Mohamed Seghir Daas1,2, Albert Remus R Rosana3, Jeella Z Acedo3, Malika Douzane2, Farida Nateche4, Salima Kebbouche-Gana1, John C Vederas3. 1. Valcore Laboratory, Department of Biology, University M'Hamed Bougara of Boumerdes, 35000 Boumerdes, Algeria. 2. 2Food Technology Research Division, Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique d'Algérie, 16200, El Harrach, Algiers, Algeria. 3. 3Department of Chemistry, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB T6G 2G2 Canada. 4. 4Microbiology Group, Laboratory of Cellular and Molecular Biology, Faculty of Biological Sciences, University of Science and Technology-Houari Boumediene, 16111, Bab Ezzouar, Algiers, Algeria.
Abstract
Bacillus thuringiensis is widely used as a bioinsecticide due to its ability to form parasporal crystals containing proteinaceous toxins. It is a member of the Bacillus cereus sensu lato, a group with low genetic diversity but produces several promising antimicrobial compounds. B. thuringiensis DNG9, isolated from an oil-contaminated slough in Algeria, has strong antibacterial, antifungal and biosurfactant properties. Here, we report the 6.06 Mbp draft genome sequence of B. thuringiensis DNG9. The genome encodes several gene inventories for the biosynthesis of bioactive compounds such as zwittermycin A, petrobactin, insecticidal toxins, polyhydroxyalkanoates and multiple bacteriocins. We expect the genome information of strain DNG9 will provide another model system to study pathogenicity against insect pests, plant diseases, and antimicrobial compound mining and comparative phylogenesis among the Bacillus cereus sensu lato group.
Bacillus thuringiensis is widely used as a bioinsecticide due to its ability to form parasporal crystals containing proteinaceous toxins. It is a member of the Bacillus cereus sensu lato, a group with low genetic diversity but produces several promising antimicrobial compounds. B. thuringiensis DNG9, isolated from an oil-contaminated slough in Algeria, has strong antibacterial, antifungal and biosurfactant properties. Here, we report the 6.06 Mbp draft genome sequence of B. thuringiensis DNG9. The genome encodes several gene inventories for the biosynthesis of bioactive compounds such as zwittermycin A, petrobactin, insecticidal toxins, polyhydroxyalkanoates and multiple bacteriocins. We expect the genome information of strain DNG9 will provide another model system to study pathogenicity against insect pests, plant diseases, and antimicrobial compound mining and comparative phylogenesis among the Bacillus cereus sensu lato group.
is a rod-shaped, Gram-positive bacterium that has been isolated from a variety of ecological niches including soil, aquatic environments, and dead insects, among many others [1].
is known for its utility as a bioinsecticide due to its ability to produce parasporal crystals that contain protein toxins (e.g. Cry proteins, also called δ-endotoxins) during its sporulation and stationary growth phase [2]. These protein toxins have also been successfully introduced to genetically modified crops, as exemplified in Bt corn, rendering these crops resistant to specific insect pests [3]. The protein toxins have been shown to be safe to plants, beneficial insects, and mammals due to the absence of specific receptors that are normally only found in the target organisms [4, 5]. The potential of to serve as an alternative to chemical insecticides has driven the discovery of new strains that may lead to the identification of novel protein toxins with potential use in pest management [1, 6]. Aside from the insecticidal properties of , it has also been reported to exhibit antibacterial, antifungal, antibiofilm and emulsifying activities [7, 8]. In general, the species are known to be rich sources of antimicrobial compounds [9-12]. For , its antibacterial effects can be attributed to a wide range of compounds including bacteriocins and lipopeptides [13]. On the other hand, its antifungal activity has been attributed to the production of compounds such as zwittermycin, chitinase, and lipopeptides [7]. In this study, the whole genome sequence of DNG9 that was isolated from an oil-contaminated slough in Baraki-Algiers, Algeria was determined. This strain was chosen for sequencing due to its strong antimicrobial and emulsifying properties. It was the aim of this work to obtain a better understanding of the observed bioactivities based on the genes encoded in its genome.
Organism information
Classification and features
DNG9 was isolated from an oil-contaminated soil slough in Baraki-Algiers, Algeria. The samples were serially diluted in water, heat-shocked at 80 °C for 30 min, spread onto Luria Bertani (LB) agar and incubated at 35 °C for 24 h. Strain DNG9, like the majority of other reported strains, are Gram-positive, aerobic to facultative anaerobic bacterium [14]. The cells are rod-shaped, flagellated (Fig. 1a) and endospore-forming (Fig. 1b, c). The bacterium has a growth temperature range from 10 to 48 °C with an optimal growth at 28–35 °C [15] and pH 4.9–8.0 with an optimal pH of 7.0 [16, 17]. It produces parasporal bodies during the stationary phase of its growth cycle (Fig. 1c), which is consistent with the three cry genes predicted from its genome. Two homologs of cry41 and one homolog of cry6 genes were predicted from the genome of DNG9 using the BtToxin Scanner server [18]. The key features of DNG9 are summarized in Table 1.
Fig. 1
General characteristics of Bacillus thuringiensis DNG9. Transmission electron micrograph (TEM) of DNG9 showing a flagellated cell, b subcentral endospore, ES, and c parasporal bodies, PB. d Spot-on-lawn assay showing the activity of DNG9 supernatant (labelled as 4) against indicator strain Lactococcus lactis subsp. cremoris HP
Table 1
Classification and general features of Bacillus thuringiensis strain DNG9 according to the MIGS recommendation [19]
MIGS ID
Property
Term
Evidence codea
Classification
Domain Bacteria
TAS [53]
Phylum Firmicutes
TAS [16]
Class Bacilli
TAS [54, 55]
Order Bacillales
TAS [42, 56]
Family Bacillaceae
TAS [42, 57]
Genus Bacillus
TAS [41, 42]
Species Bacillus thuringiensis
TAS [42, 58]
Strain DNG9
Gram stain
Positive
IDA
Cell shape
Rod
IDA
Motility
Motile
IDA
Sporulation
Spore (Subcentral)
IDA
Temperature range
10 °C – 48 °C
TAS [15]
Optimum temperature
28 °C – 35 °C
TAS [15]
pH range; Optimum
4.9–8.0; 7.0
TAS [16, 17]
Carbon source
Glucose
NAS
MIGS-6
Habitat
Soil
NAS
MIGS-6.3
Salinity
Salt tolerant
TAS [59]
MIGS-22
Oxygen requirement
Aerobic,
IDA
MIGS-15
Biotic relationship
Free-living
IDA
MIGS-14
Pathogenicity
Insect pathogen
TAS [60]
MIGS-4
Geographic location
Algeria
NAS
MIGS-5
Sample collection
February 13, 2013
NAS
MIGS-4.1
Latitude
36° 40′ 9″ N
NAS
MIGS-4.2
Longitude
3° 5′ 43″ E
NAS
MIGS-4.4
Altitude
22 m
NAS
aEvidence codes: IDA Inferred from Direct Assay, TAS Traceable Author Statement (i.e., a direct report exists in the literature), NAS Non-traceable Author Statement (i.e., not directly observed for the living, isolated sample, but based on a generally accepted property for the species, or anecdotal evidence). These evidence codes are from the Gene Ontology project [61]
General characteristics of Bacillus thuringiensis DNG9. Transmission electron micrograph (TEM) of DNG9 showing a flagellated cell, b subcentral endospore, ES, and c parasporal bodies, PB. d Spot-on-lawn assay showing the activity of DNG9 supernatant (labelled as 4) against indicator strain Lactococcus lactis subsp. cremoris HPClassification and general features of Bacillus thuringiensis strain DNG9 according to the MIGS recommendation [19]aEvidence codes: IDA Inferred from Direct Assay, TAS Traceable Author Statement (i.e., a direct report exists in the literature), NAS Non-traceable Author Statement (i.e., not directly observed for the living, isolated sample, but based on a generally accepted property for the species, or anecdotal evidence). These evidence codes are from the Gene Ontology project [61]Thirteen strains and DNG9 were chosen for phylogenetic analysis. The chosen species represent the members of sensu lato supergroup [19]. This includes the type strains Berliner ATCC 10792T,
ATCC 14579T and AMES Ancestor. The 16S rRNA gene sequence from the type strain
ATCC 6051T [20] was selected as an outgroup. The maximum likelihood method was used to construct the phylogenetic tree shown in Fig. 2. The phylogenetic tree supports the placement of strain DNG9 within the group together with the type strain Berliner ATCC 10792T.
Fig. 2
Maximum likelihood phylogeny of Bacillus thuringiensis DNG9 16S rRNA gene isolated from Algerian soil-oil slough. Nucleic acid sequences were aligned using Geneious and the tree compiled using RaxML. Numbers above the branches refer to bootstrap values. The tree was rooted using
ATCC 6051T. Type strains are indicated with T. All strains represent sequenced genomes. Scale bar indicates 2 nucleotide substitution for each 10 nucleotide sequences. Accession numbers of publicly available sequences are given in brackets
Maximum likelihood phylogeny of Bacillus thuringiensis DNG9 16S rRNA gene isolated from Algerian soil-oil slough. Nucleic acid sequences were aligned using Geneious and the tree compiled using RaxML. Numbers above the branches refer to bootstrap values. The tree was rooted using
ATCC 6051T. Type strains are indicated with T. All strains represent sequenced genomes. Scale bar indicates 2 nucleotide substitution for each 10 nucleotide sequences. Accession numbers of publicly available sequences are given in brackets
Genome sequencing information
Genome project history
The project information and associated MIGS (Minimum Information about a Genome Sequence) 2.0 compliance [21] are summarized in Table 2. This bacterium was selected for sequencing as it was determined to be one of the most promising strains for discovery of compounds with strong antibacterial (Fig. 1d), antifungal and biosurfactant abilities (Additional file 1: Figure S1). The availability of the draft genome of DNG9 may contribute to the evolution and comparative genomics studies of the sensu lato group. Furthermore, future investigations on its genome-encoded bioactive metabolites may be pursued. This work provided a standard draft genome and the assembled contigs have been deposited in public repositories. The PGAP- and JGI-IM- annotated genomes were deposited to the DDBJ/ENA/GenBank databases under accession numbers MSTN00000000 and Ga0180945, respectively.
Table 2
Project information
MIGS ID
Property
Term
MIGS 31
Finishing quality
Draft genome
MIGS-28
Libraries used
Illumina paired-end
MIGS 29
Sequencing platforms
Illumina MiSeq100
MIGS 31.2
Fold coverage
317×
MIGS 30
Assemblers
CLC Genomic Workbench 7.5.2
MIGS 32
Gene calling method
GeneMarkS, Prodigal
Locus Tag
BVF97
Genbank ID
MSTN00000000
GenBank Date of Release
9-Mar-17
GOLD ID
Ga0180945
BIOPROJECT
PRJNA359364
MIGS 13
Source Material Identifier
DNG9
Project relevance
Agricultural, Biotechnological
Project information
Growth conditions and genomic DNA preparation
Genomic DNA was isolated from a combined 16-h grown single colony isolate and a two mL 16-h grown liquid culture (150 rpm) from LB agar and LB broth, respectively. Total nucleic acid was extracted using the method described previously [22]. Briefly, cells were harvested at 500×g for 2 min and resuspended in 100 μl 1× TE buffer (100 mM Tris-HCl, 50 mM EDTA, pH 8.0). Cell slurry was sequentially treated with 20 mg/ml lysozyme (37 °C, 30 min), 2 mg/ml proteinase K (56 °C, 30 min) and 0.5 mg/ml RNase A (37 °C, 30 min). The sphaeroplast suspension was lysed with 500 μl cell breakage buffer (0.4% sodium dodecyl sulfate, 0.5% N-lauroyl sarcosine, 0.5% Triton X-100, 50 mM Tris, 100 mM EDTA, pH 8.0), 400 μl phenol and 150 μl glass beads (0.5 mm dia, Sartorius, Germany). The slurry was vortexed for 1 min and rested for 1 min on ice, for a total of 10 cycles, and finally clarified at 13000×g for 5 min at room temperature. The aqueous layer was repeatedly extracted with equal volume of phenol, followed by phenol:chloroform (1:1) and finally with chloroform:isoamyl alcohol (24:1). The DNA was precipitated with 0.1× 3 M sodium acetate pH 5.2 and 2.5× absolute ethanol, washed with 70% ethanol and resuspended in 10 mM Tris buffer, pH 8.0. Quantity and quality were assessed using Qubit 2.0 fluorometry (Qiagen) and agarose gel electrophoresis, respectively.
Genome sequencing and assembly
The genome of DNG9 was sequenced at The Applied Genomic Core, Department of Biochemistry, University of Alberta using Illumina paired-end sequencing platform and Nextera XT DNA library kit (Illumina, USA). Whole genome sequencing was performed in duplicates using the MiSeq Reagent kit v2. Sequencing of 250 bp paired-end modules gathered 3.69 M reads, which provided an average coverage of 317× resulting in 38 contigs. De novo assembly of the 6,057,430 bp paired-end sequences was created using CLC Genomics Worksbench v 7.5.2. (CLC bio, Aarhus, Denmark).
Genome annotation
Gene prediction was performed using four automated genome annotation pipelines: (1) the NCBI Prokaryotic Genome Annotation Pipeline (PGAP) [23] using GeneMarkS+ and best-placed reference protein set; (2) the Joint Genome Institute – Integrated Microbial Genomes and Microbiomes (JGI-IMG/M) pipeline [24] utilizing Prodigal gene caller [25]; (3) the Rapid Annotation using Subsystem Technology (RAST) v2.0 server [26]; and (4) the Bacterial Annotation System (BASys) server [27]. CRISPR repeats were predicted by using CRISPRfinder [28]. The draft genome of DNG9 was aligned with the type strain Berliner ATCC 10792T closed genome to generate a single scaffold using Contiguator v2 [29] and Multi-Draft based Scaffolder (MEDUSA) [30]. A chromosome map was generated from the single scaffold using BASys automated pipeline [27] and viewed using CGViewer [31].Species was established using genome-wide Average Nucleotide Identity (gANI) metric and alignment fraction (AF) calculated within the JGI-IMG/M server using the Microbial Species Identifier (MiSI) calculator [32]. Strain was established using the Genome-to-Genome Distance Calculator (GGDC) 2.1 server employing digital DNA:DNA hybridization (dDDH) and DNA G + C content [33].
Genome properties
The draft genome of DNG9 is 6,057,430 bp with 34.9% GC content, similar to the genomes of other strains [34-36], and contained 38 scaffolds with N50 of 347,259 bp. A total of 135 RNA genes and 284 pseudogenes were annotated by IMG/M and PGAP, respectively (Table 3). Annotation using the DOE-JGI IMG/M pipeline revealed 6109 total coding sequences of which 4463 have functional predictions. Conversely, RAST annotation pipeline predicted 6055 coding sequences; NCBI-PGAP revealed 6213 coding genes; and lastly, BASys annotated 6102 coding sequences. The 4463 coding sequences predicted in IMG/M pipeline were placed in 25 general clusters of orthologous (COG) functional gene catalogs. The distribution of these protein-coding genes based on COG function is listed in Table 4. The 6.06 Mbp draft genome map of DNG9, as aligned against the type strain Berliner ATCC 10792, is presented in Fig. 3.
Table 3
Genome statistics
Attribute
Value
% of Total
Genome size (bp)
6,057,430
100.00
DNA coding (bp)
5,053,197
83.42
DNA G + C (bp)
2,107,907
34.80
DNA scaffolds
38
100.00
Total genes
6109
100.00
Protein coding genes
5974
97.79
RNA genes
135
2.21
Pseudo genes
284
4.65
Genes in internal clusters
2024
33.13
Genes with function prediction
4463
73.06
Genes assigned to COGs
3633
59.47
Genes with Pfam domains
4883
79.93
Genes with signal peptides
284
4.65
Genes with transmembrane helices
1741
28.50
CRISPR repeats
4
0.07
Table 4
Number of genes associated with general COG functional categories
Posttranslational modification, protein turnover, chaperones
C
210
5.11
Energy production and conversion
G
250
6.09
Carbohydrate transport and metabolism
E
400
9.74
Amino acid transport and metabolism
F
130
3.16
Nucleotide transport and metabolism
H
228
5.55
Coenzyme transport and metabolism
I
146
3.55
Lipid transport and metabolism
P
233
5.67
Inorganic ion transport and metabolism
Q
109
2.65
Secondary metabolites biosynthesis, transport and catabolism
R
3.96
9.64
General function prediction only
S
301
7.33
Function unknown
–
2476
40.53
Not in COGs
The total is based on the total number of protein coding genes in the genome
Fig. 3
Circular representation of the draft genome of DNG9 representing relevant genome features. The draft genome was aligned into one scaffold using Berliner ATCC 10792T genome. The outer most circle shows COG functional categories of coding regions in the clockwise direction. The lines in each concentric circle represent the position of the indicated feature; the color legend is shown to the right of the map. The second circle shows predicted coding regions transcribed on the forward (clockwise) DNA strand. The third circle shows predicted coding regions transcribed on the reverse (counterclockwise) DNA strand. The fourth circle shows COG functional categories of coding regions in the counterclockwise direction. The fifth and sixth circles show the percent GC content of the genome and the percent GC deviation (skewness) by strand, respectively
Genome statisticsNumber of genes associated with general COG functional categoriesThe total is based on the total number of protein coding genes in the genomeCircular representation of the draft genome of DNG9 representing relevant genome features. The draft genome was aligned into one scaffold using Berliner ATCC 10792T genome. The outer most circle shows COG functional categories of coding regions in the clockwise direction. The lines in each concentric circle represent the position of the indicated feature; the color legend is shown to the right of the map. The second circle shows predicted coding regions transcribed on the forward (clockwise) DNA strand. The third circle shows predicted coding regions transcribed on the reverse (counterclockwise) DNA strand. The fourth circle shows COG functional categories of coding regions in the counterclockwise direction. The fifth and sixth circles show the percent GC content of the genome and the percent GC deviation (skewness) by strand, respectively
Insights from the genome sequence
DNG9 was found to be flagellated, sporulating with a subcentral endospore and producing the insecticidal parasporal bodies (Fig. 1a, b, c). These phenotypes are supported by gene inventories found in the genome of DNG9 (Fig. 3). The RAST annotation has allocated these genes into 490 subsystems, the most abundant of which are genes that are associated with amino acid and derivatives metabolism (15.5%), followed by carbohydrate (11.7%), and protein metabolism (7.6%).DNG9 was found to be most active against HP (Fig. 1d) [37, 38], and was also active against LV13 [39], Typhimurium ATCC 23564 [40], and sp. ATCC 700405 [41] but not against JM109 [42, 43],
ATCC 14217 [42, 44], and 710C [45]. Conversely, DNG9 was also found to be active against the fungus
geotrichum
MUCL 28959 but not
ATCC 9142 and
ATCC 10231. The antiSMASH 4.0 server predicted that DNG9 genome carries the gene clusters responsible for the production of several secondary metabolites including antibiotics, siderophores, and biopolymers. The genome was found to encode gene clusters with complete homology to the biosynthetic gene clusters of the antifungal compound, zwittermycin A (Fig. 4a), the iron-siderophore, petrobactin (Fig. 4b), and the bioplastic precursor, polyhydroxyalkanoates (PHAs) (Fig. 4c). The aminopolyol compound zwittermycin A was previously shown to suppress fungal-oomycete diseases in plants [46, 47], suggesting that the antifungal activity of DNG9 could be attributed to this secondary metabolite. The presence of siderophores, like petrobactin and bacillibactin, in the genome of DNG9 suggests its iron acquisition abilities. These gene clusters are not exclusive in but are also found in the genomes of other members of the sensu lato group [48-50]. Both antiSMASH 4.0 and BAGEL 4.0 servers also predicted a number of novel bacteriocins, mainly belonging to the class referred to as lanthipeptides (Fig. 4d, e, f). Lastly, Bt_toxin scanner revealed that cry genes encoding the insecticidal protein associated with is present in DNG9 genome, two homologs of cry41 and one homolog of cry6 genes. The wide biological target range of DNG9, including its antibacterial, antifungal and insecticidal properties, could be attributed to these bioactive compounds.
Fig. 4
Secondary metabolite biosynthetic gene cluster organization in DNG9. Gene clusters for zwittermycin A (a), petrobactin (b), and polyhydroxyalkanoate (c) biosynthesis as predicted by antiSMASH 4.0. The DNG9 biosynthetic gene cluster is color coded with respect to its homology (%) to the known biosynthetic gene cluster. Gene cluster for three lanthipeptide class I (d), lanthipeptide class I (e) and lanthipeptide class II (f) biosynthesis as predicted by BAGEL 4.0. Color legend for Fig. 4d, e, f is presented in G
Secondary metabolite biosynthetic gene cluster organization in DNG9. Gene clusters for zwittermycin A (a), petrobactin (b), and polyhydroxyalkanoate (c) biosynthesis as predicted by antiSMASH 4.0. The DNG9 biosynthetic gene cluster is color coded with respect to its homology (%) to the known biosynthetic gene cluster. Gene cluster for three lanthipeptide class I (d), lanthipeptide class I (e) and lanthipeptide class II (f) biosynthesis as predicted by BAGEL 4.0. Color legend for Fig. 4d, e, f is presented in GThe genome of DNG9 is highly similar to those of Berliner ATCC 10792T, YBT-1518, and Bt407 based on average nucleotide identity (> 99%) and digital DNA:DNA hybridization (> 95%) (Additional file 2: Table S1), shared gene content (Fig. 5) and phylogenetic analyses of the 16S rRNA gene (Fig. 2). The functional comparison of DNG9 genome composition with closely related species (i.e. ,
and ) [19] is presented in Fig. 5.
ATCC 6051T was used as an outgroup in the map. Comparison of the genomes of DNG9 and seven closely related species by uni- and bidirectional best BlastP implemented in RAST, cross-validated with IMG annotations and viewed in IslandViewer 4 server [51], revealed strain-specific genes that encode hypothetical proteins, which are grouped into genomic islands. (Fig. 5, Additional file 3: Table S2). These ORFs in DNG9 include a high proportion of mobile genetic elements, phage-like proteins, transposases and hypothetical proteins in five distinct genomic islands including an intact prophage in region A which is further supported by Phaster server [52] analysis.
Fig. 5
Genomic comparison of DNG9 to other Bacillus sp. genomes conducted using RAST. Each track represents pair-wise BLAST comparison between the open reading frames in query genome against those in DNG9 (Ref. = reference), with percentage of similarity represented with different colors shown in the legend. Regions marked in the genomic map correspond to gene number presented in Additional File 3: Table S2 (a = 250–313, b = 1882–2051, c = 2127–2374, d = 2785–2880, e = 5318–5365). Query genomes used in this analysis (outer ring to inner ring): Berliner ATCC 10792T, F34,
ATCC 14579, E41, YBT-1518,
ATCC 6051T and AMES Ancestor
Genomic comparison of DNG9 to other Bacillus sp. genomes conducted using RAST. Each track represents pair-wise BLAST comparison between the open reading frames in query genome against those in DNG9 (Ref. = reference), with percentage of similarity represented with different colors shown in the legend. Regions marked in the genomic map correspond to gene number presented in Additional File 3: Table S2 (a = 250–313, b = 1882–2051, c = 2127–2374, d = 2785–2880, e = 5318–5365). Query genomes used in this analysis (outer ring to inner ring): Berliner ATCC 10792T, F34,
ATCC 14579, E41, YBT-1518,
ATCC 6051T and AMES Ancestor
Conclusions
In conclusion, here we report a 6.06 Mbp draft genome of DNG9, isolated from an oil-contaminated soil-slough in Baraki-Algeirs, Algeria. The final de novo assembly is based on 306.5 Mb of Illumina data, which provided an average coverage of 317×. The assembled genome contains 6120 coding sequences (average of 4 annotation pipelines), of which the most abundant are genes that are associated with amino acid (15.5%), followed by carbohydrate (11.7%), and protein metabolism (7.6%). The antimicrobial properties of this bacterium against several Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria, as well as fungal phytopathogens, could be inferred in part with a number of gene inventories encoded in the draft genome. The comparative analysis with closely related bacterial genomes, alignment of the 16S rRNA sequences and prediction of gene inventories for the insecticidal Cry protein biosynthesis placed strain DNG9 under . This indicated that strain DNG9 could have several potential utility as an insect biocontrol agent, a fungal phytopathogen control agent, and a source of biopolymers (PHA) and antibacterial compounds. Lastly, the genome sequence of DNG9 may provide another model system to study pathogenicity against insect pests and plant diseases, and for antimicrobial compound mining and phylogenesis among sensu lato group.Figure S1. Time-course of growth and emulsification index of B. thuringiensis DNG9 in LB medium at 27 °C. Time course of growth (black rhombus, [OD]) and emulsification index E24 (grey triangle, [%]) of B. thuringiensis DNG9 during shake flask cultivations in LB medium at 27 °C. The experiments were performed in triplicate and data presented in figure is average of three parallel experiments. Error bars are shown for standard deviation (P ≤ 0.05). (DOCX 16 kb)Table S1. Average nucleotide identity (ANI) and digital DNA:DNA Hybridization (dDDH) between the genome of DNG9 and those of other Bacillales. (XLS 28 kb)Table S2. Gene inventory of 5 genomic islands in Bacillus thuringiensis DNG9 AND seven closely related Bacillus sp. (XLS 498 kb)
Authors: Weixing Ye; Lei Zhu; Yingying Liu; Neil Crickmore; Donghai Peng; Lifang Ruan; Ming Sun Journal: Appl Environ Microbiol Date: 2012-04-27 Impact factor: 4.792
Authors: E Schnepf; N Crickmore; J Van Rie; D Lereclus; J Baum; J Feitelson; D R Zeigler; D H Dean Journal: Microbiol Mol Biol Rev Date: 1998-09 Impact factor: 11.056
Authors: David Arndt; Jason R Grant; Ana Marcu; Tanvir Sajed; Allison Pon; Yongjie Liang; David S Wishart Journal: Nucleic Acids Res Date: 2016-05-03 Impact factor: 16.971
Authors: Tatiana Tatusova; Michael DiCuccio; Azat Badretdin; Vyacheslav Chetvernin; Eric P Nawrocki; Leonid Zaslavsky; Alexandre Lomsadze; Kim D Pruitt; Mark Borodovsky; James Ostell Journal: Nucleic Acids Res Date: 2016-06-24 Impact factor: 16.971
Authors: Daniel Major; Lara Flanzbaum; Leah Lussier; Carly Davies; Kristian Mark P Caldo; Jeella Z Acedo Journal: Molecules Date: 2021-11-28 Impact factor: 4.411
Authors: Tatiana Dvorkina; Anton Bankevich; Alexei Sorokin; Fan Yang; Boahemaa Adu-Oppong; Ryan Williams; Keith Turner; Pavel A Pevzner Journal: Microbiome Date: 2021-06-28 Impact factor: 14.650