.73) and incidence of metastasis (P=0.52). Therefore, compared with LCA non-preservation, patients in whom the LCA was preserved during laparoscopic resection for rectal cancer had a better prognosis. However, there was no difference in recurrence or metastasis between the two groups. Although the operative time and estimated blood loss were increased with LCA preservation, these may be reduced with improving proficiency of the operating surgeons. The conclusions of the present study require verification by larger samples and high-quality randomized controlled trials.

Entities:  

Keywords:  laparoscopic; left colic artery; meta-analysis; rectal cancer

Year:  2018        PMID: 30345051      PMCID: PMC6174423          DOI: 10.3892/mco.2018.1714

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Clin Oncol        ISSN: 2049-9450


  22 in total

1.  [Clinical effect of preservation of the left colonic artery in laparoscopic anterior resection for rectal cancer].

Authors:  J W Niu; W Ning; W Y Wang; D P Pei; F Q Meng; Z Z Liu; D G Cai
Journal:  Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi       Date:  2016-11-29

Review 2.  Management of Colorectal Anastomotic Leak.

Authors:  Michael S Thomas; David A Margolin
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2016-06

3.  Effect of left colonic artery preservation on anastomotic leakage in laparoscopic anterior resection for middle and low rectal cancer.

Authors:  Takao Hinoi; Masazumi Okajima; Manabu Shimomura; Hiroyuki Egi; Hideki Ohdan; Fumio Konishi; Kenichi Sugihara; Masahiko Watanabe
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 3.352

4.  Preservation of the inferior mesenteric artery in colorectal resection for complicated diverticular disease.

Authors:  A Tocchi; G Mazzoni; V Fornasari; M Miccini; G Daddi; S Tagliacozzo
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 2.565

5.  Risk of anastomotic leak after laparoscopic versus open colectomy.

Authors:  Alice C A Murray; Cody Chiuzan; Ravi P Kiran
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2016-04-28       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  [Clinical value of laparoscopic surgery for colon cancer].

Authors:  R Kube; H Ptok; R Steinert; M Sahm; U Schmidt; I Gastinger; H Lippert
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 0.955

7.  Colorectal anastomotic leakage at the university hospital of the west indies: an analysis of risk factors.

Authors:  P A Leake; J M Plummer; A Rhoden; M Ac Frankson; G Gordon-Strachan; L P Powell; P O Roberts
Journal:  West Indian Med J       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 0.171

8.  [Preservation of left colic artery in laparoscopic radical operation for rectal cancer].

Authors:  Luyang Zhang; Lu Zang; Junjun Ma; Feng Dong; Zirui He; Minhua Zheng
Journal:  Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi       Date:  2016-08-25

9.  High tie versus low tie in rectal surgery: comparison of anastomotic perfusion.

Authors:  Niels Komen; Juliette Slieker; Peter de Kort; J H W de Wilt; Erwin van der Harst; Peter-Paul Coene; Martijn P Gosselink; Martijn Gosselink; Geert Tetteroo; Eelco de Graaf; Ton van Beek; Rene den Toom; Wouter van Bockel; Cees Verhoef; Johan F Lange
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2011-03-29       Impact factor: 2.571

10.  Analysis of anastomotic leakage after rectal surgery: A case-control study.

Authors:  Junichiro Tanaka; Takeshi Nishikawa; Toshiaki Tanaka; Tomomichi Kiyomatsu; Keisuke Hata; Kazushige Kawai; Shinsuke Kazama; Hiroaki Nozawa; Hironori Yamaguchi; Soichiro Ishihara; Eiji Sunami; Joji Kitayama; Toshiaki Watanabe
Journal:  Ann Med Surg (Lond)       Date:  2015-05-11
View more
  3 in total

1.  International survey among surgeons on the perioperative management of rectal cancer.

Authors:  Zaid Al-Difaie; Nariaki Okamoto; Max H M C Scheepers; Didier Mutter; Laurents P S Stassen; Nicole D Bouvy; Jacques Marescaux; Bernard Dallemagne; Michele Diana; Mahdi Al-Taher
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2022-10-18       Impact factor: 3.453

2.  Low Ligation Plus High Dissection Versus High Ligation of the Inferior Mesenteric Artery in Sigmoid Colon and Rectal Cancer Surgery: A Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Tzu-Chieh Yin; Yen-Cheng Chen; Wei-Chih Su; Po-Jung Chen; Tsung-Kun Chang; Ching-Wen Huang; Hsiang-Lin Tsai; Jaw-Yuan Wang
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2021-11-11       Impact factor: 6.244

Review 3.  The significance of anatomical variation of the inferior mesenteric artery and its branches for laparoscopic radical resection of colorectal cancer: a review.

Authors:  Shun Zeng; Wenhao Wu; Xianbin Zhang; Tong Qiu; Peng Gong
Journal:  World J Surg Oncol       Date:  2022-09-10       Impact factor: 3.253

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.