Literature DB >> 30343924

Effects of lipopolysaccharide dosing on bacterial community composition and fermentation in a dual-flow continuous culture system.

X Dai1, E M Paula1, A L J Lelis1, L G Silva1, V L N Brandao1, H F Monteiro1, P Fan1, S R Poulson2, K C Jeong1, A P Faciola3.   

Abstract

The objectives of this study were to evaluate the effects of lipopolysaccharide (LPS) dosing on bacterial fermentation and bacterial community composition (BCC), to set up a subacute ruminal acidosis (SARA) nutritional model in vitro, and to determine the best sampling time for LPS dosing in a dual-flow continuous culture system. Diets were randomly assigned to 6 fermentors in a replicated 3 × 3 Latin square with three 11-d experimental periods that consisted of 7 d for diet adaptation and 4 d for sample collection. Treatments were control diet (CON), wheat and barley diet (WBD) to induce SARA, and control diet + LPS (LPSD). Fermenters were fed 72 g of dry matter/d. The forage:concentrate ratio of CON was 65:35. The WBD diet was achieved by replacing 40% of dry matter of the CON diet with 50% ground wheat and 50% ground barley. The LPS concentration in LPSD was 200,000 endotoxin units, which was similar to that observed in cows with SARA. The SARA inducing and LPS dosing started at d 8. The BCC was determined by sequencing the V4 region of the 16S rRNA gene using the Illumina MiSeq platform (Illumina Inc., San Diego, CA). The LPSD and CON maintained pH above 6 for the entire experimental period, and the WBD kept pH between 5.2 and 5.6 for 4 h/d, successfully inducing SARA. Digestibility of neutral detergent fiber and crude protein in LPSD were not different from WBD but tended to be lower than CON. Lipopolysaccharide dosing had no effect on pool of VFA concentrations and profiles but decreased bacterial N; the pattern changes of VFA and LPS in LPSD started to increase and be similar to WBD 6 h after LPS dosing. Pool of LPS concentration was around 11-fold higher in WBD and 4-fold higher in LPSD than CON. In the solid fraction, the BCC of LPSD was different from WBD and tended to be different from CON. In the liquid fraction, the BCC was different among treatments. The LPS dosing increased the relative abundance of Succinimonas, Anaeroplasma, Succinivibrio, Succiniclasticum, and Ruminobacter, which are main gram-negative bacteria related to starch digestion. Our results suggest that LPS dosing does not affect pH alone. However, LPS could drive the development of SARA by affecting bacteria and bacterial fermentation. For future studies, samples are suggested to be taken 6 h after LPS dosing in a dual-flow continuous culture system.
Copyright © 2019 American Dairy Science Association. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  16S rRNA; gram-negative bacteria; in vitro; starch digesting bacteria

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30343924     DOI: 10.3168/jds.2018-14807

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Dairy Sci        ISSN: 0022-0302            Impact factor:   4.034


  9 in total

1.  Lipopolysaccharide Stimulates the Growth of Bacteria That Contribute to Ruminal Acidosis.

Authors:  Xiaoxia Dai; Timothy J Hackmann; Richard R Lobo; Antonio P Faciola
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2020-02-03       Impact factor: 4.792

2.  Polyclonal antibody preparations from avian origin as a feed additive to beef cattle: ruminal fermentation during the step-up transition diets.

Authors:  Gleise M Silva; Federico Podversich; Tessa M Schulmeister; Erick R S Santos; Carla Sanford; Michelle C B Siqueira; Nicolas DiLorenzo
Journal:  Transl Anim Sci       Date:  2022-05-20

Review 3.  Ruminal acidosis, bacterial changes, and lipopolysaccharides.

Authors:  Hugo F Monteiro; Antonio P Faciola
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2020-08-01       Impact factor: 3.159

4.  Repeated inoculation with fresh rumen fluid before or during weaning modulates the microbiota composition and co-occurrence of the rumen and colon of lambs.

Authors:  Shaobo Yu; Guangyu Zhang; Zhibo Liu; Peng Wu; Zhongtang Yu; Jiakun Wang
Journal:  BMC Microbiol       Date:  2020-02-07       Impact factor: 3.605

Review 5.  Ruminal Lipopolysaccharides Analysis: Uncharted Waters with Promising Signs.

Authors:  Efstathios Sarmikasoglou; Antonio P Faciola
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2021-01-15       Impact factor: 2.752

Review 6.  Ruminal bacteria lipopolysaccharides: an immunological and microbial outlook.

Authors:  E Sarmikasoglou; A P Faciola
Journal:  J Anim Sci Biotechnol       Date:  2022-04-14

Review 7.  Unraveling the pros and cons of various in vitro methodologies for ruminant nutrition: a review.

Authors:  James R Vinyard; Antonio P Faciola
Journal:  Transl Anim Sci       Date:  2022-09-15

8.  Effects of ruminal lipopolysaccharides on growth and fermentation end products of pure cultured bacteria.

Authors:  Efstathios Sarmikasoglou; Jessica Ferrell; James R Vinyard; Michael D Flythe; Apichai Tuanyok; Antonio P Faciola
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-09-23       Impact factor: 4.996

9.  Effects of supplementation of nonforage fiber source in diets with different starch levels on growth performance, rumen fermentation, nutrient digestion, and microbial flora of Hu lambs.

Authors:  Tongqing Guo; Zhi Lan Wang; Long Guo; Fadi Li; Fei Li
Journal:  Transl Anim Sci       Date:  2021-04-16
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.