Literature DB >> 30342883

Are rats more human than mice?

Gerhild Wildner1.   

Abstract

In contrast to rats, mouse models are nowadays generally used for the investigation of immune responses and immune-mediated diseases, there are many different strains and mouse-specific tools available, and it is easy to generate transgenic and constitutive or inducible knockout mice for any gene. Many immune markers and mechanisms have been detected in mice and have been introduced as gold standard in immunology, however, some turned out to be not unconditionally transferable to the human immune system. Rats have been used more frequently in former days but are mostly outstripped by mice due to the fact that fewer strains are available, they need more space than mice, are more expensive to maintain and breed, and it is extremely difficult to generate transgenic or ko-rats. Consequently, the choice of rat-specific diagnostic tools like antibodies is quite poor and most researchers have switched to mouse models for the investigation of immune mechanisms, while rats are still widely used for toxicology by the pharmaceutical industry. However, it should be taken into consideration that there are some immunological similarities between rats and humans that are not presented in mice. Some of them like MHC class II and Foxp3 expression by activated effector T cells we have detected during our research on the immune response of rat models of experimental autoimmune uveitis.
Copyright © 2018 Elsevier GmbH. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  CD4/CD8 macrophages; Experimental autoimmune uveitis; Foxp3; MHC class II; T cells

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30342883     DOI: 10.1016/j.imbio.2018.09.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Immunobiology        ISSN: 0171-2985            Impact factor:   3.144


  6 in total

Review 1.  Resolution of uveitis.

Authors:  Gerhild Wildner; Maria Diedrichs-Möhring
Journal:  Semin Immunopathol       Date:  2019-10-07       Impact factor: 9.623

Review 2.  Next-generation strategies for gene-targeted therapies of central nervous system disorders: A workshop summary.

Authors:  Jill A Morris; Chris H Boshoff; Nina F Schor; Ling M Wong; Guangping Gao; Beverly L Davidson
Journal:  Mol Ther       Date:  2021-09-20       Impact factor: 11.454

3.  FoxP3 expression by retinal pigment epithelial cells: transcription factor with potential relevance for the pathology of age-related macular degeneration.

Authors:  Nadine Reichhart; Gerhild Wildner; Olaf Strauß; Ahmad Samir Alfaar; Lucas Stürzbecher; Maria Diedrichs-Möhring; Marion Lam; Christophe Roubeix; Julia Ritter; Kathrin Schumann; Balasubramaniam Annamalai; Inga-Marie Pompös; Bärbel Rohrer; Florian Sennlaub
Journal:  J Neuroinflammation       Date:  2022-10-22       Impact factor: 9.587

4.  In Vivo Analysis of Human Immune Responses in Immunodeficient Rats.

Authors:  Séverine Ménoret; Laure-Hélène Ouisse; Laurent Tesson; Séverine Remy; Claire Usal; Aude Guiffes; Vanessa Chenouard; Pierre-Joseph Royer; Gwenaelle Evanno; Bernard Vanhove; Eliane Piaggio; Ignacio Anegon
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  2020-04       Impact factor: 5.385

5.  TRDMT1 exhibited protective effects against LPS-induced inflammation in rats through TLR4-NF-κB/MAPK-TNF-α pathway.

Authors:  Zhengguang Li; Xiaolong Qi; Xu Zhang; Lei Yu; Lijuan Gao; Weining Kong; Wei Chen; Wei Dong; Lijun Luo; Dan Lu; Lianfeng Zhang; Yuanwu Ma
Journal:  Animal Model Exp Med       Date:  2022-04

6.  A high-quality severe combined immunodeficiency (SCID) rat bioresource.

Authors:  Yoshiki Miyasaka; Jinxi Wang; Kosuke Hattori; Yuko Yamauchi; Miho Hoshi; Kazuto Yoshimi; Saeko Ishida; Tomoji Mashimo
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-08-12       Impact factor: 3.752

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.