Literature DB >> 30344888

Insights into the draft genome sequence of bioactives-producing Bacillus thuringiensis DNG9 isolated from Algerian soil-oil slough.

Mohamed Seghir Daas1,2, Albert Remus R Rosana3, Jeella Z Acedo3, Malika Douzane2, Farida Nateche4, Salima Kebbouche-Gana1, John C Vederas3.   

Abstract

Bacillus thuringiensis is widely used as a bioinsecticide due to its ability to form parasporal crystals containing proteinaceous toxins. It is a member of the Bacillus cereus sensu lato, a group with low genetic diversity but produces several promising antimicrobial compounds. B. thuringiensis DNG9, isolated from an oil-contaminated slough in Algeria, has strong antibacterial, antifungal and biosurfactant properties. Here, we report the 6.06 Mbp draft genome sequence of B. thuringiensis DNG9. The genome encodes several gene inventories for the biosynthesis of bioactive compounds such as zwittermycin A, petrobactin, insecticidal toxins, polyhydroxyalkanoates and multiple bacteriocins. We expect the genome information of strain DNG9 will provide another model system to study pathogenicity against insect pests, plant diseases, and antimicrobial compound mining and comparative phylogenesis among the Bacillus cereus sensu lato group.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bacillus thuringiensis; Bacteriocin; Bioinformatics; Genome sequencing; Secondary metabolites; Zwittermycin a

Year:  2018        PMID: 30344888      PMCID: PMC6186030          DOI: 10.1186/s40793-018-0331-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stand Genomic Sci        ISSN: 1944-3277


Introduction

is a rod-shaped, Gram-positive bacterium that has been isolated from a variety of ecological niches including soil, aquatic environments, and dead insects, among many others [1]. is known for its utility as a bioinsecticide due to its ability to produce parasporal crystals that contain protein toxins (e.g. Cry proteins, also called δ-endotoxins) during its sporulation and stationary growth phase [2]. These protein toxins have also been successfully introduced to genetically modified crops, as exemplified in Bt corn, rendering these crops resistant to specific insect pests [3]. The protein toxins have been shown to be safe to plants, beneficial insects, and mammals due to the absence of specific receptors that are normally only found in the target organisms [4, 5]. The potential of to serve as an alternative to chemical insecticides has driven the discovery of new strains that may lead to the identification of novel protein toxins with potential use in pest management [1, 6]. Aside from the insecticidal properties of , it has also been reported to exhibit antibacterial, antifungal, antibiofilm and emulsifying activities [7, 8]. In general, the species are known to be rich sources of antimicrobial compounds [9-12]. For , its antibacterial effects can be attributed to a wide range of compounds including bacteriocins and lipopeptides [13]. On the other hand, its antifungal activity has been attributed to the production of compounds such as zwittermycin, chitinase, and lipopeptides [7]. In this study, the whole genome sequence of DNG9 that was isolated from an oil-contaminated slough in Baraki-Algiers, Algeria was determined. This strain was chosen for sequencing due to its strong antimicrobial and emulsifying properties. It was the aim of this work to obtain a better understanding of the observed bioactivities based on the genes encoded in its genome.

Organism information

Classification and features

DNG9 was isolated from an oil-contaminated soil slough in Baraki-Algiers, Algeria. The samples were serially diluted in water, heat-shocked at 80 °C for 30 min, spread onto Luria Bertani (LB) agar and incubated at 35 °C for 24 h. Strain DNG9, like the majority of other reported strains, are Gram-positive, aerobic to facultative anaerobic bacterium [14]. The cells are rod-shaped, flagellated (Fig. 1a) and endospore-forming (Fig. 1b, c). The bacterium has a growth temperature range from 10 to 48 °C with an optimal growth at 28–35 °C [15] and pH 4.9–8.0 with an optimal pH of 7.0 [16, 17]. It produces parasporal bodies during the stationary phase of its growth cycle (Fig. 1c), which is consistent with the three cry genes predicted from its genome. Two homologs of cry41 and one homolog of cry6 genes were predicted from the genome of DNG9 using the BtToxin Scanner server [18]. The key features of DNG9 are summarized in Table 1.
Fig. 1

General characteristics of Bacillus thuringiensis DNG9. Transmission electron micrograph (TEM) of DNG9 showing a flagellated cell, b subcentral endospore, ES, and c parasporal bodies, PB. d Spot-on-lawn assay showing the activity of DNG9 supernatant (labelled as 4) against indicator strain Lactococcus lactis subsp. cremoris HP

Table 1

Classification and general features of Bacillus thuringiensis strain DNG9 according to the MIGS recommendation [19]

MIGS IDPropertyTermEvidence codea
ClassificationDomain BacteriaTAS [53]
Phylum FirmicutesTAS [16]
Class BacilliTAS [54, 55]
Order BacillalesTAS [42, 56]
Family BacillaceaeTAS [42, 57]
Genus BacillusTAS [41, 42]
Species Bacillus thuringiensisTAS [42, 58]
Strain DNG9
Gram stainPositiveIDA
Cell shapeRodIDA
MotilityMotileIDA
SporulationSpore (Subcentral)IDA
Temperature range10 °C – 48 °CTAS [15]
Optimum temperature28 °C – 35 °CTAS [15]
pH range; Optimum4.9–8.0; 7.0TAS [16, 17]
Carbon sourceGlucoseNAS
MIGS-6HabitatSoilNAS
MIGS-6.3SalinitySalt tolerantTAS [59]
MIGS-22Oxygen requirementAerobic,IDA
MIGS-15Biotic relationshipFree-livingIDA
MIGS-14PathogenicityInsect pathogenTAS [60]
MIGS-4Geographic locationAlgeriaNAS
MIGS-5Sample collectionFebruary 13, 2013NAS
MIGS-4.1Latitude36° 40′ 9″ NNAS
MIGS-4.2Longitude3° 5′ 43″ ENAS
MIGS-4.4Altitude22 mNAS

aEvidence codes: IDA Inferred from Direct Assay, TAS Traceable Author Statement (i.e., a direct report exists in the literature), NAS Non-traceable Author Statement (i.e., not directly observed for the living, isolated sample, but based on a generally accepted property for the species, or anecdotal evidence). These evidence codes are from the Gene Ontology project [61]

General characteristics of Bacillus thuringiensis DNG9. Transmission electron micrograph (TEM) of DNG9 showing a flagellated cell, b subcentral endospore, ES, and c parasporal bodies, PB. d Spot-on-lawn assay showing the activity of DNG9 supernatant (labelled as 4) against indicator strain Lactococcus lactis subsp. cremoris HP Classification and general features of Bacillus thuringiensis strain DNG9 according to the MIGS recommendation [19] aEvidence codes: IDA Inferred from Direct Assay, TAS Traceable Author Statement (i.e., a direct report exists in the literature), NAS Non-traceable Author Statement (i.e., not directly observed for the living, isolated sample, but based on a generally accepted property for the species, or anecdotal evidence). These evidence codes are from the Gene Ontology project [61] Thirteen strains and DNG9 were chosen for phylogenetic analysis. The chosen species represent the members of sensu lato supergroup [19]. This includes the type strains Berliner ATCC 10792T, ATCC 14579T and AMES Ancestor. The 16S rRNA gene sequence from the type strain ATCC 6051T [20] was selected as an outgroup. The maximum likelihood method was used to construct the phylogenetic tree shown in Fig. 2. The phylogenetic tree supports the placement of strain DNG9 within the group together with the type strain Berliner ATCC 10792T.
Fig. 2

Maximum likelihood phylogeny of Bacillus thuringiensis DNG9 16S rRNA gene isolated from Algerian soil-oil slough. Nucleic acid sequences were aligned using Geneious and the tree compiled using RaxML. Numbers above the branches refer to bootstrap values. The tree was rooted using ATCC 6051T. Type strains are indicated with T. All strains represent sequenced genomes. Scale bar indicates 2 nucleotide substitution for each 10 nucleotide sequences. Accession numbers of publicly available sequences are given in brackets

Maximum likelihood phylogeny of Bacillus thuringiensis DNG9 16S rRNA gene isolated from Algerian soil-oil slough. Nucleic acid sequences were aligned using Geneious and the tree compiled using RaxML. Numbers above the branches refer to bootstrap values. The tree was rooted using ATCC 6051T. Type strains are indicated with T. All strains represent sequenced genomes. Scale bar indicates 2 nucleotide substitution for each 10 nucleotide sequences. Accession numbers of publicly available sequences are given in brackets

Genome sequencing information

Genome project history

The project information and associated MIGS (Minimum Information about a Genome Sequence) 2.0 compliance [21] are summarized in Table 2. This bacterium was selected for sequencing as it was determined to be one of the most promising strains for discovery of compounds with strong antibacterial (Fig. 1d), antifungal and biosurfactant abilities (Additional file 1: Figure S1). The availability of the draft genome of DNG9 may contribute to the evolution and comparative genomics studies of the sensu lato group. Furthermore, future investigations on its genome-encoded bioactive metabolites may be pursued. This work provided a standard draft genome and the assembled contigs have been deposited in public repositories. The PGAP- and JGI-IM- annotated genomes were deposited to the DDBJ/ENA/GenBank databases under accession numbers MSTN00000000 and Ga0180945, respectively.
Table 2

Project information

MIGS IDPropertyTerm
MIGS 31Finishing qualityDraft genome
MIGS-28Libraries usedIllumina paired-end
MIGS 29Sequencing platformsIllumina MiSeq100
MIGS 31.2Fold coverage317×
MIGS 30AssemblersCLC Genomic Workbench 7.5.2
MIGS 32Gene calling methodGeneMarkS, Prodigal
Locus TagBVF97
Genbank IDMSTN00000000
GenBank Date of Release9-Mar-17
GOLD IDGa0180945
BIOPROJECTPRJNA359364
MIGS 13Source Material IdentifierDNG9
Project relevanceAgricultural, Biotechnological
Project information

Growth conditions and genomic DNA preparation

Genomic DNA was isolated from a combined 16-h grown single colony isolate and a two mL 16-h grown liquid culture (150 rpm) from LB agar and LB broth, respectively. Total nucleic acid was extracted using the method described previously [22]. Briefly, cells were harvested at 500×g for 2 min and resuspended in 100 μl 1× TE buffer (100 mM Tris-HCl, 50 mM EDTA, pH 8.0). Cell slurry was sequentially treated with 20 mg/ml lysozyme (37 °C, 30 min), 2 mg/ml proteinase K (56 °C, 30 min) and 0.5 mg/ml RNase A (37 °C, 30 min). The sphaeroplast suspension was lysed with 500 μl cell breakage buffer (0.4% sodium dodecyl sulfate, 0.5% N-lauroyl sarcosine, 0.5% Triton X-100, 50 mM Tris, 100 mM EDTA, pH 8.0), 400 μl phenol and 150 μl glass beads (0.5 mm dia, Sartorius, Germany). The slurry was vortexed for 1 min and rested for 1 min on ice, for a total of 10 cycles, and finally clarified at 13000×g for 5 min at room temperature. The aqueous layer was repeatedly extracted with equal volume of phenol, followed by phenol:chloroform (1:1) and finally with chloroform:isoamyl alcohol (24:1). The DNA was precipitated with 0.1× 3 M sodium acetate pH 5.2 and 2.5× absolute ethanol, washed with 70% ethanol and resuspended in 10 mM Tris buffer, pH 8.0. Quantity and quality were assessed using Qubit 2.0 fluorometry (Qiagen) and agarose gel electrophoresis, respectively.

Genome sequencing and assembly

The genome of DNG9 was sequenced at The Applied Genomic Core, Department of Biochemistry, University of Alberta using Illumina paired-end sequencing platform and Nextera XT DNA library kit (Illumina, USA). Whole genome sequencing was performed in duplicates using the MiSeq Reagent kit v2. Sequencing of 250 bp paired-end modules gathered 3.69 M reads, which provided an average coverage of 317× resulting in 38 contigs. De novo assembly of the 6,057,430 bp paired-end sequences was created using CLC Genomics Worksbench v 7.5.2. (CLC bio, Aarhus, Denmark).

Genome annotation

Gene prediction was performed using four automated genome annotation pipelines: (1) the NCBI Prokaryotic Genome Annotation Pipeline (PGAP) [23] using GeneMarkS+ and best-placed reference protein set; (2) the Joint Genome Institute – Integrated Microbial Genomes and Microbiomes (JGI-IMG/M) pipeline [24] utilizing Prodigal gene caller [25]; (3) the Rapid Annotation using Subsystem Technology (RAST) v2.0 server [26]; and (4) the Bacterial Annotation System (BASys) server [27]. CRISPR repeats were predicted by using CRISPRfinder [28]. The draft genome of DNG9 was aligned with the type strain Berliner ATCC 10792T closed genome to generate a single scaffold using Contiguator v2 [29] and Multi-Draft based Scaffolder (MEDUSA) [30]. A chromosome map was generated from the single scaffold using BASys automated pipeline [27] and viewed using CGViewer [31]. Species was established using genome-wide Average Nucleotide Identity (gANI) metric and alignment fraction (AF) calculated within the JGI-IMG/M server using the Microbial Species Identifier (MiSI) calculator [32]. Strain was established using the Genome-to-Genome Distance Calculator (GGDC) 2.1 server employing digital DNA:DNA hybridization (dDDH) and DNA G + C content [33].

Genome properties

The draft genome of DNG9 is 6,057,430 bp with 34.9% GC content, similar to the genomes of other strains [34-36], and contained 38 scaffolds with N50 of 347,259 bp. A total of 135 RNA genes and 284 pseudogenes were annotated by IMG/M and PGAP, respectively (Table 3). Annotation using the DOE-JGI IMG/M pipeline revealed 6109 total coding sequences of which 4463 have functional predictions. Conversely, RAST annotation pipeline predicted 6055 coding sequences; NCBI-PGAP revealed 6213 coding genes; and lastly, BASys annotated 6102 coding sequences. The 4463 coding sequences predicted in IMG/M pipeline were placed in 25 general clusters of orthologous (COG) functional gene catalogs. The distribution of these protein-coding genes based on COG function is listed in Table 4. The 6.06 Mbp draft genome map of DNG9, as aligned against the type strain Berliner ATCC 10792, is presented in Fig. 3.
Table 3

Genome statistics

AttributeValue% of Total
Genome size (bp)6,057,430100.00
DNA coding (bp)5,053,19783.42
DNA G + C (bp)2,107,90734.80
DNA scaffolds38100.00
Total genes6109100.00
Protein coding genes597497.79
RNA genes1352.21
Pseudo genes2844.65
Genes in internal clusters202433.13
Genes with function prediction446373.06
Genes assigned to COGs363359.47
Genes with Pfam domains488379.93
Genes with signal peptides2844.65
Genes with transmembrane helices174128.50
CRISPR repeats40.07
Table 4

Number of genes associated with general COG functional categories

CodeValue%ageDescription
J2626.38Translation, ribosomal structure and biogenesis
A00RNA processing and modification
K3889.44Transcription
L1353.29Replication, recombination and repair
B10.02Chromatin structure and dynamics
D601.46Cell cycle control, Cell division, chromosome partitioning
V1243.02Defense mechanisms
T2135.19Signal transduction mechanisms
M2365.74Cell wall/membrane biogenesis
N551.34Cell motility
U360.88Intracellular trafficking and secretion
O1603.89Posttranslational modification, protein turnover, chaperones
C2105.11Energy production and conversion
G2506.09Carbohydrate transport and metabolism
E4009.74Amino acid transport and metabolism
F1303.16Nucleotide transport and metabolism
H2285.55Coenzyme transport and metabolism
I1463.55Lipid transport and metabolism
P2335.67Inorganic ion transport and metabolism
Q1092.65Secondary metabolites biosynthesis, transport and catabolism
R3.969.64General function prediction only
S3017.33Function unknown
247640.53Not in COGs

The total is based on the total number of protein coding genes in the genome

Fig. 3

Circular representation of the draft genome of DNG9 representing relevant genome features. The draft genome was aligned into one scaffold using Berliner ATCC 10792T genome. The outer most circle shows COG functional categories of coding regions in the clockwise direction. The lines in each concentric circle represent the position of the indicated feature; the color legend is shown to the right of the map. The second circle shows predicted coding regions transcribed on the forward (clockwise) DNA strand. The third circle shows predicted coding regions transcribed on the reverse (counterclockwise) DNA strand. The fourth circle shows COG functional categories of coding regions in the counterclockwise direction. The fifth and sixth circles show the percent GC content of the genome and the percent GC deviation (skewness) by strand, respectively

Genome statistics Number of genes associated with general COG functional categories The total is based on the total number of protein coding genes in the genome Circular representation of the draft genome of DNG9 representing relevant genome features. The draft genome was aligned into one scaffold using Berliner ATCC 10792T genome. The outer most circle shows COG functional categories of coding regions in the clockwise direction. The lines in each concentric circle represent the position of the indicated feature; the color legend is shown to the right of the map. The second circle shows predicted coding regions transcribed on the forward (clockwise) DNA strand. The third circle shows predicted coding regions transcribed on the reverse (counterclockwise) DNA strand. The fourth circle shows COG functional categories of coding regions in the counterclockwise direction. The fifth and sixth circles show the percent GC content of the genome and the percent GC deviation (skewness) by strand, respectively

Insights from the genome sequence

DNG9 was found to be flagellated, sporulating with a subcentral endospore and producing the insecticidal parasporal bodies (Fig. 1a, b, c). These phenotypes are supported by gene inventories found in the genome of DNG9 (Fig. 3). The RAST annotation has allocated these genes into 490 subsystems, the most abundant of which are genes that are associated with amino acid and derivatives metabolism (15.5%), followed by carbohydrate (11.7%), and protein metabolism (7.6%). DNG9 was found to be most active against HP (Fig. 1d) [37, 38], and was also active against LV13 [39], Typhimurium ATCC 23564 [40], and sp. ATCC 700405 [41] but not against JM109 [42, 43], ATCC 14217 [42, 44], and 710C [45]. Conversely, DNG9 was also found to be active against the fungus geotrichum MUCL 28959 but not ATCC 9142 and ATCC 10231. The antiSMASH 4.0 server predicted that DNG9 genome carries the gene clusters responsible for the production of several secondary metabolites including antibiotics, siderophores, and biopolymers. The genome was found to encode gene clusters with complete homology to the biosynthetic gene clusters of the antifungal compound, zwittermycin A (Fig. 4a), the iron-siderophore, petrobactin (Fig. 4b), and the bioplastic precursor, polyhydroxyalkanoates (PHAs) (Fig. 4c). The aminopolyol compound zwittermycin A was previously shown to suppress fungal-oomycete diseases in plants [46, 47], suggesting that the antifungal activity of DNG9 could be attributed to this secondary metabolite. The presence of siderophores, like petrobactin and bacillibactin, in the genome of DNG9 suggests its iron acquisition abilities. These gene clusters are not exclusive in but are also found in the genomes of other members of the sensu lato group [48-50]. Both antiSMASH 4.0 and BAGEL 4.0 servers also predicted a number of novel bacteriocins, mainly belonging to the class referred to as lanthipeptides (Fig. 4d, e, f). Lastly, Bt_toxin scanner revealed that cry genes encoding the insecticidal protein associated with is present in DNG9 genome, two homologs of cry41 and one homolog of cry6 genes. The wide biological target range of DNG9, including its antibacterial, antifungal and insecticidal properties, could be attributed to these bioactive compounds.
Fig. 4

Secondary metabolite biosynthetic gene cluster organization in DNG9. Gene clusters for zwittermycin A (a), petrobactin (b), and polyhydroxyalkanoate (c) biosynthesis as predicted by antiSMASH 4.0. The DNG9 biosynthetic gene cluster is color coded with respect to its homology (%) to the known biosynthetic gene cluster. Gene cluster for three lanthipeptide class I (d), lanthipeptide class I (e) and lanthipeptide class II (f) biosynthesis as predicted by BAGEL 4.0. Color legend for Fig. 4d, e, f is presented in G

Secondary metabolite biosynthetic gene cluster organization in DNG9. Gene clusters for zwittermycin A (a), petrobactin (b), and polyhydroxyalkanoate (c) biosynthesis as predicted by antiSMASH 4.0. The DNG9 biosynthetic gene cluster is color coded with respect to its homology (%) to the known biosynthetic gene cluster. Gene cluster for three lanthipeptide class I (d), lanthipeptide class I (e) and lanthipeptide class II (f) biosynthesis as predicted by BAGEL 4.0. Color legend for Fig. 4d, e, f is presented in G The genome of DNG9 is highly similar to those of Berliner ATCC 10792T, YBT-1518, and Bt407 based on average nucleotide identity (> 99%) and digital DNA:DNA hybridization (> 95%) (Additional file 2: Table S1), shared gene content (Fig. 5) and phylogenetic analyses of the 16S rRNA gene (Fig. 2). The functional comparison of DNG9 genome composition with closely related species (i.e. , and ) [19] is presented in Fig. 5. ATCC 6051T was used as an outgroup in the map. Comparison of the genomes of DNG9 and seven closely related species by uni- and bidirectional best BlastP implemented in RAST, cross-validated with IMG annotations and viewed in IslandViewer 4 server [51], revealed strain-specific genes that encode hypothetical proteins, which are grouped into genomic islands. (Fig. 5, Additional file 3: Table S2). These ORFs in DNG9 include a high proportion of mobile genetic elements, phage-like proteins, transposases and hypothetical proteins in five distinct genomic islands including an intact prophage in region A which is further supported by Phaster server [52] analysis.
Fig. 5

Genomic comparison of DNG9 to other Bacillus sp. genomes conducted using RAST. Each track represents pair-wise BLAST comparison between the open reading frames in query genome against those in DNG9 (Ref. = reference), with percentage of similarity represented with different colors shown in the legend. Regions marked in the genomic map correspond to gene number presented in Additional File 3: Table S2 (a = 250–313, b = 1882–2051, c = 2127–2374, d = 2785–2880, e = 5318–5365). Query genomes used in this analysis (outer ring to inner ring): Berliner ATCC 10792T, F34, ATCC 14579, E41, YBT-1518, ATCC 6051T and AMES Ancestor

Genomic comparison of DNG9 to other Bacillus sp. genomes conducted using RAST. Each track represents pair-wise BLAST comparison between the open reading frames in query genome against those in DNG9 (Ref. = reference), with percentage of similarity represented with different colors shown in the legend. Regions marked in the genomic map correspond to gene number presented in Additional File 3: Table S2 (a = 250–313, b = 1882–2051, c = 2127–2374, d = 2785–2880, e = 5318–5365). Query genomes used in this analysis (outer ring to inner ring): Berliner ATCC 10792T, F34, ATCC 14579, E41, YBT-1518, ATCC 6051T and AMES Ancestor

Conclusions

In conclusion, here we report a 6.06 Mbp draft genome of DNG9, isolated from an oil-contaminated soil-slough in Baraki-Algeirs, Algeria. The final de novo assembly is based on 306.5 Mb of Illumina data, which provided an average coverage of 317×. The assembled genome contains 6120 coding sequences (average of 4 annotation pipelines), of which the most abundant are genes that are associated with amino acid (15.5%), followed by carbohydrate (11.7%), and protein metabolism (7.6%). The antimicrobial properties of this bacterium against several Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria, as well as fungal phytopathogens, could be inferred in part with a number of gene inventories encoded in the draft genome. The comparative analysis with closely related bacterial genomes, alignment of the 16S rRNA sequences and prediction of gene inventories for the insecticidal Cry protein biosynthesis placed strain DNG9 under . This indicated that strain DNG9 could have several potential utility as an insect biocontrol agent, a fungal phytopathogen control agent, and a source of biopolymers (PHA) and antibacterial compounds. Lastly, the genome sequence of DNG9 may provide another model system to study pathogenicity against insect pests and plant diseases, and for antimicrobial compound mining and phylogenesis among sensu lato group. Figure S1. Time-course of growth and emulsification index of B. thuringiensis DNG9 in LB medium at 27 °C. Time course of growth (black rhombus, [OD]) and emulsification index E24 (grey triangle, [%]) of B. thuringiensis DNG9 during shake flask cultivations in LB medium at 27 °C. The experiments were performed in triplicate and data presented in figure is average of three parallel experiments. Error bars are shown for standard deviation (P ≤ 0.05). (DOCX 16 kb) Table S1. Average nucleotide identity (ANI) and digital DNA:DNA Hybridization (dDDH) between the genome of DNG9 and those of other Bacillales. (XLS 28 kb) Table S2. Gene inventory of 5 genomic islands in Bacillus thuringiensis DNG9 AND seven closely related Bacillus sp. (XLS 498 kb)
  42 in total

Review 1.  Antimicrobial peptides of the genus Bacillus: a new era for antibiotics.

Authors:  Chandra Datta Sumi; Byung Wook Yang; In-Cheol Yeo; Young Tae Hahm
Journal:  Can J Microbiol       Date:  2014-11-20       Impact factor: 2.419

2.  Relationship of Bacillus subtilis clades associated with strains 168 and W23: a proposal for Bacillus subtilis subsp. subtilis subsp. nov. and Bacillus subtilis subsp. spizizenii subsp. nov.

Authors:  L K Nakamura; M S Roberts; F M Cohan
Journal:  Int J Syst Bacteriol       Date:  1999-07

3.  Lipopeptide biosurfactant from Bacillus thuringiensis pak2310: A potential antagonist against Fusarium oxysporum.

Authors:  R Deepak; R Jayapradha
Journal:  J Mycol Med       Date:  2014-11-11       Impact factor: 2.391

4.  Mining new crystal protein genes from Bacillus thuringiensis on the basis of mixed plasmid-enriched genome sequencing and a computational pipeline.

Authors:  Weixing Ye; Lei Zhu; Yingying Liu; Neil Crickmore; Donghai Peng; Lifang Ruan; Ming Sun
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2012-04-27       Impact factor: 4.792

Review 5.  Bacillus thuringiensis: a successful insecticide with new environmental features and tidings.

Authors:  Gholamreza Salehi Jouzani; Elena Valijanian; Reza Sharafi
Journal:  Appl Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2017-02-24       Impact factor: 4.813

Review 6.  Bacillus thuringiensis and its pesticidal crystal proteins.

Authors:  E Schnepf; N Crickmore; J Van Rie; D Lereclus; J Baum; J Feitelson; D R Zeigler; D H Dean
Journal:  Microbiol Mol Biol Rev       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 11.056

7.  Target range of zwittermicin A, an aminopolyol antibiotic from Bacillus cereus.

Authors:  L A Silo-Suh; E V Stabb; S J Raffel; J Handelsman
Journal:  Curr Microbiol       Date:  1998-07       Impact factor: 2.188

Review 8.  Biology and taxonomy of Bacillus cereus, Bacillus anthracis, and Bacillus thuringiensis.

Authors:  G T Vilas-Bôas; A P S Peruca; O M N Arantes
Journal:  Can J Microbiol       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 2.419

9.  PHASTER: a better, faster version of the PHAST phage search tool.

Authors:  David Arndt; Jason R Grant; Ana Marcu; Tanvir Sajed; Allison Pon; Yongjie Liang; David S Wishart
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2016-05-03       Impact factor: 16.971

10.  NCBI prokaryotic genome annotation pipeline.

Authors:  Tatiana Tatusova; Michael DiCuccio; Azat Badretdin; Vyacheslav Chetvernin; Eric P Nawrocki; Leonid Zaslavsky; Alexandre Lomsadze; Kim D Pruitt; Mark Borodovsky; James Ostell
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2016-06-24       Impact factor: 16.971

View more
  4 in total

1.  Transporter Protein-Guided Genome Mining for Head-to-Tail Cyclized Bacteriocins.

Authors:  Daniel Major; Lara Flanzbaum; Leah Lussier; Carly Davies; Kristian Mark P Caldo; Jeella Z Acedo
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2021-11-28       Impact factor: 4.411

2.  ORFograph: search for novel insecticidal protein genes in genomic and metagenomic assembly graphs.

Authors:  Tatiana Dvorkina; Anton Bankevich; Alexei Sorokin; Fan Yang; Boahemaa Adu-Oppong; Ryan Williams; Keith Turner; Pavel A Pevzner
Journal:  Microbiome       Date:  2021-06-28       Impact factor: 14.650

3.  Metagenomic Insights and Genomic Analysis of Phosphogypsum and Its Associated Plant Endophytic Microbiomes Reveals Valuable Actors for Waste Bioremediation.

Authors:  Fedia Ben Mefteh; Ali Chenari Bouket; Amal Daoud; Lenka Luptakova; Faizah N Alenezi; Neji Gharsallah; Lassaad Belbahri
Journal:  Microorganisms       Date:  2019-09-23

4.  Genomics and Proteomics Analyses Revealed Novel Candidate Pesticidal Proteins in a Lepidopteran-Toxic Bacillus thuringiensis Strain.

Authors:  Ayda Khorramnejad; Joaquín Gomis-Cebolla; Reza Talaei-Hassanlouei; Yolanda Bel; Baltasar Escriche
Journal:  Toxins (Basel)       Date:  2020-10-26       Impact factor: 4.546

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.