| Literature DB >> 30344797 |
Shikai Liu1, Lili Song1, Hairong Yao1, Liang Zhang1, Dongkui Xu1, Qian Li1, Ying Li1.
Abstract
In this study, we aimed to assess the independent prognostic value of miR-361-3p in terms of overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) in cervical cancer, as well as its possible regulative network. A retrospective analysis was performed by using data from the Cancer Genome Atlas-Cervical Cancer (TCGA-CESC). Results showed that decreased miR-361-3p expression was associated with lymphovascular invasion and poor responses to primary therapy. The patients with recurrence and the deceased cases had substantially lower miR-361-3p expression compared to their respective controls. By generating Kaplan-Meier curves of OS and RFS, we found that high miR-361-3p expression was associated with better survival outcome. More importantly, univariate and multivariate analysis confirmed that high miR-361-3p expression was an independent indicator of favorable OS (HR: 0.377, 95% CI: 0.233-0.608, p < 0.001) and RFS (HR: 0.398, 95% CI: 0.192-0.825, p = 0.013). By performing bioinformatic analysis, we identified 24 genes that were negatively correlated with miR-361-3p expression. Among the potential targeting genes, SOST, MTA1, TFRC, and YAP1 are involved in some important signaling pathways modulating cervical cancer cell invasion, migration, and drug sensitivity. Therefore, it is meaningful to verify the potential regulative effect of miR-361-3p on the expression of these genes in the future.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 30344797 PMCID: PMC6174793 DOI: 10.1155/2018/8949606
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Dis Markers ISSN: 0278-0240 Impact factor: 3.434
Figure 1miR-361-3p expression profile. miR-361-3p expression was significantly decreased in HR-HPV(+) normal cervical tissues (N = 19) and in cervical cancer tissues (N = 31) compared to that in HR-HPV(−) normal cervical tissues (N = 25).
Figure 2Decreased miR-361-3p was associated with malignant behaviors of cervical cancer. (a, b) Comparison of miR-361-3p expression in cervical cancer patients with or without lymphovascular invasion (a) or in patients with response to primary therapy (CR and PR) or with no response to primary therapy (SD and PD) (b). (c, d) Comparison of miR-361-3p expression in cervical cancer patients with or without recurrence (c) or in deceased or living patients (d). CR: complete remission; PR: partial remission; SD: stable disease, and PD: progressive disease.
Figure 3Kaplan-Meier curves of OS and RFS in patients with cervical cancer. (a–d) Kaplan-Meier curves of OS (a, c) and RFS (b and d) in all cervical cancer patients (a, b) and in patients with cervical squamous cell carcinoma (c, d). Patients were grouped according to the optimal cutoff of miR-361-3p expression in the ROC curves for death and recurrence detection.
Comparison of the parameters between high and low miR-361-3p expression groups.
| Parameters | miR-361-3p expression |
| |
|---|---|---|---|
| High ( | Low ( | ||
| Age (mean ± SD) | 47.91 ± 13.32 | 48.51 ± 14.48 | 0.72 |
| Histology | |||
| Squamous cell carcinoma | 142 | 101 | 0.082 |
| Adenocarcinoma | 32 | 12 | |
| Adenosquamous carcinoma | 2 | 4 | |
| Grade | |||
| G1/G2 | 90 | 57 | 0.71 |
| G3/G4 | 70 | 49 | |
| No data | 16 | 11 | |
| Clinical stage | |||
| I/II | 135 | 90 | 0.88 |
| III/IV | 38 | 24 | |
| No data | 3 | 3 | |
| Lymphovascular invasion indicator | |||
| Absent | 49 | 21 | 0.093 |
| Present | 45 | 35 | |
| No data | 82 | 61 | |
| Radiation therapy | |||
| No | 45 | 32 | 0.89 |
| Yes | 108 | 73 | |
| Null | 23 | 12 | |
| Targeted molecular therapy | |||
| No | 38 | 29 | 0.36 |
| Yes | 84 | 48 | |
| No data | 54 | 40 | |
| Postoperative drugs | |||
| No | 56 | 34 | 0.89 |
| Yes | 81 | 46 | |
| No data | 39 | 37 | |
| Recurrence status | |||
| No | 139 | 79 | 0.044 |
| Yes | 13 | 17 | |
| Null | 24 | 21 | |
| Living status | |||
| Living | 148 | 74 | <0.001 |
| Dead | 28 | 43 | |
G1: well differentiated (low grade); G2: moderately differentiated (intermediate grade); G3: poorly differentiated (high grade); G4: undifferentiated (high grade).
Univariate and multivariate analysis of OS in patients with cervical cancer.
| Parameters | Univariate analysis | Multivariate analysis | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| HR | 95% CI (lower/upper) |
| HR | 95% CI (lower/upper) | |||
|
| 0.061 | 1.017 | 0.999 | 1.035 | ||||
|
| ||||||||
| Squamous cell carcinoma | 1.000 | |||||||
| Adenocarcinoma | 0.869 | 0.945 | 0.483 | 1.850 | ||||
| Adenosquamous carcinoma | 0.642 | 1.604 | 0.219 | 11.744 | ||||
|
| ||||||||
| III/IV vs. I/II | 0.001 | 2.248 | 1.373 | 3.679 | 0.066 | 1.610 | 0.970 | 2.674 |
|
| ||||||||
| Absent vs. present | 0.002 | 0.098 | 0.023 | 0.415 | 0.002 | 0.105 | 0.025 | 0.449 |
|
| ||||||||
| No vs. yes | 0.237 | 0.700 | 0.388 | 1.264 | ||||
|
| ||||||||
| No vs. yes | 0.701 | 1.114 | 0.643 | 1.930 | ||||
|
| ||||||||
| No vs. yes | 0.384 | 0.765 | 0.419 | 1.397 | ||||
|
| ||||||||
| High vs. low | <0.001 | 0.362 | 0.225 | 0.583 | <0.001 | 0.377 | 0.233 | 0.608 |
Univariate and multivariate analysis of RFS in patients with cervical cancer.
| Parameters | Univariate analysis | Multivariate analysis | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| HR | 95% CI (lower/upper) |
| HR | 95% CI (lower/upper) | |||
|
| 0.733 | 1.005 | 0.978 | 1.033 | ||||
|
| ||||||||
| Squamous cell carcinoma | 1.000 | |||||||
| Adenocarcinoma | 0.426 | 1.441 | 0.586 | 3.545 | ||||
| Adenosquamous carcinoma | 0.222 | 3.535 | 0.466 | 26.821 | ||||
|
| ||||||||
| III/IV vs. I/II | 0.974 | 1.015 | 0.415 | 2.486 | ||||
|
| ||||||||
| Absent vs. present | 0.006 | 0.128 | 0.029 | 0.562 | 0.007 | 0.131 | 0.030 | 0.572 |
|
| ||||||||
| No vs. yes | 0.399 | 0.679 | 0.276 | 1.670 | ||||
|
| ||||||||
| No vs. yes | 0.820 | 1.098 | 0.489 | 2.467 | ||||
|
| ||||||||
| No vs. yes | 0.499 | 0.694 | 0.241 | 2.000 | ||||
|
| ||||||||
| High vs. low | 0.025 | 0.578 | 0.358 | 0.932 | 0.013 | 0.398 | 0.192 | 0.825 |
Figure 4Screening of the genes negatively correlated with miR-361-3p in cervical cancer. Screening process showing the potential miR-361-3p targeting genes with negative correlation with miR-361-3p expression in cervical cancer tissues (N = 306).
Figure 5Functional annotations of the possible targets of miR-361-3p in cervical cancer in Gene Ontology.