| Literature DB >> 30343605 |
Jian Guo1,2, Chengtian Yuan2, Mengmeng Huang1,2, Yuping Liu1,2, Yunyan Chen1,2, Congyan Liu1,2, Yan Chen1,2.
Abstract
The aim of this study is to explore the influence of Ganoderma lucidum-derived polysaccharides (GLP) to coix oil-based microemulsion on pharmaceutical performance and anti-lung cancer treatment. GLP-integrated coix oil-based microemulsion (MEs(PS-GLP)) exhibited a clear spherical shape, small particle size, and good hydrodynamics similar to the coix oil-based microemulsion, but showed a lower zeta potential and a better stability. Fluorescence resonance energy transfer analysis presented that GLP was integrated with microemulsion as a single system. Notably, the average molecular distance between polysaccharide and microemulsion was approximately 1.7 nm. The half-maximal inhibitory concentration of MEs(PS-GLP) against A549 cells was about 119 μg/mL. In vivo imaging studies showed that introduction of GLP promoted the tumor-specific accumulation of microemulsion in comparison with controls. In vivo, antitumor results showed that MEs(PS-GLP) markedly inhibited the tumor growth of A549-bearing xenograft nude mice and obviously improve the serum immune index. Collectively, this study demonstrates the potential mechanism of spatial relation between polysaccharides and microemulsion and validates the significances of GLP on tumoral accumulation and antitumor efficacy.Entities:
Keywords: Ganoderma lucidum polysaccharides; anti-lung cancer therapy; fluorescence resonance energy transfer; multicomponent microemulsion; spatial structure characterization
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 30343605 PMCID: PMC6201799 DOI: 10.1080/10717544.2018.1516006
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Drug Deliv ISSN: 1071-7544 Impact factor: 6.419
Characterization of MEs(PS-Free) and MEs(PS-GLP). All the data are presented as mean ± SD (n = 3).
| Formulations | Size (nm) | PDI | Zeta (mV) | Phase inversion temperature (°C) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MEs(PS-Free) | 86.67 ± 3.36 | 0.089 ± 0.021 | −14.50 ± 1.01 | 95 |
| MEs(PS-GLP) | 87.94 ± 3.17 | 0.092 ± 0.033 | −12.10 ± 0.70 | 85 |
Figure 1.Morphology of (a) MEs(PS-Free) and (b) MEs(PS-GLP).
Figure 2.(a) Zeta potential of microemulsions coated by chitosan, dextran, and GLP with concentration of 0–10 mg/mL. (b) UV-Vis absorption of CSF, DTF, blank microemulsions and microemulsions coated by CSF and DTF (CSF-MEs, DTF-MEs). FRET analysis of fluorescence emission spectra of (c) CSF, Rh123 MEs and CSF-Rh123 MEs, (d) DTF, Rh123 MEs and DTF-Rh123 MEs.
Figure 3.(a) Cell viabilities of A549 cells incubated with MEs (PS-free) and MEs (PS-GLP) at various coix oil concentrations for 24 h. (b) Cell viabilities of Caco-2 cells incubated with MEs (1944CS), MEs (PS-Free) and MEs (PS-GLP) at various oil phase concentrations for 24 h. All the data are presented as mean ± SD (n = 6).
Figure 4.In vivo images after intragastric administration of Cy5 solution, Cy5-labeled MEs (PS-free) and Cy5-labeled MEs (PS-GLP) in A549 tumor-bearing mice.
Figure 5.Evaluation of antitumor efficiency in vivo. The curve of (a) tumor growth and (b) body weight change of A549 tumor-bearing mice after various treatments for three weeks. The (c) tumor weight and (d) body weight of A549 tumor-bearing mice after various treatments on Day 30. *p < 0.05, compared with saline group. #p < 0.05 compared with Kanglaite® injection group. The (e) liver index and (f) spleen index of A549 tumor-bearing mice after various treatments in Day 30. *p < 0.05, compared with saline group. #p < 0.05 compared with MEs-GLP mixture group. All the data are presented as mean ± SD (n = 8).