Dynamic Change in Insulin Resistance Induced by Free Fatty Acids Is Unchanged Though Insulin Sensitivity Improves Following Endurance Exercise in PCOS.

Background: Insulin resistance (IR) is the hallmark of PCOS and it is known that exercise may decrease it. What is unknown is whether exercise may mechanistically alter the underlying IR, attenuating the dynamic lipid induced IR in insulin resistant subjects.
Methods: 12 women with polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) and 10 age and body mass index matched controls completed an 8 week supervised exercise program at 60% maximal oxygen consumption. Before and after the exercise program, all participants underwent hyperinsulinaemic euglycaemic clamps with either saline or intralipid infusions. Skewed data were log transformed and expressed as mean ± SEM.
Results: Before exercise, women with PCOS had a higher HOMA-IR and lower VO2 max than controls. Compared to saline, lipid infusion lowered the rate of insulin stimulated glucose disposal (M value; mg/kg/min) by 67 ± 5% (from 0.5 ± 0.03 to -0.25 ± 0.2, p = 0.01) in PCOS, and by 49 ± 7% (from 0.65 ± 0.06 to 0.3 ± 0.1, p = 0.01) in controls. The M value was significantly less in PCOS compared to controls for both saline (p < 0.01) and lipid (p < 0.05). Endurance exercise in PCOS improved VO2 max and HOMA-IR, but not weight, to those of pre-exercise control subjects. The glucose disposal rate during the lipid infusion was reduced following exercise in PCOS, indicating decreased IR (67 ± 5 vs. 50 ± 7%, p = 0.02), but IR was not altered in controls (49 ± 7 vs. 45 ± 6%, p = 0.58). The incrementally increased IR induced by the lipid infusion did not differ between controls and PCOS.
Conclusion: Insulin sensitivity improved with exercise in the PCOS group alone showing that IR can be modified, though likely transiently. However, the maximal IR response to the lipid infusion did not differ within and between control and PCOS subjects, indicating that the fundamental mechanism underlying insulin resistance was unchanged with exercise. Precis: Maximal insulin resistance induced by lipid infusion determined at baseline and 8 weeks after exercise in control and PCOS women did not differ, though insulin sensitivity increased in PCOS after exercise.

Introduction

Non-esterified fatty acids (NEFA) play a significant role in the pathophysiology of insulin resistance (1). Increased availability of NEFA could lead to storage of lipids “ectopically” in tissues other than adipocytes, such as muscle, liver and beta cells (2). The intramuscular triglyceride (IMTG) storage is positively correlated with the degree of total body and visceral fat (3, 4). Increased availability coupled with a decreased rate of mitochondrial lipid oxidation in skeletal muscle results in accumulation of intra-myocellular lipid metabolites such as the long chain fatty acids Acyl Co A, diacylglycerol (DAG) and ceramides (5, 6). These are thought to interfere with insulin signaling mediated glucose transport, and thus result in insulin resistance (IR) in skeletal muscle (7, 8). An acute fat load orally or intravenously results in an acute rise in DAG in the muscle that subsequently induces insulin resistance by reducing nonoxidative glucose disposal through PKCθ activation (9). Furthermore, an acute rise in NEFA levels decreases insulin stimulated glucose disposal in skeletal muscle and increases hepatic glucose production, resulting in IR (10).

Fatty acids are the predominant fuel used by skeletal muscle during fasting and exercise. Exercise increases the blood flow through the adipose tissue and enhances the delivery of free fatty acids for use by skeletal muscle. Exercise improves fatty acid oxidation and reduces accumulation of intra-myocellular fat metabolites and subsequently improves IR (11). A maximal rate of fat oxidation is observed at exercise intensities between 59 and 64% of maximum oxygen consumption (VO2 max) in trained individuals, and between 47 and 52% of that in a large sample of the general population (12). Bruce et al. illustrated that moderate intensity exercise increases mitochondrial fatty acid oxidation and decreases DAG and ceramide content of skeletal muscle in obese subjects (11). Schenk et al. demonstrated that one session of exercise completely decreased the accumulation of highly bioactive fatty acid metabolites, and then reversed fatty acid-induced IR, in healthy subjects (13).

Polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) is a dysmetabolic condition that is strongly associated with obesity, IR and metabolic dyslipidaemia. Women with polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) showed lower insulin sensitivity (IS) than women without PCOS, and the impact of BMI was greater on IS in women with PCOS than those without PCOS (14). In addition, PCOS that were overweight showed moderately lower IS than lean PCOS (15). The prevalence of gestational diabetes, impaired glucose tolerance and type 2 diabetes (5-fold in Asia, 4-fold in the Americas and 3-fold in Europe) are significantly increased in PCOS regardless of their age, with risk independent of, yet exacerbated by, obesity (16).

PCOS is well recognized to have an intrinsic post-receptor insulin signaling defect in skeletal muscle (17, 18) that may augment the detrimental effect of NEFA on insulin sensitivity. Therefore, raised NEFA levels may worsen IR to a greater extent in women with PCOS than those without PCOS, but it is unknown if this mechanism can be modified. A lipid infusion gives a dynamic and maximal measure of IR, and the gold standard to measure IR is the hyperglycemic glucose clamp method to determine its change with an intervention. The effect of endurance exercise on lipid induced IR in subjects with underlying IR has not been studied, nor is it known if the underlying mechanism of IR is altered by exercise. We therefore hypothesized that women with PCOS were less tolerant to an acute rise in NEFA levels resulting in more severe IR than weight and age matched healthy subjects, and that endurance exercise would improve their tolerance to lipid induced IR with a mechanistic change in IR.

Subjects and methods (figure 1)

This study was approved by a local research ethics committee. Subjects with PCOS were recruited from the endocrine clinics, and normal female controls were recruited through advertisements at a local university and in the hospital newsletters. PCOS was diagnosed based on the presence of two out of three criteria; oligomenorrhoea, clinical or biochemical hyperandrogenism, and polycystic ovaries on ultrasound after exclusion of other endocrine causes of hyperandrogenism according to the Rotterdam criteria (19); however all women fulfilled all 3 criteria. All the subjects gave their informed consent to participate in the study. They were all non-smokers, took no regular medications, had no concurrent illness and had had no regular exercise prior to the study. All women had a pregnancy test prior to their inclusion in the study. Subjects who were diagnosed with impaired glucose tolerance at screening oral glucose tolerance test were excluded. Subjects were requested not to modify other aspects of their lifestyle, including their dietary pattern, during the study period. All the subjects had anthropometric measurements, fasting blood sampling and two hyperinsulinaemic euglycaemic clamps with either 5 h saline or intralipid infusions at baseline. Normal control women had the initial clamp in the first week of their menstrual cycle, whilst PCOS women were clamped after 6 weeks amenorrhea. These tests were repeated after completion of an 8 week moderate intensity exercise program.

Overall study scheme.

Hyperinsulinaemic euglycaemic clamps

Following a 12 h overnight fast, participants underwent a hyperinsulinaemic euglycaemic clamp that measured insulin sensitivity whilst receiving an infusion of normal saline on the first occasion followed by a second intralipid infusion within a week. An 18 gauge intravenous cannula was inserted into an antecubital vein to administer test infusions and a retrograde cannula was inserted into the dorsal hand vein on the contralateral hand. This hand was heated (60°C) to arterialize venous blood for the measurement of blood glucose. On the lipid infusion day, an additional cannula was placed in the contralateral antecubital vein for the lipid emulsion. After fasted blood samples were taken, either normal saline 1.5 mL/min or 20% intralipid 1.5 mL/min along with unfractionated heparin sodium 0.3 unit/kg/min was infused for 5 h. At 180 min, a 2 h hyperinsulinaemic euglycaemic clamp was started using intravenous soluble insulin (Humulin S, Eli Lilly and Co., Indianapolis, IN) at a rate of 80 mU/m2 surface area/minute for the first 20 min followed by a constant rate of 40 mU/m2 surface area/minute for the remaining 100 min. Plasma glucose was clamped at 5.0 mmol/L with a variable infusion rate of 20% dextrose, adjusted relative to arterialized blood glucose measurements undertaken every 5 min. Endogenous glucose production was more than 90% suppressed by an acute rise of insulin with the primed insulin infusion (20). The rate of insulin stimulated glucose disposal (mg/kg/min) (M value), a measure of insulin sensitivity, was calculated from the mean of the five 20 min periods from 20 to 120 min during the clamp using the Defronzo method (21). Blood samples were taken at baseline and every hour for 5 h. These samples were centrifuged at 1,500 G for 15 min at 4°C within 15 min of sampling, and then plasma and serum stored at −80°C until analysis.

Exercise intervention

All participants underwent a structured supervised exercise program for a 1 h session, three times per week for 8 weeks in the sports laboratory at the Department of Sports, Health and Exercise Science, the University of Hull. Moderate intensity exercise was defined as achieving a targeted heart rate equivalent to 60% of their baseline VO2 max. Measurement of individualized VO2 max was performed on a motorized treadmill starting with a warm up, then speeding to walking pace then increasing every minute until the subject could not keep pace with the treadmill or became too tired to continue. Inspired and expired gas fractions, and heart rate were continuously monitored (22). All supervised exercise sessions achieved a targeted heart rate equivalent to 60% of their baseline VO2 max. A mid-point reassessment was conducted to adjust the moderate intensity based on improvements in exercise capacity.

Biochemical analysis

Serum insulin was assayed using a competitive chemiluminescent immunoassay (Euro/DPC, Llanberis, UK). Plasma glucose was measured using a Synchon LX 20 analyzer (Beckman-Coulter, High Wycombe, UK). Serum testosterone was measured by high performance liquid chromatography linked to tandem mass spectrometry (Waters Corporation, Manchester, UK) and sex hormone binding globulin (SHBG) was measured by immunometric assay with fluorescence detection on the DPC Immulite 2000 analyzer. The free androgen index (FAI) was obtained as the quotient 100* Testosterone/SHBG. Total cholesterol, triglycerides (TG), and high density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-c) were measured enzymatically using a Synchon LX20 analyzer (Beckman-Coulter, High Wycombe, UK). LDL-c was calculated using the Friedewald equation (23). Non-esterified fatty acids (NEFA) were analyzed using enzymatic colorimetric methods (Wako NEFA-H2) on a Konelab20 autoanalyzer with an inter-assay and the coefficient of variation was 1.4%.

Data analysis

Homeostatic model assessment of insulin resistance (HOMA-IR) was calculated by the formula: HOMA1-IR = fasting plasma insulin (μU/ml) × fasting plasma glucose (mmol/L)/22.5 (24). Total TG are under the response curve (AUC), and insulin, glucose and NEFA AUC were calculated using a trapezoidal rule (25).

Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS for Windows NT, version 19.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL). Wilcoxon signed ranks test was applied to skewed variables that violated the assumptions of normality when tested with the Kolmogorov–Smirnov test, and paired sample t test for normally distributed data within the group. Log transformation and then an unpaired t test were undertaken on those data that were skewed. Data are presented means ±SEMs. For all analyses, a two-tailed P ≤ 0.05 was considered to indicate statistical significance. The missing values were handled by case-wise deletion.

Results

Twelve women with PCOS and ten healthy subjects, comparable in terms of age and BMI, completed the study. Baseline characteristics of the subjects are summarized in Table 1. Subjects with PCOS had a larger waist hip ratio, higher FAI and HOMA-IR, and lower HDL-c than controls. Fasting TG and NEFA were not increased in PCOS relative to controls. PCOS subjects were less physically fit, with a lower VO2 max than controls.

Table 1

Baseline characteristics of participants.

	Controls (n = 10)	PCOS (n = 12)
Age (year)	25.26 ± 6.5	28.27 ± 6.5
BMI (kg/m2)	26.8 ± 6.5	29.4 ± 5.5
Waist (cm)	81.1 ± 14.2	98.8 ± 15.8
WHR	0.79 ± 0.06	0.87 ± 0.06
Testosterone (nmol/L)	1.05 ± 0.34	1.51 ± 0.69
FAI	2.1 ± 2.05	6.77 ± 2.90
SHBG (nmol/L)	69.6 ± 29.7	26 ± 17.6
TC (mmol/L)	4.61 ± 0.75	4.13 ± 0.65
TG (mmol/L)	0.84 ± 0.18	1.25 ± 0.72
HDL-c (mmol/L)	1.48 ± 0.47	1.12 ± 0.20
LDL-c (mmol/L)	2.66 ± 0.56	2.33 ± 0.51
FPG (mmol/L)	4.89 ± 0.56	4.94 ± 0.55
HbA1c (mmol/mmoL)	33 ± 5.6	34 ± 2.9
TSH (iu/L)	1.9 ± 0.91	1.6 ± 0.58
HOMA-IR	1.34 (0.80, 2.13)	2.3 (1.3, 3.9)
NEFA (mmol/L)	0.48 (0.29, 0.64)	0.45 (0.42, 0.58)
VO2 max (ml/kg/min)	36.3 ± 6.3	26.9 ± 4.8

Skewed variables are provided as the medians (25th, 75th percentile). Normally distributed variables are shown as the means ± standard deviation.

Effect of lipid on insulin resistance before exercise intervention (tables 2, 3)

During the saline infusion, PCOS subjects had a lower rate of insulin stimulated glucose disposal (0.65 ± 0.06 vs. 0.5 ± 0.03 mg/kg/min, p = 0.01) but higher TG AUC 3 h (3.51 ± 0.56 vs. 2.34 ± 0.14) mmol/L, p = 0.05 than controls. Lipid infusion led to a 3.5–4 fold rise in NEFA AUC and TG AUC in both groups. This led to a reduction in insulin stimulated glucose disposal rate in PCOS from 0.5 ± 0.03 to −0.16 ± 0.2) mg/kg/min, p = 0.01 and in controls from 50.65 ± 0.06 to 0.3 ± 0.1 mg/kg/min, p = 0.01. The glucose disposal rate fell more in PCOS than in controls from their (saline) baseline levels following lipid infusions (67 ± 5 vs. 49 ± 7%, PCOS vs. control, p = 0.05). Therefore, PCOS subjects were more susceptible to lipid induced insulin resistance. In addition, the lipid infusion caused a rise in plasma glucose AUC 3 h in PCOS from 14.2 ± 0.26 to 14.9 ± 0.25 mmol/L, p = 0.03 but with no concomitant increase in insulin secretion [insulin AUC 3 h (pmol/L): with saline 2.1 ± 0.0 with intralipid 2.2 ± 0.08]. The within group effect of the intralipid infusion on insulin sensitivity is summarized in Table 2.

Table 2

Effect of intralipid infusion on insulin sensitivity within groups.

	Controls	PCOS	PCOS-Controls
	Mean (After-before)	Mean (After-before)	Mean difference (95% CI)	p-value
Glucose disposal mg/kg/min	−2.518	−2.076	0.51 (0.49, 0.54)	0.33
NEFA AUC 3 h (mmol/L)	4625	5922	1558 (1496, 1620)	0.19
TG AUC 3 h (mmol/L)	8.24	9.01	0.60 (0.48, 0.72)	0.63
Glucose AUC 3 h (mmol/L)	0.65	0.73	−0.058 (−0.092, 0.024)	0.88
Insulin AUC 3 h (pmol/L)	−16.64	38.23	57.58 (55.66, 59.50)	0.49
NEFA AUC 5 h (mmol/L)	9703	11137	1987 (5572, 5782)	0.36
TG AUC 5 h (mmol/L)	18.2	18.4	−0.54 (−14.77, 13.69)	0.94

When the effect of the intralipid infusion on insulin sensitivity between the PCOS and control groups was analyzed, no differences were apparent (Table 3).

Table 3

Effect of intralipid infusion on insulin sensitivity between groups.

	Controls	PCOS	PCOS-Controls
	Mean (After-before)	Mean (After-before)	Mean difference (95% CI)	p-value
Glucose disposal mg/kg/min	−2.518	−2.076	0.512 (0.489, 0.541)	0.33
NEFA AUC 3 h (mmol/L)	4625	5922	1558 (1496, 1620)	0.19
TG AUC 3 h (mmol/L)	8.24	9.01	0.60 (0.48, 0.72)	0.63
Glucose AUC 3 h (mmol/L)	0.65	0.73	−0.058 (−0.092, 0.024)	0.88
Insulin AUC 3 h (pmol/L)	−16.64	38.23	57.58 (55.66, 59.50)	0.49
NEFA AUC 5 h (mmol/L)	9703	11137	1987 (5572, 5782)	0.36
TG AUC 5 h (mmol/L)	18.2	18.4	−0.54(−14.77, 13.69)	0.94

Effect of exercise on demographic and fasting biochemical parameters (tables 4, 5)

The endurance exercise for 8 weeks improved cardiovascular fitness in both PCOS patients and controls (mean VO2 max ml/kg/min ± SEM: PCOS before 8 weeks exercise, 26.9 ± 1.40; PCOS after 8 weeks exercise, 28.7 ± 1.7, p = 0.05) and (mean VO2 max ml/kg/min± SEM: controls before 8 week exercise, 36.3 ± 2.02; controls after 8 week exercise, 39.2 ± 1.8; p = 0.008). This was accompanied by a significant reduction in HOMA-IR in PCOS from 1.2 ± 0.09 to 1.07 p = 0.01) although this did not reach significance in controls (from 0.94 ± 0.11 to 0.86 ± 0.1; p = 0.08). The post exercise HOMA-IR level of PCOS was reduced to the pre-exercise level of controls. The reduction in IR was associated with a reduction in waist circumference (98.1 ± 4.6 vs. 96.4 ± 4.4 cm, p = 0.05) but no significant changes in weight (29.4 ± 1.6 vs. 29.1 ± 1.8 kg/m2, p = 0.40) in PCOS. Total cholesterol, LDL-c, HDL-c and NEFA levels were not decreased post-exercise, but TG fell in both groups (Table 4).

Table 4

Demographic and biochemical changes with exercise within groups.

Parameters	Controls (n = 10)			PCOS (n = 12)
	Exercise			Exercise
	Before	After	p =	Before	After	p =
BMI (kg/m2)	26.8 ± 2.0	26.5 ± 1.5	0.07	29.4 ± 1.6	29.1 ± 1.8	0.40
Waist (cm)	81.1 ± 4.5	80.1 ± 3.6	0.20	98.1 ± 4.6	96.4 ± 4.4	0.05
TC (mmol/L)	4.61 ± 0.24	4.44 ± 0.27	0.29	4.13 ± 0.19	3.95 ± 0.24	0.26
TG (mmol/L)	0.84 ± 0.06	0.69 ± 0.07	0.03	1.25 ± 0.21	0.97 ± 0.12	0.06
HDL-c (mmol/L)	1.48 ± 0.15	1.6 ± 0.12	0.29	1.12 ± 0.06	1.13 ± 0.06	0.78
LDL-c (mmol/L)	2.66 ± 0.18	2.68 ± 0.23	0.99	2.33 ± 0.15	2.12 ± 0.14	0.11
*NEFA (mmol/L)	2.65 ± 0.05	2.66 ± 0.06	0.89	2.65 ± 0.04	2.65 ± 0.02	0.86
FPG (mmol/L)	4.89 ± 0.18	4.74 ± 0.15	0.26	4.94 ± 0.16	431 ± 0.40	0.18
*HOMA-IR	0.94 ± 0.11	0.86 ± 0.10	0.08	1.2 ± 0.09	1.07 ± 0.08	0.01
VO2 max (ml/kg/min)	36.3 ± 2.02	39.2 ± 1.8	0.008	26.9 ± 1.40	28.7 ± 1.7	0.05

Log transformed t test (±SEM).

There were no significant differences between groups in demographic or biochemical data following exercise, with the exception of with VO2 max, where the control group showed a significant improvement with exercise while the PCOS group did not (Table 5).

Table 5

Demographic and biochemical changes with exercise between groups.

	Controls	PCOS	PCOS-Controls
Exercise	Mean (After-before)	Mean (After-before)	Mean difference (95% CI)	p-value
BMI (kg/m2)	−0.18	−0.16	0.06 (0.02, 0.10)	0.97
Waist (cm)	−2.1	−2.2	−0.10 (−0.22, 0.022)	0.96
TC (mmol/L)	−0.17	−0.2	−0.03 (−0.05, 0.01)	0.91
TG (mmol/L)	−0.19	−0.01	0.18 (0.16, 0.37)	0.16
HDL-c (mmol/L)	−0.07	−0.02	0.05 (0.04, 0.06)	0.54
LDL–c (mmol/L)	0	−0.28	−0.28 (−0.29, −0.27)	0.17
NEFA (mmol/L)	0.23	−37.44	−37.67 (−44.86, −30.48)	0.70
FPG (mmol/L)	−0.04	−0.27	−0.23 (−0.26, −0.20)	0.66
HOMA–IR	0.58	−0.25	-0.83 (−0.86, −0.80)	0.16
VO2 max (ml/kg/min)	8.05	−4.89	−12.94 (−13.25, −12.63)	< 0.005

Effect of exercise on lipid induced insulin resistance (figure 2, tables 6, 7)

After 8 weeks of moderate intensity exercise, there were concomitant rises in insulin sensitivity, in both PCOS patients and controls (Table 6). More importantly, exercise improved lipid induced insulin resistance in both group (Table 6). In PCOS, endurance exercise improved lipid induced insulin resistance i.e. lipid infusion reduced glucose disposal rate by 67% before exercise and 50% after exercise (p = 0.02). The effect of lipid infusion on glucose disposal rate between controls (before exercise) and PCOS (after exercise) was similar (49 ± 7 vs. 50 ± 7%, p = NS) (Figure 2). Exercise decreased TG AUC in PCOS (p < 0.05), and lowered the 3 h AUC NEFA levels significantly (Table 6).

Table 6

Effect of exercise on intralipid-induced insulin resistance within groups.

		Controls (n = 10)			PCOS (n = 12)
		Exercise			Exercise
Parameter	Infusion	Before	After	p =	Before	After	p =
*Glucose disposal mg/kg/min	Saline	0.65 ± 0.06	0.74 ± 0.05	0.01	0.5 ± 0.03	−0.25 ± 0.03	0.01
	Intralipid	0.30 ± 0.10	0.42 ± 0.08	0.01	−0.16 ± 0.2	−0.79 ± 0.17	0.01
Lipid induced % reduction in glucose disposal rate		49 ± 7%	45 ± 6%	0.58	67 ± 5%	50 ± 7%	0.02
*NEFA AUC 3 h (mmol/L)	Saline	2.9 ± 0.05	2.5 ± 0.10	0.002	3.0 ± 0.02	2.7 ± 0.05	0.003
	Intralipid	3.0 ± 0.09	3.0 ± 0.11	0.60	2.7 ± 0.07	2.3 ± 0.02	0.0001
TG AUC 3 h (mmol/L)	Saline	2.34 ± 0.14	2.51 ± 0.41	0.70	3.51 ± 0.56	2.83 ± 0.48	0.05
	Intralipid	11.0 ± 1.28	9.35 ± 0.78	0.09	13.4 ± 1.61	10.7 ± 1.44	0.03
Glucose AUC 3 h (mmol/L)	Saline	14.4 ± 0.40	14.1 ± 0.26	0.38	14.2 ± 0.26	14.01 ± 0.49	0.65
	Intralipid	15.0 ± 0.24	14.9 ± 0.24	0.86	14.9 ± 0.25	14.4 ± 0.28	0.17
*Insulin AUC 3 h (pmol/L)	Saline	2.0 ± 0.08	2.0 ± 0.07	0.87	2.1 ± 0.07	2.2 ± 0.08	0.56
	Intralipid	1.9 ± 0.08	2.0 ± 0.09	0.91	2.2 ± 0.09	2.2 ± 0.08	0.83

Normally distributed variables are shown as mean ± SEM.

Log transformed t test (±SEM).

Figure 2

Effect of intralipid on the rate of glucose disposal before and after moderate intensity exercise (Data are expressed as mean ± SEM).

When the effect of exercise on intralipid-induced insulin resistance was analyzed between the PCOS and control group, no significant differences were found (Table 7).

Table 7

Effect of exercise on intralipid-induced insulin resistance between groups.

		Controls	PCOS	PCOS-Controls
Exercise	Infusion	Mean (After-before)	Mean (After-before)	Mean difference (95% CI)	p-value
Glucose disposal mg/kg/min	Saline	0.56	0.72	0.16 (0.12, 0.19)	0.8
	Intralipid	0.56	0.28	−0.28 (−0.30, −0.26)	0.41
NEFA AUC 3h (mmol/L)	Saline	−405.94	−244.41	161.52 (146.11, 176.94)	0.5
	Intralipid	−606.07	−1129.59	−523.52 (−594.28, −452.76)	0.64
TG AUC 3h (mmol/L)	Saline	0.17	−0.78	0.86 (0.82, 0.91)	0.13
	Intralipid	−1.64	−2.32	−2.49 (−2.56, −2.41)	0.63
Glucose AUC 3h (mmol/L)	Saline	−0.36	−0.15	0.21 (0.18, 0.25)	0.69
	Intralipid	−0.08	−0.34	−0.26 (−0.30, −0.22)	0.64
Insulin AUC 3h (pmol/L)	Saline	−2.14	1.70	3.84 (1.87, 5.81)	0.91
	Intralipid	−0.76	−46.95	−46.19 (−48.18, −44.19)	0.2
NEFA AUC 5h (mmol/L)	Saline	−479.92	−314.04	165.88 (144.42, 187.34)	0.57
	Intralipid	−176.11	−1688.26	−1512.15 (−1596.83, −1427.48)	0.31

Analysis of testosterone and SHBG before and after exercise did not differ (data not shown).

Given the importance that obesity may have on insulin sensitivity, subjects with a BMI >30 were excluded from a subanalysis of 7 PCOS and 9 control subjects, but the M value did not differ significantly from the results above (data not shown).

Discussion

It is well recognized that women with PCOS are more IR than their weight and age matched controls (26). In the hyperinsulinaemic euglycaemic clamp the rate of glucose infused is equal to the rate of whole-body glucose disposal or metabolizable glucose (M value) and reflects the amount of exogenous glucose necessary to fully compensate for the hyperinsulinemia; in insulin resistance this M value is lower and this was reflected in the lower values seen for the PCOS patients compared to controls in the saline infusion and particularly in the lipid infusion that exacerbated the insulin resistance. The tolerance to an acute rise in NEFA in PCOS has not been studied in comparison with non-PCOS women. Before exercise, an acute rise in NEFA with the lipid infusion lowered the rate of insulin stimulated glucose disposal in skeletal muscle (i.e., increased insulin resistance) by a greater magnitude in PCOS than age and BMI matched controls. This could be related to their underlying insulin signaling defect or to their lower VO2 max and higher waist circumference when compared with controls. This also suggests that the underlying dyslipidemia found in PCOS may be a major contributor to the exacerbation of the underlying IR, and may be reflected in the improvement in IR with anti-lipid statin therapy (27).

Ectopic fat in muscle, liver and beta cells (2) through triglyceride storage leads to a decreased rate of mitochondrial lipid oxidation in skeletal muscle, resulting in accumulation of intra-myocellular lipid metabolites such as the long chain fatty acids Acyl Co A, diacylglycerol (DAG) and ceramides (5, 6). These are thought to interfere with insulin signaling mediated glucose transport, and thus result in IR in skeletal muscle (7, 8); therefore, if this is the fundamental cause of IR in PCOS, exercise, through a reduction in intra-myocellular fat metabolites, would improve IR relative to that of the control subjects (11). At the end of the 8 week moderate intensity exercise, women with PCOS improved fasting HOMA-IR and insulin stimulated glucose disposal in skeletal muscle with a significant improvement in physical fitness similar to controls. PCOS patients became more tolerant of lipid induced IR after exercise and became comparable with controls prior to exercise, but this was not reversed to that level seen for normal controls following exercise. This improvement is likely due to increased fat oxidation with moderate intensity exercise (12), and a reduction in intra-myocellular fat metabolites would improve IR (11). In addition, moderate intensity exercise has been proven to improve insulin sensitivity in conjunction with favorable alterations in lipid partitioning and an enhanced lipid oxidative capacity within muscle in healthy adults (28). Though previous studies have shown the benefit of exercise and weight loss with a reduction of IR in PCOS (29, 30) and a reduction in muscle lipid (31), this is the first time a study has shown that endurance exercise attenuates lipid induced IR. This suggests that PCOS women who undertake moderate intensity exercise for 180 min per week could tolerate an acute fat load comparable to the level observed in controls and possibly reduce the risk of adverse metabolic outcomes. The absolute increase in the dynamic IR induced by the lipid infusion did not differ before and after exercise for both the controls and PCOS subjects, indicating that the underlying mechanism of the IR was unchanged by exercise. However, IR could be modified with exercise in the PCOS insulin resistant individuals, but could not be improved upon if insulin resistance was already normal. PCOS subjects who did the exercise had a response i.e. the percent reduction in glucose disposal rate to the lipid infusion was similar to healthy subjects with no regular exercise.

Following exercise, there was a significant reduction in NEFA AUC during the lipid saline infusion for controls and for both the saline and lipid infusions for the PCOS group, suggesting exercise induced effective removal of circulating NEFA (32). TG levels fell with exercise, thus it is unlikely to be due to an increased uptake of NEFA by the liver to synthesize very low density lipoproteins (VLDL). Therefore, the fall in NEFA levels after exercise in this study may well indicate increased uptake of NEFA by skeletal muscle in PCOS.

PCOS has a profound effect on peripheral insulin resistance due to a reduction in insulin receptor substrate-1 (IRS-1) associated phosphatidylinositol (PI) 3-kinase activity in skeletal muscle (33). This underlying intrinsic defect in the proximal insulin signaling pathway could explain their lipid intolerance. However, a previous study showed that intralipid had no effect on proximal signaling (34). Therefore, it is more likely that acutely elevated NEFA levels act synergistically rather than enhancing the underlying insulin signaling defect in skeletal muscle glucose transport in PCOS. A recent study showed that endurance-trained athletes with high mitochondrial oxidative capacity had lower lipid induced IR than untrained subjects (35). This might explain why PCOS subjects with less physical fitness had more severe lipid induced IR than controls before exercise. Analysis of testosterone and SHBG before and after the 8 week exercise showed no change, in accord with others (36).

Abdominal obesity is associated with increased delivery of NEFA to non- adipose tissue, either due to enhanced mobilization of NEFA from adipose tissue due to decreased effective inhibition of insulin on hormone sensitive lipase (37) or to decreased entrapment of NEFA by adipose tissue during the postprandial period (38). It has been recognized that elevated NEFA interferes with skeletal muscle glucose transport via increased production of intermediate lipid metabolites (39). Corbould et al. reported that an intrinsic insulin signaling defect only inhibited insulin mediated glucose transport in the presence of lipidemia in skeletal muscle of PCOS in in vitro studies (18, 40). The present in vivo study confirms the importance of high NEFA levels increasing skeletal muscle IR in PCOS. Therefore, IR will be enhanced in PCOS in those with a high fat diet, or acute weight gain with high NEFA availability. The M value did not differ significantly when subjects with a BMI >30 were excluded, but this is likely due to the observation that insulin resistance may decrease 15 ± 8% with BMI (25) and the sample size was too small to detect this.

Bruce et al. investigated the effect of 8 weeks of moderate intensity endurance exercise on the rate of mitochondrial fatty acid oxidation and lipid content in muscle of obese subjects and their relation to glucose tolerance. It was found that endurance exercise improved glucose tolerance with an increase in mitochondrial fatty acid oxidation (11). A recent study reported that trained individuals were more tolerant to lipid induced insulin resistance than untrained subjects because they had higher mitochondrial oxidative capacities in skeletal muscle (35). Therefore, adequate mitochondrial lipid oxidation is required to maintain the balance of fatty acid uptake and utilization to protect excessive accumulation of intra-myocellular triglycerides and their metabolites. In women with PCOS, the impaired insulin-stimulated total oxidative and non-oxidative glucose disposal are associated with a consistent downregulation of mitochondrial oxidative phosphorylation gene expression (OXPHOS) in skeletal muscle that couples with reduced levels of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma co-activator alpha (PGC-1alpha) (41). Hence, this defect could also be a plausible explanation for the failure of exercise to reverse completely lipid-induced insulin resistance in PCOS in this study.

This failure of complete reversal of lipid induced insulin resistance by exercise was also observed in healthy subjects in this study. Therefore, it may well be due to the time gap between the lipid infusion test and exercise activity. In other words, performing the lipid trial immediately after the exercise may have given a different result, particularly if the effect of exercise was not sustained. This had been seen in a previous study in which an hour of prior leg exercise before lipid infusion alleviated the lipid induced insulin resistance in healthy subjects (42).

The strength of this study was using gold standard methodology for this intensive interventional study and the well supervised exercise intervention. However, the limitations were that this was a small group of women with PCOS, though all fulfilled all three of the diagnostic criteria for its diagnosis thereby reducing heterogeneity; the groups were not well matched for BMI and age. The diagnostic criteria to define the PCOS group would likely not have altered the results here as IS was reported to be no different between NIH and Rotterdam criteria (15).

In summary, insulin sensitivity improved with exercise in the PCOS group alone showing that IR can be modified, though likely transiently. However, the maximal IR response to the lipid infusion did not differ within and between control and PCOS subjects indicating that the fundamental mechanism underlying insulin resistance was unchanged with exercise.

Ethics statement

The study was carried out in accordance with the recommendations of the International Council for Harmonization Guidelines for Good Clinical Practice (ICH GCP) with written informed consent from all subjects. All subjects gave written informed consent in Accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki. The protocol was approved by the Humber Bridge Regional Ethics Committee.

Author contributions

MA assisted with study design, performed the study, and assisted with manuscript preparation. SA and DS were responsible for overall study design and manuscript preparation. AR performed the statistics. AB, EK, RK, and RV assisted with the study and manuscript preparation.

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.