Literature DB >> 30344399

A Comparative Evaluation of Surgical, Electrosurgery and Diode Laser in the Management of Maxillofacial Nevus.

Manjunatha Reddy Bandral1, Priyadarshani J Gir2,3, Sharanbasppa R Japatti2, Anuradha G Bhatsange4, Chidambar Y Siddegowda2, Reshma Hammannavar2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To compare the post-operative wound healing of patients treated for excision of the nevus/mole from maxillofacial region with surgical, electrosurgery and diode laser.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Forty-five clinically confirmed cases of benign nevus were included in the study and randomly divided into three groups according to the technique used for excision, i.e. Group A-surgical excision, Group B-diode laser and Group C-electrosurgery. Post-operative wound evaluation was done using Stony Brook scar evaluation scale on post-operative photographs taken on days 7, 21 and 90 (3 months).
RESULTS: Statistically, there was no significant difference between the three techniques on post-operative day 90. Clinically, hypopigmentation was noted with diode laser and electrosurgical excision of benign nevus.
CONCLUSION: Since all three techniques yielded statistically comparable results, the patients can be given a choice of technique to undergo surgery. Surgical excision being the most cost effective and nil post-operative hypopigmentation may be the treatment of choice for majority of the patients.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Electrosurgery; Laser; Mole; Nevus; Surgical excision

Year:  2018        PMID: 30344399      PMCID: PMC6181846          DOI: 10.1007/s12663-018-1081-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Maxillofac Oral Surg        ISSN: 0972-8270


  17 in total

1.  Development and validation of a novel scar evaluation scale.

Authors:  Adam J Singer; Blavantray Arora; Alexander Dagum; Sharon Valentine; Judd E Hollander
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 4.730

Review 2.  Cryosurgery in the treatment of oro-facial lesions.

Authors:  Ashok Bansal; Shivani Jain; Shipra Gupta
Journal:  Indian J Dent Res       Date:  2012 Mar-Apr

3.  Esthetic removal of head and neck nevi and lesions with 4.0-MHz radio-wave surgery: a 30-year experience.

Authors:  Joe Niamtu
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2013-10-31       Impact factor: 1.895

4.  Atypical histopathologic features in a melanocytic nevus after cryotherapy and pregnancy.

Authors:  Casey E Wilford; Julie S Brantley; A Hafeez Diwan
Journal:  J Cutan Pathol       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 1.587

5.  Round excision of small, benign, papular and dome-shaped melanocytic nevi on the face.

Authors:  Umit Tursen; Tamer Irfan Kaya; Guliz Ikizoglu
Journal:  Int J Dermatol       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 2.736

6.  Serial excision of congenital melanocytic nevi.

Authors:  Vinod K Jain; Mahendra K Singhi; Rajiv Goyal
Journal:  J Cutan Aesthet Surg       Date:  2008-01

Review 7.  Congenital melanocytic nevi: where are we now? Part II. Treatment options and approach to treatment.

Authors:  Omar A Ibrahimi; Ali Alikhan; Daniel B Eisen
Journal:  J Am Acad Dermatol       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 11.527

Review 8.  Cryosurgery for common skin conditions.

Authors:  Mark D Andrews
Journal:  Am Fam Physician       Date:  2004-05-15       Impact factor: 3.292

Review 9.  Optimal management of common acquired melanocytic nevi (moles): current perspectives.

Authors:  Kabir Sardana; Payal Chakravarty; Khushbu Goel
Journal:  Clin Cosmet Investig Dermatol       Date:  2014-03-19

10.  The undermining effect of facial attractiveness on brain responses to fairness in the Ultimatum Game: an ERP study.

Authors:  Qingguo Ma; Yue Hu; Shushu Jiang; Liang Meng
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2015-03-10       Impact factor: 4.677

View more
  1 in total

1.  Irregularly Irregular Stellate Incisions for Selective Reduction of Benign Facial Lesions.

Authors:  David Teplica; Emmett Cooney; Jamey Srock; Michael Sayers
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2022-07-07
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.