Literature DB >> 30344936

The ubiquitin-activating enzyme, UBA1, as a novel therapeutic target for AML.

Samir H Barghout1, Aaron D Schimmer1.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Keywords:  AML; MLN7243; TAK-243; UBA1; Ubiquitin

Year:  2018        PMID: 30344936      PMCID: PMC6188141          DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.26153

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oncotarget        ISSN: 1949-2553


× No keyword cloud information.
The clinical approval of bortezomib, the first proteasome inhibitor, marked the advent of a new generation of anticancer drugs that target broadly-acting non-oncogenic cellular machineries important for both normal and cancer cells [1, 2]. Although perhaps initially surprising, targeting the highly conserved ubiquitin-proteasome system (UPS) preferentially produced proteotoxic stress in malignant cells over normal tissue and created a therapeutic window in specific cancers. Given the success of bortezomib, attention turned to evaluating other components of the UPS. This system consists of ubiquitin-activating enzymes (E1), ubiquitin-conjugating enzymes (E2), ubiquitin ligases (E3) and the proteasome. These three enzyme classes act sequentially to tag protein substrates with different forms of mono- or polyubiquitin. The UPS plays a key role in maintaining cellular proteostasis and regulating many ubiquitin-dependent signaling pathways such as DNA repair and nuclear factor kappa B signaling (Figure 1). We focused on targeting the initiating ubiquitin-activating enzyme, UBA1. Previously, we showed that leukemia cell lines and primary AML samples had increased reliance on UBA1 and decreased reserve capacity of the enzyme [3], suggesting inhibiting UBA1 could be of value in the treatment of AML.
Figure 1

The ubiquitin-proteasome system (UPS) and its role in proteotoxic and DNA damage stress

Endoplasmic reticulum-associated degradation mediated by the UPS is known to rid the cells of misfolded proteins, whose accumulation would otherwise induce proteotoxic stress, unfolded protein response and ultimately cell death after sustained disruption. Ubiquitylation is also involved in regulating DNA repair and other signaling pathways such as the NF-κB pathway. Three examples of the different ubiquitylation patterns are depicted in the diagram: mono-ubiquitin, Lys48- (K48)- and Lys63 (K63)-linked polyubiquitin chains. UBA1, NAE and the proteasome are targeted by TAK-243, pevonedistat and bortezomib, respectively.

The ubiquitin-proteasome system (UPS) and its role in proteotoxic and DNA damage stress

Endoplasmic reticulum-associated degradation mediated by the UPS is known to rid the cells of misfolded proteins, whose accumulation would otherwise induce proteotoxic stress, unfolded protein response and ultimately cell death after sustained disruption. Ubiquitylation is also involved in regulating DNA repair and other signaling pathways such as the NF-κB pathway. Three examples of the different ubiquitylation patterns are depicted in the diagram: mono-ubiquitin, Lys48- (K48)- and Lys63 (K63)-linked polyubiquitin chains. UBA1, NAE and the proteasome are targeted by TAK-243, pevonedistat and bortezomib, respectively. Recently, we evaluated a first-in-class small-molecule UBA1 inhibitor developed by Takeda Pharmaceuticals, TAK-243, in preclinical models of AML [4]. TAK-243 is an adenosine sulphamate related to pevonedistat, a NEDD8-activating enzyme (NAE) inhibitor and the prototype of this class of mechanism-based E1 inhibitors [5]. TAK-243 acts by a unique mechanism known as substrate-assisted inhibition as it forms covalent adduct with ubiquitin that mimics the ubiquitin-adenylate complex and inhibits the cognate E1 enzyme [6]. In our study, we assessed the cytotoxicity of TAK-243 in a panel of AML cell lines and primary AML samples. TAK-243 exhibited a potent and rapid anti-leukemic activity with half-maximal inhibitory concentrations in the nanomolar range. Moreover, TAK-243 was equally effective in AML patient samples with high risk molecular and cytogenetic mutations. TAK-243 also showed preferential cytotoxicity towards leukemic versus normal hematopoietic progenitors. In vivo, TAK-243 reduced the leukemic burden without evidence of toxicity. To confirm the cellular target and determine the selectivity of TAK-243, we exploited the cellular thermal shift assay (CETSA) that measures target engagement in intact cells [7]. By CETSA, TAK-243 preferentially bound UBA1 over related E1 enzymes in AML cells and primary samples at concentrations associated with cell death. We also evaluated the downstream biological effects of UBA1 inhibition after TAK-243 treatment. In AML cells and primary samples, TAK-243 reduced the abundance of ubiquitylated proteins leading to endoplasmic reticulum stress that was functionally important for TAK-243-induced cell death. In addition, TAK-243 reduced the abundance of mono-ubiquitylated histones H2A and H2B. Mono-ubiquitylation of histones plays a pivotal role in recruitment of DNA repair molecules such as 53BP1 and BRCA1 to double-strand break (DSB) lesions [8]. As an inhibitor of histone ubiquitylation, TAK-243 inhibited DSB repair and induced DNA damage stress as evidenced by induction of γH2AX under unirradiated conditions. It also reduced 53BP1 foci at ionizing radiation-induced DSBs. Additionally, pre-treatment of AML cells with TAK-243 reduced their ability to resolve DSBs as evidenced by sustained γH2AX foci. A prior study showed that TAK-243 synergized with radiation in patient-derived breast and non-small cell lung cancer cells in vivo [9]. To understand mechanisms of resistance to TAK-243, we generated populations of AML cells resistant to the drug. By sequencing the adenylation domain of UBA1 in these resistant cells, we identified Y583C and A580S missense mutations. The A580S mutation is similar to the mutation previously reported to confer resistance to pevonedistat [10]; however, the Y583C mutation is TAK-243-specific and likely conferred acquired resistance to the drug by eliminating hydrogen bonds and destabilizing the hydrophobic core of UBA1. Recently, Hyer et al. characterized the mode of action and biological activity of TAK-243 in cell-free and cell-based systems and evaluated the preclinical efficacy in several mouse models of solid (prostate, ovarian, breast, colon, neck and lung) and hematologic (multiple myeloma and lymphoma) malignancies, further demonstrating efficacy and tolerability of this drug [9]. Thus, data by our group and others support advancing TAK-243 to a phase 1 clinical trial in AML patients. However, several open questions remain to be answered: 1) given its pleiotropic activity, what is the most critical mechanism of TAK-243 cytotoxicity and does it vary between different malignancies? 2) what are the determinants of sensitivity to TAK-243 in various cancers? and 3) given the anticipated broader spectrum of signaling affected by TAK-243, can this drug overcome specific forms of resistance to bortezomib and pevonedistat? Answering these questions will provide deeper insights into TAK-243 action and enable identification of potential biomarkers to determine patients most likely to benefit from this drug.
  10 in total

1.  Preclinical evaluation of the selective small-molecule UBA1 inhibitor, TAK-243, in acute myeloid leukemia.

Authors:  Samir H Barghout; Parasvi S Patel; Xiaoming Wang; G Wei Xu; Simon Kavanagh; Ondrej Halgas; Sara F Zarabi; Marcela Gronda; Rose Hurren; Danny V Jeyaraju; Neil MacLean; Shawn Brennan; Marc L Hyer; Allison Berger; Tary Traore; Michael Milhollen; Adam C Smith; Mark D Minden; Emil F Pai; Razq Hakem; Aaron D Schimmer
Journal:  Leukemia       Date:  2018-06-08       Impact factor: 11.528

2.  Substrate-assisted inhibition of ubiquitin-like protein-activating enzymes: the NEDD8 E1 inhibitor MLN4924 forms a NEDD8-AMP mimetic in situ.

Authors:  James E Brownell; Michael D Sintchak; James M Gavin; Hua Liao; Frank J Bruzzese; Nancy J Bump; Teresa A Soucy; Michael A Milhollen; Xiaofeng Yang; Anne L Burkhardt; Jingya Ma; Huay-Keng Loke; Trupti Lingaraj; Dongyun Wu; Kristin B Hamman; James J Spelman; Courtney A Cullis; Steven P Langston; Stepan Vyskocil; Todd B Sells; William D Mallender; Irache Visiers; Ping Li; Christopher F Claiborne; Mark Rolfe; Joseph B Bolen; Lawrence R Dick
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2010-01-15       Impact factor: 17.970

Review 3.  Histone ubiquitination in the DNA damage response.

Authors:  Michael Uckelmann; Titia K Sixma
Journal:  DNA Repair (Amst)       Date:  2017-06-09

4.  The cellular thermal shift assay for evaluating drug target interactions in cells.

Authors:  Rozbeh Jafari; Helena Almqvist; Hanna Axelsson; Marina Ignatushchenko; Thomas Lundbäck; Pär Nordlund; Daniel Martinez Molina
Journal:  Nat Protoc       Date:  2014-08-07       Impact factor: 13.491

5.  Treatment-emergent mutations in NAEβ confer resistance to the NEDD8-activating enzyme inhibitor MLN4924.

Authors:  Michael A Milhollen; Michael P Thomas; Usha Narayanan; Tary Traore; Jessica Riceberg; Benjamin S Amidon; Neil F Bence; Joseph B Bolen; James Brownell; Lawrence R Dick; Huay-Keng Loke; Alice A McDonald; Jingya Ma; Mark G Manfredi; Todd B Sells; Mike D Sintchak; Xiaofeng Yang; Qing Xu; Erik M Koenig; James M Gavin; Peter G Smith
Journal:  Cancer Cell       Date:  2012-03-20       Impact factor: 31.743

Review 6.  Targeting tumour-supportive cellular machineries in anticancer drug development.

Authors:  Matthias Dobbelstein; Ute Moll
Journal:  Nat Rev Drug Discov       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 84.694

7.  Principles of cancer therapy: oncogene and non-oncogene addiction.

Authors:  Ji Luo; Nicole L Solimini; Stephen J Elledge
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2009-03-06       Impact factor: 41.582

8.  The ubiquitin-activating enzyme E1 as a therapeutic target for the treatment of leukemia and multiple myeloma.

Authors:  G Wei Xu; Mohsin Ali; Tabitha E Wood; Derek Wong; Neil Maclean; Xiaoming Wang; Marcela Gronda; Marko Skrtic; Xiaoming Li; Rose Hurren; Xinliang Mao; Meenakshi Venkatesan; Reza Beheshti Zavareh; Troy Ketela; John C Reed; David Rose; Jason Moffat; Robert A Batey; Sirano Dhe-Paganon; Aaron D Schimmer
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2010-01-14       Impact factor: 22.113

9.  An inhibitor of NEDD8-activating enzyme as a new approach to treat cancer.

Authors:  Teresa A Soucy; Peter G Smith; Michael A Milhollen; Allison J Berger; James M Gavin; Sharmila Adhikari; James E Brownell; Kristine E Burke; David P Cardin; Stephen Critchley; Courtney A Cullis; Amanda Doucette; James J Garnsey; Jeffrey L Gaulin; Rachel E Gershman; Anna R Lublinsky; Alice McDonald; Hirotake Mizutani; Usha Narayanan; Edward J Olhava; Stephane Peluso; Mansoureh Rezaei; Michael D Sintchak; Tina Talreja; Michael P Thomas; Tary Traore; Stepan Vyskocil; Gabriel S Weatherhead; Jie Yu; Julie Zhang; Lawrence R Dick; Christopher F Claiborne; Mark Rolfe; Joseph B Bolen; Steven P Langston
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2009-04-09       Impact factor: 49.962

10.  A small-molecule inhibitor of the ubiquitin activating enzyme for cancer treatment.

Authors:  Marc L Hyer; Michael A Milhollen; Jeff Ciavarri; Paul Fleming; Tary Traore; Darshan Sappal; Jessica Huck; Judy Shi; James Gavin; Jim Brownell; Yu Yang; Bradley Stringer; Robert Griffin; Frank Bruzzese; Teresa Soucy; Jennifer Duffy; Claudia Rabino; Jessica Riceberg; Kara Hoar; Anya Lublinsky; Saurabh Menon; Michael Sintchak; Nancy Bump; Sai M Pulukuri; Steve Langston; Stephen Tirrell; Mike Kuranda; Petter Veiby; John Newcomb; Ping Li; Jing Tao Wu; Josh Powe; Lawrence R Dick; Paul Greenspan; Katherine Galvin; Mark Manfredi; Chris Claiborne; Benjamin S Amidon; Neil F Bence
Journal:  Nat Med       Date:  2018-01-15       Impact factor: 53.440

  10 in total
  5 in total

1.  Comparative proteomic analysis identifies differentially expressed proteins and reveals potential mechanisms of traumatic heterotopic ossification progression.

Authors:  Zhenyuan Wei; Shang Guo; Hongwei Wang; Yang Zhao; Jiren Yan; Chi Zhang; Biao Zhong
Journal:  J Orthop Translat       Date:  2022-05-14       Impact factor: 4.889

2.  SLFN11 Inactivation Induces Proteotoxic Stress and Sensitizes Cancer Cells to Ubiquitin Activating Enzyme Inhibitor TAK-243.

Authors:  Yasuhisa Murai; Ukhyun Jo; Naoko Takebe; Yves Pommier; Junko Murai; Lisa M Jenkins; Shar-Yin N Huang; Sirisha Chakka; Lu Chen; Ken Cheng; Shinsaku Fukuda
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2021-04-16       Impact factor: 13.312

3.  UAE1 inhibition mediates the unfolded protein response, DNA damage and caspase-dependent cell death in pancreatic cancer.

Authors:  Yajing Liu; Sahezeel Awadia; Amy Delaney; Merna Sitto; Carl G Engelke; Heli Patel; Andrew Calcaterra; Sylvia Zelenka-Wang; Hojin Lee; Joseph Contessa; Nouri Neamati; Mats Ljungman; Theodore S Lawrence; Meredith A Morgan; Alnawaz Rehemtulla
Journal:  Transl Oncol       Date:  2020-07-17       Impact factor: 4.243

Review 4.  Ubiquitin Proteasome Pathway Transcriptome in Epithelial Ovarian Cancer.

Authors:  Jerry Vriend; Mark W Nachtigal
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2021-05-28       Impact factor: 6.639

5.  A genome-wide CRISPR/Cas9 screen in acute myeloid leukemia cells identifies regulators of TAK-243 sensitivity.

Authors:  Samir H Barghout; Ahmed Aman; Kazem Nouri; Zachary Blatman; Karen Arevalo; Geethu E Thomas; Neil MacLean; Rose Hurren; Troy Ketela; Mehakpreet Saini; Moustafa Abohawya; Taira Kiyota; Rima Al-Awar; Aaron D Schimmer
Journal:  JCI Insight       Date:  2021-03-08
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.