| Literature DB >> 30344668 |
Xianmin Meng1,2, Yongguo Li2,3, Hong Luan1,2, Xiuyan Shi1,2.
Abstract
Therapeutic effect of photodynamic therapy combined with imiquimod in the treatment of anal condyloma acuminatum (CA) was investigated to explore its effect on immune function. A total of 104 patients with anal CA were randomly divided into two groups: Patients in the study group were treated with photodynamic therapy combined with imiquimod, and ii) patients in the control group were treated with recombinant human interferon α-2b cream. Clinical efficacy and immune function related indicators were compared between the two groups. After treatment for 6 weeks, the cure rate and total effective rate of study group was 53.85 and 92.31%, respectively, which were significantly higher than those of the control group (30.77 and 75.00%, P<0.05). Recurrence rate of study group was 3.85% within 6 months after treatment, which was significantly lower than that of the control group (19.23%, P<0.05). After treatment, levels of CD4+, CD4+/CD8+ and IFN-γ in the study group were significantly higher than those in the control group, and levels of CD8+, IL-4 and IL-10 in the study group were significantly lower than those in the control group (P<0.05). Photodynamic therapy combined with imiquimod in the treatment of anus CA can regulate T lymphocyte subsets and cytokine levels, enhance immune function, improve clinical efficacy, reduce recurrence rate, and have almost no side effects. Therefore, this treatment should be popularized in clinical practice.Entities:
Keywords: T lymphocytes; anal condyloma acuminatum; cytokines; imiquimod; immune function; photodynamic therapy
Year: 2018 PMID: 30344668 PMCID: PMC6176148 DOI: 10.3892/etm.2018.6676
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Exp Ther Med ISSN: 1792-0981 Impact factor: 2.447
Comparison of clinical efficacy of two groups after treatment (n, %).
| Groups | Cases | Recovery | Effective | Ineffective | Total effective |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Study | 52 | 28 (53.85)[ | 20 (38.46) | 4 (7.69) | 48 (92.31)[ |
| Control | 52 | 16 (30.77) | 23 (44.23) | 13 (25.00) | 39 (75.00) |
P<0.05, compared with the control group.
Comparison of recurrence rate between two groups (n, %).
| Groups | Cases | Within 6 weeks after treatment | Within 3 months after treatment | Within 6 months after treatment | Cumulative recurrence rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Study | 52 | 2 (3.85) | 2 (3.85) | 1 (3.85) | 2 (3.85)[ |
| Control | 52 | 4 (7.69) | 4 (7.69) | 2 (3.85) | 10 (19.23) |
P<0.05, compared with the control group.
Comparison of peripheral blood T lymphocyte subsets before and after treatment (mean ± SD, %).
| Groups | Time-points | CD4+ | CD8+ | CD4+/CD8+ |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Study | Before treatment | 35.42±2.23 | 34.17±4.25 | 1.04±0.17 |
| After treatment | 41.39±6.78[ | 26.13±3.57[ | 1.58±0.22[ | |
| Control | Before treatment | 34.79±2.46 | 34.22±4.16 | 1.02±0.18 |
| After treatment | 38.31±5.71[ | 30.09±3.68[ | 1.27±0.20[ |
P<0.05, compared with pretreatment level
P<0.05, compared with control group.
Comparison of cytokine levels before and after treatment (mean ± SD, pg/ml).
| Groups | Time-points | IFN-γ | IL-4 | IL-10 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Study | Before treatment | 13.02±4.13 | 11.02±3.41 | 30.21±9.56 |
| After treatment | 21.55±7.21[ | 6.67±2.06[ | 18.17±8.05[ | |
| Control | Before treatment | 12.89±3.89 | 11.26±3.19 | 29.78±9.14 |
| After treatment | 18.05±6.64[ | 8.34±2.25[ | 24.45±8.12[ |
P<0.05, compared with pretreatment level
P<0.05, compared with control group.