| Literature DB >> 30343554 |
Ragip Pala, Fahrettin Beyaz, Mehmet Tuzcu, Besir Er, Nurhan Sahin, Vedat Cinar, Kazim Sahin.
Abstract
PURPOSE: The aim of the study was to determine the effects of dietary CoQ10 on serum biochemical parameters, lipid peroxidation, and HSP expression in the liver and slow-twitch muscles (soleus and gastronemius deep portion) of exercise-trained rats.Entities:
Keywords: exercise
Year: 2018 PMID: 30343554 PMCID: PMC6199489 DOI: 10.20463/jenb.2018.0019
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Exerc Nutrition Biochem ISSN: 2233-6834
Effects of CoQ10 on biochemical parameters in rats subjected to AE and CE
| Variables | Control | CoQ10 | CE | CE + CoQ10 | AE | AE + CoQ10 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Glucose (mg/dL) | 105.7 ± 5.68 | 107.2 ± 5.01 | 104.8 ± 5.91 | 107.3 ± 4.96 | 106.0 ± 3.30 | 105.3 ± 6.32 |
| Cholesterol (mg/dL) | 80.6 ± 3.12[ | 71.1 ± 2.91[ | 69.7 ± 0.85[ | 68.4 ± 1.64[ | 69.3 ± 0.62[ | 68.7 ± 4.30[ |
| Triglyceride (mg/dL) | 93.8 ± 2.85[ | 83.8 ± 1.78[ | 84.7 ± 2.58[ | 72.0 ± 2.16[ | 84.3 ± 2.42[ | 74.3 ± 2.23[ |
| AST (U/L) | 230.8 ± 19.44 | 221.5 ± 17.82 | 225.3 ± 26.34 | 221.9 ± 11.2 | 219.3 ± 15.42 | 222.0 ± 17.78 |
| ALT (U/L) | 92.0 ± 8.89 | 91.0 ± 6.26 | 85.7 ± 6.15 | 90.4 ± 7.89 | 92.3 ± 6.05 | 97.0 ± 7.02 |
Data is given as mean ± standard error. Different superscripts (a–d) indicate group mean differences (P < 0.05). Control: Rats fed a basal diet; CoQ10: rats fed a basal diet supplemented with CoQ10; CE: rats fed a basal diet and subjected to CE; CE + CoQ10: rats fed a basal diet supplemented with CoQ10 and subjected to CE; AE: rats fed a basal diet and subjected to AE; AE + CoQ10: rats fed a basal diet supplemented with CoQ10 and subjected to AE.
Effects of CoQ10 on oxidative stress in rats subjected to acute and chronic exercise training rats
| Variables | Control | CoQ10 | CE | CE + CoQ10 | AE | AE + CoQ10 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Serum MDA (nmol/mg protein) | 0.88±0.04[ | 0.61±0.03[ | 0.55±0.02[ | 0.43±0.03[ | 1.37±0.05[ | 0.91±0.03[ |
| Liver MDA (nmol/mg protein) | 101.4±2.24[ | 95.1±2.46[ | 96.1±2.04[ | 87.2±1.94[ | 117.7±2.55[ | 108.3±2.8[ |
| Muscle MDA (nmol/mg protein) | 85.2±3.11[ | 61.3±2.05[ | 59.6±1.82[ | 53.0±1.50[ | 97.7±2.22[ | 93.6±1.43[ |
Data is given as mean ± standard error. Different superscripts (a–d) indicate group mean differences (P < 0.05). Control: Rats fed a basal diet; CoQ10: Rats fed a basal diet supplemented with CoQ10; CE: Rats fed a basal diet and subjected to chronic exercise; CE + CoQ10; rats fed a basal diet supplemented with CoQ10 and subjected to chronic exercise; AE: Rats fed a basal diet and subjected to acute exercise; AE + CoQ10: Rats fed a basal diet supplemented with CoQ10 and subjected to acute exercise.
Fig. 1.Effects of CoQ10 on the expression of liver heat shock proteins (HSPs) in rats subjected to CE and AE training. Control: rats fed a basal diet; CoQ10: rats fed a basal diet supplemented with CoQ10; CE: rats fed a basal diet and subjected to CE; CE + CoQ10: rats fed a basal diet supplemented with CoQ10 and subjected to CE; AE: rats fed a basal diet and subjected to AE; AE + CoQ10: rats fed a basal diet supplemented with CoQ10 and subjected to AE. Gene expression was analyzed by RT-PCR. Different superscripts (a–d) indicate group mean differences (P < 0.05).
Fig. 2.Effects of CoQ10 on expression of muscle heat shock proteins (HSPs) in rats subjected to CE and AE training. Control: rats fed a basal diet; CoQ10: rats fed a basal diet supplemented with CoQ10; CE: rats fed a basal diet and subjected to CE; CE + CoQ10: rats fed a basal diet supplemented with CoQ10 and subjected to CE; AE: rats fed a basal diet and subjected to AE; AE + CoQ10: rats fed a basal diet supplemented with CoQ10 and subjected to AE. Gene expression was analyzed by RT-PCR. Different superscripts (a–d) indicate group mean differences (P < 0.05).